>it seems ridiculous to me that a civil trial can even take place (constitution or not) if someone has been acquitted in a criminal trial - one would think that an acquital would be the perfect defense.<
In many cases I'm sure it is. But in cases like Blake and Simpson, where the reasonable doubt was just barely so (and not at all, for some people), it doesn't help.
The advantage to a civil case is that it's over money, not your life, and you can lock things up in appeals and not be sitting in the slam throughout the whole process.
Civil vs. Criminal
Charlie and Duane,
Thank you for your replies to my question. I understand the difference in venues and evidence. Maybe I'm being idealistic or completely irrational, (both of which I can most certainly lay claim to on occasion) but it seems ridiculous to me that a civil trial can even take place (constitution or not) if someone has been acquitted in a criminal trial - one would think that an acquital would be the perfect defense.
*shrug*
This is probably why I'd suck at being a lawyer.
Thanks, again!
K
Cookies
Unca Harlan:
I'm sorry that I don't have any chicken croquette recipes to pass on; however, I remember that your favorite cookie was the lost and lamented Hydrox. I don't know if you eat many cookies these days, but I think that I've finally found a reasonable replacement of creme-filled, chocolate joy. Newman's Own Organics produces Newman-O's creme filled chocolate cookies. We have only tried the Hint 'O Mint variety, so far, but it is most encouraging. The creme is soft, creamy and quite tasty, and the cookies themselves are firm and crunchy with a strong chocolate flavor. They definitely put Oreos to shame.
The bad news is that they are fairly pricey: Around $3.50 US for a 16 oz. package of 33 cookies. You'll probably also have to visit a large grocery chain that has an organic foods section in order to find them. Nonetheless, I urge you to check them out!
All hail Paul Newman!
DISREGARD URL TO O'BANNON INTERVIEW -- INCORRECT!
I apologize, folks for providing the wrong URL and for double-posting. I'll repost when I figure out how to provide you wtih the correct URL.
Kevin the Cyber Idiot
ROCKNE S. O'BANNON INTERVIEW
Harlan, you are kindly mentioned in this profile of Rockne S. O'Bannon, which focuses on (but isn't limited to) his terrific TWILIGHT ZONE episode "Wordplay":
http://mailcenter.comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/4380C28D000073530000289E2206424413979D0A900E0207900A05?cmd=Show&no=3&uid=178594&sid=c0#article2
First SF readings
I am almost certain that the first SF I read was a Ballantine collection of Henry Kuttner stories that came out in the mid-1970's. I was 12 years old, and I vividly remember the inventor who could only invent when he was drunk and considered himself a purist because he only drank beer out of cans, not plastic bulbs. (Even though I was a teetotaler at the time, I mourned with him when the last brewer to put its suds in cans went out of business.)
I also read A WRINKLE IN TIME around that time--it would have been shortly before or after the Kuttner collection. And I vaguely remember reading the NARNIA series in elementary school. But the Kuttner stories made a real impression on me. After that came Bradbury, Clarke, the Heinlein juveniles, Simak's "City" story cycle and yes, at the tender age of 14, Harlan Ellison's "Deathbird Stories." And I took his warning to read only one story at a time sincerely, and not as hyperbole.
BTW, anent my previous post, Jennifyr recommends Roscoe's House of Chicken is another possibility. (I bow to her superior knowledge of Southern cuisine and restaurants in California.)
Chicken croquettes
My friend Jennifyr says that her mother used to do salmon croquettes, which are similar:
The simplest is to use primarily dark meat because it's more juicy. Chop up 2 cups of chicken, then take saltine crackers (1/4 box; in other words, 1 wax paper sleeve's worth--about 30 saltines). Leaving the salt in, crumble the crackers and mix them in with the chicken in a large bowl. (You can also use bread crumbs). Add 3 L or XL eggs--best to whisk them up before adding to mixture. If you like onion, you can add dehydrated onion flakes (easiest), or chop up or cut with scissors a green onion. Once all this is together, check the consistency. If the mixture won't hold together, then it's time to start adding extra moisture. You can add chicken broth, an egg or a splash of milk.
Taste the mixture--add salt and pepper to taste. (If you're a spicy guy, this would be the time to add 'em if you wish.)
Smoosh mixture into balls, then drop into cooking oil and flatten somewhat with spatula. (This is so they will cook evenly.)
Form patties into whatever size you want--I would suggest 3 inches in diameter. Fry patties in frying pan--use any kind of oil you want--olive, peanut,etc. (I would suggest not using an oil that would add extra flavor.) Patties do not have to be deep-fried. Watch them very closely--estimated cooking time is about 4 minutes on each side. When done, drain on plenty of paper towels. If you want to be thorough on draining oil from the patties, change the towels. After changing the initial paper towels, replace them and this time use other paper towels to press down lightly from the top (like a sandwich). DO NOT leave upper paper towels on top after pressing, as this will remove the crunch. (Remember, steam is the enemy to crunch here.)
Serve and enjoy!
Jennifyr also recommends Johnny Rebs for their authentic Southern cuisine. They have restaurants in Victorville, Long Beach, Bellflower and Orange.
Reading List
The earliest SF-ish books I remember reading were Heinlein's Starship Troopers (odd, but true), and two Mark Twain stories (Tom Sawyer Abroad, Connecticut Yankee) with what must have been -- at the time -- SF-ish elements.
Also, a very vivid image comes to mind of a novel for which I cannot remember the title, but I clearly recollect that it involved multi-organism aliens with detachable tentacles, a disaster in space, and a very solid description of a collapsing gantry on the moon. The cover featured a spacesuited human hiding behind a metallic disc with four tentacles reaching around the disc. (If this sparks recognition in anyone, please let me know the name of the thing.) Again, think children's book.
And, yes I'll admit it, "Star Trek: Mission to Horatius". There are some things best left alone...
ME
Correction:
The del Rey title I had in mind was, "Marooned on Mars".
"Moon of Mutiny" is another Heinlein title.
Childhood Reads
One influential book was PAGOO, by Holling C. Holling. It was the life story of a hermit crab, and about life in the sea. It was technically accurate and at the same time made feisty little Pagoo an appealing character. It helped encourage my interest in science and storytelling, and showed the two could go together.
The opening of the book went something like this:
LITTLE Pagurus-"Pagoo" for short-floated at the surface of the sea...Instinct said, "You're hungry!" And sure enough, he was.
Chuck
Oops...
Charlie in St. Pete nailed it more accurately and succinctly than I did.
Hey Keiti,
If I get this wrong, someone will point out my folly, but my thinking goes like this:
Criminal trials and civil trials have different "burdens of proof." With criminal trials, the prosecution must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Volumes have been written on what is meant by "reasonable doubt," but we'll just leave the term defined as it is.
With a civil trial, the burden of proof is "Preponderance of the evidence," which is less rigorous than "reasonable doubt." This basically means if the prosecution can convince a jury that there is more evidence supporting their side, then the jury can convict. Since a criminal court can have someone's freedom taken away (or killed), the Constitution requires a much higher standard of proof than "we are at least 51% sure so-and-so committed this crime."
In both cases, a criminal jury didn't believe that the prosecution proved its case beyond a "reasonable doubt" (for whatever hair-ripping reason, at least in the case of OJ). But a CIVIL jury, which can't send a man to prison but can take large sums of his money, was convinced that there was at least a 51% chance that the defendant was indeed guilty.
Now, I'm no big city lawyer (he said, tugging at his suspenders), but it's the best I could come up with. Anyone more knowledgable than I have any thoughts?
ME: Started with speculative fiction in middle school, with this stuff.
Lloyd Alexander's Prydain series
C.S. Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia
Asimov, Bradbury, and Clarke short stories
Stephen King's Nigh Shift
Good stuff.
PAB
Early Reading
I started reading Harlan in 6th grade after i discovered he was the creator of THE CITY ON THE EDGE OF FOREVER. Found a couple-three stories in the old Orbit anthologies ed. by Damon Knight. Blew me the eff away.
I read WILLARD by Stephen Gilbert
The Science Fiction Hall of Fame
The Martian novels of Edgar Rice Burroughs
Elric novels of Michael Moorcock
The Andromeda Strain and The Terminal Man by Crichton
Joseph Wambaugh and Ed McBain novels
On second thought, better not have the kid start with the stuff that I did.
Regards,
Neal
Harlan,
If you want a basket full of hot Southern biscuits to sop up the gravy with, I've got a Savannah recipe passed down from my maternal grandmother that my mom taught me to make. They are the real deal.
ME
This stuff is great for early teens:
del Rey (Moon of Mutiny, etc.)
Heinlein (Have Spacesuit Will Travel, etc. anything from '40s & 50's)
Doc Smith (Lensman, Skylark, etc.)
Le Guin (Earthsea)
Regarding children's books
ME: Ever read THE FORGOTTEN DOOR by Alexander Key? I'd still prefer to live in Jon's world. People haven't changed much in forty years.
Eleanor Cameron's MUSHROOM PLANET books made me want to build a rocket in my backyard, and I often scoured old newspapers looking for classified ads printed in green ink. [Midnight confession... I still do, and long for a planet just big enough for me.]
Evelyn Sibley Lampman's THE CITY UNDER THE BACK STEPS may seem more fantasy than science fiction this days, but I was fascinated by the concept of going to live among ants.
I'm sure that there are dozens more I can think of; going to the library with my dad remains the best memory of my childhood in the Sixties.
---------Patty
Keiti...Two different venues (civil and criminal) and two different legal standards (preponderance of the evidence vs. beyond all reasonable doubt). There is no constitutional prohibition to be found not guilty in a criminal trial and to be sued thereafter in a civil court. The state is the party in interest in criminal proceedings whereas a civil suit (such as in OJ & Blake) is brought by the estate of the deceased person (plaintiff) against a defendant.
Completely Random Question
Greetings to All.
I have a question that I thought perhaps some of you could shed some light on...
As I'm sure most of you have heard (whether you care or not) Robert Blake was found liable for his wife's death in a civil suit after he was acquitted in criminal court.
So, my question is essentially this: How does it make any sense for him to even have had a civil trial and subsequently found liable when he was acquitted of any criminal wrong doing?
Same thing with O.J.
For the record, I don't want this turned into a frackus (sp) concerning actual guilt or innocence. I simply don't understand why or how it makes any sense to hold a civil trial after a person (any person) has been acquitted in criminal court.
Could someone please explain this to me?
I'm gagging...
Stop stop stop stop stop
Stop stop stop stop stop stop stop
Stop stop stop stop now!
Got that from my boyfriend. =)
But seriously.
takin' care of bidniz
HARLAN:
Got your message. I'm copacetic.
Should note my change of address, for purposes of future "Rabbit Hole" mailings (recent issue was forwarded just fine) as well as the upcoming task:
1030 SW Jefferson, #637
Portland, OR 97201
Large packages are probably best sent to my workplace:
Old Federal Courthouse
620 SW Main, Suite 702
Portland, OR 97205
CROQUETTE RECIPES
Thank you, one and all.
he
Barney, here in Elanoy, "manual" is two syllables. Man-yull.
Drinking melk, Eric
Poppy
HARLAN
POPPY Z may have an answer to your query, hubby is a chef. She digs the cuisine.
Neal
Pacific Rimshot
A Note Composed Long After The Rising Of The Sun On Eastern Shores But Possibly Encountered By West Coast Dwellers As They Sip Thir First Cup Of Java.
(In which our hero, and by "our" I mean me, but what the heck, attempts yet another haiku in a fruitless attempt to avoid the actual chores waiting for him as daylight ceaselessly burns.)
Harlan Ellison
Net surfing is not his way
Must pound manual
- b
Chicken Croquettes
Harlan, Susan:
Judi is an accomplished cook. She can do chicken croquettes Cuban, Jewish, or Italian style. (Not Southern, she says.) We will be gone all day today, but if you'd like a quick lesson she'll be delighted to provide one.
A-TC
Croquette, anyone?
http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/recipes/recipe/0,,FOOD_9936_20485,00.html
http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/recipes/recipe/0,,FOOD_9936_15881,00.html
Children's books; what a great topic.
Maybe in forth grade or fifth grade I picked up William F Wu's "The Robin Hood Ambush" (part of the Robert Silverberg
"Time Tours" series). And Arthur Roth's "The Iceberg Hermit". I recall reading a lot of stories about guys in very cold places; some with dogs, some without.
Some really great books I read in 6th grade are the Susan Cooper "The Dark Is Rising" series.
And of course, you gotta stock up on "Calvin and Hobbes" for your kid. I loved that strip. Being an extremely daydreamy creative kid (seen as an odd duck by everyone), I could really relate to Calvin. I felt atleast Bill Waterson understood what it was like to be like me...a real spirit lifter.
I really wish I had kept more of the books I had when I was younger. Or atleast a list. That might be something you want to do for your kid. Jot down every title s/he has until s/he can write, then encourage your child to keep up the list.
I read all the time when I was growing up (starting at an earlier age than most) but for the life of me, I can't remember 97% of what I had read during those years. I recall a lot of stuff based on cartoons and movies...Transformers, GI Joe, and Indiana Jones chapter books. And I know I read every single Encyclopedia Brown my school library had. Comic books...loads of comic books. I started collecting as soon as I could read; I have thousands and thousands now. Y'know in Boy's Life, there was a comic strip based on Isaac Asimov's "Norby"; not sure who wrote and drew it though.
The recipes from the 1918 version of the Fannie Farmer Boston Cooking School cookbook may be the sort of thing you're looking for:
http://www.bartleby.com/87/r1062.html
http://www.bartleby.com/87/r1061.html
In terms of interesting cooking, you might also want to dig up copies of Food That Really Schmecks and More Food That Really Schmecks, both by Edna Staebler and both perenially in print -- basically, German-Canadian-Mennonite Country recipes that are delightful and simple.
Cheers, Jon
Todd Cassel, Harlan -
imagine the limericks
eschewed for haiku.
* * *
As for chicken croquettes, perhaps either of these will do:
http://southernfood.about.com/od/deepfryerrecipes/r/bl01006c.htm
http://www.freerecipe.org/Appetizers/Croquettes/chicken-croquettes-1-recipe-bscr.htm
ME:
I think "Tripods" has been released in the UK. You'd probably find it on e-bay or some other website.
Begining books? I think I was born in the wrong decade. I started with Wells and Burroughs. Then it was Doctor Who novelizations, then back to Burroughs. What's the cut off age for childhood? I think still in it actually. . .
Vincenzo Kagetaka:
Finally, another naysayer. But what's wrong with Celtic Heritage?
Finally,
I Cannot Impress
Harlan Ellison
So I Will Not Even Try.
Love,
Steve
HARLAN - Paste this into your browser
http://chicken.allrecipes.com/az/lftvrchckncrqtts.asp
if you can't get it to work, I'll send you a printout! This version is almost trivially simple though. Google generates *multiple* hits.
Kristin
HARLAN SEEKS A RECIPE
One of my favorite foods from when I was a kid...
"What is patriotism but the food we ate as a child." LIN YUTANG
...was something every restaurant in America made from the weekend's leftovers. It was a purely American dish, with a swell yellow-white country gravy to drizzle over it.
And it was...
CHICKEN CROQUETTES!!!!!!!!!
The restaurants would take all the leftover chicken meat, dark, but mostly white, mince the hell out of it, mix it with spices and other stuff, and deep-fry it into those nifty rhomboid shapes (like rounded cones, blunt at the top), crispy golden outside, crunchy and crackly...and delicious inside, about the consistency of, say, the best tuna casserole you ever et.
Well, as they've nearly ceased making nationalistic foods everywhere in the world (I asked at ten different restaurants in Australia before an old fry-cook knew what a jaffle was), so has it befallen the fate of the humble, magnificent chicken croquette.
Nibbler's in LA was the last place I could get what was on every menu in every lunch counter and Woolworth's and reliable neighborhood beanery in this nation--before the fucking razr-fone & iPod turned dining in public into a nightmare imposition of being forced to eavesdrop on everyone's else's boring as shit private conversations--all through the '30s, '40s, '50s and into the '60s, '70s, early '80s: but Nibbler's closed down their last restaurant three months ago.
And now Susan and I cannot enjoy chicken croquettes, a modest wonder of American cuisine. We've tried making them ourselves, but the recipes have been lacking. They are ersatz, written by people who've never actually EATEN a chicken croquette.
So...
We need some GOOD SOLID unfancy non-cuisine-minceur American down-home, diner and one-arm joint recipes for CHICKEN CROQUETTES. Would some of you out there, maybe Amy, maybe Cindy, maybe ANYdamnbody who has an old gramma who cooked tasty, not fancy-schmancy croquettes, please see if you can send us the Real Goods so we can enjoy a meal of croquettes and that lovely glutinous yellow-gold country gravy?
Huh, wouldja please?!!!!????
Droolingly, Yr. pal, Harlan
sci-fi books that got you started...
With a new child on the way and the wife piling up cool books to tease the mind (The Rainbow Goblins, anyone?)... I began thinking ahead to the books that inspired me to investigate speculative fiction.
Of note, I remember reading around age 11 or 12 The White Mountains (Tripods trilogy) by Samuel Youd (aka John Christopher). I now think these books set me forth on my love of science/speculative fiction and adventure stories.
Anyone else want to share their early, early reading? Anyone want to critique Christopher's work? Anyone have a bootleg of the DVD "The Tripods" that I understand was never released?
Supes
Stacy Dooks,
Way waaaaaay cool.
Neal
Look what I started
I lower my head in shame
Please, no more haiku!!!!!
-TODD
"Haiku" chokes out like
Cats coughing slimy hairballs
Onto the carpet
Trees whisper softly
In the Garden of Envy
..."Harlan Ellison"
Stacy,
I saw the teaser on Smallville last night. (Yeah, it's a WB teeney bopper show, but it can be suprisingly good at times) It's been far too long since The Big Red S has been on the screen; the trailer definitly put a smile on this fans face.
Harlan Ellison
Spoke of Mickey Mouse porno
Disney wasn't pleased
To Adam-Troy Castro
In order to write
a creditable haiku
you must learn to count.
Oscar
(paraphrasing) "You don't WANT his undivided attention."
Harlan Ellison
Eat where he tells you to eat
And don't get him mad
Oft misspelled Mefisto
HE reaches for pistol
Boom
REPLY TO OSCAR LIM (whoever the hell HE is)
Oh, indeed, it DID happen.
Try the Office of Military Records, Fort Benning, Georgia, March--April 1957. Ranger Training Battalion.
O, Oscar, you ought to be ashamed of yourself. Never happened, my ass.
PFC Harlan Ellison US 51403352 Mustered out: 1 April 1957.
Harlan Ellison
a U.S. Army Ranger?
Never happened, man.
On Harlan's driveway
Shatner laid a skid. Model?
The one in his shorts
Still a seven-month wait, but worth it. . .
Yes, there are probably more esoteric and enlightening things I could be discussing right now to rub shoulders with the literati here but c'mon now. Tell me in your secret heart of hearts where the inner fanboy or girl dwells this teaser doesn't give you a little tingle: http://supermanreturns.warnerbros.com/
Chills man. Chills up and down the spine. I think Singer and company are on the right track with this one.
This has been Stacy's Geek Moment of the Week. We now return you to the higher-brow programming already in progress. ~.^
Stacy
Peter Jackson's filming of Tolkien accentuated the worst aspects of his books, the part based on ancient ethnic myths, and mitigated their strong imaginative originality. The end result for such a mass medium is that it encourages every burley, unshaven, poltroon to put on chain-mail and leather and be proud of his Celtic heritage.
Peter Jackson's filming of Tolkien accentuated the worst aspects of his books, the part based on ancient ethnic myths, and mitigated their strong imaginative originality. The end result for such a mass medium is that it encourages every burley, unshaven, poltroon to put on chain-mail and leather and be proud of his Celtic heritage.
Joining in your Reindeer Games
In Onyx HE wrote
A favourite tale of mine
Read first in Slippage
Of all the stories I enjoyed in Slipppage the story and the title of 'Mephisto in Onyx' sticks in my mind. It's not the best story in Slippage (IMHO) but for some reason it's the most memorable.
Harlan Ellison
And Japanese Poetry?
No apparent link...
Various
Returned to NYC, staying in a hotel other than the one that trapped Harlan, the Castros, and divers others in an elevator last spring. THAT one is undergoing major renovation, but we gave it a shuddery wide berth.
Saw the glorious AVENUE Q again. THE PILLOWMAN, which I consider must-see theatre, is alas no longer playing on Broadway.
Ariana Huffington is offering a great service, over on her blog: for the price of an e-mail to her, she will hand-deliver your name to Bill O'Reilly, so you can be placed on his touted Enemy's List.
Harlan Ellison
Stuck in the lift with you
The Shaft Rings With Rage
Harlan Ellison
reading haiku massacre
bleeding from his eyes
The ED SF Project
Most of you in the SF genre know that SCI FI has axed the online zine SCIFICTION, of which Ellen Datlow was the editor. To pay tribute to her and the ezine, David Schwartz has put together the ED (For Ellen Datlow) SF Project: http://edsfproject.blogspot.com. Go now and choose your favorite story, before it gets taken, and write a loving tribute to it. Still up for grabs are a couple of classic Ellison pieces, so hurry now before they're snatched up.
James
Harlan Ellison
eats Hydrox cookies atop
Kilimanjaro.
Harlan Ellison
is a registered trademark,
so tread carefully.
Harlan Ellison
the crimson leaves fall, collect
beneath your lone oak
Echoes...
Did anyone else catch Criminal Minds on CBS Wednesday night? I couldn't help but flash back to Harlan's 'Rat Hater' when the serial killer tortured the man by cutting him and leaving him for the rats to eat...who knows? I imagine the writers all grew up reading Manhunt and its like. 'Rat Hater' certainly conjures images that are hard to exorcise.
By the way, those who aren't watching CM are missing one of the best hours on television.
Harlan Haiku
Harlan Ellison
Makes other scribes jealous, son.
HE, is Nobel One.
Harlan Ellison
Harlequin beneath the skin
Horror's favored son
Haiku:
Harlan Ellis-ain't
Mister Cordwainer Bird 'less
The man fuck him up
(I think I've had one too many beers.)
Harlku
Harlan Ellison
The devil can't write like he
His books: razor sharp
Haiku
Pheromones, pishaw
Ellison is a horndog
Now you are smiling
Haiku
Holy Fucking Shit!
Someone in Webderland Pukes
It's Alan Coil's fault
Ellison haiku.
65 degrees on Tuesday, cold and blustery on Wednesday, 27 degrees right now with snow flurries. (4:30pm EST)
Just in case there is someone who doesn't know, a haiku is
5 beats
7 beats
5 beats
Each beat may be a word or syllable (or sound effect, I'd guess)
Hows about we all write a haiku with the first line: Harlan Ellison. Here's mine.
Harlan Ellison
Listening to what he says
Won't drive you bugfuck
Harlan,
Thank you so very much for your reply and I shall send a note off to Susan at HERC to get the necessary information on joining. I have looked around the net, picking up editions that fit in gaps in my collection, but will be very pleased to get notice ahead of time for any new releases.
Thank you again for your reply.
Marlow
Bobby Hutcherson's Oblique, re-released remastered RVG edition. With Herbie Hancock on piano, Albert Stinson on bass, Joe Chambers on drums. They do a version of Hancock's Blow-Up theme. Tres cool.
rambling, ending with a question for Harlan
cool... I like this.
The Six String Samurai is cool; Buddy Holly inspired sword-slinger riposting to "If I were you, I'd run" with the line "If you were me, you'd be good lookin'." Cool.
Also cool:
Watching the first snowfall of the season (flurries here in Michigan) and realizing that, good things willing, I'll have a child before the last snowfall of the season.
Morphine (the band; baritone sax, drums, bass)
The opening line to Neuromancer.
Starting a car ride with five hours of an un-listened to Ellison audio.
That was me two weeks ago and I've been meaning to write a thank-you note to you, Harlan, ever since I got back. The cd set in question was 'Midnight in the Sunken Cathedral' and all I can say is: good god, sir. I was well aware of your chops as a writer, and had already read most of what was on the cd when I rented it. Likewise, I've heard you speak, in the lecture/question-and-answer sense of the word, and so I knew you had a certain stage presence. At least, I thought I'd known... hell, I had no idea. On that cd you brought a different voice to Every. Frickin'. Story.
How, how, HOW did you do that? Does it come with effort? Practice? Years of influence from radio and vaudville? Or is this talent just one of those things; some people can curl their tongues, wiggle their ears, etc - you just happen to have the moderately more startling ability to conjure a wide array of voices.
This generated some unexpected reactions to the readings, too. Your voice and the mental voice that accompanies what I read are more than a little different; I came out from Jeffty is Five with an angry ennervation I'd never picked up before. "Prince Myshkin, and Hold the Relish" had me just a shade too fascinated to actually slip into hysterics. And "Pennies off a Dead Man’s Eyes," well...
This is probably one of my favorite stories of yours, ever. Unlike, say, Jeffty, this voice I'd picked up on pretty accurately just from reading it, and hearing you act it out started me wondering all over again. Have you ever been concerned about being accused of using someone else's voice? This isn't a criticism of what you've written, but is something I've been wondering about.
I'm white. As a writer I'd rather not be restricted to just writing white voices for white characters, but... Maybe I'm overly sensitive, maybe college brainwashed me, but whatever the reason I'm left feeling like I don't have any right to write from a perspective with which I am not personally familiar. That I could be called out and pilloried for stealing, for co-opting a voice/heritage/issue that I have no right to use because I am not [insert ethnic background here].
You write so well that I can't really picture much in the way of criticism being leveled at what you've done, but I'm curious to hear anything you have to say on the matter. And has there ever been a time you've backed away from a writing in one voice or another?
COOL THINGS:
Recently got a chance to see my favorite Antonioni film, THE PASSENGER (starring Jack Nicholson), in a theater again for the first time in, oh, 30 years. It's coming out on dvd soon. (HARRY POTTER & THE GOBLET OF FIRE is swell, too.)
Listening to: Kate Bush's AERIAL, The Cardigan's SWEET EXTRA GRAVITY, Stevie Wonder's A TIME TO LOVE, Fiona Apple's EXTRAORDINARY MACHINE (the album of the year), The New Pornographers' TWIN CINEMA, Regina Spektor's SOVIET KITSCH, and Aram Khachaturian's GAYANE suites. (Note to DWIGHT: Please post your home address so I can play these for you from the sidewalk outside youe bedroom window some night. Asshole.)
Austria...land of free speech - not.
Hitler's home country will toss you in the slam for 20 years for saying the wrong thing:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051117/ap_on_re_eu/austria_irving_arrested
Irony. It's a bitter pill, Mr. Irving.
Cool stuff ahoy!
The Harold Lloyd Comedy Collection Vols. 1-3 just released on DVD.
The Burial at Thebes : A Version of Sophocles' Antigone (Paperback)
by Seamus Heaney (Translator)
Love Cannot Bear
by Robert Fripp (Audio CD, you know, music)
I am looking forward to seeing the Egon Schiele retrospective at the Neue Galerie this Sunday, although I suppose his work is fairly confrontational. I will be meeting an old classmate for coffee at the museum's cafe. Now that I think about it, that may be fairly confrontational too.
I did see Andrew Lloyd Webber's "Woman in White" at the Mariott Marquis last night. It wasn't confrontational, but it was awful in every other regard, and the theater smells like a cistern.
Webber is the most amazing talent-void. He's so talentless, it's almost as if other people's talent cannot escape the gravitational pull of his mediocrity. I sat through the entire shower of shrieking dreck with my eyes open, stone cold sober to boot, and am unable to tell you if any of the cast could so much as carry a tune in a sponge.
By the way, the Mariott Marquis, in addition to possessing all the architectonic grace of a men's room in the Death Star, has the most uncomfortable seats of any theater in the entire city. If I sit somewhere for six hours and wind up with a sore rear like that, I expect at least to be landing very shortly in France. Or saying good morning to Colin Farrell.
Or something.
I don't think I'm very good at this "not, um, mean" thing.
I blame my parents.
Things that are cool? Yes, LOST is very cool. LOST is one of the best shows ever produced for television. It hasn’t hit a sophomore slump in the least, in fact, it’s better than ever.
Old Kubert stuff is cool (did I ever tell you that he was a member of my father’s congregation back when we lived in Dover, NJ….Kubert still does…..and I would play basketball with Andy in our junior jew group. Andy used to be one of those kids who, regardless how young, you needed to flinch back when he was around because he would always be hitting you….y’know, those punchy kids who even hit adults). Anyway, old Kubert stuff is cool, but what is cooler is that he is still producing great stuff today and has a new Sgt Rock mini-series about to come out.
Portable DVD players are cool. Mine allows me to get through many of my backlog of discs while taking the dogs for their excretory visit around the backyard each night. I sit in my lawn chair, watch some old Sergio Leone pastawesterns at 10-15 minute intervals, while the dogs do their things. When Nova begins to eat leaves, then it’s time to go in.
Fall and Winter in Phoenix is cool. Never cold, just cool. It’s time for everyone to come out of their A/C hibernation and visit some of the weekly outdoor festivals that have now begun. Last week was the Fountain Hills Arts Festival which surrounds a beautiful park and pond with the country’s highest spouting (world’s highest spouting?) fountain that spurts impressively each hour at 15 minute intervals. 500 artists sell their wares, pack up, and prepare for the Tempe Arts Street Festival in two weeks. And then my favorite, the Indian artists festival at Indian School Park in central Phoenix, where I can barter for freshly made, beautiful and expensive Kachinas.
The original King Kong coming out on DVD for the first time, along with a 2 hour documentary and Son of Kong, Mighty Joe Young and something else that slips my mind: that’s cool. Whether you loathe remakes, or whether you give them a chance, Peter Jackson’s King Kong looks very very cool. Keeping it a period piece (wait, you can’t KEEP something a period piece when the original was from that period) was a smart move, and could probably have only been done by Peter Jackson and his newfound Hollywood power. Yes, we all love the original Kong with his constantly flowing hair, and we all want to look down on remakes…..but I expect cool from this one, and if not, at least it’s the reason why the original Kong is appearing in DVD. Finally.
Oh, and let's not forget. Harlan is cool. Just that name is cool....it rolls off the tongue: HARLANELLISON. Perfect for Haiku:
Harlan Ellison
He isn't a sci-fi guy
Say so and you die
-TODD
Maybe we should have a Pavillion day or two in which we describe cool stuff that isn't irritating, confrontational or, um, mean.
Lost was cool last night, with its humanization of Ana Lucia. And the Joe Kubert Tarzan archives volume 1. comes out today from Dark Horse. 200 pages of Kuberty goodness originally published at DC in the 1970's and featuring everyone's favourite jungle hero!
Cheers, Jon
LORD HALIFAX:
Uh... thanks for sharing... uh, I guess...
I would like to have an orgy with Cate Blanchett, Tilda Swinton, Gwyneth Paltrow, Naomi Watts and Uma Thurman in an extra large heart shaped bed with mirrors over the top and a soap bubble machine going. After that I could die in peace.
I lived for two years on 181st and Riverside in the 1980's.
There was a lot of ethnic music being played at excessive volumes then, too.
I guess ethinic music is not linked to global warming after all.
It's the middle of November temperatures are in the 70's in New York, there are lot's of Puerto Rican's listening to their ethnic music at excessive volumes on their Sony portable stereo systems. Thing's just aren't like they used to be....
What?
Harlan bought you a round of drinks and you....
1> Threw a tumbler of single malt in his face?
2> Poured it on the carpet and loudly demanded any writer present in the restaurant to lick it up?
3> Hid a really obvious joke in plain sight?
Flummoxed, I remain... flummoxed.
oral delights
Yesterday, I went to the central library to see LA attorney Lesley Klinger speak about the third and final volume of his brand-new annotated Sherlock Holmes. Normally, I assiduously avoid pinioning authors with an obvious question, but this one was unavoidable: Having lugged around -- with great affection -- my boxed set of W.S. Baring-Gould's annotated Holmes for about 28 years now, I had to ask Klinger how his version differs. How well did he answer? Well, suffice it to say that with great anguish I added $150 to one of my credit cards at the end of the talk.
Fortunately, in the course of answering other people's questions, Klinger said that, apart from the Hound, his favorite Holmes short story might be "The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle," which enabled me to announce to the room that I am scheduled to read that particular story aloud for my "Story Time for Grownups" in December, so I got to pass out or collect email addresses and phone numbers from interested parties afterward.
On Monday, November 21, the Readers Theatre of Mt. Hood Repertory Company will present a dramatic reading of George Bernard Shaw's "The Devil's Disciple," a tale of the American Revolution set in 1777 shortly before the Battle of Saratoga.
Richard Dudgeon is shunned by all as the freethinker whom everyone knows as "the Devil's Disciple," but the Redcoats mistake him for the Reverend Anthony Anderson, a Presbyterian minister they intend to hang as an example to the rebels, and Richard has to decide what he's going to do -- especially under the gaze of the Reverend's pretty, youthful wife Judith.
Readers Theatre is a relaxed, casual evening of play reading by professional actors from the Portland area. (Then there's me; director Keith Scales unaccountably cast me as General Burgoyne, the urbane and literary soldier known -- mostly behind his back -- as "Gentlemanly Johnny.")
The show is next Monday, Nov. 21, at 7:00 p.m. The performance will occur in the 80-seat theater of Reynolds Middle School on the corner of East 201st and Halsey in Fairview. Tickets are $7.
For more information and a map, go to www.mthoodrep.org
BARBERism
STEVE:
Wheeew.
Well, your little jape succeeded. You had me troubled, upset, concerned, bothered, beetle-browed, querulous, rattled, canted, worried and unmanned. After reading your first post, I had to wait two and a half days to get in touch with Lakesha, because she's closed on Mondays, and doesn't come in for dinner on Tueday till 5:00. And so, I was distended for two worrisome days till I could reach her last night BEFORE I posted to you. You'll be pleased to know she would not "speak of it" to me, and said I was to have a tete-a-tete with her when I arrive for dinner with out of town guests tomorrow evening.
Would not "speak of it."
"How well do you know these people?" she asked.
"Not at all," I replied, already upset. "The man appears on my website, I'm not sure I've even met the women. Why??? What the hell happened??? Why this talk of credit cards and cleaning charges and such...???"
She would not go into detail, would not "speak of it."
So. Much troubled, for obvious reasons, I entered my post to you.
Now I have an answer.
I will "play along" with this gag, and commend you on the effectation of a "joke on the jokester," and will allow Lakesha to bring it to fruition tomorrow night.
No need to do anything. I will not surprise her with advance knowledge of my having been let into the loop.
And I cannot thank you enough for having added to my daily burden of tsuriss and emotional drain. Perhaps you'll be able to explain to Susan and Sharon why I spent the last two days in a funk, snapping at them for no apparent reason.
Apparent.
I will no further "speak of it."
Harlan
Good Wishes for Stan and More on White Phosphorus
Stan, allow me to also wish a very speedy and complete recovery to your wife
As for Elijah's posting on the use of white phosphorus, I have some additional details and links to articles to share, as I was the individual who originally posted the article on its use in Fallujah.
According to the data I have been able to gather, Elijah is correct, white phosphorus is not a banned weapon under the Chemical Weapons Convention. However, that is more a technicality than anything else, as it is a very dangerous chemical agent whose properties are very similar to many other weapons that are banned.
Here is a quote from a BBC article:
Professor Paul Rodgers, of the University of Bradford's department of peace studies, said white phosphorus could be considered a chemical weapon if deliberately aimed at civilians.
He told PM: "It is not counted under the chemical weapons convention in its normal use but, although it is a matter of legal niceties, it probably does fall into the category of chemical weapons if it is used for this kind of purpose directly against people."
The sad fact that is emerging is that we fired a chemical agent that could actually melt skin into an area that had both civilians and insurgents. More than that, they lied about its use. At first, the military denied the use of white phosphorus completely, then amended that to state that it was only used for illumination purposes, then admitted that it was used within Fallujah itself. If there was really nothing wrong with their actions, why lie in the first place?
Here are a couple of links to some addition articles on the use of the Weapon of Mass Destruction within Iraq:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article327094.ece
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4440664.stm
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/11/9/164137/436
Well, sometimes you get the gag, and sometimes the gag gets you.
Does anyone know how Tom Snyder is, btw? When he stopped blogging, he seemed to have dealt with some health stuff and been faced with some other health stuff. A good interviewer and, so far as i could tell from out here in TV Land, a nice fellow. Now sit back, relax, and watch the colored pictures fly through the air, thanks to our good friends at Bacardi.
My other observation for the day is that a lot of people are model train aficiandos -- one Snyder interview revealed Meat Loaf's love of Lionel (?) trains, and apparently Neil Young loves 'em too, to the tune of co-owning the company.
Cheers, Jon
Sucking Out
Okay, agreed. I sucked out.
It was my first time staring down the twin-barrelled eyebeams of Mr. E. Suddenly, visions of time-honored retributions; week-old packages of gopher carcasses sent book rate; the very palpable moment in time when seated, dining, in my favorite restaurant when -- behind me and very close -- I would hear "so YOU'RE that suck-a** weasel who tried to put one over on ME???"
And so on.
In my own little world I'm probably up to it. Here on the main stage, however...
A friend of mine once wrote (probably stealing)
"So, it seems, it's not the twisted mind that's the problem, but the supply of alcohol.
Funny how it can all be reduced to economics like that."
Sorry Dima, sorry Lakesha.
Harlan: If you need me, my true name is George W and I live in Washington.
(I know. I suck.)
***Jeff*** "which looks to BE A nice compilation..." Hey, if you're going to cut and paste me, please proof me and clean up my typos, would'ja? ;-)
Yeah, after a quarter of a century plus of dumbass celebrity interviews, that one still lives on in memory as "must be seen to be believed" television. After that, the Dan Akroyd SNL sketch was more like cinema verite than parody.
My other favorite from around the same time was David Bowie on Merv Griffen singing FAME. Since the song is almost a round like "row row row your boat", once you decide which track/chorus you're going to sing you spend half the song waiting for your part to come around again. Then he sits down for the interview and CANNOT stop sniffling. I was in high school and even I knew he was coked to the gills. Griffen asks him if he has a cold. Bowie does a double-take, checks out the audience of blue haired ladies and says, "yeah, right, that's it, a cold, guvner", and they moved on. Funny stuff.
- Barney
Things must be a little slow in L.A. this week.
Steve!!!! Nooooooooo.
Man, you gotta call me before something like this happens! You caved! I'm bored in Boston and I coulda come up with at LEAST 10 ways for you to turn this! Arrrgh. I mean ARRRGH.
Joke Setup = 7.5 (it was very good, but the inspecifics sounded fishy to me)
Joke Execution = 1 (dismal, I tell you, to see you cave like that. Be bold. BOLD!)
-Keith
Sir Arthur C received the Lankabhimanya award, the highest civilian award in Sri Lanka.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051114/sc_nm/srilanka_clarke_dc
Cheerios boxes have childrens books in them for their current promotional/free item. And that's all nice and dandy for kids. But it's a darn shame General Mills (or any other cereal company) never thinks about the adults who eat their breakfast foods. How cool would it be to open a box of Cheerios and find a short story by HE, Sir Clarke, Bloch, Silverberg, Chabon, or anyone. "Little Quack" and "No Dogs Allowed!" (the 2 kiddie books that have come in my cereal thus far) just don't do it for me.
Cripes
(I should wait until morning, but hope this merits a second post.)
Harlan - Okay, plans went awry. Lakesha felt she would speak to you today, and hence a badly planned leg-pulling (unless, of course, you're pulling mine and actually HAVE talked to her). Just a chance to play with the master of practical pranks.
Nothing happened. Nada. No spillage, no damage, no hits, runs or errors. No massive credit-card bills. Nothing but a purely fun evening, with perhaps just a bit too much mischief afoot.
From even further beneath the rock,
Steve B
(And yes, on certain things I fold like an origami swan)
If a goat is a kind-of-a-ram; and a mule is an ass, why is a ram in the ass a goose?
BARBER: Before I speak to Lakesha later this week, just simply tell me what happened.
I am not smiling as I write this.
Harlan
Hey Barney,
Which looks to ba nice compilation of all those interviews Tom Snyder did with Punks and proto-Punks over the years. I distinctly remember the trainwreck interviews with Wendy O' Williams and John Lydon.
a big "hell yeah" to that remembrance. I saw the interview with the Pistols and to this day remember Johnny Rotten being completely rude then having Snyder say, "Pardon me while you're interupting". I still use that one today and find more and more opportunities for its usage as more and more people take their breaks from talking to grab a breath and talk some more while ignoring what i say. Sheeeeeeesh!
First Amendment Minute
Hey everyone,
I found an interesting website: firstamendmentminute.com.
From the homepage:
"The First Amendment Minute is a topical, fast paced, entertaining, and informative 60 second look at freedom of speech, religion and other liberties protected by the First Amendment. Every week join Derek Newman for his solidly legal, sometimes laughable, seldom lame, up-to-the-minute take on these Constitutional freedoms we enjoy."
You can listen to mp3 archives of previous "minutes" (about a minute long -- hence the name) covering such topics as regulating radio, "adult entertainment," terrorist litmus tests, etc. You need Quicktime, but each download is small; less than, well, a minute or so on an average dialup connection (a few seconds on DSL).
Check it out and let me know what you think. -- duane
footnoting an earlier topic
The following is apropos of nothing, but as I stumbled onto the following today I thought I'd pass it along as a sort of follow up. Apologies for the non-sequitor, I assume it'll be no trouble for the disinterested to scroll past.
About a week ago, give or take, someone posted a story concerning the possible use of white phosphorous by U.S. troops in Iraq. The article (I've tried and failed to find the link in the archives here, sorry) was broken by the Italian media and seemed prominently based on evidence presented by Iraqi doctors and such. I can't speak for anyone else, but I was a bit skeptical.
Today, the following fell into my lap today (via boing-boing.net, if anyone's wondering):
Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001944.html
"a thermobaric mixture which ignites the air, producing a shockwave of unparalleled destructive power, especially against buildings"
While apparently this new weapon was used in Fallujah (which left me wondering if it could be tied to the Italian story) at the conclusion there is a link to a more in depth article regarding what does and does not constitute a chemical weapon, shifting the discussion specifically to white phosphorous:
http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/11/its_not_chemica.html
It's NOT Chemical Warfare
We like WP because when you're under fire by snipers or groups of hostile people that you can't immediately reach out and touch, you can call for fire and get a nice, thick smoke screen between you and them very, very quickly. Yes, WP has some nasty qualities, and maybe particles of the WP fall off and hit people, but it's quick and it saves U.S. military lives. Because the fighting is in an urban area, some of those people hurt might be noncombatants. But we don't use "phosphorus munitions" to target and hurt civilians. Not only is it very inefficient (why not just drop HE?), it's not moral. And our soldiers (relatively speaking) are better than that.
...and a bit later...
The U.S. military has made a clear distinction between chemical-filled munitions and chemical warfare munitions since World War II, and the funny thing is, most of the world's nations agree with us (check out the Chemical Weapons Convention sometime). IT'S NOT CHEMICAL WARFARE. It's conventional warfare, period, when a military force uses an incendiary weapon to attack an adversary's position. There is nothing like flame to scare the crap out of the enemy, and it's very effective.
All that being said, the article concludes with the following update: "Well, evidently the Army IS using WP in a direct-fire mode against combatant targets." and links to a .pdf by way of explaination:
The Fight for Fallujah
http://sill-www.army.mil/FAMAG/Previous_Editions/05/mar-apr05/PAGE24-30.pdf
page 26
"WP proved to be an effective and versatile mutition. We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes when we could not get effects on them with HE. We fired 'shake and bake' missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out."
I will resist editorializing; my only plan was to supplement information provided earlier.
Tom Snyder tidbits
***Stan*** Perservere and my very best wishes to your wife for a full and speedy recovery. If they can fix the throats of sinners like me and Charlie Watts, I have very high hopes for the innocent.
***Others*** A friend just sent me this;
http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/newsitem.cfm?NewsID=4489
Which looks to ba nice compilation of all those interviews Tom Snyder did with Punks and proto-Punks over the years. I distinctly remember the trainwreck interviews with Wendy O' Williams and John Lydon. Good times.
This leads me to believe there could be more in the offing. If not a DVD of just Harlan's appearances on The Tomorrow Show, then perhaps a "best of authors appearances", or, forgive me, SF related appearances.
Well, I can hope.
- Barney Dannelke
Harlan, you might like this. Matt Welch writing in Reason magazine:
"To this day, journalists discuss Talese’s 1966 Esquire piece 'Frank Sinatra Has a Cold' in the same reverent tones with which originalists describe the Constitution."
Jay--karma points are good at Starbucks? I am getting SO many chai lattes.
And a banana nut muffin.
Thanks for the heads-up!
Mrs. Ellison,
I just picked up a money order for the Limited Edition and should have it in the mail today or tomorrow, in which case, it should reach you post-haste. eeggouchh that pun hurt!
Thanks
> I just read your February 28, 2000 review of A.M Homes'
> book "The End of Alice"
You mean the one on Amazon? Holy cow, you must have dug deep to bring that one up! I trust you looked at some of the other, highly-offended reviews -- they're hilarious. As a writer, Homes can do anything, I am convinced. Check out _The Safety of Objects_, if you haven't already: It has some fairly hair-raising but admirable tales, including the title one about a young teen male who has an affair with his older sister's Barbie. Her latest book of stories includes on that imagines, fairly straight, what life was like for Ron and Nancy Reagan in their last days. And she's a babe, on top of it. (Not that that matters.)
I meant to include a note to Stan yesterday: Sending warm thoughts and lots of hope your way.
Owning Up - Harlan
Harlan,
Thank you for the recommendation of L'Kesh for Sunday night, and for the round of drinks you so generously bought for us. You're exactly right. The food is terrific and Lakesha herself is an utter delight -- as is her sister!
Now the hard part. You've likely, at this point, spoken to Lakesha and have some understanding of my little gymnastic gaffe. I have already let Lakesha know that you had no idea I'd do something quite so klutzy, and I sincerely hope she doesn't regard you with any less love and respect as a result. Dima and my wife were similarly horrified.
Lakesha has my credit card number for laundering and carpet cleaning, but she indicated she'd be speaking with you about this.
With sincerest of apologies, and from well beneath a rock somewhere in the Mohave Desert,
Steve B
Karmic Xfer Notice
Upon receipt of ten-thousand +karma points for whatever good I did this week, I hereby transfer the balance what I didn't already owe my own wife and kiddies to Charlotte for use as she pleases (+karma transferrable, net worth x2 in transfer = 5,000 +karma). Redeemable at any church, synagogue, mosque, participating starbucks, or the universal church of payitforward; Kirby Hensley Pope-rioter.
Seriously, our best hopes and thoughts for you both.
Stan:
I've been away from the Pavilion for a week or so, but please allow me to add my best wishes for Charlotte's health to the many other kind thoughts expressed here. May mercy find you both.
D.
Harlan,
Thank you for your reply to my question! I like asking the Big Questions. They're fun! Your reply was excellent, and has me squirming with urges to say a lot, ask, discuss, maybe argue. But mostly, I am just being quiet and reading thoughtfully. This paper will be a learning experience for me in a number of ways, not just for technical aspects, but because I'm asking a question that genuinely interests me. So, I am listening for now. =)
Having said all of that, I actually have one more question for you. This time, it is more specific. May I pose it to you?
Philip,
There's more than enough older material to fill the waiting period between new releases. As the Edgeworks were reprints of older works anyway, you can always just hunt down the books from previous printings. There's a catalogue here on the website, or any good internet used book store should have what you need to grow your Ellison library.
And if ya stick around here as a regular reader/poster, you're bound to get the scoop as new things come out.
REPLY TO PHILIP MARLOW
Sir:
Thank you for asking. Yes, there are about half a dozen new and semi-new things coming out. The newsletter of the Harlan Ellison Recording Collection (HERC), issued with sporadic regularity by Susan, enumerates same, with details. It saves me the time of repeating all that data infinitum.
I urge you to join up. Write to HERC, PO Box 55548, Sherman Oaks, CA 91413 for the subscription info ... or perhaps one of the good Webderlanders will reiterate it here in brief, for your convenience. It's a piddling amount for an au courant and snappy illustrated periodical that my good wife slaves over a hot stove to produce.
Again, thanks for asking. (Recent back issues will probably list an already-extant half-dozen items you might not know about.)
Respectfully, Harlan Ellison
Stan -- God bless you and your wife; I will say a prayer.
And may I say, you are a classy guy. So many on the net are argumentative and combative and a pain-in-the-butt. You, sir, are a gentleman.
Kate
STAN,
My thoughts are with you and your wife. Strength to you and yours from your southern neighbor.
DAVID LOFTUS,
I just read your February 28, 2000 review of A.M Homes' book "The End of Alice," and I must say that I agree with your assessment that it's an amazing book. I'm reading the book right now and find it disturbing yet compelling...and I don't mean warm and fuzzy compelling, but compelling from being well-written.
To Mr. Philip Marlow(e): Whereas you look forward to anything new by Harlan, I, on the otherhand, look forward to new adventures about you! It's been some time!
((Yeah, like you don't get that all the time))
-TODD
Harlan,
My pardon if this is a question that arises in the pavillion regularly, but I am new to the site--although not your work. Is there any new book coming out soon? Or resumption of the Edgework books? I look forward to seeing any new titles from you and pass on my bok money for new works of yours to enjoy.
Sincerely,
Philip Marlow
TO STAN:
Everyone else here said it much better than I could. The percentages are on your side. Please don't forget that.
maxim-al exposure
>Growing older is an honor none enjoy.
>And I liked it in a Deepak Chopra, pseudo-intellectual kind
> of way. I wonder if it is original?
Depends on the context. In the big picture, it's probably not original because almost nothing is.
But if nobody around you has heard of it, it's original enough. Use it often and claim it proudly until someone informs you otherwise.
A GREAT BIG THANIK YOU!
Yes...a great big thank you to all of you here on Pavilion and very special thank you to you Harlan.
So far....my wife has not heard from the second biopsy. Maybe sometime today...hope for the best. She is, going for a second opinion and our insurance provider and hospital cannot refuse her that.
To the few on here who profess being Christian...thank you for your prayers.
To the many on here who are agnostic or call themselves atheist...thank you for your thoughts.
and finally to those of you who are like me...more questioning of organized religion but still hold on to a basic belief whether it be God or E.T. A big thank you to you all.
TO UNCA HARLAN...We will probably never meet. But I want to make a special thanks to you (and to Susan), for being who you are...for making us all think with our brain...maybe in conjunction with our heart, for allowing a Conservative Republican like me, to love and cherish the words you have put down in the form of novels and short stories...and who still thinks Hollywood is shafting one of the greatest writers of television, movies, short stories and novels to come down the literary pike. Poltically and spiritually we probably do not agree...but in the long run...it does not matter, we are all human and I would like to count you and your lovely wife as friends of mine. Thanks again.
STAN
Stan: I'm keeping a good thought for you and your wife.
Hang Tough,
Mark W.
Stan
Just another voice in the crowd, shoulder to shoulder with everyone else: my thoughts are with you and your wife. You have my every sympathy just for being in such a situation, but please don't give up when the fight's not over. Persevere and good luck.
Random thought
I was just in a colleague's office and we were talking about "Oingo Boingo" and, "They Might be Giants," and we were both in the later years of high school when those groups were in their prime. She said something to the effect that we were getting old, and sighed. Then I said:
Growing older is an honor none enjoy.
And I liked it in a Deepak Chopra, pseudo-intellectual kind of way. I wonder if it is original?
-Keith
Stan,
Best wishes to you and your wife.
BOOK/RECORDING/HERC Order
Mrs. Susan "Glad to have you in my clutches" Ellison,
I'll send the order in as you specified.
Thanks for quick response,
Kelly.
Dear Stan -
There are periods in the life of each human being during which we look around and it seems like all we see is loss - and as often as not, it's more than merely "seems like". And it's never just one stretch: such periods often recur. And there are no words to describe the feelings of helplessness and rage and terror of such times.
I can only think of two things that can lend the least iota of comfort. First, as Unca Harlan often states so eloquently in his work, you are not alone. We all either have gone or will go through such horrific times ourselves; and I think I can say with some assurance that everyone of us here stand ready with all the comfort and encouragement we can offer.
Second, should worse come to worst, I've found some peace in remembering that life is a temporary proposition and at the base of it, we're all just on loan to each other - it's the time we have together that's the real treasure.
So: go cherish each other. The future and what it holds will arrive whatever else you do.
Cheers,
Doc
Stan, my regards and thoughts to your wife. Hope things get better for the both of you.
--Eric
Stan
.
My good thoughts are with you and your wife and family. It must be hard, with so much adversity striking in such a short time. Take care, but don't give up.
Remember that you'll always be able to get a leg up, a shoulder to lean on, a pat on the back, and even an occasional ass kicking, here. That's what friends and family do.
-Keith
Stan -
Hang in there. Yeah, I know from personal experience that life is often an exercise in futility and depression, but it almost always gets better, given time and the right people. (Hm. Reading that it becomes too obvious I'm also in a 'down' period right now).
Hang in there, friend - you're not alone.
cd
Words can only help so much. Stan, none of us can promise that things will get better. We hope your wife pulls through. And we know that you will _endure_. You may find yourself with the worst days of your life. Your wife will need help after the operation. But endure. We can't promise that any joys that come will be great, or that there's some kind of reward for it.
But every day that you _do_ continue, that you _do_ endure, is a victory against pain and emptiness.
Stan and Family
yes, what they all said
Respectfully,
Neal
Yeah, Stan...saw your post only now. These are the moments life presents its roughest challenges, the ones so blatantly unfair. I honestly hope your situation finds a ray of light.
Stan, please add us to the list of those who wish the best for you and your family. Going through bad times is never easy, so if it helps even a little, keep posting. There's a lot of good resources here, and a pretty deep well of compassion, too.
Alice and John
Likewise, Stan, our thoughts are with you and your wife.
Michael and Alia
Stan,
I can't even imagine what you're feeling. I will pray for you and Charlotte and for your family. Everything that Harlan conveyed to you, everything that Alex Krislov and Alex Jay wrote is right and correct. My heart goes out to yours along with my hopes for Charlotte's complete recovery. Please keep us posted here.
Cindy
Stan
Our thoughts and prayers are with you, Stan. If there is--indeed--a God, keep in mind that just because He sees every sparrow fall does not mean that He's shooting them down with a cosmic shotgun. Things do NOT always happen for a reason.
Amen.
STAN:
We are here if you need us. And we care. Beyond that, words are well-meant, but no more than words. Repeatedly, we all stand in front of that dark doorway, and when the tears run out there is only courage.
May your God, and all the others, go with you in the dark places. Courage, Stan.
With hope, from your friends here,
Harlan
Stan, hang in there
I've got Barrett's esophogus with dysplasia, myself, and repeated checks haven't shown cancer. Yes, be prepared for the worst--but don't assume it. Stay strong for your wife and for yourself.
STAN,
God's "punishing" you? For what? Despite what the more hardcore Christian sects might believe, God has no interest in the pursuit of punishment. If anything, God "punished" us by simply making us human, warts and all.
My sincerest prayers go out to you and your wife.
Stan
Allow me to join the chorus. You've got my thoughts, prayers and any other services can be provided. Listen to Alex J, he is right to point out the percentages work the other direction.
The pain is undoubtedly intensified in that all this is happening to your loved ones and you feel there is nothing you can do. Hold her hand, steady her shoulders, tend to her bruises, love her intensely -- that's what she needs right now and for the forseeable future, and that's what you've been doing right along. That will get the two of you through this.
Go fight the good fight and we'll "see" you when she's better. Even a Louzyrepublican suchiz y'self. Godspeed.
Stan:
What Alex said. If God listens to agnostics, I'll put in a good word for you. Don't try to second-guess The Big Deity by thinking he's punishing you. It may have nothing to do with that.
And remember to focus on the ninety to ninety five percent.
Chuck
STAN: Compassion knows no political affiliation. My thoughts are with you and your wife.
(And do me a few favors: Remember that five to ten percent chance of NO means a ninety to ninety-five percent chance of YES. I were you, I'd start thinking of what to get her for your thirty-eighth, and for the anniversary after that, and after THAT ...
Do keep us posted, please.
Harlan photography
Seeking professional-quality photo(s) of Harlan suitable for framing.
Our thoughts (And in the case of theists, prayers) are with you Stan.
Kristin
A SPECIAL NEED
Well people...just need your thoughts and prayers (for those of you who still believe in God). My wife has been diagnosed with Barrett's Esophagus with high end Dyspasia...the dyspasia is almost always cancerous. On November 29th, she will be going into a local hospital here in the Portland area. MY wife Charlotte and I have been married for over thirty seven years...looking at the possibility of losing her (there is a five or ten percent chance she might not survive the operation, which involves removal of the esophagus and stretching the upper portion of her stomach up to replace it. So....you can see that I will be putting things on hold...including expounding on here or even getting back to my story writing.
If God is out there....I think he is punishing me by having go through the hell of losing everyone around me....first it was the murder of my only brother...then my dad died in 2003...and now I just might have to go through hell again by the possible loss of my wife. All I know is ... the past five years have not gone well for me...am not looking forward to any good future. Harlan? Take care of yourself good buddy...Susan? Cherish the time you have with him, because you never know when the unthinkable can happen. Time with friends, and family are very precious...thanks again, to you Harlan and to your web server for letting me expound my thoughts...even though I am a die-hard Conservative and Republican ... Ha!
STAN BLUMENTHAL
Beaverton, Oregon USA
Generalissimo Francisco Franco and Lenny Bruce - still dead.
That header may or may not work, but it is presented in the spirit of "sick" humor and also to reference his contined influence, so sue me.
http://www.netflix.com/MovieDisplay?movieid=70041214&trkid=148483
The Lenny Bruce "Performance Film" comes out on DVD this week and includes the Lone Ranger animated short. It's not really rare and sadly it documents that period near the end of his career when he was reading his court transcripts with running commentary, BUT, it is one of those things you should see at least once. Now at last in a more durable format.
For anybody coming in late to this show, the Harlan/Lenny Bruce connection is that when Harlan was working at ROGUE magazine in the early 1960's Lenny Bruce had a monthly column called BRUCE HERE that Harlan, umm, ghost wrote. I only put the "umm" in there because I don't know that Harlan has ever tried to quantify the level of input on either end and I don't want to take anything away from either of them. The way Harlan has occasionally told it, he would take shtick [schtick?] scrawled on cocktail napkins and turn them into whole columns. I've seen and heard Harlan repeat long complicated remarks by other people verbatim. I've also seen Harlan make up outrageous material on the spot just to see the look on someones face. SO, this is where the "umm" and qualifications come in. But, nevertheless, that's the Lenny Bruce connection.
If this gets traction I can repost some of Harlan's remarks on Bruce - or, Doug Lane can - so that Harlan doesn't have to chew his cud twice.
question: How do kids these days keep those nightgown length white t-shirts so damned white?
answer: Blee-acchh!!
- Barney
Hellinabucket, PA.
Weekend Stuff
For anyone checking on over the weekend, plans are for Cafe L'Kesh at 7pm Sunday. Reservations recommended.
Brad--Many thanks.
--Susan
Susan - Both of Harlan's episodes are in the season 1 package.
THE HUNGER - UK EDITION
Brad--Thanks for the info. Question: Are Harlan's episodes in the series 1 or series 2 package?
Thanks--Susan
Harlan - Don't know if this of any interest to you, but the first series of THE HUNGER, containing the two 'Cordwainer Bird' episodes, has just been released on DVD in the UK.
Cindy, I'm fine and will drop you a line before going back out.
On minor Harlan spotting, I recieved the Columbia DVD of the extended version of Major Dundee yesterday. Exploring the special features, there is a short documentary concerning the film where L.Q Jones is interviewed whilst a poster of "A Boy & his Dog" is prominately displayed.
FAQ
Kelly:
I have no problem with sending the book order and HERC membership/order in the same envelope, but the book check is payable to THE KILIMANJARO CORPORATION while the HERC stuff is payable to THE HARLAN ELLISON RECORDING COLLECTION. Glad to have you in my clutches. [Did I say that out loud?]
With kind regards--Susan
Jason, I checked out the link. That has to be one of the funniest things I have ever read. "The COULTER Laws?" Hannity and Liddy in charge of some deep, dark underground? Ho!
It's satire, pure and simple.
If anyone is offended by this, it's probably a measure of personal provinciality, and proof that yet another brilliant satirist has hit his target.
Mrs. Ellison,
Yes Ma'am I definitely would like a copy. Just wanted to make sure I send you the correct amount. Thanks.
NEOCON COMIC BOOK
http://accstudios.com/f/accproduct.htm
Oh dear god.
I actually believe I remember seeing this pitched in, of all places, one of Peter David's message boards (either his old AOL board or the comments sections on www.peterdavid.net, can't recall which). One of the ultra conservative trolls he so often attracts was going on and on about how all comic books were liberally biased and that wouldn't it be great if someone published HIS idea for a conservative comic? And then he went on to describe this exact comic book. This must have been a couple years ago at least. He phrased the whole thing as a sort of "dare" to the comic book industry - would they have the GUTS to print something that didn't kowtow to their "liberal jewish new york elite etc." worldview?
I can't believe he actually made it into print. I'm somewhere between appalled and impressed.
Brent:
You might check the Powells Books web site for Edgeworks 3 and 4. I often see copies on the shelf when I drop by there.
Being Difficult
Mrs. Ellison,
I'd like to order a recording (AN HOUR WITH HARLAN ELLISON) as well as a book (THE HARLAN ELLISON HORNBOOK) from the store.
I'm not yet a HERC member. May I send the HERC membership form, the order forms for the recording (requires HERC membership ID number) and the book all in one evelope with a single money order to cover the lot?
Kelly.
Mike: THE ESSENTIAL ELLISON -- Limited/Boxed/Numbered is $150.00 plus $5.00 S/H (and, if appropriate, 8 and 1/4% CA tax). Do you still wish a copy?
Alex: I'll hold one for you.
Brent: We do not have copies of EDGEWORKS 3 or 4 for sale. Sorry.
Thanks--Susan
Restaurant Recommendations
Harlan - Thank you for the recommendation. L'Kesh it is if I can coordinate with Dima and anyone else who wants to join us. Sunday at 7pm is the most likely time. (Reservations are highly recommended.) Stay tuned!
If I may exchange the favor? Not sure if you and Susan like Italian food, but, bar none, nothing, no one and nowhere, the very best garlic bread in the known universe can be found at Prizzi's Piazza in Hollywood (http://www.prizzispiazza.com/).
The rest of the food is danged good as well, but the garlic bread requires mega-doses of Lipitor prior to consumption -- a necessary step prior to the first eyeballs-rolling-back-in-the-head, look-of-pure-childlike-bliss, tears-rolling-down-your-cheeks, manna-from-heaven bite. Tell the owner Catherine that Cris Barber referred you. (She may allow you to sit inside.)
I will post the final plans (if any) tomorrow morning. One way or t'other, Cris and I will prolly be at L'Kesh Sunday at 7.
Mrs. Ellison,
I forgot to ask the most obvious of questions yesterday about the Limited Edition.. uhmm how much does it cost? Thanks for the help.
Term paper
Hi Erika. Two aspects I can think of that no one else here will think of ;-) are:
1. Science fiction stories have increased people's interest in technological developments because they have shown us what end results technology might advance towards. This increased interest in technology has also encouraged more people to go into science and thus to accelerate scientific/technological progress.
2. Science fiction literature has a smaller audience than sf (or "sci-fi") television and movies (which tend to mix sf notions with Hollywood storytelling standards), but literature of every kind filters through to a mass audience by well-known processes. It may well be that everyone asks themselves the question "what if?" a lot more than they normally would without sf movies and tv.
For example, we have seen the results of global warming in a number of films. In my estimation that's very important. To some degree the needs and opinions of the people determine where the money is spent and what laws are passed.
By the way, if I remember correctly, Harlan prefers the term "speculative fiction" (someone correct me). As you may well know, it is not necessarily the "fiction of the future" nor of science and technology. Science and speculation help writers create unusual environments for the characters to reveal themselves in through their actions.
Jan
Harlan,
That was one really nice, affecting little piece o'prose there.
That was a good angle, Erika. Ingenious. I wish I'd thought of it before. From now on when I seek a reply from da man I'm gonna wave a term paper around.
REPLY TO ERIKA OF THE TERM PAPER ERIKA
Kiddo, that is one complex bloody query. Seemingly tidy and small, it is--of course--deep and wide and openly requiring substantial original conceptualizing. Not easy to answer; and I'd be writing your entire paper if I were to attempt even a shortie. You sneaky li'l dickens, you.
But--unless other Webderlanders take up your cause and help you summat--here is a starting place concept no one else in your class will be thinking of (I guarantee it):
History is the River of Time, and it endlessly flows away from us unchanneled and wild. It has a personality and a demeanor all its own. It can be turned in any direction or be dammed by the smallest, least obvious individual, cultural artifact, scientific device, or idle word spoken at the precise pressure-point.
The ancient invention in Mesopotamia of the stirrup, so that charging horsemen could grip a horse's flanks with the knees, thus freeing their hands to use the bow and arrow, altered the course of battles, gave victory to nations without precedent, and changed the flow of the river.
The simple EXISTENCE of the atomic bomb changed the thinking of the entire world. UNCLE TOM'S CABIN, THE SEA AROUND US, Upton Sinclair's THE JUNGLE, as just three examples of the written word, have had powerful freightings for society. The automobile altered moality as well as commerce in America.
Paradigm shifts occur daily. It takes a futurist much cannier than I to spot the ones that will matter. And similarly, a story can cause an epiphany in some fifteen-year-old today, and ten, twenty years from now...that kid will invent a surefire male contraceptive pill and bring forth the answer to Malthusian overpopulation, the abortion controversy, the sheer face of society.
Who is to know what song sung today, will be the battle anthem of tomorrow? Stories and writing are powerful. Why do you think everyone tries to censor it?
That's the best I can do for you, Erika.
Good luck.
Yr. pal, Harlan Ellison
DIMA ... STEVE BARBER ... ET AL:
Take Dima to Cafe L'Kesh on Burbank between Van Nuys Blvd and Kester.
Tell Lekesha Harlan sent you.
You will adore me for this suggestion.
Yr. pal, Harlan (& Susan)
REPLY TO JOHN SIUNTRES
Sir:
You think those perfectly cordial, mild and bland as Buddha's countenance, querulous and quavering, mewling and whimperish comments were any sort of manifestation of the so-called
"Wrath of Harlan"
?
Surely, you pull my gotkes, Slim. I was no more than civilly responsive. A touch, a tad, a soupcon of gentle pique, mayhap; but
W R A T H
?
Ho, m'lad; you obviously dunno from WRATH.
But, yes, your offer of largesse is heartily, even imperially, received here. Please do send me a CD of my dear pal and long time editrix, Ms. Schutz, speaking her piece. You can post it to me care of
The Harlan Ellison Recording Collection
Post Office Box 55548
Sherman Oaks, California 91413-0548
And if you include your own return address, as well as a working telephone number, I will attempt to get in touch with you to discuss this "interview" business. I make no promises.
Respectfully, but hardly wrathfully,
Yr. pal, Harlan
More from the "we decide, you listen" crowd. Actually some on target parody- http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1ldyn/id2.html
Heading to London this Christmahanakwanzaa season, any decent bookstores to search out? Any to avoid??
A note to Susan...
Susan, if you've another limited Essential Ellison available, could you hold it for me? I'd like to buy an inscribed copy for a friend who did me a solid. I'll be sending payment along with an envelope I'd like included with the book, and, of course, an address (one out in L.A., as it happens).
Harlan,
Hi. :) I'm seeking your opinion, and thoughts for a term paper of mine: How influential do you feel that a science fiction story can be on how a society and its technology develops? What types of observations have you had?
Anything that you can share would be mighty gracious and helpful. =)
Dima in Town, LA Weather
Keith, wish I could add to your fantasy-trip visualizations, but it's a dreary, drizzly northwest-like day in LA. But, looking ahead, the 10-day promises our cherished sun will return tomorrow.
LA-based folks: I have Dima's contact info and she has mine. She's staying in the Century City area for several days on a business trip.
Email me if you might be interested in a board group get-together-something maybe this weekend. I'm thinking uniquely old-time "LA" like Pink's, Farmer's Market or maybe Cantor's. Late night?
Something in Hollywood or Santa Monica?
Jazz club?
Anyone? Anyone? Beuhller?
The Diana Schutz Interview
HE,
My apologies for not providing more step by step info about how to hear my mp3 shows. You're right, I did assume that by now most folk have computers with mp3 players pre-installed, and that the dissatifaction with RADIO has sent many like us t the net for more diverse sounds.
However, I also feel a little warm and fuzzy that something I did, (or didn't do) incurred the "Wrath Of Harlan"!
I've loved your stories and rants for decades, and now I'm a target. Unlike Scooter Libby & Karl Rove, that's fine by me! ;)
If you still havaen't heard the interview, and want to, I'd be glad to send you a CD copy. Please e-mail me an address.
If you also don't think I'd request a future converstaion with you for my show, you're nuts! It'd be a real honor.
As a guy who grew up in Wilmette, I'd make you talk about what the hell you were doing in Evanston, Il back in the day?
I'll hang up now, and wait for my answer,
John Siuntres
wordballoon.com
Warfare, WMDs, and silly little word games.
Mark Goldberg,
Followed the link you provided. I have trouble with the Italian language, but I was able to find the video footage referenced by the link. If we are using WMDs, it wouldn’t be the first time. The problem with warfare has always been that innocent people die. I don’t think it matters if they are targeted for attack, or just get in the way of an attack. Warfare is not like a sport, played on a field, with only 2 teams. It’s messy. I’m not condoning or excusing the death of innocent people, but people always seem to suggest an outrage at chemical or biological weapon use, but no outrage for war itself. It’s sick that we’re over there. Totally sick. I mean if 8000 civilians die by mines, or by bullets, or by bombs, or by nuclear weapons or by chemical weapons, aren’t they still dead? And doesn’t it require some crazy kind of mental disconnect on our part to actually differentiate between the means of their death? A gut-shot 8 year old boy probably suffers more pain and agony, and for a longer period of time, than a phosphorous coated one.
Thanks for the link though. Shows me more than ever what a huge mistake this Iraq thing was and is, and why the Neo-Cons approach is way off base. And yes, the irony you mention is glaringly obvious.
Mike Lane,
I take fantastical and obviously false pride in the fact that as soon as I moved from Maryland to Virginia, we Virginians elected a Democrat Governor and the Marylanders elected themselves a Republican one. Thereby short-circuiting my sister and brother-in-law's argument that I was moving from civilization into a Red-Neck zone. As if I was moving to Kansas or something! Sheeeit.
Dima!
Hi yourself! I’m still feeling guilty about Cleveland. I hope you and your husband have forgiven me by now. And, I’m envious about your trip to the West coast. I would love to step into LA or San Diego right about now and enjoy the weather. Or drive up the coast from LA to San Francisco and enjoy the magnificent views. I'm sure you'll have fun.
FinderDoug!
Good to hear your keyboard-voice again. Shoot me an e-mail if you can go hiking this weekend. I’ve always wanted to hike the Manassas Battlefield Park (since I heard about it last week from another friend of mine), and this weekend could be good for getting out. Then you and I can go out whoring and drinking in Manassas. Or maybe get a game of Scrabble going. Best word I ever used in Scrabble? UVULA, against a pediatric dentist’s wife and daughter at the Danzante resort in Baja last year. That was way fun. They creamed me, though.
Be seeing you!
-Keith
"I cannot fathom as to how some people can be so numbskullish to see G. Gordon Liddy or Ollie North as some sort of hero."
"But surely this series is supposed to be a parody!"
Does it matter? If the person did this _seriously_, then obviously they're more than a little cracked. If the person did it as a _satire_, then it magically turns into _funny_.
But this bit of alchemy requires that we know, or be told, about the person's motives and values. So, either we're asking for a Nod and a Wink to make the joke more explicit... or we have to have the joke _explained_ to us.
I think it's pretty funny no matter _what_ the creators intended. The picture of _Sean Hannity_, of all dickless wonders, scowling like Judge Dredd was priceless.
Nate P wrote:
"I cannot fathom as to how some people can be so numbskullish to see G. Gordon Liddy or Ollie North as some sort of hero."
But surely this series is supposed to be a parody!
Fountain Pens
Harlan/Susan: Just wanted to verify with the source, do you have any copies of EDGEWORKS vol. 3 or 4 for sale? I didn't see them listed on the order sheet.
Mitch:
I use a fountain pen that is almost 100 years old. A Waterman 52. I love it. They just don't make nibs like it anymore, no idea why. It is the old fashioned kind that sucks up the ink and can be messy, but that is part of the charm, in my opinion.
The nib is the key when it comes to smooth writing. If your pen has a crappy nib, not much you can do. If money was no object I would buy a Pelikan 800, I tried one the other day and it was heaven. Big fat pen, with a smooth as butter nib that flowed greatly. However, I think they are around $200 or more, I think a lot more actually. Being financially embarrassed, I just can't swing that myself right now. Your bank account may vary.
The other key thing is ink. Make sure you use nice ink, I have some Schaffer, although again like the Pelikan I was recently turned on to Lamy. Wow. Smooth as buttered up baby born in butterscotch. Once you have the smoothness and scratchy part taken care of my help ends. My handwriting isn't something that I'm particularly proud of, perhaps books can improve that somehow.
I enjoy writing things by hand, as it makes you think about what you're doing and give it so much more meaning when held in hands rather than seen on screen. However, my biggest problem is you can't find fountain pens or ink, you get looked at like you stepped on a baby when you inquire at office stores. There is only one store in my state I'm aware that sells them, and its like walking into a jewelry store, I can't justify buying anything in there. So, I'll have to look to mail order over the Internet soon, as my supply of ink is nearly gone. Ironic that I'll use modern technology to buy antiquated.
Dear Mrs. Ellison,
Thanks for the reply. If you can hold one for me, (limited edition) I'd be greatful. I will notify you via the board here on the date I send the payment. Thanks again and best wishes to you.
Sincerely
Mike Lane
Fountain Pens
Friends,
I have a request. I know that Mr. Ellison has a plethora of fountain pens and probably alot of you people do as well, so you should be able to help me. I've been buying fountain pens since my high school days (and that's been awhile ago), and have tried all kinds from the inexpensive to the not-so-inexpensive ones. Thing is, I've never had much luck writing with them. I love them, love the way they look, the idea of writing in an old-fashioned manner, love owning them (like I love owning books), but my writing stinks. Not only does my writing stink, the pens always feel 'scratchy' and the ink never flows like the manuals tell me it should. 'The nib should lightly rest opon the vellum, and with expansive flourishes, using a minimal of pressure, the very ebon liquid should flow like darkest, perfect, night...' yada, yada, yada. But the ink doesn't flow for me. At least not the way I'd like.
Here's my question: could you people give me some practical advice on the care and feeding of fountain pens? Or point me in the direction of some really good books on the subject? I've searched the net and my local bookstores, but their is a dearth of reading material on such things. Right now I am using (or trying to use) a Namiki Vanishing Point pen. A beautiful retractable pen my wife bought me for Christmas a few years ago. It is a pleasure to hold. But I'd really rather find pleasure in the writing.
I would really, really appreciate any practical advice you would give me. Thank you fellows and felletes.
Mk
Look what bullshit is availible at a comic store near you.
http://accstudios.com/f/accproduct.htm
I cannot fathom as to how some people can be so numbskullish to see G. Gordon Liddy or Ollie North as some sort of hero. Its almost just as bad as the swarms of idiots that have a hard-on for McCarthy.
Mike:
Re: THE ESSENTIAL ELLISON.
We a few limited editions available. The trade is available through the stores (or discounted to HERC members directly from Morpheus). If you want the limited, I'll hold one for you. Please advise.
Thanks--Susan
Keith - Wasn't that sweet? I feel as if a great weight has been lifted from the Commonwealth's shoulders... of course, why you need to widen 66 INSIDE the Beltway is beyond me - it's a hideous bitch goddess from Centreville to Gainesville from 4 to 7:30 every night.
The Good, the Still Good, and then there's Harlan's Royalties
Ezra - For every Kansas, there's a Pennsylvania.
"DOVER, Pennsylvania (Reuters) - Voters on Tuesday ousted a Pennsylvania local school board that promoted an "intelligent-design" alternative to teaching evolution, and elected a new slate of candidates who promised to remove the concept from science classes. "
In the next graph it mentions that 8 of the 9 existing board members were edumacated out of office.
________________________________________________
Dima - You post your note after most Webderlanders have posted for the day and (legally) cannot reply until after you lose your access. Keep my email above and I'll let you know if anyone else can get together while you're in the area. Let me know possible times and where you might want to meet.
I suggest "Pinks" -- I hear there may be quite the discussion on Russian literature going on.
________________________________________________
Harlan?
I DO know a bit about the publishing industry (second-hand, but still quite reliable).
$100 a year?
(Dude. *I* make more than that, and I'm a useless nobody hack.)
Does this mean orders from HERC are not only highly recommended, but are now be tax-deductable as support of the arts? Hmmmmm...?
LA
Hi everyone,
I will be in Los Angeles from the 10th to the 15th for a conference, and I was wondering whether any of the local webderlanders would like to get together? I will probably be free most evenings. I may not have internet access after tonight, so I will check back this evening in case anyone's interested.
Regards,
Dima
P.S. Hi Keith!
Keith
I was agreeing about the election results, that is. sorry bout the double post.
Dear Mr. Ellison,
Thanks very much for your reply. I admit freely to being ignorant about the publishing industry (along with numerous other subjects, unfortunately). Although it disappoints me to find hear (or read actually) that authors don't receive much in the way of compensation for the actual sales of their books, it doesn't really surprise me. I would expect large publishing companies to take advantage of authors. Or at least that is what I would assume to be true. Not having experienced the process first hand, is this assumption correct? Or are there publishing companies that treat authors fairly while others don't? Has the relationship between the publishing industry and authors changed over time? Are things better or worse now than in the past for new authors or are they the same? Or again does it depend on the company?
Please don't take my inquiry is an attempt to "tease the cat". Since visiting this site I have a pretty good impression of how you feel about working with the film and TV industry but not the publishing industry. My question comes strictly from curiosity about something with which I have absolutely no direct experience. I'm not trying to draw you into a tirade against (or for, for that matter) the publishing industry. Nor would I expect you to provide a list of your favorite companies or "name names" or anything like that. You have better things to do, I’m sure.
It is just that my personality, upbringing, etc. are such that I tend to be suspicious of large corporate interests as they relate to the individual. This is a prejudice. I admit that as well. Someone like yourself who has started from the bottom and risen to the top in this field, knows many different authors, and doesn't pull punches would be a good source for an opinion about such an industry and might make me reconsider my assumptions about it.
And finally, since you mentioned it, do you happen to have a copy of the latest Essential Ellison a 50 Years Retrospective I can buy direct from the author? I didn’t see them on the HERC list so I figured I’d just ask. Thanks again for your response and especially for your work.
Respectfully,
Mike Lane
For Keith Kramer
I agree wholeheartedly while wiping the sweat off my brow with absolutely profoundly perplexed yet astounded relief.
Belated Thanks to Rick & Interesting Article
Rick,
You do a great job here managing the board, thank you for all of your hard work and diligence in keeping all of us in line. Have a great time with the Ellisons, and I hope you will have some fun pictures to share with us after the visit.
I came across this article and cannot believe that it has not generated more public outcry:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article325560.ece
I have no idea if the allegations within the article are true, but there needs to be a serious investigation on these charges. The use of white phosphorus in warfare is prohibited as it is a Weapon of Mass Destruction, and to use it within an urban warfare area to help secure a city (Fallujah), is nothing short of War Crimes.
I find it darkly ironic that the US was unable to find any WMDs within Iraq, yet we are accused of using them against the Iraqi population ourselves.
Kansas, Future Manufacturing Hub of the USA
-
Current State Motto: To the stars through difficulties
Suggested Motto 1: To hell with the stars.
Suggested Motto 2: We used to be progressive.
Suggested Motto 3: Seeing stars and difficulties.
and my number 4...
In the beginning there was Kansas, and it was good.
Peace Out. At least we hired ourselves another Democrat Governor in VA. If Kilgore hadn't been palling around with Bushy on the last day, it might have turned out a bit different. Thanks Prez!
-Keith
Let us all pause and thank the Lord for the good folks in Kansas rising up off their haunches and standing up against the ANTICHRIST COMMUNISTIC KABBALISTIC JIHADISTIC ATHEISTIC NO GOOD FILTHY LIBERALISTIC EVOLUTIONISTIC attempt to pull the hogwash over the eyes (how's that for a mixed metaphor) of the simple folk who know better cause well hell Pastor Collins down to First Assembly woulda told us if any that muhlarky was true!
Can a sponge think? (Sorry I stole that from INHERIT THE WIND.)
HE:
Here is a direct link to the Diana Schutz mp3.
http://www.wordballoon.com/media/wbDIANASCHUTZ.mp3
Depending on what web browser you are using, different things will happen, but in general you will be asked to either save the file to your computer so you can listen to it later, or open it immediately. (This may be the incomprehensible crap you mentioned in your post)
If you choose to open it immediately (or indeed even if you save it to your computer and choose to play it later) you will need software that can play mp3's. In which case, there are many free applications available if you don't have one already. Downloading and installing winamp prior to clicking the mp3 link from http://www.winamp.com would be a quick solution.
Brent
NATHAN PITTS:
Sorry, kiddo, but punching up that website takes me right back where I was before; and punching the 10/12 Schutz legend only brings up more incomprehensible crap. Do the idiots who design these sites not understand that not everyone is a zombie-fudgehead who instinctiverly KNOWS all this runic nonsense?
So Diana's comments are beyond my reach.
h
Segue To A Rapturous Rupture...
I grew up watching Laurel & Hardy avidly while it was on regular tv in NY.
I finally stumbled across 3 dvds with tons of their stuff. I am re-experiencing the ecstacy...the incredible ruptures of laughter...while noticing much more...
There is sexual subtext in a bunch of their stuff. The women...they cannot handle women. I mean, Stan...he doesn't know a man is not supposed to kick a lady in the ass, and proceeds to do so, only to get her retribution straight to the jaw. And there is this short called Chickens Come Home, in which a vampish flapper girlfriend from Oliver's past reappears to blackmail Mr. Hardy who is now married and, incidentally, a mayor. At one point, when she is unconscious, they prop her on Mr. Hardy's shoulders, her legs suggestively wrapped around him (this was still early 30's pre-Hays); they throw a coat over them, so that Mr. Hardy's legs (with pant legs pulled up) now appear to belong to this chick; "she" wobbles toward the door with the incongruous gait width of a horse. Oliver's wife suddenly enters and thinks she's hallucinating. Suddenly Oliver's head drops from under this lady's dress at a 90 degree angle to the floor! Looking at his wife upside down, he screams in terror and his head disappears back up the chick's dress! It looks both odd and...um...VERY tantalizing.
I gotta tell ya, man, that shot took me off guard. It was fuckin', freakin' hysterical.
So...with that, I got these gorgeous digital masters of The Music Box (which got an Oscar), Another Fine Mess, Sons Of The Desert (their best), Way Out West, Blockheads, and several other shorts that weren't quite as good as those already mentioned.
I totally treasure this stuff. I'd taken care of Chaplin 3 years ago for my collection and had waited since for these guys to come along. It's friggin' about time.
Well...I HAD to spout off. I is outright tickled.
Brian wrote:
"when I heard the news that the cousin I'd held as an infant was now dead, I thought of this incident... and wondered if they'd ask me to be a pall-bearer."
My GOD that is the singular most awful thing I've ever READ!!! Just BAD. I thought I was going to rupture an eyeball laughing.
Cindy
Shout out to Faisal-- where you been kid?
This past week, a cousin of mine died, and a friend's mom passed away. Y'all don't have to post anything like condolences; I know they're meant well, but my couin and I weren't close, and condolences make me feel a little uncomfortable.
I was talking about this with my friend, K-- how we don't seem to fit the expectations of how the bereaved should be bereaving. K knew her mom was going this year; her mom had severe emphysema and insisted on stoking up on a pack a day, so it really was a matter of months. During that time, K had made some preliminary arrangements for the funeral. She got her mom to sign the proper Do Not Resuscitate paperwork, and start lining up the records indicating the disposition of the estate.
Amazingly, when she told a co-worker about this, the co-worker opined that K must be a very cold person. How could she _plan_ for her _mother_ to _die_? Never mind the simple pragmatics-- that when her mom _did_ die, she _might_ go to pieces, and it's best to have as much taken care of when she's in her right mind. And, when she did go to take care of the funeral issues, she scrupulously avoided dealing with the female relatives-- because they tended to dwell on the mourning and misery, and what a _loss_ it was, and how _awful_ she must feel... And that was the last thing she wanted to have thrown at her.
And we talked about how we _never_ feel the "right" way at funerals. She asked me how I deal with the Heaven chatter since I'm an atheist. I said that I keep that stuff to myself, but I don't participate in the prayers, or even take the Host. I -could_, having been confirmed in the Catholic Church... but at some point I realized that taking it would be "faking it," or _lying_, about one of the holiest acts in the Church, and it'd actually be an _insult_. But, I always worry that some relative will be offended that I don't, and that I should take the Host... if only to make relatives feel better. (No one has, by the way. It's never come up, and that's good.)
So we talked about how there's just so much _wrong_ with the popular wisdom about what mourning people "need." There's this assumption that what people need to feel better are simulated goodbyes and assurances of an afterlife. But even the most religious people are trying to sort out the lack of closure, the seeming randomness and unfairness of a death, the fact that a loved one is _no longer there_... and while the happy afterlife chat can help mourners from getting too unruly, it doesn't really _help_ address that.
I read her a piece of Harlan's introduction to _Angry Candy_, which echoed a lot of our conversation. At this, the worst of times. it's as though some of us exist under a tyranny. The cheap sentiment rules, and will be broadcast to the accepting and unquestioning public. But the things which mean something, which help, which explicate what we are and what we need and what we could become if we face the facts of mortality... that has to stay underground, spoken quietly and in private, and shared directly.
And to end this note with some levity: I first met my cousin when I was six, and my uncle brought him over when he was less than a month old. I asked if I could hold him... and I promptly _dropped_ him. Uncle was furious. And when I heard the news that the cousin I'd held as an infant was now dead, I thought of this incident... and wondered if they'd ask me to be a pall-bearer.
click her name
Sorry to post again Rick, just wanna help Harlan out real quick.
Harlan,
At http://www.wordballoon.com/SCHUTZ.html, there are the words
"NEW 10/12 DIANA SCHUTZ"
That's a link. Click it and presto, the voice of the Lovely Lady Diana, Princess of Darkhorse in mp3.
Nathan Pitts
"Strange Wine" in Panama City
...So my wife and I are wrapping up a 2-week trip to Panama (yes, the country), and were walking around Panama City yesterday. On the corner of a major street downtown is a great bookstore called ExedraBooks, which features a large selection of both Spanish and English-language books, as well as some music CDs and a nice cafe.
As you walk in, there´s a table set right inside the entrance with "featured" books, which included bestsellers by Dan Brown, Jeffery Deaver...
...and the Edgeworks Abbey imprint of "Strange Wine," sitting right up front. They also had a second copy of the book in the general Fiction (NOT Science Fiction) English-language section in the store.
Anyway, I don´t know who runs the store, Harlan, but I thought I´d pass along the info that you seem to have a fan among the bookstore staff, here in the steamy metropolis of Panama City. I took a digital photo of it that I could probably send to Rick, or post on a server space, so you could see it (but I´ll have to do it after I get back home tomorrow night.)
Take care,
-- Jon
Thank you, Mr. Ellison
I'm sending this again, in case Mr. Ellison missed it the first time around. If he did see it, but simply chose to make no comment, then that is okay, too.
Thank you, Mr. Ellison, for replying to my comment and question.
The editor of the issue I was referencing was, indeed, Mr. Robert Lowndes.
I have found a letter you sent to the editor of FANTASTIC Science Fiction magazine, published in the October, 1957 issue. It's a lengthy letter, some four pages, where you take to task the people who had been complaining about the cost of FANTASTIC going from 25 cents to 35. It's a really neat letter.
It begins: "Sitting in an Army barracks in Kentucky, so far from New York and the writing game, the perspective shifts, and a lot of things became clearer. One of them is the sound of some of the letters in the August FANTASTIC."
You later say, "Charity does not pay off. Hard work and talent do."
You wind up with, "But be tolerant. And in some cases, fellas, kindly, grow up a little, willya?"
In addition, I found the August, 1957 issue of SCIENCE FICTION ADVENTURES: 3 COMPLETE NEW NOVELS BY TOP WRITERS! It includes your story "Forbidden Cargo." (Fargo Jeffers hated war, and didn't relish the job of ferrying hundreds of war-torn corpses back to Earth - that is, until a hidden enemy tried to stop him!)
But, what I thought was most interesting, was this note from the editor, found on the first page of the story:
"As this issue goes to press, Harlan Ellison is leaving for Army service. He hopes to continue writing science fiction in spite of his military duties - at least after he finishes basic training. We hope he can too; we want more Ellison stories! Harlan's vast output makes it hard to think of him as a 'promising' writer, but as a matter of fact, his career has been brief, and we fully expect even greater things to come from him."
As a Vietnam veteran, I'd like to thank you for your years of service to our country back in the 50s, and for making good on that editor's prediction of "greater things to come."
Okie
Old news, Jeff, and hardly worth mentioning in the first place.
In this day and age, why should sexual orientation matter? Shouldn't we, as a self-proclaimed "advanced" society, care nothing at all about who is Gay or Black or Latino as long as that person harms no one and contributes in some way to our society?
Sulu is gay? Oh my......
OPEN LETTER TO THE MYSTERIOUS GREG STROUD
Dear Greg:
Every year your untraceable birthday gift arrives, every year Susan and I indulge ourselves in decadent dining, and every year I try in vain to locate you. I don't pursue the chore obsessively, because it's clear to both of us that you do it with a generous nature and a desire to remain a shadowy figure of largesse.
But this year we went to MAX, as your gift certificate properly directed. It's been a long year, with a lot of out-of-towning, so though the certificate arrived in May, we didn't get to the elegant MAX till late last week. Belated 71st birthday gift.
Our good friend Charles Edward Pogue, and his wife Julieanne, are leaving Hollywood for the wilds of Louisville, Kentucky --and with Julieanne in Ky. to do some prelim work on their new house--we hosted Chas. Edward at MAX.
I cannot begin to enthuse with sufficient prolixity anent the spiffy comestibles, save to asssure you that I had TWO blindingly superb appetizers, two desserts, and side dishes to sate a satyr. The steak was au poivre. The only thing that would have emboldened the evening more would have been a way to share a toast--coffee please--with our mysterious benefactor, the estimable Greg Stroud.
It is my fervent hope that somewhichway this note-in-a-bottle gets to you.
Thank you again, and again, and yet again.
Yr. pal, Harlan
REPLY TO MIKE LANE
MIKE LANE:
Your purchasing habits affect me not at all. SFBC pays an advance...small...keeps reprinting for years...provides no understandable royalty statement...provides no advisement of how many reprint editions they've sausaged-out, nor pub dates of same...and if they pay any roaylties at all, they are minuscule.
Used book stores provide zero money to me, but I have no prob with that. I think used bookstores are terrific, and I like to keep them in business, which is why I usually sign a copy or two for reputable shoppes. But if I get EVEN a smile and a thankyou, I'm ahead of the game, since virtually ALL bookstore owners delude themselves that they are earning ME a living and I should be overwhelmed with joy to sign on for hours and hours without them even offering me an emplyee's discount for books I might want to purchase ... when, in fact, I'd estimate what I get--after 75 books--from ALL bookstores, new, used, internet, whatever, is less than a hundred bucks a year.
Buy a new book, and I might get a royalty of a buck or so after they've recouped their advance. If I make the wheel squeak loudly enough.
Buy a used book, from anyone but Susan and me directly, and I get squat. That's why I started selling my own titles, out of print, personalized and in mint condition.
Does this information, known to virtually everyone with even a passing association to the world of publishing, come to you fresh and new? How surprising.
Respectfully, Harlan Ellison
REPLY TO EB , ET AL
The website for looking at Diana Schutz's "wordballoons" chat that mentions the upcoming final issue of HARLAN ELLISON'S DREAM CORRIDOR, as given by EB, only gets me to a dormant site that contains the Dillon's cover of an old issue of the Dream Corridor. I can't get ti to do anything else, and the stupid set-up at the website offers no other path to the material EB apparently glommed. If anyone can provide SIMPLE directions, in an alternate way, I'd be relieved and grateful.
Goddam interfriggingnetsumbitch!!
Yr. pal, Harlan C. Magnon, gnawer of ivory artifacts
REPLY TO MICHAEL CAHLIN
Easily done. Get either/both your phone number and address to us via Rick Wyatt, our webmaster, and/or ask Rick for our phone number, and we'll make it as easy as 1-2-3.
For a pittance.
And thank you for going through channels. Bravo!
Harlan Ellison
I just received my latest packet of offers from the Science Fiction book club today. In it is an offering for an illustrated Spider-Man authored by Adam Troy-Castro, plus the info that the next release to be offered in the SFBC 50th Anniversary collection, will be Deathbird Stories by Harlan. I sure hope it will be in the next issue in just a few weeks time so I can get a new copy ordered. Yes, I do have the original, but with the new forward, how can I resist. Did I read the new issue of Dream Corridor will not be out till next year? I was really getting pumped about getting a new one. I'm reading a series of novels by Kristine Kathryn Rusch right now, the Retrieval Artist Novels. I picked up my first one at a used book sale and liked it so much I went out and bought 3 more in the series. Oddly enough I'm not reading them in the order they were printed, I started with the third one published and am on the second, The Disappeared right now. Next will be Polaris by Jack McDevitt and then two from Dan Simmons, Ilium and Olympus That would be unless I get something, anything, new by Harlan in the near future. Harlan's stuff always goes to the top of the pile.
John Fowles and F. Scott Fitzgerald
Dang. Having just now learned of John Fowles' death (and me right in the middle of DANIEL MARTIN), I came here to spread the news, only to find that I have been scooped. You folks are too up-to-the-minute for me.
* * *
A few weeks ago, I read something in F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel, TENDER IS THE NIGHT -- written a lifetime ago -- that seemed to me to describe perfectly George W. Bush and his presidency: "The strongest guard is placed at the gateway to nothing. Maybe because the condition of emptiness is too shameful to be divulged."
Just thought I'd share that.
Re: "Twilight Zone," here's an interesting press release (scroll down to the bullet points):
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=109706&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=779357&highlight=
must've had silver on the brain
Serling...no t. duh.
"Too"
When congratulating people on literacy, you should be literate yourself...
Humor of the Day
This person deserves Website of the Day status:
If Fox News Had Been Around Throughout History
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1ldyn/id2.html
___________________________________________
Also, kudos for teaching "Jeffty...". All to often kids today believe good literature is for little more than decorating the mantle.
Who needs an electron gun when you've paper?
Today I found Rod Sterlings 'More Stories From the Twilight Zone', Alfred Hitcock's 'Happy Deathday' AND 'Noose Report' anthologies.
I'd love to see Dick Wolf edit a Law and Order anthology; that'd be keen.
Michael Cahlin,
I cannot answer your question, but I do want to give you a pat on the back for teaching "Jeffty is Five". Back in 97/98 (my senior year), I showed "Jeffty" to my English teacher, asking her if we could use it in our class. I lent her my Essential Ellison, and the next day she gives the book back saying "I don't get it. Is the kid always five?" and some such dumb shit.
Using "Jeffty is Five" in my class`
I would like to use "Jeffty is Five" as one of the short stories in my lesson plan for 11th and 12th grader college prep class. How do I go about making LEGAL copies so I can expose my students to Harlan without making Harlan crazy.
Question for Mr. Ellison
Dear Mr. Ellison
I recently picked up a copy of Dangerous Visions at a used book store and found that it was a book club edition. This reminded me of a question that I wanted to ask you. Book club editions of hard backs and paperbacks are usually offered at some savings to the reader and I was wondering if there was any difference in payments to the author for copies sold in various editions offered by the publishers. Also, you obviously don't get compensated when I buy a used book that you wrote and I assume there is some difference in compensation for hard cover versus paperback sales. I purchase books both new and used and also through one book club. But how do my purchasing habits affect you and other authors?
Fowles has flown
Hmmm. Well, I have been one of Fowles's champions on the Web; I didn't recall his coming up here all that often, though. (Somewhere or other, Harlan placed his name on a list of authors he admired. . . .)
I only just learned of his passing less than 15 minutes ago, from a post by a regular on rec.arts.books. Very sorry to hear about it, but Fowles has been struggling ever since a big stroke 'way back in 1988 (nasty habit, cigarette smoking), closely followed by the death of his beloved wife Elizabeth.
I saw him speak here in Portland in the spring of 1996, and he mentioned working at a leisurely pace on at least one novel, and perhaps as many as three. I hope one or more of them is in sufficiently polished shape to be published before too long.
And of course, someone else could go on editing his journals and bringing them to print. (I must admit I have a copy of volume 1 but haven't gotten around to reading it. Right now I'm enjoying Poe and Collier, and slogging to the end of Gao Xingjian's Nobel-winning _Soul Mountain_, which I did not much enjoy, for a book group.)
John Fowles
David Loftus--I heard about John Fowles death yesterday and immidiately thought of you. Odd, I suppose, because I only know of you through Webderland. I was sorry to hear the news.
(Will introduce myself on the users page soon, but now I gotta stop reading posts and get to work. Damn.)
--Bret
. . . . the twilight of the word . . . ?
Check this one out - caught this tonight on BBC World here on Foxtel :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4294818.stm
'US school swaps books for bytes'
and
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4295084.stm
'Diary of a laptop school pupil'
Cheers,
Dougie.
Lloyd Bochner
I am sad to report the passing of LLOYD BOCHNER on October 29th of cancer. Mr. Bochner, the father of HART BOCHNER another good actor usually in television movies, was a staple of character actors in character roles both on the big screen and in television in the 50's, 60's and 70's. He played the part of the hapless future gourmet meal of the alien in the episode TO SERVE MAN, in the original TWILIGHT ZONE. You can find out more on this excellant actor of character roles on IMbd, THE MOVIE DATABASE on your computer.
http://www.wordballoon.com/SCHUTZ.html
An interview with uber-editor DIANA SCHUTZ. Topics include Will Eisner, Michael Chabon's "The Escapist", Jeff Smith and "The Art of Bone", and the next volume of HE's "Dream Corridor" (to be released....next summer...damn; why oh why must we wait so long?)
"Here, of course, we are models of decorum and maturity, critical readers of progressive literature, and just all-around back-slappin' pals."
Oh, man, god-bless, effing coffee. Effing-friggin' blankety-blank-blak nostrils....
People who've lived in the Los Angeles area for awhile, people who enjoy Mark Evanier's work or people who enjoy reading interesting anecdotes about restaurants and LA may enjoy this section of Evanier's webpage I ran across when he updated it:
www.povonline.com/larestaurants/larestaurants01.htm
It's basically Mark Evanier's anecdotes about famous and not-so-famous Los Angeles restaurants that no longer exist and that he went to at some point. Enjoyable stuff, and I say that as someone who's never been in LA. He's also updated his Kirby FAQ (to which I can only add that Evanier's Kirby biography, when it comes, will be worth a hearty hurrah).
Cheers, Jon
>where we make asses of ourselves, bicker, whine<
And how constantly we do that, too. Thus the gift for Mr. Wyatt, in appreciation for providing the pen.
Here, of course, we are models of decorum and maturity, critical readers of progressive literature, and just all-around back-slappin' pals.
For those, like Todd, who know not where to turn in regards to receiving a Private Message (PM), herewith a quick five minute block of instruction:
1) On this very page, there is a link that says "another place". It is not the Phantom Zone. Well, maybe it is, but the point is, the other place is the board where we make asses of ourselves, bicker, whine, and otherwise make fun of Rob and Frank.
2) Click on that link. You know...the one that says "another place".
3) If you do not know who you are, you can check the "Memberlist". It can be sorted by username.
4) If you forgot your password, there's a nifty link for those that don't remember.
There you go. Easy as 1, 2, 3. And 4.
"Check your PM's on the Forum."
What if we don't go onto the forums? I don't even know my user name and password.....or maybe I know my username, but not my password. I don't usually spend any time in the forums. So, how do these PM's go out?
Just interested.
-TODD
"The history of film as a self-conscious art, as a major financial institution, as a significant shaping force on the modern mind and the modern world begins with D.W. Griffith.
It may be argued that his contribution-a contribution that may be summarized by saying that he had the insight to understand that a technological novelty could be converted into an instrument capable of sustaining complex narrative development-would ultimately have been provided by someone else. But no matter. The stubborn fact remains that it was he who made this contribution first, this strange and even unlikely man. And it was a great achievement, one that has few parallels in the history of art."
Richard Schickel.
"D.W. Griffith, a magician of tempo and shadow. A revelation."
Sergei Eisenstein.
Dream Corrider to be A TV Series?
From the WebSite Dark Horizons, talkign about new Dark Horse Media Projects:
"Ellison's project is a "Twilight Zone"-type anthology called "Dream Corridor," on which pre-production is set for early next year."
I don't check in as often as I would like, but I thought if anyone could shed some light on this exciting news, it would be this fine group of people.
Is this information true, or has reality started to crack?
Please let me know so I can stop taking my medication.
Scott
For any of you out there who still find time to read books, Viking has published a new translation of Borges' BOOK of IMAGINARY BEINGS in a nice hardback edition. The translation is by Andrew Hurley with illustrations by Peter Sis.
If we're going to start copyrighting plotlines, I've got dibs on that "boy meets girl" thing.
Faisal,
"As far as I am aware, Eisenstein didn't do any work on War of the Worlds beyond Paramount forwarding the book to him (or according to one biographer"
My post - that is what I was trying to claim - may have been a little confusing since the opening reads that Eisenstein "started filming an adaptation of Wells' WAR OF THE WORLDS"; I tend to use that line, even when I refer strictly to preproduction without any shooting. But I did say - I thought with a LITTLE clarity - that Eisenstein worked on the script, then dropped from the project before any filming began.
I read about it a few nights ago in Filmfax - a reputable mag cranked out by the same guys who do Ouvre. According to the piece, Eisenstein was brought over here by Paramount (Hollywood was interested in his talents now) - they'd owned the property from the point DeMille picked it up to when Pal finally filmed it (and, who, incidentally, almost had to shut down production when a lawyer approached him and said Paramount ONLY owned the SILENT film rights to the novel, not the SOUND version!) - and he actually did work on a script (unless my ADD kicked in while I was reading; one gets distracted when he's trying to hit on girls in a bookstore while perusing a mag at the same time).
Tell your friend about that piece so that he can match his info with theirs.
...and tell us what goes down with you in Uzbeckistan.
JONO-
Sorry; overlooked your response. Thanks. I don't think your Canadian address has anything to do with the estimated ship date. I think Amazon has a warehouse in neighboring Nevada and I'm still looking at a late December/early January ship.
As far as the storyline patents are concerned, well...damn, that's just scary. I hope the whole monstrous concept gets shredded under scrutiny, but after watching the copyright extensions stretch on and on in recent years I'm not so optimistic. Cultural stagnation, ho!
--
Ever your purveyor of pessism and sweeper of generalizations,
Ryan
Make that "disappears".
And speaking of Frank, where the heck is he?
I post him a genuine hand crafted black helicopter haiku and he up and dissapears.
Wait a minute, you don't think...
Ambrose Bierce
I wish A&E, The History Channel or even Hollywood research and develop the "true" story on the life and death (or disappearance) of Ambrose Bierce. I know they tried it with Gregory Peck, Jane Fonda and Jimmy Smits in the film THE OLD GRINGO...But hey! As far as I know, that was all fictional because being an avid reader of World History, I never heard of a Mexican Revolutionary General by the name of Tomas Arroyo (played by Smits)...I believe Pancho Villa was resposnsible for Bierce's disappearance and death in a big way.
er...errata
that's "though" not "thought."
So, Rick...
Two quick stories, one common lesson:
1. Nine months ago I loaned a friend at work the first 4 seasons of the Sopranos DVDs, because he and his wife had only gotten into it at season 4. I got the DVDs back in dribs and drabs as they got through them.
2. Two months ago, I had the faulty air-conditioner blower in my car replaced at a local gas/garage. The mecahnic gave me a great deal on the part (I checked and would have paid almost twice as much at the Ford dealer), so after I settled the bill in the office, I found the mechanic and gave him a $20.00 tip, and a hearty and sincere thank you.
When my friend gave me the season four DVD set back, he also gave me season five, shrink wrapped, that he bought for me in appreciation of loaning him the first four. I was flabbergasted and very grateful. A few weeks ago, going to work, I pulled into the gas station to fill up, and my battery died right at the pump. Car would not start. I went into the packed garage (3 bays, 3 cars deep in each bay), found a mechanic (it happend to be the one I tipped many months ago), and he came over, diagnosed my car, hooked up a temp battery, drove it over and put it at the end of one of the lines, and got it out in 15 minutes, ahead of everyone else. I thanked him profusely.
So, Rick. Thought neither of my initial acts was intended to gain anything for myself, kindness and gratitude was reflected back like the light from a dozen mirrors over a lantern.
Thank you, for Webderland.
-Keith
You're exactly right, Rob. You and Frank were the primary motivators in our desire to acknowledge Rick's efforts on the boards.
By the way, an item of interest to Ellison fans. Apparently the BATMAN Anthology has mention of Ellison in one of the documentaries of the making of. To quote from the review:
"The immense effort begins with "Legends of the Dark Knight: The History of Batman," a 40-minute look back of the character, from the page to the small screen to the big screen and everywhere else. An impressive roster of participants, including Harlan Ellison, Frank Miller, Kevin Smith, and Stan Lee, put the character into historical context and talk about what makes Batman the cultural icon he is."
Hitchcock / GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK
The prospect of an Eisenstein or Hitchcock WAR OF THE WORLDS fills me with deep sadness. (Sigh). It joins the long, long list of other discussed but abandoned opportunities, including the Welles version of the story that became DEAD CALM, Hitchcock's own version of the sinking of the TITANIC, and (perhaps the single most heartbreaking unmade film of all time), Kubrick's NAPOLEON.
Seconding any recommendation for GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK. One of this year's very, very few indispensable films.
Rob,
As far as I am aware, Eisenstein didn't do any work on War of the Worlds beyond Paramount forwarding the book to him (or according to one biographer, H.G Wells offering the rights to him and Eisenstein offering it to Paramount). Bernard Rose may know more about this so I've emailed him about this.
If Eisenstein did shoot anything, its safe to assume that Jay Leyda, Ivor Montague and others would have pursued a copy if possible. Look at how diligently Russian film historians and Eisenstein's colleagues preserved many of his notes and fragments of Ivan the Terrible Part III. Or even now there are film buff's who'd love to get hands on the (badly preserved) rushes of Que Viva Mexico.
Was a script done for War of the Worlds? I can't say but if so, why wasn't it released like his adaptation of Theodore Dreiser's An American Tragedy (seen as one of the classic unmade Eisenstein projects)? It should do, I'd love to read it. Any chance you can send me the source of this story and I can investigate further.
Incidentally, I'll be working in Uzbeckistan in late December at the same studio's where Sergei Eisenstein was working during WW2.
FAQ
Rick, that's the payoff for the years of ulcers we've given you.
**I just learned that the great director Sergie Eisenstein came to Hollywood in the early 30's and started filming an adaptation of Wells' WAR OF THE WORLDS. He actually completed the script. Then, for whatever reasons, he dropped from the project before any shooting could start, and the property went back to the shelves.
Wells was constantly approached by filmmakers from all over the world throughout his career, and this story was probably the most frequently sought. Cecil B. DeMille first bought the rights in 1927. It got shelved. In the late 30's, yet another of the world's greatest directors, Hitchcock, pushed hard for the rights (this was before 'ol young Orson came along with the radio show); and this is the tale that really gets me: Wells insisted that his book was too dated, and he could not be convinced - however determined Hitch was on the issue - that WOTW could be updated. I'd REALLY like to know what Wells was thinking. I mean how close can an author get to his story before he forgets what a GREAT story it really is? It blows my mind.
When I imagine what kind of take on the book we'd have seen from EITHER Eisenstein OR Hitchcock...JEEZUS!
(Another item that was news to me: Wells disliked Lang's METROPOLIS. When Alexander Korda made a deal with him to do THINGS TO COME, the author said, "this is where I correct Lang's mistake". Of course, after Korda's movie was done, Wells was displeased with the treatment of his script as well. While I remain an obssessive fan of ALL these guys, I will never figure out some of you authors)
***Just saw GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK. Beautiful anatomy of early tv journalism and its potential stakes. Clooney is a great guy.
Prince Myshkin and George Clooney
I came home this evening after my wife and I went to see George Clooney's incredible "Good Night, and Good Luck" at the Edwards Towncenter, a film I'd urge every red-, blue- and possibly green-blooded person on this planet to see not only once but twice and maybe a third time. A challenging topic, superb acting (esp. David Strathairn who was literally channeling Edward R.), intelligent writing, striking cinematography, and a whale of a jazz soundtrack featuring the incomparable Diane Reeves. This is a classic in need of an audience, kids.
Anyway, as we were heading up the walkway, escorted by our feline alpha pet Frankie with his tail held highly in the air to announce that the "three" of us were home, I stopped by the mailbox and retrieved a padded yellow envelope.
At first my heart dropped. "One of your cd's was sent back," I told my wife.
She looked down at the proffered package.
"Not unless it was addressed to you," she retorted.
Which is just my very lengthy way to tell Susan that I got the cassettes she sent, laughed out loud at your note, tested the tapes (both worked) and I will be returning the requested/required postcard with the appropriate box checked off. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Can't I please just win the lottery and spend every day like this? Please?
SB
Just thought I'd let people know--if it hasn't been mentioned already--that there's a very brief mention of Ellison on the DVD for Stone Reader. In an excerpt from Roger Ebert's film festival, Ebert talks about a mutual friend of his and Mossman (the subject of the movie) with whom Egbert drove to some midwest science fiction convention to meet Ellison.
Hope this isn't old news to everyone. Stone Reader is a darn fine movie, by the by.
Rick: We loves ya, man. This gift has been too long in coming. I hope you now get the sense of how much we appreciate all your hard work on our and Harlan's behalf. Enjoy your trip and let us know all about it when you get back. You deserve a nice, all expenses paid vacation.
Todd: Check your PM's on the Forum. You were contacted. We did our best to attempt to get word to everyone. This isn't the only way to say thank ya, either. Use your imagination.
PAB
INFOMITE: Thanks, Mite - I was SO hoping that it was just a nasty dream or a reaction to my meds or some bizarre halucination.
RICK: Congrats, bubie! Let me know when you're hitting LA - maybe we can finally meet face-to-face!
Cheers,
Doc
My take on the essential Ellison
Dear Mr. Ellison,
Thank you for your excellent stories. The first piece I read of your's was 'The Deathbird'; it was collected in a shiny silver paperback I found, no kidding, in a drugstore rack in 1974. You'd probably recall. It was one of Terry Carr's, and had Gene Wolfe and James Tiptree Jr. and Ursula K. Le Guin and Jack Vance et al. 31 years later, that book still resonates with me.
If you will, here's my list, after considering your work over three decades.
I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream
All the Lies That Are My Life
Seeing
She’s a Young Thing, and Cannot Leave Her Mother
I See a Man Sitting on a Chair, and the Chair is Biting His Leg [with Robert Sheckley]
Along the Scenic Route
Jeffty is Five
Grail
The Beast That Shouted Love at the Heart of the World
Shatterday
The Whimper of Whipped Dogs
The Man Who Rowed Christopher Columbus Ashore
Croatoan
“Repent, Harlequin!” Said the Ticktockman
The Region Between
Pretty Maggie Moneyeyes
Flop Sweat
Mephisto in Onyx
All the Birds Come Home to Roost
A Boy and His Dog
From A to Z, in the Chocolate Alphabet
Paladin of the Lost Hour
The Resurgence of Miss Ankle-Strap Wedgie
Hitler Painted Roses
The Hour That Stretches
Shattered Like a Glass Goblin
Soft Monkey
Brillo
Adrift Just Off the Islets of Langerhans, Lat. 38, 54 N, Long. 77, 00, 13 W
The Deathbird
I'm grateful for the many fine hours I've spent with your stories. Kindest regards.
Well, I think we made Rick blush, anyway.
Please keep in mind that we tried to contact everybody thru email or PMing over on the other board, but that universality was always either going to be impossible or was going to require that the gift was going to be sent sometime in the Year 3002 when we finally tracked Frank Church down to his hiding place in the trackless sewers of Angkor Wat. As this came together in three weeks, two conference calls and 1211 emails (I counted; my hard drive is now full), it's about as good as a freshman attempt was going to get without stretching everything out into a never-arriving future.
Thanks again to Rick and to the contributors.
Cheers, Jon Stover
Silly lawyer, ideas are for artists...
Doc,
I saw that earlier today on Fark -- it is exactly what you think it is -- this concept is earnestly proposing that talentless people should be paid money -- serious money -- from their artistic betters simply because they imagined they thought of a cool idea...
At plotpatents.com, it says this under the 'about us' link: "Since then, he has conceived of a variety of unique fictional storylines. Recognizing that fierce competition for publication and financial reward focused on the quality of storytelling, as opposed to the quality of the underlying storyline itself, and further recognizing that even the world’s most skilled storytellers (of which he is clearly not) rarely turn a profit, his unique fictional storylines have matured into pending patent applications instead of novels or screenplays. He thus seeks reward on the true value of his innovations—the underlying storylines—instead of forced, sub-par expressions of these underlying storylines."
---
And after all the legalese under the link 'legal analysis' these three paragraphs distill his entire theory down to relatively understandable language:
"There is currently little motivation for artistic inventors to innovate new plots, themes, and methods of expression. The value of an innovator’s copyright, if he in fact embodies his invention in a particular expression (such as a novel or movie) is far less than the value of the invention itself, because the invention umbrellas every possible embodiment. Further, and perhaps more importantly, the value of his copyright depends on his ability as a performer, not as an inventor. An artistic inventor who invents a fantastically original and compelling storyline may not be a particularly skilled writer. He may, for example, have a very limited vocabulary and a poor understanding of grammar. Any book he creates will be avoided by any potential buyer who reads the first paragraph, such that the copyright value of his extremely valuable invention is nil. Any Hollywood producer who sees through the book’s garbled sentence structure to the excellent and creative plot beneath the surface may steal the only value the book contained: its inventive plot. The producer may then moderately alter the expression of the plot in a subsequent movie—while keeping the plot’s essence fully intact—and obtain unearned financial benefit from the inventor’s unrewarded hard work and innovation. If there is any evil that the United States patent system ought to prevent, it is this.
"Said another way: the value of a singer’s performance or a dancer’s performance or a writer’s performance or an artist’s performance is in the performance, while the value of an inventor’s invention is in the invention, not a single instance, embodiment, expression, or performance of the invention. The value of a performance is protected by copyright; the value of an invention is not. An artistic innovator is given but two choices absent patent protection: to sacrificially innovate for the unearned benefit of thieves, or to not innovate. Both options are morally and practically repulsive.
"A patent system that sanctions and defends patents on artistic inventions, such as new and nonobvious plots, will spur an array of never-seen-before, never-experienced-before, intellectually inspiring forms of entertainment. A patent system that lethargically clings to an as-of-yet unarticulated rule that artistic inventions are not patentable subject matter because they are not closely enough related to a mechanical gear or an electronic integrated circuit will guarantee our nation the same repertoire of mind numbing movies and dime-a-dozen boy bands."
---
You needn't read any further to understand what he's trying to do. The sad, sad thing is that the legal arguments appear to be based on sound precedent -- and may actually sway some judges -- because largely, patent law has already stumbled merrily and drunkenly down the path of idiocy...
There are a number of reasons why it'll never work -- most of them having to do with the incredible cost of monitoring and litigating every conceivable "infringement" of the patented idea. It would be a money pit of unmeasurable proportions, and it's just silly, to boot... But -- it's also completely wrong on the face of it -- Hollywood remakes endlessly not because there's a dearth of original material out there to be adapted -- it's because the art is controlled by talentless beancounters who are afraid of innovation and are comforted by the notion that if the public bought the idea once, they'll do it again and again...
informationally,
the mite
Could someone have a look at this tripe and tell me I've misunderstood, or that it's a horrible dream or, or,... or just not what it looks like? This thing makes my head hurt - it makes me want to make Andrew Knight's head hurt. I feel outraged, but I get so lost in legalese, I can't say for certain whether I *should* feel outraged, or if it's just frustration with the jargon. Nevertheless, the ocncept seems loathesome...
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20051103183218268
or
www.PlotPatents.com
Cheers,
Doc
Package Received
Harlan, Susan:
Your lifesaving package arrived in today's mail. Thanks again. It's understating the case to say I owe you one, more accurate to say I owe you one more. Catch you soonest...!
Adam
HARLAN-
Thanks for the reply.
OKIE-
"I have found a letter you sent to the editor of FANTASTIC Science Fiction magazine, published in the October, 1957 issue."
Is this the issue bearing the space-gladiator-with-a-sword cover image and with the top story banner of "A WORLD CALLED VICIOUS"?
Thanks.
--
Ryan
Rick - You're A Peach
Rick, As one who has been on the board since 2001, I also toss out a grand THANK YA.
I wasn't invited into the ticket fund team, but if I was, I woulda.
-TODD
a herd of gift horses
Ahhhhh, shut up, Rick! Whether you deserve it or not -- and it's our call, really -- you're getting it.
I'm not one for trying to hunt up old issues of skiffy pulps, so I don't know how difficult it would be to find a copy out my way, but if the provenance of the HE letters and references in these old magazines turns out to be true, is there any way of getting a copy of the text, at least? Maybe getting the content typeset and put on Webderland somewhere?
Yay Rick! Hope you have a most excellent time with The Man! I'd also like to second Steve's request for a report afterwards. And pics! We want new pics!
Jon - We really need FOOR buttons! Or maybe a coffee mug.
Ryan - I ordered mine October 5, and the estimated arrival is Dec 5 - 20, but maybe that's because I'm happily located in Canukistan.
ATC - The only complaint I have with the Val Lewton set is the crappy and cheap packaging, but I've only watched the documentary disc (which was pretty impressive!). That may have been a mistake, as I haven't seen any of these movies.
luv to all,
jono
Read This
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/11/emw303435.htm
Instructions
Rick - Naturally, we here in Webderland expect an extensive "what I did on my Harlan vacation" report upon your completion.
________________________________________________
Cookie, just getting something into the mail today.
________________________________________________
It can't be November already. It just can't.
I'm not ready.
>don't think I deserve it<
You deserve it, pallie. Down a few sidecars in L.A. and toast the many ghosts in that fine town.
GOG
Holy shit
Nothing makes a cynic feel stupid more than people being amazing.
I saw a forums post from Paula a while back with an address like "palsofrick" so I thought someone might be doing something like getting together a card or invited me to a con or doing a special e-mail. I deliberately didn't look into it because I am not the sort of person to look in the closet for presents. But I knew SOMETHING was up.
However, I'd forgotten about that. And I never DREAMED it would be something like this!
I hope it goes without saying that I am moved. I handle people doing nice things for me about as well as Harlan - which is to say I get embarrassed and flustered by it, don't think I deserve it, and don't know how to respond. I feel like I am more of a dedicated hall monitor these days than a webmaster. The site desperately needs updating, and I need to take better care of people like Tim Richmond and Michael Reed who could really benefit from some attention and exposure in the good work they are doing. But the e-mails and forum stuff takes up too much of the time I have to devote, and I no longer have more than 10-15 hours a week to spend. These are all things I hope to rectify if my job and life ever slow down again, but in the meantime I feel like I am not doing enough.
That you guys think despite that I still have done anything worthy of having something this nice done for me, well, I'm flabbergasted. Really. I don't know what to say. I am capable of running on for pages when I'm pissed off but praise and kindness stifle me.
HARLAN - I have an absolutely KILLER weekend ahead but I will give you a buzz Monday or Tuesday to discuss. I don't have a lot of vacation time at the moment but I feel it would be criminal to not use this gift in the spirit in which it was offered. We'll talk.
THE REST OF YOU - thank you. You've made my day, my weekend, maybe my year. And this has been a good year for me.
Harlan, met up with Bob Andelman last weekend at the St. Pete. Festival of Reading. He wrote the authorized Will Eisner bio., A Spirited Life. He mentioned he wanted to interview you for the book, but the schedules didn't mesh. Anyway, if you keep track of these facts, you're mentioned on p.298 regarding a script for the Spirit movie.
Adam: Can't wait to see your review (although it's POST Halloween now...but I guess that's WB's fault for not releasing the DVD set sooner.) I have only watched two of the DVDs so far (and that was just the movies not the commentary) but one of them WAS I Walked With A Zombie/The body Snatcher so I know exactly what you mean! The psychological horror of the relationship between Karloff's character and the doctor is really chilling.
I'm saving Cat People/Curse of the Cat People for when I don't have to get up the next morning!
Kristin
Thank you, Mr. Ellison
Thank you, Mr. Ellison, for replying to my comment and question.
The editor of the issue I was referencing was, indeed, Mr. Robert Lowndes.
I have found a letter you sent to the editor of FANTASTIC Science Fiction magazine, published in the October, 1957 issue. It's a lengthy letter, some four pages, where you take to task the people who had been complaining about the cost of FANTASTIC going from 25 cents to 35. It's a really neat letter.
It begins: "Sitting in an Army barracks in Kentucky, so far from New York and the writing game, the perspective shifts, and a lot of things became clearer. One of them is the sound of some of the letters in the August FANTASTIC."
You later say, "Charity does not pay off. Hard work and talent do."
You wind up with, "But be tolerant. And in some cases, fellas, kindly, grow up a little, willya?"
In addition, I found the August, 1957 issue of SCIENCE FICTION ADVENTURES: 3 COMPLETE NEW NOVELS BY TOP WRITERS! It includes your story "Forbidden Cargo." (Fargo Jeffers hated war, and didn't relish the job of ferrying hundreds of war-torn corpses back to Earth - that is, until a hidden enemy tried to stop him!)
But, what I thought was most interesting, was this note from the editor, found on the first page of the story:
"As this issue goes to press, Harlan Ellison is leaving for Army service. He hopes to continue writing science fiction in spite of his military duties - at least after he finishes basic training. We hope he can too; we want more Ellison stories! Harlan's vast output makes it hard to think of him as a 'promising' writer, but as a matter of fact, his career has been brief, and we fully expect even greater things to come from him."
As a Vietnam veteran, I'd like to thank you for your years of service to our country back in the 50s, and for making good on that editor's prediction of "greater things to come."
Okie
RYAN:
RUN FOR THE STARS is indeed shipping. I got my copies several weeks ago. There shouldn't be any problems getting a copy.
----------------------------------------------------------------
JON STOVER, ET AL:
Youse guys is swell-tacular! Rick, gimme a call: I'd like to add a few bucks to the kitty.
Hot diggies, Ricksie's comin' to visit!!!!!!!
Yr. pal, Harlan
OKIE: I think Keith Cramer has it right. I recall no such letter, and the time-frame is a bit wonky: by March of 1957, I had been inducted into the US Army and would've been in the middle of Ranger training at Fort Benning, Georgia when that issue of the magazine came out. To have written it, I'd have had to do it late in 1956, given the editorial lead-time of periodicals. But since I was LIVING in NYC prior to Army service, I would merely have called Doc Lowndes, editor of the magazine--or was it a John Raymond-published digest size, edited by Lester del Rey or Harry Harrison or Damon Knight or Algis Budrys (all of whom were my friends, with me on a daily conversational basis)?--and would have expressed my opinions mano-a-mano.
So, I think Keith's guess is much more than a guess. Logical deduction leads him, as it does me, to the certain belief that the farthead who signed "Cordwainer Bird" was acting precisely as Keith has opined.
Harlan Ellison
Run for the Stars?
Is the 'Run for the Stars' audiobook shipping? I see it listed on Amazon with a 5 to 10 day ship delay, but in Amazon-speak that typically means 'we don't have the thing but we may be able to get it'.
Has anyone ordered and received it?
Thanks.
--
Ryan Leasher
Three cheers to the man who good naturedly (and with only the occasional back-o-the-hand)puts up with all our crap! -- Duane
Thanks, Webmaster Rick Wyatt
Dear Rick Wyatt,
About a thousand years ago (well, September 2004), I PMed Harlan to solicit his input on what sort of group gift Webderland could get Webmaster Rick Wyatt for his work here, through all the blow-ups and warm fuzzies, all the -- well, enough of my yakking.
Harlan responded with: "Get him a cheap round-trip ticket to come visit Susan and me. We haven't seen him in quite a while, and it would allow me to take him out to splendiferous dinners, sit and chat, introduce him to a high-powered group of our friends, stretch a simple gift into an adventure. Jus' a thought... Yr. pal, Harlan"
More than a year later, complete with one false start and a lot of emailing and PMing, it's as done as it can be. As Rick can much more easily and productively get his own airline ticket (and work stuff out with Harlan) under his own power, $580.00 US was sent to Rick this evening. A couple of checks are still in the mail, and they'll be added to a later-posted contributors' list, but it seemed like a good idea to get going on closing the books on this enterprise.
The following contributed to the gift: Alex Krislov; Chuck Messer; Cookie; Daniel Barron; David Loftus; Doug Harrison; Duane; Earl Wells; Eric Martin; Faisal Qureshi; Jay Smith; Jim Davis; John Gillespie; Jono; Jonathan Stover; Keith Cramer; Mike Jacka; Paula Berman; Peggy; Rich Weems; Steve Barber; Steve Jarrett.
Thanks and good wishes to all contributors, and an extreme and whole-hearted thanks for all your work on this board, Rick.
Cheers, Jon Stover for Friends of Ol' Rick (FOOR)
Val Lewton Boxed Set Continued
I just e-mailed my wildly positive review of the Val Lewton boxed set to Scott E. at SCIFIWEEKLY. My favorite film of the bunch may be THE BODY SNATCHER, with Boris Karloff's incredibly sinister portrayal of the grave robber.
Apologies for the 2nd post, but just to clarify: I meant that Schulz is not listed as a writer on the page for Ligotti. Given that Ligotti has repeatedly mentioned Schulz as a major influence and that Schulz's work does, indeed, share certain of Ligotti's thematic concerns, this looks like a botched job.
DVG -
Schulz is there
Questions are a burden to others Answers are a prison for oneself
INFORMATION
You won't get it.
Who just get the Prisoner box set?
That would be telling...
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
That map's a bit rubbishy. Checked for Thomas Ligotti, and the closest writer was Jeff VanderMeer while H.P. Lovecraft was whirling around the outer orbit and Bruno Schulz was nowhere to be found.
Nonsense. That's like saying that Richard Neutra had a real thing for Henry Hobson Richardson and, yes, had once heard of that Frank Lloyd Wright chap.
Who loves you, baby?
(From: http://www.literature-map.com/harlan+ellison.html)
According to cutting-edge AI associative tools, these are the results of where Harlan Ellison lives in the 'literature-sphere'.
Closest writer: Lewis Carroll
Furthest writer: Ayn Rand
Most unusual inclusion: Groucho Marx
Have a nice day, everyone!
HARLAN'S QUEST FOR INFORMATION
HI, SUSAN: Tell Harlan that if he _does_ want to talk with Mr. Brock, maintenance dept. of the Kansas City Star (and pump him for information about working on and with Babcock-Wilcox, Superior and Keweente brands of that sort of equipt), and that if they miss talking with each other tomorrow, it is _imperative_ that Harlan catches Mr. Brock _before_ Nov. 9th. That's when an operation -- on his throat! -- is scheduled to take place. (The number provided is Mr. Brock's home phone).
In the meantime, I'll continue following leads and tracking down more suspects.
Yours in secrecy,
Dorman (field operative #112 -- who STILL hasn't been outed by the decidedly unctious Mr. Novak)
Republican control
Steve,
While I was not aware of Bush's plan to restrict travel should there be a pandemic of Avian Flu, the additions to the Patriot Act have received quite a bit of attention. The reason why I do not think it has received a ton of media exposure is because it is simply proposed right now and has not left Committee hearings.
This is still a dangerous message, but I am hopeful that the more extreme measures within this bill (such as the one you highlighted that would impose the death penalty for someone contributing, even unknowingly, to an organization that committed terrorist acts) would be scuttled by the Democratic minority. It is probably too much to hope that they would be able to tie this bill up in Committee indefinitely.
I finally am starting to have some hope for the Democrats, as their play to have a closed-door hearing on the investigation into the reasons we entered the Iraqi War was a brilliant one. My hope is that they continue this stance through the "Scalito" hearings. The truth is that he will probably be confirmed, especially with a number of the Republican centrists saying that they will not support a filibuster.
However, the Democrats can force Frist to trigger the so-called Nuclear option, which would override the filibuster. In that event, Democrats could use various procedural tricks, such as the closed hearings they recently used, to bring Congress to a standstill. They could then say, in all seriousness, that since the Republicans decided to throw all decorum out the window, they don't have to play nice either.
Bush's approval rating this morning hit an all time low of 35%, with the approval ratings for Congress even lower. If the Democrats can craft a coherent message and say, "This is what we stand for," then I think we could see a seismic shift in the political landscape, similar to what happened in 1994.
However, one of the legacies of Bush will be his effect on the judiciary branch. By this, I mean not just the Supreme Court, but also all of the federal courts and the courts of appeal to which he has consistently appointed those whom Attila the Hun might consider right wing. That, and the shambles of our relations with other nations, may be the most enduring and injurious of Bush's actions.
notes....
Erika,
It's doing just fine (I have yet to find a thread relating to it, or buttocks in general, but I'll keep sniffing around for it.)
In the mean time, keep your nose clean.
To reply to Okie. I think you'd do well to assume that it was someone OTHER than Ellison who wrote that letter. Here's my inductive reasoning: 1. Cordwainer Bird was used by Ellison when he wanted to let everyone know that his work was butchered so much that the steak had turned to hamburger. So why would he send a complimentary letter to the editor and sign it thus? 2. If you know anything about Harlan, he's not one to hide behind a fake name when expressing an opinion, negative or positive. 3. Ellison has been a target of crazed yahoos since his early days. His peculiar personality tends to grate on the insecure and make them want to lash out at him. It also attracts sycophants like myself and Eric Martin (to name a few fawning fanboys). Conclusion: It is likely that some jackass wrote to the magazine and used Ellison's pseudonym.
I'd bet on it.
-Keith
Threads
Harlan is exactly right that what differentiates his "Elements" quote is the humor. Einstein, or anyone else who may have said something similar, lacked that one key ingredient. Have you ever read Einstein's bestselling "Theory of Relativity"? Dry, very dry. Could've used a few yucks spread here and there to keep the reader's interest. And that, Ladies and Germs, is why HE is not AE, and wouldn't want to be.
__________________________________________________
I woke up this morning and am a little concerned that the person looking back at me in the mirror is now in the sub-classification of "Conspiracy Theorists". Did anyone else note the item in Bush's Bird Flu plan that allows the government to restrict travel? Or the 41 additional riders to the Patriot Act that the GOP is trying to add without public knowledge? Things like you can get the death penalty for merely contributing to an organization that later commits a terrorist act (whether you know they were going to or not). (Hmmm. I wonder if that includes taxes...)
I'm really beginning to consider West Coast independence a viable alternative. (And NorthEast as well as other Blue-tinged regions.)
___________________________________________
Lastly, I don't have TiVo, but can someone clue me in as to whether the TiVo guide is similar to the DirecTV channel guide? If so, we've learned to live with and even prefer that sort of channel surfing. We know, for 'zample, that "Lost" is on Channel 7 Wednesdays at 9 (though we also have the East Coast feed and can watch at 6). "Gilmore Girls" and "Supernatural" are the WB at 8 on Tuesdays (she watches former, he watches latter). Otherwise, we simply check to see what's on whenever we feel the need to veg-out for a while.
It's so much nicer not planning TV days in advance. Trust me. (Wait. Sounds too GWB.) Err, Try It, You'll Like It.
Have a wunnerful day. I have a giant cup of coffee I need to explore...
SB
I never said HE or anyohe else SHOULD rely only on interactive or online tv listings....only observing that TV Guide seems to think they should. As soon as technology makes something possible, it becomes mandatory. (Pity the poor soul caught on the freeway in a road emergency without a cell phone. Those yellow call boxes on California highways are being removed because "no one uses them anymore.")
Knight Ridder? that's the company that owns the San Jose Mercury News, our local paper....they are getting rid of their freebie Spanish-language weekly and ditching the weekly "neighborhood" sections distributed in different communities aruond the area.
"Hydrogen and stupidity" or whatever paraphrase exist(S) is only one of many quotes attributed to more than one person. I think these things tend to get back-dated and pasted onto somebody else; it seems much more Harlan-esque than anything Einstein would have said, and besides, Einstein died when Harlan was only 20 or so, so if Einstein stole the saying he was robbing the cradle!
Was it Jefferson or Franklin who said something like, "Those who trade their liberty for security deserve neither?" Because at Foolscap, I saw 2 t-shirts for sale side by side; one had the quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin while another had a slightly different version supposedly said/written by Thomas Jefferson!
Brian: Did I or did I not see you mistype your own name???? I loooove it! Can't wait for the next episode of Pinky and the Brian..oops, wrong series ;)
Kristin
Keith:
Speaking of derrieres in general, how's your ass?
>:)
Cordwainer Bird
Mr. Ellison, This is my first time to write, though I've hovered over this site for a couple of years.
I understand that Cordwainer Bird is a pseudonym that you have used over the years for various reasons.
I have stumbled across a pretty early use of the name and was wondering if this was you.
It's a letter to the editor in the Spring, 1957 issue of FUTURE Science Fiction magazine. The letter is "signed" Cordwainer Bird, New York City, N.Y.
It begins, thus:
"The occasion for this - the first letter to a science fiction magazine since my first year's acquaintanance with the genre - is my complete amazement at issue 31 of FUTURE. By amazement, perhaps I should qualify the word with 'pleased,' because I read the entire issue at one sitting, something which I have not done in five years. I found the issue strong throughout, stimulating, and unmarred by any of the ludicrous editorial prejudices that seem currently to be plaguing your competitors."
This is the earliest use of the name that I've personally seen ... I'm just assuming this is you, Mr. Ellison. Would you care to comment?
Thank you for your time.
>By the way, the Grand Tetons National Park is in Wyoming.
That's why the one in Idaho is such a friggin' riot.
Anyhow, at the risk of appearing a toady, I find DVG a friggin' riot. Keep posting.
Harlan - You should read Theodore Dalrymple's "Holmes and his Commentators" in the latest New Criterion. I think you'll enjoy it.
Le Grand Tetons
That is correct, the Grand Tetons are just outside Jackson, Wyoming. I beleve they were named by a lonely French voyageur.
Very lonely.
Chuck
re: DVG and his French friend
Don't forget the French also consider Jerry Lewis to be a comedic genius. By the way, the Grand Tetons National Park is in Wyoming.
I stands corrected, re: things and elements. This will teach me to quote stuff from memory.
And now, having not only misparaphrased our Unca Harlan but also broken the one-post-per-24-hours rule, I slink away to brood in my dank grotto for a few days ....
At the risk of appearing trollish, I always perceived stupidity as a complex compound, rather than an element, consisting of elements of laziness, mean-spiritedness and ignorance adjoined to misinformation.
According to a French friend, the Grand Tetons National Park in Idaho is considered gut-wrenchingly funny. In France, anyway.
beg to differ
I was in the Idaho panhandle in '96 and saw and Elk humping either the effigy of Bob Dylan, or a scarecrow. Either one of which is funny.
REPLIES TO MARCI KISER & STEVEN UTLEY
Marci: It may very well be that Einstein AND a congeries of others expressed the aphorism attributed to me, in different words, long before I trumpeted the thought in my own FUNNY words...but...
If such existed, I wasn't familiar with them, though I would not for an instant suggest they weren't extant. Merely that I came up with mine independantly. And mine is FUNNIER.
But...I truly DID express the thought, and in the form used by the Flash comic, truly DID express it frequently, widely, and loudly. So I deserve the kudos, if not for absolute originality or fecundity, surely for being FUNNIER!
Steve: as one of the Webderlanders noted, "things" is NOT FUNNY. And I didn't say, "The two most common 'things' in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." I said (and I'm repeating this correction for the fucking millionth time, so don't make the mistake again or I'll play whack-a-mole with yr Texican noggin, mo'fodduh!) THE TWO MOST COMMON ELEMENTS IN THE UNIVERSE ARE HYDROGEN AND STUPIDITY.
"Elements" is funny. "Things" is sloppy and NOT funny.
I know from funny.
Trust me on this.
Elements, not things.
Get it right, Utley, or move to Idaho, where it won't make any difference, because NOTHING is funny in Idaho.
Yr. pal, Harlan
Steven Utley posited:
> Somewhere, I'm sure, a brilliant scientist is trying to
> determine whether stupidity is evenly distributed throughout
> the universe or tends to clump, and also -- if the latter
> circumstance obtains -- whether or not the Earth is currently
> ploughing through a clump of stupidity, which would mean on
> the one hand that eventually people will get smarter and
> things will get better, or, on the other, that people are now
> as smart as they're ever going to be and are, in fact, going
> to become even stupider as soon as the Earth hits the next
> clump. Place your bets while you may.
Hmmm. Perhaps you should define your terms a little more precisely. I suspect most people would assume that when you posit clumped stupidity ("evenly distributed throughout the universe"), you are speaking geographically (that is, in terms of space) rather then temporally (i.e., in time). But in the passage above ("whether or not the Earth is currently ploughing through a clump of stupidity"), you clearly veer into temporal clumping.
(Yes, I know time and space are inseparable in cosmological terms, but I doubt any terrestrial scientist could measure theoretical clumping of stupidity at that level.)
Since, as far as we know, stupidity is a function of consciousness, then clearly it has to clump geographically. Where there is intelligence, there is also stupidity; where there is no consciousness at all (let's assume for the sake of argument that such is the case on Pluto and Phobos), one will find neither.
The question of spatial clumping of stupidity thus becomes one of perspective. At the galactic level, one obviously will find stupidity clumped within certain systems, and on certain celestial bodies. But at the level of the universe, all such bumps (singularities, if you will) may indeed flatten out and appear regular.
Satisfied?
The Quote
Just wanted to comment quick on quote from HE:
It is often misquoted as "things", when elements is the accurate word. Elements is funny.
I'll have to swing by a comic shop and check out the latest issue of Flash...
B
Ellison's Theorem?
Is that really considered Ellison's theorem?
Because it seems very similar to the Albert Einstein quote: "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
I love Mr. Ellison very deeply, but I doubt he wants something attributed to him that wasn't his to begin with.
Hydrogen and stupidity
Michael D. Blum reports that Ellison's Theorem ("The two commonest things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity") has percolated its way into the comic books. And just the other day I cited it (properly attributed) in an online political forum to account for polls that tell us 38 percent of Americans still think George W. Bush is doing a heckuva job. Somewhere, I'm sure, a brilliant scientist is trying to determine whether stupidity is evenly distributed throughout the universe or tends to clump, and also -- if the latter circumstance obtains -- whether or not the Earth is currently ploughing through a clump of stupidity, which would mean on the one hand that eventually people will get smarter and things will get better, or, on the other, that people are now as smart as they're ever going to be and are, in fact, going to become even stupider as soon as the Earth hits the next clump. Place your bets while you may.
Newspapers and their future
Kristin and others,
I happen to work for the local Minneapolis paper (Star Tribune), so I have a unique perspective on newspapers. While circulation numbers are, without question, declining, the numbers are not as dramatic as you would think. Our paper, for example, has remained relatively stable in its circulation for the past several years.
The Star Tribune just launched a redesign and had a huge response from the community. While there was a lot of negative response to certain aspects of the redesign, many people realized that we were trying to make the paper more accessible to a younger generation and accepted those changes (our average readership age is approximately 55).
I have talked with a number of newspaper executives about the decline of newspapers and while they all acknowledge that there may be an inevitable shrinkage of readership, they unanimously agreed that newspapers, on the whole ain't going away any time in the near future. There is just something special about the physical act of reading a newspaper, especially for me on Sunday mornings with my kids.
Having said that, everyone acknowledges that the newspaper industry is in need of updating. The news this morning that Knight Ridder, one of the largest newspaper chains in the nation, may be forced to sell off many of its key properties was a sobering realization. For this reason, we are constantly looking at ways to improve our papers' content, both online and print, and to examine how we can best leverage technology to best reach a younger audience
box of treasures
Harlan & Susan:
Package arrived yesterday; many thanks. It was the perfect anodyne for a day I would describe as nothing less than woebegone.
-Brent
I too need a good, paper listing of the upcoming week of television. One that I can sift through while watching a game or some other fluff (I never watch teevee without reading material in my lap.....unless it's something worth paying attention to like Lost or a good movie on DVD). I especially need to sift through a good listing of movies for every cable channel; all the variations of HBO and Showtime and Cinemax etc., not just the mother channels. My local cable company used to put out the official TV Guide that covered all of the movie channels. They stopped, probably in preparation of TV Guide changing formats.
Yes, I can go onto TV Guide Online, pop in my zip code and cable company name, and get the entire listing I need for the next 10 days, but dammit I can't seem to get comfortable with that heavy PC and terminal on my lap in my favorite recliner! No, I'm not going to buy a laptop just to sift through teevee listings.
Doing this online sucks. It wastes my computer time when I get home....and even though TV Guide Online has a movie section that allows you to sift through everything alphabetically by day, that's still time consuming and I actually need to bring my portable DVD player to my tech desk and watch a movie while I'm playing with the Guide.
Sure, it's nice if you have cable/satellite and have a listings channel to click on, but that's not how I watch teevee. I don't think I watch a single program on teevee when it's actually airing, other than some sports (and I mostly tape my Yankee games to watch when I get home from work, thanks to the time difference). I plan my handful of shows, my movies, and tape them to watch at my convenience.
Last week, the mother-in-law was visiting and she is one to turn on the tube and go straight to the TV Guide channel to see what's on tonight. I can't live that way! I can't sit in front of the tube and say "OK, now that I'm here, what's on?" Nope, I have to sit in front of the tube and say "OK, I've got my Lost tape, my Daily Show and Colbert Report from last night, Oh, how about that silly movie I taped the other day. No plan, no tube....but there's always a plan.
So, maybe it's anal, but it's my own low-tech version of TiVo. If you have 3 VCRs in the house hooked up to 3 teevees that receive 200 channels, you can afford to coordinate things yourself. It's empowering.
I don't lament the loss of TV Guide's listings, as they were beginning to bite the big one anyway (sticking to Prime Time only, and only the most popular cable channels), I only lament that I have to struggle to find a comfortable way to catch that a movie is playing next Tuesday on SHOWTIME18 or whatever the obscure channel may be.
Too many words on such an insipid topic....I say adieu.
-TODD
I'm about halfway through Bob Spitz's new biography of The Beatles, and it's already supplanted Philip Norman's _Shout!_ as the best such book available. This is a good, serious piece of work, well-written and apparently exhaustively researched, and if you appreciate the Beatles-- that is, if you're an intelligent person with taste and a healthy soul-- you really ought to read this.
And now it's time for "Brain Gets Peevish," where Our Hero takes offense at some minor detail or comment and works himself up into a lather far out of proportion to the actual event. This week, Brian notices that people seem to have ignored his reasons why he wouldn't recommend a TiVo to Harlan.
In our last thrilling chapter, Brian explained that getting TV listings in print offered the pleasures of browsing... something that the otherwise wonderful TiVo does not offer.
This week, Brian has noticed that several people have suggested that Harlan rely on electronic TV listings, or that he buy a TiVo. Clearly, he thinks (and as we all know, Brian is _always_ thinking clearly), further explication on this crucial topic is required. Education of the Masses, and all that.
So:
By browsing, one can occasionally come across some previously unsuspected delights. If one has his or her browsing "filtered," then one is essentially constraining one's field of vision. One may be more likely to find things that one is actively looking for, but one is less likely to be surprised. One loses those moments when, by glancing at a page of print, a particular word jumps out of one's peripheral vision and catches the eye
And while TiVo is a wonderful machine, it does _not_ afford the joys of random browsing. Yes, one can page through the listings by channel, or by category; but one sees only a dozen or so shows at a time on the TV screen.
Yes, one can have TiVo recommend shows that fit one's interests; but this is filtered to fit one's previously established interests, and to correlate with those of thousands of others, so it isn't exactly "browsing" in the wide-ranging, joy-of-randomness sense that browsing a used bookstore or densely-packed catalog would offer.
In Summary: while TiVo offers a lot to a serious TV viewer, and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend one to the Ellisons, it doesn't fulfill the role of decent, in-print TV listings.
Elijah! If you didn't read TV Guide where else could you get fat pictures of Kirstie Alley and incisive interviews with Ted Danson and Bronson Pinchot?
Some people can live without culture but not me!
perplexed
um. I think I'm about to be the target of many a rotten tomato, but what was so great about TV Guide in the first place? Not to knock personal tastes but this is the last forum I would've expected to see it discussed, much less lamented. Am I, culturally deprived quasi-yoot of an offending generation, missing something?
The march of technology
The Internet is killing newspapers. Readership is migrating away from the paper editions to online which the papers can't make money from either through subscriptions or classifieds (online ads are a whole different business model).
What killed TV Guide (as a paper publication) was cable and satellite. There isn't enough room to print listings for 500 channels. People now use the interactive program guides that come with their cable or satellite boxes or with devices such as TiVo. THere are also searchable/customizable (you enter a zipcode and get listings for the satellite or cable system in hour area) guides online for those who do not have a box connected to their tv. TV Guide actually provides the listings in many devices (and even a rather crude guide built into our JVC set - it's based on the old StarSight engine) so I guess they are mostly abandoning the paper magazine business to become an "interactive content provider."
Kristin
The current issue of The Flash (#227) has Dr. Alchemy quoting the line about hydrogen and stupidity - yet another example of how HE changes the world!
best to all,
Michael
That's awful to hear about Michael Piller. Awful way to go.
Not to veer to abruptly, but my rewason for stopping by was to point people to The Victory Old-Time Candy Store: http://www.victoryseeds.com/candystore/index.html. It looks liek the kind of thing Harlan and some others here might be interested in.
Literature Map
Looking on the first page, I see an "Ursula Guin" and a "Micheal Moorecock". That hardly bodes well.
I suspect that the newspaper will be dead in a decade, with perhaps the exception of a few big-city papers like the New York Times. Sites like craigslist are destroying one of their main revenue streams and with the AP wires easily available, few papers have all that much to offer.
Personally, I read yahoo news for factual stuff as one AP feed is as good as another. I read the electronic version of the SF Chronicle for local news. For opinion/columnists, I read wherever the blogs take me. The only time I ever handle a dead-tree paper is to read the one left in the toilet at work.
The New York Times has started carging for some of its web content. It'll be interesting to see how that shakes out.
Michael Piller, 1948-2005. Worked on the first three Trek spinoffs and co-created DS9 and Voyager. Head and neck cancer.
Literature Map?
http://www.literature-map.com/harlan+ellison.html
Has anyone seen this? Not sure what it means (probably nothing, but you never know....)
British newspapers and periodicals are not notably superior to their American counterparts in my opinion. The Economist probably comes closest to offering a comprehensive and objective review of world and domestic affairs; the Guardian is a bottomless well of spiteful sniping, idiotic stunts (letters from readers to random addresses in Ohio begging the state’s populace to vote for Kerry, for God’s sake) and rock-bottom cultural standards all round. As for such as The Spectator—well, one is merely reminded of the old ditty (attributed variously to Belloc and Ogden Nash):
You cannot hope to bribe or twist
(Thanks God!) the British journalist.
But seeing what the chap will do
Unbribed, there’s no real reason to.
We sent them Edward Murrow, they sent us Toby Young. Not really much of a comparison, I’m afraid.
Harlan.
You should try subscribing to a few British newspapers, which seem to be of a much higher standard than their American counterparts. THE GUARDIAN is probably the best of them (their Saturday book review section is just superb), but THE INDEPENDENT is also worth reading.
Shocking Halloween
When I bought eight large bags of candy on Sunday my wife rolled her eyes and told me I was being too optimistic. By 8:30 I was at the local Rite-Aid buying two more bags. I knew we were in trouble when large SUVs began congregating in the street outside our house.
One of the patterns I DID notice was that kids fourteen, fifteen and sixteen were happily ringing the bell and Trick or Treating just like the other kids. I kind of figure (as a non-parental observer) that the kids know when it's time to give it up, and any pressure from parents just contributes to the overall demise of childhood at an early age.
________________________________________________
"I put on a black hat and alligator trench coat and ---poof! Alicia Keys!"
Coffee through the nostrils again. Again!
________________________________________________
Bestest NPR program (runs on KCRW on Mondays at 2pm here in LaLa Land) is "Says You". No contest.
the printed word
HE: Your reply to Ray Carlson was a fun read.
I was curious what your thoughts are on the CBG's new format. (Well, not so new anymore I guess...)
Even though it was never on time, I miss the weekly.
Whew! I gave out 300 units of candy within an hour and a half last night! I made up 100 bags, then had some extra packages of chocolate bars if that wasn't enough. Well, it wasn't enough. I gave out the 100 goodie bags, cleaned out the rest of our chocolate bars, and sent my husband out for more. *He* cleaned out the grocery store. I hated having to turn out the light because I truly love to see the costumes. Even when we turned out the light, the doorbell kept ringing so my husband put up a sign that said "out of candy--sorry!" I had never counted our visitors before, but I honestly believe that had we not run out, we probably would have encountered at least a hundred, maybe a couple hundred more. I could hear them out in the streets until at least 8:30. So next year, I'm planning for 500. Tip: I found that kids get really excited when they get their candy in a goody bag. It might just be a couple of lollypops, but something about the goody bag makes it super special and elicits many oohs and ahhs!
I don't so much mind the older teenagers, especially if they take the time to dress up (some of them were very creative!). What ticked me off was the mother dressed like Glinda the Good Witch holding out what was very obviously her own bag for candy (all her kids had their own so she didn't appear to be collecting for someone else). Now, I don't mind it when parents are holding the bag for their very little ones on their first or second Halloween (and they are sooo cute those li'l teddy bears, tigers, and dragons!), but this woman was a bit over the top (and hill). I gave her the candy anyway because there were probably 6 kids on the porch (they come in droves) and it was just easier than telling her off and killin' the buzz.
One thing I did demand of all our guests was that they utter the words "Trick or Treat." I had to coach some of them. I said, "You have to say the words otherwise how am I gonna know what you want? I mean, you might just be standing out there in a costume for the heck of it. You gotta say the words!!!"
I didn't really dress up, but since I'm now wearing my hair in long braids (a birthday present to myself on my 40th), I put on a black hat and alligator trench coat and ---poof! Alicia Keys! I thought my youngest was going to be Darth Vader (I bought him the voice changer and everything!), but he opted for the freaky ghoul mask that scares all the little kids. The oldest (disguised as a preppie) went to a Halloween party armed with about 8 cans of silly string.
Anyway, it was a fun one. I'm really glad I moved my rehearsal to tonight. It really took both my husband and myself to get our kids where they were going and to keep the candy flowing. 300! In an hour and a half!!!
Imagine (and feel pity for) those poor teachers who have to deal with those kids in school today!!!!
On Halloween and age... I was listening to a bit on NPR about this just yesterday, only rather than suggesting Halloween is childish the concern was that it was becoming too inappropriate for children. Cited were horror movie prop costumes, gorier than the homespun hobo/cowboy/sheet-with-two-eyeholes-ghost costumes of the speakers' childhoods, and the sexualization of young ladies' costumes.
They ascribed this particular evolution of costumes to the 'boomer generation who had a good time as yoots and were unwilling to let go as they grew up. They got jobs and money for better costumes, more adult tastes and tolerances, and there you have it.
I say let kids celebrate Halloween until they feel lame. It might never happen - I think the nature of the holiday changes to accomodate them as they age, but at its core it's an Inversion Festival, a night when everything is upside down; you can beg something for nothing, talk to strangers and stranger than strangers.
Did I dress up for Halloween? Yep, was a Tourist all during the day - but then I work at a school, so a certain immaturity is part of the job description. Wish I could've handed out candy, but we live in a condo so there's no way for kids to come to the door. Favorite costume that I heard about this year? The three-year-old daughter of a friend is dressing up as a mailman... ferociously cute because, you see, she thinks there is only _one_ mailman in the world who delivers _all_ the letters and packages, a la Santa Claus.
hee.
On an unrelated side note:
As we're tossing around the subject of how newspapers, tv guides and such have changed over the years, could I be so gauche to ask how Playboy has altered over time? Seems like I hear about a good many authors, including our honorable host, who got their start writing for it. Back In The Day, was it just another girlie mag who'd throw a couple bucks to a starving author, or was there an element of status to writing for them? How about today? Did they/do they take unsolicited manuscripts?
I'm trying to balance two perspectives: one which says all these now-greats who used to write for it at some point in their careers and so it must have some aspect of a literary magazine, vs. another perspective which holds the more common *wink wink, nudge nudge* I-read-it-for-the-articles comments. Just wonder if there's been some fundamental shift that's gone on, I guess.
Unca Harlan,
Thanks for your rapid reply to my query regarding newspapers and for sharing some of your reading list with us. I share your enthusiasm for THE WEEK. It’s outstanding.
Again, thank you.
Dorman:
At the age of fifteen, a kid is still a kid. Maybe they need to start learning all that non-fun stuff they'll be responsible for when they are adults, but I think they ought to be able to enjoy being kids while they still are. More power to ya.
When I think of Halloween, I think of our house in Evergreen, Colorado. It was a trilevel home with a dutch door in front. Our Saint Bernard, Hannibal, enjoyed halloween. To him, everybody in the world was a potential pal. "Oh, boy! Somebody to pet me and be my friend!"
So, when the doorbell rang, we'd open the top half of the door and Hannibal would prop himself up on the lower half with those huge paws and greet the trick-or-treaters. Even kids we'd never seen would say, "Hello Hannibal!". He was our official Halloween greeter.
He hated Christmas. We'd bring a *TREE* into the house? And hang shiny stuff on it that would fall off every time he walked by it. He hated that tree. We also had a decoration that was a music box in the shape of a bell. You'd hang it up at the top of the door jam and when you pulled the clapper, it would play an obnoxious, tinkly version of Jingle Bells. He'd start crying and looking for a place to hide.
Halloween was his holiday. He LOVED meeting trick-or-treaters.
Chuck
Mr. Ellison--I lived through the 1970s, thanks. More than enough singing for me. Let me tell you, you haven't learned to hate a decade until you've been expected to milk a goat at some point during it.
Facetiousness aside, I have a certain amount of respect for the people and places of those times, and a great deal of affection for them--but I remember how the solar power and home-schooling, the folk dancing and Latin lessons, the champagne socials and the parent-sanctioned same-sex crushes lay at the end of a steep and narrow stair on the very edge of the American continent, and how few people passed that way. I simply do not accept a view that the 70s (and previous decades) were chock full of intellectja-mals--the people my parents knew and the children with whom I played were part of a shadowy subculture that existed outside what my parents dismissed as the modern mainstream. Nor do I think that their retreat from that mainstream was necessarily the correct or (I must say) honorable thing to do. It is easy to dismiss the proles when one is an aristocrat. This is the lesson of facism as well as my parents' progressive socialist tendencies. Lily Bart's Seldon and his Republic of the Spirit were no more a refuge for her finally than were the vulgar excesses of her friends.
In the end, whatever song the sixties sang, the books that spoke first to me were those that stressed the meaninglessness and destructive force of social divisions in earlier times: "The House of Mirth" and "The Great Gatsby," "The Sound and the Fury" and "The Golden Bowl."
As for my recollections of the 70s--cross "The Ice Storm" with "The Stepford Wives," pour Edie Sedgwick and Ossie Davis another Long Island Iced Tea and kiss them for me.
I may be delayed.
A Halloween Question for Harlan & one for ALL the rest of you
HARLAN: Just got cleaning up after walking around with my daughter (who is fifteen and in all probability did her last night of trick-or-treating -- not for the candy, mind you, but for the fun of dressing up in costume; she made one _very_ cute Wicked Witch of the West, wearing an outfit similar to that worn by Margaret Hamilton in "The Wizard of Oz" and green makeup), and after taking a peek at the message board tonight (and noticing how many people were as saddened as I by the lack of participation of late in my favorite holiday)...where was I?
Oh, yeah! I couldn't help but smile when thinking of trick-or-treaters showing up at your door.
Do you and Susan participate in handing out candy on Halloween? (I'd guess yes, but I don't want to assume). If so, who answers the door? (For some reason, the picture of you swinging open your door and greeting a clutch of kids dressed as vampires, werewolves and other assorted monsters with, "YEAH?" --the way you answer the phone-- makes me chuckle.
Hope you and the Electric Baby had good time tonight, no matter what you did (or who answered the door). And the next time my mother and brother call to talk to you as they did today, howzabout sparing a little time for the 90 year-old battle-ax who gave birth to a sweetheart like me -- allright? Okay, then.
Best,
D.T(rouble) Shindler
P.S. TO ALL THE REST OF YOU WEBDERLANDERS: Do you guys, like so many other adults, think kids should stop trick-or-treating before 15? I've always thought of 16 as the true cusp of teenage-hood, and every age before that is still part of childhood. But I've heard more and more parents tell their children (at 13 or 14) that they're too old to do that sort of thing (those are the same parents that scream bloody murder when those kids --- who've been told to growup and act your age -- start dressing in hip huggers or half-shirts, showing more skin, drinking booze, playing at sex, etc., in imitation of "grown-ups"). And I've seen quite a few of my daughters friends (especially last year, when they were fourteen) balk and visibily struggle with the urge to go out and have fun the way she does. All of those friends have older sisters or brothers who probably say cruel things and expose them to peer pressure if they do still have the urge to childlike things at the ripe old age of fourteen or fifteen -- either that, or parents like those of Amanda, another of my daughters friends, who told their daughter, when she was thirteen, that she was too old to go trick-or-treating. What a sad fuckin' commentary on the mindset of American parents: on the one hand, they tell their kids to "act thier age" and that they are "too old" to do this or that; and on the other hand, they wig out when these "tweenagers" try to act like the older (16,. 17, 18-year-old) kids in order to fit in.
Sorry about the rant.
So what do you guys think? Am I alone in the notion that kids should be allowed to be kids at lest through the age of fifteen? Or have I been living in a glass bubble and missed the boat when it comes to proper parenting skills?
Harlan,
'"Just tell him when a woman who's ninety years' old calls, he oughtta talk to her and not give her that kind of message, and if you don't think this will be written up, you've got another think coming"'
..."Why ME, God?"
Why am I sitting here laughing my ass off, y'poor bastard?
Clearly, somebody mistook you for the OTHER Harlan Ellison ....
If all you need is TV listings . . .
. . . why not just get TiVo? They practically give the boxes away these days, and the monthly subscription couldn't be much more than getting the Times delivered. The listings are searchable in a number of ways and are more useful than print TV listings. You can, for instance, store a keyword (say "Val Lewton" or something like that) and it will give you a list of all listings in the next ten days that include that word. Plus you get the functionality of the machine.
A CHARMING INTERLUDE w/ GARGOYLES
Okay, here's a beauty for y'all.
I offer it a priori, as bulwark against...
Well, you'll understand why in a moment. My tale is a brief one, but typical of what We Godlike Celebrities have to enfuckingdure:
I'm in a pre-production meeting for a tv/movie thing--here at the house--today--couple of hours with a couple of guys--and at some point late in the day, maybe 3:30 or so, the phone rings, and Sharon answers it, and comes in to tell me (approximately) as follows:
There is a guy with a sorta kinda "flat-affect" voice who says he's calling for some woman in her nineties (he apparently stressed that several times with Sharon), who avers she is the mother of someone whom I knew sometime long ago in the past, or like that. And she wants to talk to me, he says; but he won't say about what. And he won't give his name.
So I yell to Susan, "Would you plizz grab this, I'm in the middle of this session...just tell 'em I'm in a meeting and if they wanna leave a number, I'll call them back."
So Susan goes and takes the call. I don't get out of the meeting till 5ish, and I find an indecipherable scrawl on a post-it, so I ask Susan what's what with it.
And here's the story. Susan goes to pick up where Sharon left off, and the old woman is now online. She says she's the mother of someone named Paul Devinny, and her name is Margaret
Devinny. And Susan asks what it's about, and (my wife says to me later) it "was like pulling teeth," I suppose because the woman is 90. But apparently she just wants to "chat" with me.
About WHAT...no idea...because: I don't KNOW any Paul Divinny. And if I knew him so far back ago that not even his name rings an echo, then we couldn't have been too close, and heaven only knows why his mother is calling me now.
In any case...
Susan was polite to her. You know Susan. That's her thing. Polite. With that Brit accent.
And she tells the old woman I'm in a meeting, or a conference, or whatever, and if she'll give Susan a number, and a precis of why she needs to speak to me, she'll give it to me when I surface.
Apparently the woman says something like, "never mind," and hangs up. I think I'm recounting all this with fair accuracy.
A little later, Sharon catches ANOTHER call, this time from the droning guy, who proceeds to threaten Sharon with (this is a close proximate as related by her, hours later) "Just tell him when a woman who's ninety years' old calls, he oughtta talk to her and not give her that kind of message, and if you don't think this will be written up, you've got another think coming," and HE hangs up.
Well.
Since I am PARALYZED with fear that this will be "written up"--if not in some half-assed blog or fanzine website, then certainly carved in letters of fire on the Stone of Eternity--I thought I'd let y'all know about it so if you run across this "fit of pique" umbrage ...
...does this sound familiar, friends...?...
you'll know what happened. I wouldn't want you to think I'm one of Those Godlike Celebrities who blows off intrusive strangers who interrupt my workday with phone calls I never solicited, with people I don't know, for purposes in which I have zero interest. Heaven forfend that I should put my own concerns before those of random obssesed idiots who have gotten my phone number to assuage their own trivial curiosities. And when a 71-year-old tells someone to go away, you'd think his advanced years would receive SOME respect; and if you don't think this has been "written up" then you have another think coming.
Exhausted, Yr. pal,
Harlan
P.S. Why ME, God?!
Todd
No one here either. (Except, as I was taking a picture of our pumpkins, the neighbor walked by with his kid on his shoulders and didn't stop. Must still be upset about that whole fence thing...)
Read the same article and thought, "But I LIKE Smarties..."
Mike
Wow, was that last posting fulla typos or what? The spirits have possessed my fingers, I tellya, and now they want to close slowly around Deb's......no....noooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
Halloween
Where are all the fuckin' kids?!?! C'mon, ya little bastids, I got my M&M's ready to go....Peanut and Plan. Take yer pick. Even got the Smarties as back-up, not that I'll need 'em now (and thank the Gods for that, as the local paper made sure to rate all candy types this morning, and Smarties were rated one of the big Your Neighbor Is A Loser candies. At least the M&M's got some raves.
Geez, when I was a kid we would have been halfway through our 3 mile round trip trek, pillowcases already heavy with the goods. Now? Damned kids and their damned parents and their damned safety parties and street gettogethers......C'Mon, getcher asses over hear and get some fucking candy! Can't you see I luv ya's?
-TODD
(oh well, Steelers in an hour.....)
A Boy and His Dog Aust DVD
OK no worries, Harlan. Three copies will be sent over...I might have to visit a few shops to get that many units (this DVD is not as omnipresent as I, ROBOT sadly). First, I'll mail them to the HERC address, then we'll go from there. I'm sure a trade can be worked out to cover the transaction.
Brian, sorry to break it to you but its not the Gamble House in the film. But boy is that house a gem.
For those who want to see it... http://www.gamblehouse.org
Brent, my fav Holloween tunes include The Kronos Quartet's recording of the theme from Psycho and Mike Oldfield's Tubular Bells.
I get my news from NPR mostly, through both the radio and checking out their website. Any of you guys ever listen to the NPR news quiz show "Wait, Wait...Don't Tell Me"? It's always a hoot. http://www.npr.org/programs/waitwait
I think the Lion, Witch & Wardrobe film should be regarded with trepidation, one of the associated websites calls Turkish Delight "addictive" as if it were heroin or cocaine. Not a good sign. A tie-in CD of gospel singers? Bizarre. This is Walden Media's doing probably. While Disney just wants to capitalize on the Lord of the Ring's films. Also I'm getting tired of seeing bucolic New Zealand landscapes.
Architectural Note of the Day: They're running ads for the upcoming movie _Zathura_, which has only one attraction for me. They've obviously filmed a lot of it in the Gamble House, an architectural treasure in Pasadena designed by Greene and Greene. Can't say that recommends the expense in seeing the thing, but it's a detail that interests me. (It's the one reason I sat through _Casper_: middling movie, but _great_ Art Nouveau set design.)
Just to concur with Harlan a little on newss and TV listings. I find my newsprint intake's a lot less these days, but that's mainly because of the Web making news sources much more available. I go into work, hit a slew of sites, and print what I want to read in detail. The nice thing about this system is that my daily sites include places with decent daily reporting (the NY Times), the opinion weeklies with frequent updates (The Nation, Slate) and places where the essay holds sway (NY Review of Books, Arts and Letters Daily).
A side note about TV listings: The computer age has enhanced an interesting paradox of intellectual life. Thanks to database-organization and terminology-searches, computers enable us to zoom right in on Stuff We Want. This is great when we _know_ what we want. But, most of us enjoy _browsing_ stuff, like books in bookstores, because we'll come across something that we've never thought of. We delight in surprise and variety. So browsing TV listings _in print_ has a lot of pleasure for most of us; we'll see a movie we haven't thought of in years, or a documentary on a subject in which we were once interested, and enjoy it.
That's why I won't suggest a TiVo to Harlan. He's probably up on the product already. And for all of its wonderful strengths, it's not exactly conducive to the simple pleasure of browsing. (I've suggested a remedy for this on the TiVo company's website, i.e., enabling users to download the schedules and print'em out. Dunno if it'll ever come to pass.)
DAVE and EZRA:
http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/ligotti/1/
Ezra,
Looks like we've been reading the same books. The new Ligotti collection is super duper drad, top of the line weird. I've not yet had the chance to crack the Hodgson collection. I finished THE NIGHT LAND a few months ago. It was good, genuinely weird, difficult.
All Hallows
"And now… a high pitched scream? Could it be the fool from the village did not leave my property with as much dispatch as he ought?"
Um, no. Sorry. (I was using a pushpin before drinking coffee this morning.) Please go back to sleep.
_________________________________________________
Cookie - No worries. Keep your eyes on the mail. I may spirit a copy or two your way if I can do it without Cris noting the disappearance (it IS Halloween, after all). Looks like she's being submitted for a SoCal Music Award by her label. (Shhh. Keep your fingers intertwined...)
I envy you being swamped with Jazz -- so nice to die doing something you love, no? The household cd of the moment is Diana Krall's Live in Paris, which features a friend of Cris' on bass. (And I'm spending a lot of time with Manhattan Transfer's Offbeat of Avenues.) Have a wonderful time tonight, especially given the Halloweeny neighborhood! I miss those. Give my regards to the Goblins if you would.
____________________________________________________
And so this doesn't descend into Unca Harlan's website o' other media, I'm reading AE van Vogt's novel Slan at the moment -- which HE once cited as one of his favorites. Slogging through, but hoping it gets better (sorry, Harlan). And just gave a copy of Mind Fields to my cousin who is an artist in his own right.
HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
REPLY TO RAY CARLSON
Oddly enough, Ray, just two weeks ago my "situation" vis-a-vis newspapers changed. I was brought up reading two, three different papers a day, I actually worked as a reporter for a while, and always started my days with newsprint.
But when they started collapsing one paper into another, narrowing the focus, imitating USA TODAY and the tv morning shows, I grew weary of them. I had always subscribed to a plethora of magazines--SCIENCE NEWS, HARPER'S, PLAYBOY, SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, TV GUIDE, COMICS BUYERS GUIDE and then, wonderfully, THE WEEK, just to name a few of my regular reads. So my need for the dailies grew even less pressing.
When I moved to LA in 1962, there were a few papers here. Now there is only the LOS ANGELES TIMES, which is awful, except for the book review (which they keep slimming down every year). So I relied on books of current events, Sunday discussion shows and the Lehrer News Hour, and the on-the-hour CBS feed to KNX-AM to keep me abreast of current events. Magazines filled in the needed "deeper insights," particularly via THE WEEK, which I set considerable store by. Highly recommended!
But when TV GUIDE went to that awful new "entertainment tonight" format, and stopped the local listings, we cancelled, after 50 years' being a subscriber, right from the first issue. They've lost 60,000 subscribers in the first 2 weeks, according to one of my pals at TV GUIDE, and they don't seem to give a shit, because they're saving a fortune not having to assemble all those regional editions. It was NEVER a vade mecum, but now it's just utter trash, a hand-maiden to the apparat that considers the bowel movements of Josh Duhamel more important than the growing dislocation of civilization.
But to cover, for the need for tv listings, we're now getting the awful LA TIMES on Friday, Saturday & Sunday.
So, yes, NOW I'm back to reading newspapers...somewhat.
Yr. pal, Harlan
All Hallow's Eve
Anyone have any favorite tunes for today?
Nick Cave - Knoxville Girl
Warren Zevon - Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner
BOO!
On this unhallowed evening, this accursed portion of our mindless orbit around the uncaring star which we arrogantly call “the Sun”, when the membrane that shields all that is clean and wholesome and sane against the nameless measureless void is thinnest and most easily penetrated; two manuscripts have been left by the simpleton from the village who delivers my mail, hastening away not sure but that the gargoyle on my stoop eyes him speculatively.
Thomas Ligotti, THE SHADOW at the BOTTOM of the WORLD
William Hope Hodgson, ADRIFT on the HAUNTED SEAS
Both of these are edited and introduced by Douglas A. Anderson for Cold Spring Press.
I only became aware of the work of Thomas Ligotti myself less than a year ago. He dwells in relative obscurity, mostly out of print. Finding his stuff is difficult which is a shame because he is a hell of a writer. Ligotti has accomplished something I would have thought impossible. He has been influenced by Lovecraft, without becoming a clone or a parody of HPL. Ligotti has swallowed him alive, and shat out something strange and wonderful. This collection is a “best-of” with some newer work added. If you count yourself a lover of the macabre and the unsettling and don’t mind good writing as well please help make this guy some money and keep him in print.
Hodgson is one of the “old masters”, doing all his work before he was 40 years old, fated to be vaporized in a field at Ypres in 1918 by a German artillery shell. He left home at thirteen and endured eight years at sea. He spent the rest of his short life writing about it, both realistically and otherwise. This collection contains the best of his supernatural sea stories. It also includes two fascinating essays, one about what it would have been like to be on the Titanic, and the other reminiscence about experiencing a cyclone at sea. Hodgson is the master of the creepy mood and his great novel HOUSE on the BORDERLAND is one of the few successful attempts at sustaining this mood at novel length. (It also anticipates everything in HPL except the tentacled vaginas but we had that argument already didn’t we?)
Congrats to Mr. Anderson for his taste and timeliness. And both of these books together will only set you back about $20 so don’t say you weren’t warned!
Hmmmm… the sound of sliding stone and crunching feet fast disappearing into the distance. And now… a high pitched scream? Could it be the fool from the village did not leave my property with as much dispatch as he ought?
REPLY TO ROD
YES YES YES! Please buy me two or three of the Aussie A BOY AND HIS DOG videos. Doesn't matter if they're in PAL, because they're for my archive and Tim Richmond's bibliography.
Payment in advance, if you require it.
Payment after-the-fact, including cost of mailing, if you'd prefer.
In US or Australian $$$$, whichever is a better deal for you. Let me know and I'll either get one of my pals downunder to send you the reimbursement posthaste, or I'll do it by bank transfer...or whatever...
In any case, you won't get stuck for this largesse.
And thank you, thank you.
Also, thank you.
Yr. pal, that sweet old cobber, Harlan
>It was "Bright Corners" by Monk.
Alex - I believe you mean "Brilliant Corners". My favorite Monk recording. I was listening to it before I left for work this morning.
Great minds think alike...
Happy Halloween, folks!!
Today's the day I read "Pillar of Fire" by Ray Bradbury (which Harlan turned me on to right here on Ye Olde Weberlande").
I live in one of the greatest trick or treat neighborhoods in the world. I moved my Monday night rehearsal to Tuesday just so I won't miss anything. When the kids get home from school, we'll carve up pumpkins and make ready for the wild rumpus to begin!!
________
Steve Barber: I really should get in touch and am sorry I haven't. I'm just swamped with jazz these days. I enjoy reading what other people here have to say about their music (of all kinds), but I'm sort of wrapped up in it all day long. When I come here, it's more or less to escape my "dayjob". I *am* glad to read that Chris is doing well and landing some good gigs. She deserves it. So thanks for sharing the info. Sorry I haven't bought a disc yet, man. I want to, but I just plain ol' haven't gotten around to doing so. Forgive me. Like I said, I'm swamped in jazz and somedays I feel like I'm on the verge of drowning!! So much music!! For me lately it's been Ahmad Jamal, Ella Fitzgerald (a kind of semester-long focus related to my teaching), Billy Strayhorn, Henri Salvador, Stevie Wonder (the new one!! I love it!! "Moon Blue" alone is worth the price of admission), and sundry other things I'm either studying or just happen across. The new Coltrane/Monk at Carnegie Hall is interesting too.
Heinlein story
Edward,
If my fading memory serves, the Heinlein story is probably "They," which you'll find in THE UNPLEASANT PROFESSION OF JONATHAN HOAG, and in THE FANTASIES OF R.A.H.
--tr
Newspapers
Unca Harlan,
If it's not too personal...
A few years back there was an introduction to a book in which you stated you don’t read newspapers and get your news from CBS radio. Just wondering why no newspapers and does this still hold true today? Thank you.
Help!!!
I recently finished reading Jim Thompson's "Now and on Earth" and I need some help from those in the know. There is a passage in the book where the main character makes a reference to a Robert Heinlein story about a guy who is talking to his doctor about how he only gets enough food and sleep to keep him going through the work day and how he makes just enough money to pay his bills and that his wife, boss, kids, friends, etc. are demons that are controlling his life; Anyone know the title of this story?
Brent,
I'm sorry about giving up teaching, too. I may get back into it, just in an alternate manner.
We'll see.
Keiti
A Boy and His Dog Arrive in Australia
The Australian DVD release of A BOY AND HIS DOG has hit the shelves in retail outlets down here. It has been put out by Shock and Umbrella Entertainment, distributors who specialise in cult titles.
Link to the cover:
http://www.shock.com.au/releases/info.asp?release_ID=130627
In case you can't quite read the text at the top of the slick, it says, "Harlan Ellison's Classic Sci-Fi Tale". Too bad about the use of "skiffy", but at least Harlan's name is on the cover.
Harlan, let me know if you want an original copy of this DVD. It is in PAL video format and coded for region 4. The cover says it's not an anamorphic transfer, so it seems that our distributor has recycled the same letterboxed transfer doing the rounds in all territories.
Rob: I just got this link from a yahoogroup advertising jobs for technical writers of all things; someone had (knowingly) posted a slightly (for them) offtopic message announcing it. Check out
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/graphicnovel/
I think it's just starting up, but if people pass the word it will become more active. As for jobs, well writing things like technical manuals does pay the bills, but it's not exactly creative!
Brent: Yup, I saw that page - the Google search engine actually is good for something some of the time. As for the album, one can seek out used record stores and put in a request to notify you if they get a copy in. I couldn't find any on Ebay or in the inventory of a couple mail order stores at the moment.
I don't think any "popular" genre of music is likely to *really* outlive the generation that grew up with it. Classical can hopefully be immortal and perhaps jazz as well since it isn't totally tied to an adolescent experience (I suspect people listen to "music" more with hormones than with their ears!)
Kristin
I've been supplementing my living for the past 30+ years as a musician, and cannot afford to be ignorant about the state of the art.
But I have also found that Sturgeon's Law applies at least as much to music as it does to writing. The bands and songs that not only survive for more than a generation, but are accessible to more than a narrow slice of the populace are the ones that I'll take seriously. The flash in the pan "Ain't I cool!" bands that follow trends don't much interest me, and generally for a good reason.
Give me Gershwin, Tchaikovsky, Brahms, Clifford Brown, Louis Armstrong, Billy Joel, Fats Waller, Vivaldi, Beethoven, Paul McCartney, Paul Williams, Bach (JS and PDQ), Billy Holliday, Billy Strayhorn, Billy Preston, Gustav Holst, Steve Kupka and Gordon Goodwin any day. But I can leave Shaun Combs alone, and I have a feeling few will remember him more fondly in 30 years than we recall most of the flash acts of the disco era now.
Note "many of".
Huh?
"As far as music goes...many of the posters have shown a gross ignorance of musical history post 1975."
You've GOT to be kidding.
Do you really want to go mano-a-mano?
Britney Spears doesn't suck, she rules. 50 million fans can't be wrong. I've got all her albums, can't wait for the comeback.
4th season of the Brady Bunch coming out on Monday. Can't wait.
Listening
Brian Siano - The trouble with the Baby Boomers is that they stopped listening around about 1980. I'm Genx myself, and watched my generation get accused of being lazy (Slackers) first and then greedy later (damn dotcom millionares) without anyone apparently noticing the contradiction.
Steve Barber - Interesting statistical tidbit: television viewership among today's youth is way down. Where my generation (and your generation) sat staring at the boob tube, today's generation sits killing zombies, blogging on live journal and reading webcomics. Which is worse? Who can say?
As far as music goes...many of the posters have shown a gross ignorance of musical history post 1975. Not surprising. It's normal behavior. At fourteen, we listen to pap, and call it classics. At twenty-five, we discover what's new and good and proclaim it new and good. We then spend the next sixty years complaining that the music the fourteen-year-olds listen to is pap and utterly missing what is new and good.
Sure, you're fourteen-year-old nephew has no clue who The Velvet Underground was, but then, you've got no clue on today's equivalent. Just because you haven't found them, doesn't mean they aren't there. It means you are ignorant of them, most likely because you've dismissed anything modern because Britney Spears sucks.
If you want to make the case that the music of the sixties is far superior to that of today, you can't compare the critically aclaimed of the past with the top of the charts today. You've either got to compare just the pop hits of then to the pop hits now or, better yet, you've got to do some legwork and actually learn what is out there that is good. Though I suspect it's easier to ignorantly dismiss those damn kids.
It's common behavior. It means that all of the college radio music lover types that encounter this thread are going laugh at you old fogie. And talking about all the great sixties acts isn't going to stop the laughter because a) the college radio music lover types damn well do know about it and b) you display gross ignorance of anything that has happened musically afterwords.
I know that the comment down thread about how "unexperimental" modern music is had me in stitches, as the CD at my elbow was by a pop star who'd recently released a virutally a cappella featuring two songs in icelandic.
Honestly, this all amuses me to no end because if there was ever a generation that was the target of raving polemics about the fall of America's youth, it was the baby boom. To have the same generation point the exact same charges at the generations to follow just shows how utterly un-self-aware most people are.
to HE
I ran into David tonight while out shopping, we talked and I passed on your message to him. he sounded pleased to have got the message.
I need a job.
Harlan, please find me a writing job right away.
I can write barbing column reviews. I can write self-righteous film reviews. I can write yellow journalism. I can write slander. I can write smut. I can write twisted romance. I can write dialogue for porno. I can write sf or fantasy. I can write ace suicide notes.
I need the work right away, so please don't take your time about things. And don't want any of this shit about "unsolicited" material or experience. I can handle the work.
The payment arrangements: I work by pay-or-write. Anyone wishing to acquire my services will have to send me a check for $1.5 million along with an outline of the assignment. If I really like the project I'll cash the check. The client will then owe me another $1.5 million. If he cannot come up with the other half I will forfeit the assignment and keep my half.
I'll wait by the phone for your call. Don't be too long - I have to hit the can.
Val Lewton Boxed Set
Am currently making my way through the Val Lewton boxed set, preparatory to a review: a real labor of love for me, since I've always wanted to see these films and have never managed to catch up with any of them other than CAT PEOPLE. (A shocking hole in my movie buff experience, I know. But I lived most of my life in the days before DVDs, and none of Lewton's movies but CAT PEOPLE were ever in heavy rotation on the midnight movie). Anyhow, so far I've seen GHOST SHIP, THE LEOPARD MAN, and BEDLAM; GHOST SHIP is so far my favorite of the three. Was less impressed with LEOPARD MAN than I expected to be, though I dearly loved the suspense sequences, including the one involving the locked door that our host has praised in many venues.
Stephane
That Stringsville article refers to Grappelli as "sirup" (sic?). And here I thought I had good taste in jazz violin.
Ever the humbled one,
Neal
Typos
Please forgive 'em. As stated, 4 hours sleep and only on my first cup...
Bled Jazz
Four hours sleep last night after a late evening roadying for me esposa, so, yeah, good topic for the day. We just made a deal for distro to fifty or so college and internet jazz "radio" stations. Hopefully I can point you towards some of 'em for a airplay. (Cookie, email me...)
Oh, and she may be playing at the Beverly Hilton and a guest-spot at the LA Hard Rock (?!?) in Feb.
(I know. Shameless.)
_______________________________________
On the other hand, I can't resist posting one more thought on dem damn yoot...
Would it be fair to make the observations that a) kids today aren't necessarily dumber than previous generation, just less motivated to learn and more motivated to watch tv/play video games? And b) that we're all echoing the exact same complaints previous generations level at the "youth of today"? I can remember some pretty scathing reviews of the "Youth of the '60s", and most of them worked out okay (though some with fewer brain cells than the rest of us...). The same with the self-indulgent '70s and the new-wave '80s.
SOME of today's youth are pretty lacking, there's no question. Have they read the great authors? Do they know from Hemingway, Shakespeare, Flaubert, Tolstoy, Cervantes or Thackery? No, not likely. The messages posted by the younger-skewing PA fans inevitably began "I don't know who Harlan Ellison is, but..." The vast majority of the '60s generation may have recognized the name Kerouac, but did they really ever red his stuff? God knows enough people DID read Rod McKuen' poetry and labeled it great literature -- so youthful tastes and education WERE questionable in that generation.
On the other hand I'll go back to the motivation thingy. In all honesty, I think kids today are as smart and potentially as edumacated as older folks, but they seem to be (vast generalization and I can give many examples of exceptions) less inclined to excel, and a good portion of this comes from our society's message to them: Self-indulgence is okay, get rich quick with a lawsuit, criticism is a no-no according to psychologists, and pressure/punishment is something reserved for adults since we don't want the kids to grow up -- gee -- like we did.
USA Today gives headlines instead of analysis. MTV gave us the three minute attention span. Pokemon instead of Curiosity Shop and Schoolhouse Rock on Saturday morning. George Bush -- a noted slacker, alcoholic and drug user in his youth -- was an acceptable president to the majority of Americans AFTER demonstrating his incompetence in office.
Folks, it's OUR view of the world these kids are growing into, and in many ways complaining about the quality of the kids today is a reflection on what WE created. The kids didn't invent this world, they're simply adapting to the one we gave 'em. That doesn't make 'em dumb, just evolutionary.
if you're cut, do you bleed jazz?
Fun article on Stringsville:
http://www.jonroseweb.com/c_articles_stringsville.html
It is indeed a tasty album.
Keiti- Sorry to hear you're giving up teaching.
My Own Two Cents (for what they're worth)
I haven't posted here but once, so you may or may not recall at my last post I had just started teaching high school english. That was about three months ago. Suffice to say, I've had the current topic of today's youth on my brain. I also told Harlan that I would get back to him and let him know whether I got the okay to teach "I Have No Mouth" to my 11th Grade Honors Kids. (For the record, I never got the official "okay", but I did read it to them as a last hurrah.) After a mere three months of teaching I'd decided I'd had enough. Perhaps my reasons of choosing not to continue teaching make me a selfish bitch. So be it. Self-preservation kicked in and took hold.
In some ways, I fall into the abyss that is today's youth. I am 34 - not the brightest person on the planet, and mis-spent much of my youth goofing off and doing not much else. I have, however, spent the past 10 years playing catch up, or trying to. For whatever that's worth.
At any rate, I'll skip posting my complete tirade here, but should you want to read it, you can visit http://lucretiaisme.blogspot.com.
Have to go continue cleaning up post Wilma.
Keiti
One thing I've noticed about the younger generation is that profanity has become punctuation. I heard one twentysomething talking to a friend on his cellphone. The conversation went something like this: "Yeah, man, I fuckin' went to the bank yesterday and this hot fuckin' chick was standing in line, and we fuckin' said hello to each other, and I was fuckin' psyched!"
Musings
If the shift to a white collar (and services) economy sucks the life out of youth, is that a statement against technology (above a certain level?)
Many jobs are sent overseas, but more are lost to automation.
The economy is increasingly technical and scientific, which means that increasingly only those with advanced degrees - or at the very least a lot more science background than our schools give people - can earn a living wage. There is a polarization between high and low paying jobs with the middle class rapidly disappearing.
Science education is failing and more and more people are taught to believe in Creationism even as the biological sciences are the fastest growing (with the things like an aging population needing new medicines, etc.)
Also, I sometimes wonder how people who have been science fiction fans can be Luddite, and why political activism is more important than a good general education.
Just thinking,
Kristin
Are the Yoots of Today legions of morons? Well, gang, I've devoted some serious thought to this. Really. I noodled on this one for a few hours today, on and off, while I ironed my shirts, watched _I Walked with a Zombie_, oversaw the Roto Rooter man drill out my sewer line, washed out my basement with a hose of hot water, helped a friend deliver goods to a goodwill store, and did all kindsa other boring stuff. But all though it, I was wondering, "Okay, _are_ today's kids creeps compared to those of Those Fabulous Sixties?"
And it's a sad admission to say _yes_. It's sad because I come from the cohort at the tail end of the Baby Boom. I say this _admitting_ the failure of my generation to meet and surpass the challenges of that great decade.
I'd like to point out that most of the movers and shakers of that time were not, precisely speaking, Baby Boomers. The Port Huron Statement-- that wonderful distillation of the aspirations of postwar America-- was composed by those born just before or during World War II. The leaders of the Civil Rights movement-- King, Abernathy, even Malcolm-- were born in the 1920s. The artists who stepped forward as New American Voices were also prewar babies, perhaps in the 1920s or the 1930s. In some cases, they were the same men and women who'd fought in World War II, and knew the stakes then. The 1960s weren't an aberration, or something that popped up from the shitload of Baby Boomers who'd made it into college; they were the last and highest reach for greatness of the men and women of the 20th Century.
The main virtue of the Baby Boomers is this: they had a damn good sense of who to _listen_ to. This may be because they were the last _literate_ generation, where print carried an authority that we now give to television and movies and music. This doesn't mean that everyone they followed was a king among men (Timothy Leary, for example). But they did seem to have a slightly better bullshit detector than those who've followed.
I won't say all of the kids are Fer Shit. There are always percentages of activists, agitators, thinkers and doers among any large cohort. But to me, it seems that those people are comfortably marginalized by their peers; the rest of the subsequent generations are more content to leave the Big Questions up to those in power.
I have a strongly-Marxian theory that this has to do with the rise of our service economy: office clerical work has never been conducive to labor unrest or worker solidarity, and the fruits of that labor feel empty and pointless, so perhaps its rise has met with a general lack of spirit and a disconnectedness from real life-and-death issues. It grinds people doen, and the people who aren't ground down _yet_ see others being ground down, and figure that's the Way of the World.
So yeah. I'd say we've gone downhill. Just not without cause.
Old News
I've been looking at the comments here, those that are savory and those that are vapid little things, and I find that the best way I can answer them is to include part of my own exchange with Harlan, from right here in 2001. And I note that with the passing of years, I now think I was dead wrong, and Harlan, as so often, was deadly right---
Alex Krislov
Stray Cur Heights, Ooooooooo-klahio United States - Sunday, July 29 2001 11:20:42
Okay, okay, so the kids today ain't got no culture. It's true, I don't deny it. What bothers me a bit about these comments is that I always hear my generation muttering along these lines, and, damnit, neither did we. I squeak, of course, of the Baby Boomers.
Harlan wrote, in THE GLASS TEAT, of finding reason to bless television when a waiter in a restaurant sported a t-shirt with the words "Rick's Cafe American." For all the boob tube's manifold flaws, it did help maintain the past. Where else, in those pre-cable, pre-VCR days, would this youngster have seen "Casablanca?" Bubelahs, Balbatim, that's not kids, that's _us._ That's the boomerbaby generation, the self-absorbed coterie that invented sex, proclaimed the church of pot-smoking, and outlawed tobacco. Think our generation has cultural depth? Hah!
Whenever someone challenges me on my skepticism regarding astrology, I point out that I'm a twin. My sister, born five minutes ahead of me (pushy, even then), raised with the same enormous family library, educated at the same schools, holder of two degrees, reads a book as often as twice a year. During the OJ trial, she stretched out and read _three!_ We've got the same sign? Hah!
I know boomers who talk about today's damn kids, but who wouldn't know Also Sprach Zarathustra (except for the main theme, for obvious reasons) from the Moonlight Sonata. This year, they know Dizzy from Satchmo because they've heard the gospel of Ken Burns. But it won't last.
In 1995 or 6, Harlan told me his great "Lost Horizon" story--and how it was totally lost on the staff of White Wolf publishing, where the oldest member of the staff, publicist Kim Shropshire, was several years shy of thirty. Delighted, I repeated the yarn to my wife....who said, "What's 'Lost Horizon?'"
Yeah, the damn kids don't know nothin' today....but are the boomers in a position to talk?
Okay, I'm feeling cynical today. My older daughter asked what I had playing in my office this morning, and my wife said, "More of daddy's weird music." It was "Bright Corners" by Monk. Faz baz.
--Just ranting, Alex
Harlan Ellison
- Sunday, July 29 2001 18:46:13
Cookie and Alex K.:
I am about to turn you on to a thing that you will never forget, that will roll your socks up and down . . . if you can locate a copy.
Monk is one of my passions. Heard him play live at the Five Spot, the Showplace, the Village Vanguard, and other venues, in the '50s and early '60s. My favorite Monk composition is, predictably, "'Round Midnight."
And the best version of it---after Monk's original, of course---appears on an Atlantic album (circa late '50s) by violinist Harry Lookofsky titled STRINGSVILLE. The number of memorable jazz violinists beyond Grappelli and Joe Venuti and Stuff Smith and the occasional piece by Tal Farlow (and one other famous one, whose name has fallen out of my head just when I need it) can be counted on the fingers of one hand with enough digits left over to pick your nose.
This, as far as I know, was Lookofsky's only pressing as a leader, though he was a much-valued, much-hired, much-respected studio musician and first violin in several world class symphonic aggregations. How and why this offbeat album was cut, I have no idea. But when Atlantic released it, I gave it a "highest recommendation" in my jazz columns and in reviews for METRONOME. It is, simply, breathtaking. Haunting. Imperial.
If you two enjoy Monk, then take it as your life's work to locate a copy of STRINGSVILLE. You will honor me for the advisement.
(And to all those of you with an unquenchable egalitarian mien--much like the one I sported for fifty-plus years--who think that "babyboomers" shouldn't be dissing today's dunderheaded tots because YOU were vapid in YOUR teens, well, as I've said repeatedly, LIFE IS NOT A COMPARISON OF CHAMBERS OF HORROR!!!
(Just because YOU were shallow, does not make the emptiness, surliness, arrogance, cultural illiteracy, violence, fatheaded antics, outright ignorance, blatant stupidity, and random disrespectful belligerance of today's punks any less objectionable, any more pardonable, any nobler or permissable.
There is a qualitative difference, as well as a quantitative one. Things ARE worse. More jerkazoids, and the level of jerknicity asymptotically higher than a cat stranded in a belfry. Even in the '60s and '70s, when addressing a high school or college crowd, I could expect a level of understanding and curiosity and cultural ethic that today would get such kids a place on The Weakest Link or Who Wants to be a Badly-Informed Millionaire. Today, the plague sowed by rock'n'roll as religion has taken its toll. Kids are, in fact, dumber, less informed, less literate, and snottier about it than they were in times before The Gap and MTV and the dynamite pr of this week's shitty movie blockbuster. They are a corrupted constituency mesmerized and potty-trained to be nothing more glorious than conspicuous consumers of seasonal faddish food and tune and clothing, to want nothing more than a Lexus and partypartyparty; and it is only the anecdotal exception--such as Justin, who is ANYTHING but a punk--that keeps me from pressing the red button to blow every one of the orally-challenged little pismires to Kingdom Come.
(Stop excusing the rampant cultural moronicity just because there were shitheads and dumbkopfs and assholes when YOU were in high school. Remember what it felt like to NOT be one of their ravenous clique? Pre-Columbine horror situations. Remember?)
These are the soulless doofuses who go to work for rapacious law firms like Latham & Watkins. Who buy acromegalic SUVs to show how big their dicks are. Who litter without a thought. Who see no Big Picture, see no Little Picture, see only their own avarice as worthwhile. Who have everything, but are still riddled with umbrage. Who cannot accept responsibility for their actions, much less their lives. Who know nothing, but have never had a star shine in their eyes, or a dream illuminate the arid wasteland of their inner moral desert. They were ignorant and amoral as an asp when they were kids, and as adults they are as free of ethical imperative as aluminum siding.
You excuse them, you let them off the hook, at your peril. Nathaniel Brazill was not unique.
Yr. pal, Harlan, who daily grows more pragmatic as the darkness creeps toward him.
DVG:
It is time someone rapped your pinkies with a steel-edged ruler.
Your asseverations and "observations" about the society of the 1960s--1970s are ignorant AND no more accurate than any other politically-fomented Urban Legendry that serves the current loathesome apparat. Which is to say, as we used to say in the slam, "you are talking outta the side of your neck."
But sanity is available to you. Help is on the way. I have written a long essay. It is called "The Song the Sixties Sang." It is accurate and even-handed, down to the smallest jot of minutiae. It originally appeared in Playboy.
It is one of the selections contained in THE HARLAN ELLISON HORNBOOK. If you do not own a copy, and cannot take one out of the nearest library, we will cheerfully sell you a copy at a reasonable price, right here at this website.
But do avail yourself of this wonderful, fact-&-fun-filled testament to a period about which, clearly, you don't know squat.
Respectfully, Yr. Pal, Harlan
DVG
Please play by the same rules the rest of us are expected to obey---1 post per day.
Thank you.
"Okay. I am going to stop myself, because I could go and on and on and on..."
Thanks! Duly noted.
I really have no idea what sort of cave you'd have to live in to think kids only listen to what's on the radio or MTV. It couldn't possibly be a cave in New York, where every 20-something is busy giving me a pass to their friend's cousin's aunt's cat's alto-techno-ska-rock-opera concert and where the acclaimed queen of the cabaret revival, Maude Maggart, checks in at the ripe old age of 28.
"DVG - Because in the sixties youth created great artistic triumphs like "Herman and the Hermits."
I'll climb onto my soapbox for a moment. I'm very disappointed in the musical awareness of kids these days. If it's not on MTV (for what little music they even play anymore), or on the radio, then it's obscure and unworthy. I'm just so disappointed in today's generation, because sterotypical attitudes rule their openness to and judgement of music. For example, classical and bluegrass. If hasn't a beat, then it's not "normal" music. Sure, a lot of other forms of music are an acquired taste, but that requires a slowing down and focusing; a lot the most popular, mainstream alternative/pop-rock music gives kids a quick, two-minute music high. Fast music for fast moving lives. A lot of kids in this latest generation are nursed on it during their early exposure to music; it's addicting, and therefore breeds ignorance, limiting their spectrum of awareness and appreciation. It's all so disappointing.
Okay. I am going to stop myself, because I could go and on and on and on...
Honor your forefathers (and foremothers)
Steve Burnap cracked:
> DVG - Because in the sixties youth created great artistic triumphs like "Herman and the Hermits.
That was "Herman's Hermits" (as distinguished from Paul Revere and the Raiders, The Mamas and the Papas, and and Dion and the Belmonts), led by Peter Noone, whippersnapper.
Just the other day, I was thinking about how I ought to do "Mrs. Brown, You've Got a Lovely Daughter" on karaoke night. . . .
The young are impatient with, and dismissive of the old. The old are jealous and fearful of the young.
Same as it ever was.
Ignorance is always bad but old ignorance seems to do a lot more damage than young ignorance.
And every generation is simultaneously slip slidin' into the arms of ole scratch and sprouting wings flying to glory.
Same as it ever was.
Now that that's settled...
S.P.I.D.E.R. Forums
Hey everyone,
If you are new to the board or haven't visited in a while, might I recommend a visit to the SPIDER Forums located in the Forums (see the top of the page)? The service is slow, but the conversation is lively the company slightly mad, but fascinating, and the meat... is an Ellis-ATION!!
Come in and bring your own dish. Take a bite off someone else's plate. Hell, take a bite out of someone's ass. It's all haute cuisine at SPIDER Forums.
Da Forumz: Where the Elite Meet for Spider-y Treats!
Alex Krislov:
Okay, be more specific. Your complaint, in substance, is no different from the one people were making ten, twenty, and, I suppose fifty or five hundred years ago. Are 87% of today’s kids dunderheads, as opposed to 83% thirty years ago? I think this sort of comparison is useless. It tells us nothing. Also, again, and this is obviously a matter of personal taste, the attitude reeks of paternalism and condescension, which irritate me.
You should take a look at David Brooks’ Atlantic article on Princeton students. Which many people took as a portrait of a generation of organization men (and women.) Well, maybe, but they’re a bunch of very smart conformists. “Overachiever” seems an understatement. Twenty years ago I managed to get into Columbia. Today I think I’d be lucky to be admitted to UC Berkeley, which was my safety school in 1984.
I’m also reminded of Vonnegut’s retort to Allen Ginsberg, which went something like “Well, I saw the best minds of MY generation become particle physicists and biochemists.”
Eric Martin:
You’re right. It’s a sorry picture. And I’m sure in trailer parks all over America people are losing sleep, asking themselves “How did I let Eric Martin down?”
Let me suggest a slogan for the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee: “Prove you’re not an idiot...vote for me.”
That’ll be a big winner.
Artistic Culture
DVG - Because in the sixties youth created great artistic triumphs like "Herman and the Hermits.
"Harlan told me I was kidding myself. He told me to examine today's kids more closely, and compare them to the kids of the sixties and seventies. He said they didn't measure up.
And y'know what? He was right."
In what way precisely?
Bad dancing? Illegitimate children named "Moonbeam?" VW Bus ownership? Later BMW ownership? Ugly haircuts? Multiple marriages? Herpes transmission rates? Illiterate New York Times Op-Ed contributions? Greenmailing? Whining? Having an old fondue pot somewhere that they haven't used since 1978?
And precisely how did this "close examination" take place? A detailed checklist titled "Ways in Which you Are Inferior to Dirty Hippies" passed out to the Senior Class at Yale? Or was this one of those "candy and a long dark car" things weird old Uncle Harry was always going on about?
Are kids self-centered ignoramuses?
Yep, by and large - but no less than their parents. I don't envy kids.
I had a discussion a couple of years ago with a mom who heatedly advocated for home-schooling and railed against public education. Well, I pointed out that when I grew up in the '60s public education was a fine and productive thing, going back to FDR. It was dismantled by the extreme tugs of political factions in the '70s (I watched that happen from the inside, moving as I did from parochial and public schools, even doing a two-year non-ROTC bid at the same Jesuit/military high school from which Antonin Scalia graduated.) But long argument short, the point being that public schooling COULD work, if people didn't whine about paying for it.
"But since you don't have any kids," she countered, "it's not really your problem then, is it?"
And I answered, "It's my problem when stupid kids grow up to be stupid adults."
And my point to all of you is: The world is run by stupid, self-centered adults NOW, many of whom are as subbornly ignorant of history as toddlers. Where did they come from?
But rather than wait for more on this tiresome topic, I direct you all to this splendid profile of my heroine, Sarah Silverman, from a recent issue of the New Yorker:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/051024fa_fact
History
Steve D - I kind of wonder if this isn't a recurrent question generation after generation. The "kids" never seem to get "it", and the parental types always tend to believe that we're losing touch with our heritage.
I think there's valid concern that younger people don't have a real appreciation of historical events, and part of this has to do with age and maturity. But it also has to do with exposure and experience.
Growing up I moved around quite a bit (Navy family). What I discovered is that people who grew up in places of real historical value (Washington, DC; Newport; Boston; Philadelphia, etc) tended to have a better understanding of what had gone on before because they were literally surrounded by it. When I moved to SoCal I found that a lot of my friends just didn't care because it was all textbook, no reality.
Inner city young people who have never seen anything but pavement and cards are never going to understand what it's like to stand on the edge of the Grand Canyon, the middle of the Shenandoah forest, or the coast of Maine. Just no reference. Jamestown becomes just an animated backdrop to Pocahantas.
I grew up with an appreciation of history because history was all around me and it was important to my family. It isn't "Black History" that's in danger -- it's American history. If it isn't real, if it isn't living, then it's not of relevant importance to somone who is dealing with gangs, poverty, racism, drugs and the world at large.
Most (if not all) of the Webderlanders have a better appreciation of history and education simply because we've all been lucky enough to encounter the world as something to be explored and wondered at, not as something to be feared or ignored. I've always thought that the most valuable learning tool is travel. Sadly, not enough of us do it, and not enough of us do it well.
My 2 Centavos.
_______________________________________________
Glad to read the news that Chez Castro is alive and well, if a little damp...
I just had an eighteen year old "African American" student in my class hold forth on Huey Newton, Marcus Garvey, Rosa Parks, MLK, "The Letter from a Birmingham Jail" and "The Autobiography of Malcolm X." HE IS ALSO NOT ATYPICAL.
So many of the assumptions being made here, on both sides, show that the "wise posters" of the pavilion are being misinformed by the exact same media that they decry.
Is it that "black history" is dead in the "black" community or is it really that history is dead all around?
Steve Dooner
Jack Skillingstead, the very notion of a "working class" is a generalization. But I think the numbers would bear me out on most, if not all, of my unfair lumpings.
Class
Eric Martin, your list regarding "the working class" is an unfair generalization.
This is what Alex K. said in his original post: "today's African-American youth don't appreciate the legacy she won for them..."
What he is referring to specifically is a sample space of inner city black youth. But he didn't say that. He made an otherwise valid argument by pointing at "today's African-American youth". A rather all-encompassing label, if you ask me. As such, it is imprecise; however unintentionally, it marks everyone with a presupposition if he or she is young and black. This is, as I was trying to argue, the construct of stereotyping. I have black friends who'd sit there shaking their heads.
This is NOT a difficult point to follow.
To be clear on the rest of Alex's issue, he is right about how people, in general, can forget the struggle that pre-dated them and gave them the advantages of the present day. Happens all the time.
Hmmm...
Hmm. This dialogue about ignorant/attentive youth does stir my thoughts, but at almost-twenty-five, I don't consider myself experienced enough in life to comment up to the level that some you others are. But I'll toss in my two cents: I will agree that there's a massive plague of ignorance in today's youth. However, there are some very empowered and intelligent kids out there; the "bright stars" who will influence society. One single person can't change the world, but they can influence others who may put forth the same effort towards betterment of society. That's truly how it works.
Sociologist Herbert Spencer said that Social Darwinism was The Way for societies; fuck that shit. We are creatures of reason, and are entirely empowered with abilities to mold our societies. So, my point: There's a lot of youth out there whom know that, and are rising up to the challenges. Again, it's not just up to them. They'll influence and inspire, and hopefully that'll spread more and more, as the generations go on. But I'm not wearing rose-colored glasses; gotta be realistic: it's a choice. Free will is bittersweet.
Checking In
Have been without power since early Monday AM, when the hurricane knocked us out, but the lights came on a few short minutes ago. All is well here. Thanks for the queries, and thanks to Harlan and Susan for a necessary service to the temporarily electronics-deprived. --ATC
What you mean by "we," Kemosabe?
-------------"Yes, I'm sure you and your wife have encountered plenty of ignorant young folks, and old folks, of every race. What grates on me (and I might be guilty of reading more of it into your post than was actually there) is the paternalistic, condescending tone of "why don't they appreciate all we've done for them?" ----
We? Do I look like Rosa Parks? Nope, not nearly as pretty, and certainly nowhere near as impressive. Say, friend, I used to sound _just_ like you--and on this board, too! I spouted the "well, today's kids may suck, but they're no worse than we were" and "every generation pisses down on the next generation" bit, too.
Harlan told me I was kidding myself. He told me to examine today's kids more closely, and compare them to the kids of the sixties and seventies. He said they didn't measure up.
And y'know what? He was right.
There's a real lack of curiosity and intellectual rebellion in today's kids. They're not nihilistic--they're not giving their fatalism enough thought to rate that term. It's no wonder Bush is in office. He fits.
(Well, that ought to get me some hate mail.)
The working class have also been very disappointing what with all the drowning in the streets they've been doing recently. And those higher levels of mental and physical disorders--what's up with that?
Really, if only the super-rich controlled all of society. Things would be so much better. Well, for us, anyway.
Perhaps we could kill off the poor by sending them to a meaningless war someplace, preferably where there are a lot of other poor people?
See you poolside.
Caviar-flavored martinis--what won't they think of next?
>Oh dear...the working class is such a disappointment to me<
Well, what HAS the working class been up to these days? Let's see...
--a total decline in union membership
--the rise of idiot reality television and pseudo-sports like wrestling
--resounding votes for Bush and his administration for two terms running
--jingoistic support of the Iraq war
--a complete disinterest in environmental issues
--fervid anti-abortion lobbying
--gay-bashing as a matter of course
--tacit compliance with the surveillance society
--crystal meth epidemics in trailer parks across the land
--local lobbying to replace evolution with Christianity in the classroom
Yeah, I'd say the working class has been a disappointment to me too.
Alex - Yes, I'm sure you and your wife have encountered plenty of ignorant young folks, and old folks, of every race. What grates on me (and I might be guilty of reading more of it into your post than was actually there) is the paternalistic, condescending tone of "why don't they appreciate all we've done for them?" I think it's best summed up by that wonderful moment in "My Beautiful Laundrette" when Roshan Seth's disillusioned alcoholic journalist looks sadly at Daniel Day Lewis' reformed skinhead-turned-"underpants cleaner" and says "Oh dear...the working class is such a disappointment to me."
Some buried bones and a follow-up
*** Jay *** Thanks for the "SMILER" post on the other board. The hair part and pin make it almost too creepy.
***Mitch***
I'm posting the link to Harlan's story, ALL THE SOUNDS OF FEAR.
http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/classics/
Since you're hitting that archive anyways, you may want to check out this little ditty by Manley Wade Wellman with Halloween so close upon us. It's a nice tight little John the Balladeer tale.
A wonderful series for the uninitiated and just as good on the re-read.
http://tinyurl.com/9aawk
----------------------------------------------------
I stuck my Rosa Parks thing up on my blog and got a great letter from a friend of mine about how I should have tagged or "screenshot" the page I referred to, so as to capture the moment and so that he could hit the link. At first I thought this was a netiquette thing - not that I have a problem with that, since I firmly believe they are excavating new levels of hell for spammers and ALL CAPS screamers - but, he brought me up to speed on the power of blogs to track Orwellian revisionism and how more imbedded links can sometimes equal more veracity. Oh hell, I'm just going to quote him;
>> Kev to me: "I believe you. It's just that, having been tipped, I wanted to see what you were talking about, and one of the strengths of web-based reporting is that you, the reporter, can link to what you're talking about so we can see for ourselves. Could be because we want more detail; could be because we don't trust reporters' ability to summarize what they're told by people working on things the reporters have no background in (which is most things).
Once you start spending time on blogs, you develop a habit of clicking through to see whatever it is the blogger is talking about, instead of just taking their summary. And once you've developed that habit, you start to wonder why you CAN'T do it on NYT and CNN stories.
Especially stories about controveries triggered by blogs and community sites (DKos, FreeRepublic, DemocraticUnderground). Why don't they have links in their online stories and URLs in their paper editions? When they're reporting on documents and speeches, why are links to scans of the documents and transcripts of the speeches so rare? I think it's just being slow to get with the times, but a cynic might wonder if it has anything to do with how often such scans /transcripts are the basis of debunkings (Rathergate, canonically).
Rumsfeld (and Wolfowitz, when he was at the Pentagon) makes his own recordings when he's interviewed by the press, and the Pentagon posts the transcripts. Why don't the reporters do the same?" <<
Me again. Now, to some of you this is all old news, but it REALLY got me to thinking. I don't plan to use my blog as a reportage/investigative tool but rather, as an archive. But his point about the imbedded links as footnotes, or points of potential verification and their use (or, lack of same) got me excited about the [forgive me] blogosphere, in a way that I really hadn't been.
I know Harlan sees MOST of this as backyard washerwoman gossiping, and sometimes I'm in that camp myself, but if one of my smartest friends is going to give this new information environment this kind of thought I really have to at least consider its potential value.
The "follow-up" on the Parks thing was that just after I wrote that piece yesterday, Ms. Parks got bumped down from the national news [above the fold] section of the Google news page to the "people" section. Nothing sinister there, that's just the news cycle, doing what it does. But the USA Today link took me to a photo gallery of 12 shots. The fingerprint shot, mug shot,
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/rparksmug1.html
I'm using this link only because the USA Today photo gallery section is not copy/pastable.
and the ubiquitous "riding the bus" shot, but also, 9 color photos of her looking older - and happier.
So, no particular apparent malice on the part of USA Today unless they assigned some sort of value algorithm to the gallery shots. For all I know, Google tracked me checking some other "perp-walk" link and said to it's AM-like self, "Give Barney mug shots. He likes mug-shots." Brrr.
And if none of this process is fascinating to you, I'm sorry, but the idea of algorithms tracking and possibly altering our shared realities or personal realities sure is interesting to me.
- Barney
http://barney.wordpress.com/
The unsettling thing about the Miers withdrawal is the reason: Bush was bowing to pressure/lack of support from the extreme right. Kind of indicates how weak and disorganized the left continues to be in this country.
On a brighter note:
This coming weekend, actors and technical people from the Willamette Radio Workshop will perform a new adaptation of "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" by Portland playwright Sam Gregory, in the style of an old-time-radio show -- with actors reading scripts and doing live sound effects before an audience at several venues.
The shows will include the crackle of thunder and clip-clops of hansom cabs, gunshots, a large body falling down a staircase, and other exciting noises. (We're probably going to waste a few melons to get the sound of a head cracking open on the cobblestones after a fall from a roof.)
Shows will be at 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, Oct. 29th at the White Eagle Saloon (long reputed to be haunted), 836 North Russell Street; and at 5:30 and 7:00 p.m. on Halloween night, Monday, Oct. 31 at McMenamins Kennedy School, 5736 N.E. 33rd.
And yes, I will be reading a number of different roles as well as doing sound effects.
For more on the Willamette Radio Workshop (you can order CDs of their past shows, including last Halloween's Ogle-award-winning performance of "Frankenstein") at:
http://www.radiowork.com/index.php
The first comics adaptation of "The Hobbit"
First, I see it's being reported that Harriet Miers has withdrawn as Supreme Court Nominee. Credit her with some sense.
Now, I think that I may have asked this here before, but I'm trying to track down a comics adaptation of "The Hobbit" that appeared in a children's magazine in the mid- or late-1960s, when I was a wee lad growing up in Albion, NY. Obviously, this has nothing to do with the Eclipse Comics adaptation by Chuck Dixon and David Wenzel (of which, I have two copies--surely I have a nephew or niece who could use one). I thought that someone--perhaps the esteemed Mr. Ellison, himself--might remember this.
What I am trying to find out, is: 1) Who produced the adaptation; 2) Where and when was it actually published; 3) Was the adaptation ever completed; 4) Was it ever collected; and, 5) Does anyone know where I could obtain a copy?
I know for certain that this actually existed; I once possessed several issues of the magazine that serialized the story. Unfortunately, I have long-since lost the issues, and cannot even remember the publication's title. Help!
OUR History
Ummm.
Since when is teaching about Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Harriett Tubman, the underground railroad, the civil rights movement and the slave trade only African American history? They are AMERICAN history.
(Damn, where are italics when you need 'em.)
I've always felt the two-word approach to a sub-group's ancestral heritage (African American, Asian American, etc) detracts from us as a whole, and lets the divisions remain intact...
The fact that the schools may or may not be teaching specific parts of history -- it becoming increasingly difficult to teach anything controversial -- doesn't let us off the hook as a society. WE'RE the ones who need to make sure that the history isn't forgotten.
_____________________________________________________
Harriett Miers figured out that a lack of support from both the left and the right makes the process kind of worthless.
Tomorrow we (hopefully) get some justice from Prosecutor Fitzgerald. Delay, Frist and maybe Rove all indicted. So much for Bush's much vaunted ethical administration. Wasn't it Harlan who once observed that he would happily vote for any candidate with the cajones to tell us he/she would steal from us, but steal less from us than the other candidates???
______________________________________________
Lets hope the continuing silence from Florida is merely reflective of a lack of access, not a more significant problem.
Fun Shops
Mark,
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad places like Dreamhaven are around, I'm just find it amazing that they stay in business. Maybe they have decent rent since they are in a not-so-nice part of town. In days like today, the Cub and the Rainbow and the other super stores have put out the mom and pop grocery stores out of business. Same thing applies to book stores and everything else that has a fun quality to it, being a unique locally owned business versus a huge corporation.
However, Dreamhaven doesn't really carry much for "new" books, other than a niche selection, so I don't see places like Barnes and Noble really taking much of its business. Personally, I find their selection to be sub-par; all of it at priced at market premium or above. That is just my opinion. The Nostalgia Zone operates on a similar business model, I call it The Museum, because they price everything at top dollar or above. The difference between the two is that I know Nostalgia Zone will have just about every oddball obscure comic from 30 or 40 years, so long as I'm willing to pay through the nose. Dreamhaven prices the same, but caries a much skimpier selection, I find their comic selection in particular to be pretty forgettable. At Dreamhaven I see stuff way overpriced sitting on their shelves for YEARS! Years man! That is just crazy to me. Places like Uncle Hugos still operate with the frame of mind, that they are turning product over, constantly. Run by fans for fans, if you will. I'm not giving the Uncles a huge pat on the back or anything, I'm just pointing out the difference. eBay of course has changed how collectors interact.
One thing that I do like about Dreamhaven a lot, is that they publish stuff from time to time that is pretty fun. I'm not sure if you've read "Now we are Sick" or "Shelf Life" but stuff like that is pretty cool, unique and only happens at once place. But for finding some gem paperback or comic from the 60's or 70's, it just isn't the place to go. They have a small stock of it, and what they do have, is priced at a premium. Which is too bad, because to me that seems like what the main function of a store should be to the consumer - but in reality I'm guessing the main function of the physical store these days is to buy - buy up collections from people off the street.
I find the stories of the people who own and operate these stores to be pretty interesting. Greg from Dreamhaven seems to be a pretty connected guy. The feuds that took place between the owners of the Comic City/College of Comic Book Knowledge/Nostalgia Zone and the beginnings of Shinders are all fun bits of Mpls collectors history.
Sorry if I tend to ramble.
P.s. You mentioned Neil Gaiman - he is going to be signing at Dreamhaven, I think a spurt of the moment thing - in the next couple of weeks. Might want to keep your eyes peeled at Neil's blog or Dreamhavens website if you're interested.
The rap artist was KRS-One, who also provided the ad-lib commentary at the end of REM's "Radio Song."
I actually don't like rap particularly. But then it isn't really addressed to me.
If kids don't know about X, then there is something wrong with the people and/or organizations who are teaching them the subject. How this doesn't immediately present itself as a fact will never cease to astonish me.
I count myself as fairly well-read but if my mother hadn't taken the time to instill a sense of reading as a pleasure in me at a young age and also indicate what books were and would be important, I don't know that I would have come to it by myself. Most kids would rather run around outside and play than sit indoors with a book. This probably has something to do with hormones, etc., than it does deeply rooted character flaws.
Arguments to the contrary have a whiff of Mrs. Joe about them. "Ungrateful! Why is it that the young are always ungrateful?"
Bookstores in Mpls
Brent,
I know Uncle Hugo's and its brother store Uncle Edgar's very well. I usually take a trip there 3-4 times a year and have never left there empty handed. When my Dad makes his annual visit up here, I know that I will be spending at least one afternoon at Hugo's, so the place is very special to me. They can be found on the web at http://www.unclehugo.com/prod/
Dreamhaven is a bit different as it is not solely focused on books. They have a huge inventory of collectibles that I love to browse and their comic book catalog is very impressive. Due to the fact that the owner of the store is friends with both Harlan and Neil Gaiman, they have a substantial offering of works from both authors, with much of the stuff from Neil signed.
Dreamhaven is, without question, one of the best stores for fans of the speculative fiction genre that I have ever found. For those interested, the website is http://www.dreamhavenbooks.com/ and has a nice little quote from Harlan at the top of the page
Hip-hop
Y'know back when hip-hop got started, MCs took offense to being called "rappers". Last last week there was an excellent show on NPR about Kwaito (a South African hip-hop/house/world music hybrid); one of the big Kwaito artists said that in their music there are no "bitches, hos, or n*gg#rs". FOr them it is perplexing and sad that American hip-hop is so negetive, violent, and self-degrading.
As a side note, Japanese hip-hop is very interesting. There's a lot of cool stuff that comes out from the Land of the Rising Sun. Check out DJ Krush and Toshinori Kondo's album 'Ki-Oku'. Hip-hop beats and amazing trumpet playing. (Kondo also did an album with Bill Laswell that features spoken word vocals of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Which I give 2 thumbs up.)
========
I must give George Bush props for not using the passing of the Rosa Parks to further his agenda. For him, it must have been tempting to say "Rosa Parks would want us to stay the course in Iraq" or "Rosa Parks would want Miers to be on the Supreme Court".
It is indeed tragic that young people today - especially African American youth - do not learn about the history of the civil rights movement. Looking back, I realize that the schools (well this was white suburbia though) did a good job of educating *me* about it; my 8th grade history text covered civil rights pretty well. (I also read about Kitty Genovese in some other book about the same time - i don't remember which, but the story is so haunting I never forgot it.)
I wonder if it is a failure of education in general or just inequity in education (minority students do not do as well and go to schools with fewer resources). How could they leave such things out of the school *curriculum*? Is it that African American history isn't being taught, or that the young aren't learning anything???
Rap: I always thought the music (or noise if you prefer) was hip hop if you like it and rap if you didn't! "Rap" started as a noun, not an adjective...it means the rhymes spoken over the music/rhythm beats. I can't stand the hardcore gangsta stuff and am especially offended by the misogynistic language (women are "hos" and "bitches") as well as the violence, gunshots, etc. It *is* a generational thing though (the popular music of people much younger than you is generally considered noise anyway). Not all the lyrics are negative; gangsta is just a sub-genre. Of course, gangsta is something heavily identified with Los Angeles (south central and compton) but you can't blame musicians or street performers for the gang activity; crack cocaine was more responsible. And no, I do not approve of gang violence! And given where Harlan is coming from I don't expect him to like rap, or blame him for calling it noise. I have been reading his late 80s essays in Hornbook (what's interesting is that they were written before the riots, which were a kind of logical outcome to what HE and others were perceptive enough to see coming.)
Kristin
"Has anyone spoken to the Castros?"
Yeah! Hey, A.T.! Are you all right?
DVG:
Who WAS that rap artist? I'd like to know.
DTS in Subterranean Magazine #2
For those who may not have seen it yet, our own DTS (Dorman T. Shindler) debuts his "On Books" review in the above mag, same issue. Publisher/Editor Bill Schafer says that DTS's review column will cover "small and large press releases with an unwavering critical eye." Check it out! Note: This is also the special Caitlin R. Kiernan issue.
Rosa, them damn kids, und so weiter
ROB--No, I haven't taken a comprehensive survey, but my wife teaches in the inner city, here in Cleveland, and she's aghast at how little the kids know of the civil rights movement. They all know of Martin Luther King -- and that's good. But they've barely heard of Rosa Parks, and the name Frederick Douglass is meaningless to them. So, yeah, I DO have a basis for my comment, thankew kindly.
Mind you, the public schools here in Shaker Heights aren't entirely disimilar. Black history month tends to be Martin, Martin, Martin, with a side order of Martin. I like the guy, too, but it seems to me that the focus is far too exclusive.
Maybe Tony Isabella or Bob Ingersoll can chime in and let us know if the focus in their Cleveland suburbs is better distributed. But I'd be surprised if that were the case.
KB,
'Yeah, today's African-American youth don't appreciate the legacy she won for them.'
"Is this based on a comprehensive survey?"
I think that's a damn good question. Do we sit there and characterize the situation from an assumption because we hear someone else say it, or do we actually get out there and talk to "THOSE" people so that we really know what we're talking about?
Stereotyping is a fine gradient with many hidden buttons; it's danger is that we're OFTEN stereotyping with out our realizing it or when we think we AREN'T stereotyping. And it's ground in - readily imbedded - by the fluidity of word-of-mouth (how often do we research ANYTHING to confirm its validity? It's too ez to hear something and then repeat to someone else, wherein he, likewise, will assume it must be so). That's a malady, man; and a mark of EVERY society.
Having said that, then, are we assuming we White Boys appreciate black heritage and UNDERSTAND it better than today's black youth? Once again, our race is apparently ahead in the game. Smarter. Faster. Stronger.
For the record, needless to say, I've met plenty o'black folk - most of them in their 20's - extremely informed about their own heritage, with a GREAT deal to say about people like Rosa Parks.
My guess is, those who aren't into that history are no greater in proportionate number than those of any OTHER group. Of course, I haven't done my research on that.
I apologize for making this the second post of the day, but would like to make the following example:
Here are selections from the lyrics of two songs, both performed by African-American artists.
One is a widely-aclaimed jazz classic, the other a rap song.
Hush now, don’t explain
Just say you’ll remain
I’m glad your back, don’t explain
Quiet, don’t explain
What is there to gain
Skip that lipstick
Don’t explain
The truth is that police must serve and protect
REALITY is black youth is shown no respect
The truth is government has a war against drugs
REALITY is government is ruled by thugs
With all this technology, above and under
Humanity still hunts down one another
Rappers display artistic cannibalism
through lyricism, we fight each other over rhythm
Through basic animal instincts, we think
So the battle for mental territory is glory, end of story
Reality, ain't always the truth
Please tell me which of the two better sums up an apolitical, self-deceiving and superficial lifestyle.
And yes--I'd reach for Miss Holiday's record first on a Friday night. But characterizing rap as somehow innately antithetical to Rosa Parks (or, more to the point, Angela Davis) is absurd and indicative, in my opinion, of nothing more than a John Betjeman-like philistinism in the face of contemporary black art.
Eeewwww. You should refrain from the using the word "them" when referring to an extremely diverse and poorly defined group of people that have historically suffered from being collectively referred to as "them". Even though you know what you mean, it puts you in bad company.
TO KB:
No, they're certainly not ALL a bunch of gangst rap lovin' dumbshits. But don't you think that far too many of them ARE?
Recommended reading...
Hey guys/gals--Just wanted to pipe up and let you know about a story I just finished. It's Jeffrey Ford's 'Boatman's Holiday' and it can be found in the Oct/Nov issue of the magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction. I've been reading alot lately, namely the latest Year's Best Fantasy and Horror and the new Mieville short story collection, as well as 'Anansi Boys' by Gaiman. But this little gem is one of the best stories I've read in a long time. Just thought I'd pass the word.
Also, Scfi.com's Weekly Scifiction is offering an Ellison story
"All The Sounds of Fear" as well as a homage story to Terry Bisson-Michael Bishop's "Bears Discover Smut". Take care people. Happy Halloween!
Mitch
Baby Steps
Rosa Parks, like so many others, took a small but very essential step towards changing a society she saw as wrong. In refusing to give up her seat she might very easily have disappeared into the fabric of history without so much as a single asterisk to her name. In taking that very small, crucial step she participated in a movement that her actions helped galvanize. There would have been no way of predicting that her gesture of defiance would prove to be a rallying point any more than a thousand other actions by similarly motivated people.
We tend to forget that it's the seemingly insignificant acts which may have the most profound implications. It's the dreams we dream that create a reality as it is meant to be.
There are always detractors of any societal action, no matter how selfless, giving and inspirational the individual's actions may be. Martin Luther King, Gandhi, Mother Teresa, Rosa Parks, the anonymous shopper who stands down a tank in Tiananmen Square, the thousands who gathered to surround the Russian White House in 1989, and the countless millions of other revolutionaries which give grandeur to the smallest of acts to change society -- and all have been lightning rods for the hatred of those who resist that change.
We take a small step. If others see it and rally around it the step becomes significant. But it takes a resolute person who can not only take the step but accept it for what it was.
Rosa Parks had a profound impact upon American society. And while America has a very long road left to travel, her simple action made it possible for others to forget her act of defiance because they have no frame of reference to its true significance.
That is the legacy of her contribution.
______________________________________________
Has anyone spoken to the Castros?
A day of mugshots
Couldn't help but notice that USA Today, with 50+ years of Rosa Parks file photos to choose from, opted to go with her 1956 mugshot. Let's not give the woman a little dignity a day after her death. Hell no. I do realize the historical signifigance of the photo. I'm just saying I'd use that if I were doing an article with perhaps 3 photos. Using that alone, and having that be the Google "go to" photo, says to me that things haven't changed as much as we would sometimes like to think.
Certainly that feeling was reinforced last night when I was in my local drinking establishment for some much needed live music and got to listen to some of my "liberal" friends hold forth on their feelings about Ms. Parks after one too many beers. Scratch the surface around here and it becomes "Pennsyltucky" mighty quick. Sad.
The bizarre bookend to the Rosa Parks mugshot was Tom Delay's mugshot plastered all over the media. I couldn't help but think of Warren Ellis' THE SMILER from TRANSMETROPOLITAN. That book gets more prescient by the week. If only I could get a bowel disruptor gun, life synching with art would be so much more worthwhile.
- Barney
>Yeah, today's African-American youth don't appreciate the legacy she won for them.
Is this based on a comprehensive survey? If Trent Lott told me today's black youth were all a bunch of gansgsta-rap-listening dumbshits I might think he was, uh, racist.
Just something to think about.
Brain Surgery
DVG-
I'm sure that everyone here would happily inform a young person of just who Rosa Parks was and what she did. Indeed, it is not brain surgery. It is also not germane to my original point: That most Grown People I know are unaware that Rosa Park's actions were not improvised on the spot, but rather the result of a very intelligent, dedicated, and righteous plan. That she was a smart, active American Hero, and not the passive, tired, woman that so many attempt to pass her off as, simply because they can't be bothered to know any better.
Like I said in my original post, I was once a child who bought this line. And now I'm a little bit older, and have managed to learn more, and to correct my thinking. And I lament the fact that more and more people seem to simply not care enough to make the effort.
Diggin'
TONY RABIG:
Thanks for the suggestion, but to be quite honest, the day I read a book on a computer screen will be shortly after the world unites in perfect harmony, cancer becomes good for you and cheese grows on trees. Besides, I bet those eBooks would omit the great intro from Harlan, which sometimes is just as much fun as the story itself.
ERIC MARTIN:
Lists like the one you linked exist, lacking all chance of soul, simply to draw people and get have them look at the surrounding advertisements. "Best" lists pop up all the time for that reason. I saw a "100 best" book list recently that Watchman was on interestingly enough. The fact that you see Star Wars but nothing by Akira Kurosawa (see: The Hidden Fortress) makes it immediately not interesting. Goodfellas is not Scorsese's best film in my opinion, and it's what, 15 years old? Where is Duck Soup? Where is Rules of the Game? Only movies you'll see are mainstream American ones, not the better original ones that influenced many of them.
BRAD STEVENS:
That is some neat info. Interviews with authors of interest don't pop up very often. Too bad I don't have satellite tv... or live in the UK... =-)
MARK GOLDBERG:
I also enjoy Matheson. I'm re-reading I am Legend and Hell House this week. I'm shocked you found something for a decent price at Dreamhaven, I went there recently looking to fill in a book I'm missing from Harlan's pyramid paperback series in the mid seventies (10 total, great cover art and quotes on the front)... their prices are as frightening as some of the material in the novels! Places like Dreamhaven, that have very limited sales (99% of their older books were bagged, thus not on sale when I visited there a week or so ago) and the Nostalgia Zone and most wall comics at Shinders and a number of other places are nothing more than a Museum, in my opinion. If you venture down to Chicago Ave (heavy construction and not the greatest part of town) Uncle Hugo's is a lot more affordable, but their stock is even more picked over. But if you hit it right, it can be a fun place to pick things up. I got a James Sutherland book there last week.
More Cheesesteaks
Alex Jay,
Thank you for jarring the old memory cells, yes, it was Steve's Prince of Steaks. Damn good food, even if it does take years off your life to eat too many of them.
However, I was surprised by your endorsement of Jim's Steaks on South Street. As I remember, that establishment chopped, rather than sliced, the meat for their cheesesteaks. While I know of many who love Jim's, that difference in preparation ruined the steak for me.
For those in the Minneapolis area, I would recommend taking a trip over to Dreamhaven within the next week or so, they are having a great sale on many of their used books. I picked up a Richard Matheson novel, Hunted Past Reason, and so far it is as good as I expected (I am rarely disappointed by Matheson).
Just because
During the 1950s, whenever my Air Force family wasn't stationed abroad, we lived in Tennessee and Kentucky, which are not quite in the Deep South, but certainly weren't (and aren't) bastions of progressive thinking. I was utterly bewildered by my first encounter with segregated civilian society: why (I wanted to know) mustn't I play with the black children down the street? Because, I was told; just because -- the least satisfying answer that can ever be given to any important question. This happened along about the time I was six, seven years old, and also, incidentally, though I didn't know it for a good while to come, along about the time Rosa Parks was ordered to move to the back of that bus -- just because.
Rosa Parks: Civil Rights Angel or Blunt Weapon?
It seems whenever somebody of note dies these days, their primary function is to serve as yet another club to hit American Youth over the head with.
What the kids don't know, Mom and Dad didn't teach 'em.
I don't recall the generation previous to mine being made up exclusively of zither-playing aesthetes who discussed Tolstoy in bed. I seem, indeed, to remember them as being the people who stood around, flowers in their hair and fingers up the collective nostril, while Pennsylvania Station was carted off to New Jersey.
And I am a litle bored with lists of references I'm evidently too stupid to catch. I could sit here all day name-dropping Valerie Solanis, Georges Bataille, Thomas Ligotti, Polly Delano, Lee Krasner and Amanda Forsythe. If you know who they are, fine. If not, feel free to ask.
If a child of your acquaintence knows nothing of Ms. Parks, may I be the first to suggest you let them in on the secret.
It's not brain surgery, really.
DARK DREAMERS
According to the U.K. Horror Channel's website, a forthcoming episode of Stanley Wiater's series DARK DREAMERS is going to include an interview with Harlan. The episode in question will be broadcast on November 25th at 9 PM.
The episodes of DARK DREAMERS that I've seen so far have included intelligent interviews with Clive Barker and Richard Matheson. There's also a Peter Straub interview scheduled to appear on November 18th.
The Horror Channel's website can be found at:
http://www.thehorrorchannel.tv/main/thc_welcome.htm
MARK G.: If it was one block south of the Roosevelt Mall (the only mall worth the name around Cottman, a nice open-air monstrosity which used to host carnivals in the Seventies), and laid up against a rowhouse block--and I'm pretty sure it must have been--then it was Steve's, Prince of Steaks.
One block from where I grew up and lived for a quarter-century.
(Jim's, on the edge of the mall, is good, if not as good as its South Street [yes, the street of the Orlons] location, and across from the mall is Hollywood Bistro, a bar that makes a pretty good steak sandwich themselves.)
And yes; any steak sammich worth its meat uses Amoroso's, with the exception of a few places who bake their own rolls.
MIKE: Our own Paul T. Riddell posted a pithy couple paragraphs on his Sclerotic Rings weblog about the impending Voice sale which pretty much said it all.
BRIAN: The redoubtable Ms. Parks' blemish-free life is what led the Montogmery Improvement Association (whose formation brought the even more redoubtable Dr. King to national prominence) to convince her to fight the charges; she was, in effect, scandalproof, and this would seem to have continued throughout her subsequent life as beloved midwife and godmother to the civil rights movement. If they attempt to smear, they'll have to do so by association only, by bringing in someone like Jesse Jackson. And that'll be seen as the pernicious bullshit it is. So they're laying low, not even mentioning Parks.
I think they've started hedging their bets, and have plotted out a course which will allow them, in times hence, to claim themselves as the men who saved conservatism from George W. Bush.
MARK W.: Thank you for that ray of hope, and thank the kids, for all of us.
You know, there's a lot of currency being given the whole "Rule of Threes" when discussing deaths of famous folk happening close together, with little thought given to the fact that millions of people die every day and that, by necessity, some of those will be famous.
But for some terrible reason, I had the sudden thought ... "August Wilson, Rosa Parks ... is Joan Didion next?" Boy, I hope my ill-conceived thoughtpulse was wrong.
Rosa Parks lived to see...
...okay, so she lived to see the deprepadations of gangsta crap and historical illiteracy. But she also lived to see people like Chip Delany and Ishmael Reed and Toni Morrison--and you know, you just know, what her example meant to them in the 1950s. She lived to see Octavia Butler and Maya Angelou (So I'm oriented on writers. This is news?)
Yeah, today's African-American youth don't appreciate the legacy she won for them, but this is nothing new. Harlan, your own fights for the ERA are largely forgotten today. That amendment never did pass, but today's young women take for granted the things the feminist movement won for them.
When I was a kid, there was a popular riddle involving a doctor who was in the emergency room of a hospital when a man and his son were brought in from an automobile accident. "Oh, my God, it's my son!" the doctor says. The riddle was--if his father was in the accident, how could his parent be in the hospital?
You remember that one, I'm sure; today, it's meaningless. Today's kids don't understand that the notion of the MOTHER being a doctor was downright shocking in the fifties and early sixties.
So it is with Rosa Parks and civil rights. Today's youth take everything she won, at incredible personal risk, for granted. And maybe that's a good thing, in a way--that it doesn't even occur to them that it should be any different. But it is sad that they just don't know how great a risk she took.
A Sign of Hope
I opened class today by saying that we needed to take a few minutes and discuss an important person who passed away yesterday. No sooner did I have those words out of my mouth when roughly nine of my eighteen students all said "Oh, you mean Rosa Parks." I asked them to tell me who she was and why she's important. And they did -- in considerable detail, the information coming from black students and white alike. One of my students even knew how to take her 'excuse' of being tired to mean. I thanked them and told them they made my day.
There is hope, folks. Specks of light in the gloom. Here's to those specks becoming a constellation of stars.
Mark W.
The tale of Rosa Parks being merely a "tired" woman was kind of the conventonal wisdom when I was growing up: William Manchester's wonderfully readable history _The Glory and the Dream_ recited this bit, which was where I'd first heard of her. It was years until I read of Parks's involvement with progressive civil-rights efforts, her education, her seriousness about civil rights, and the planning and discipline that went into the bus boycott.
That's why I hate cheap sentiment. It keeps people stupid. It patronizes the fine, brave human being who was Rosa Parks by describing her as merely a simple, weary woman accidentally sparking a movement. It tells us that Martin Luther King was a a "great spiritual" leader, so we can ignore the fierce analytical intelligence that ignited his work and brought him to address injustice beyond civil rights. And it even downplays their bravery, because they were _more_ than smart enough to know what they were facing. When the tremendous capabilities of these people are ignored, the conventional wisdom is free to tell us that those edumacated radicals jes' ain't worth squat, when it's the simple folk who git things a-happenin'.
Jeff R., I know exactly what the right-wing journals'll be saying about Rosa Parks. They're driven to smear whatever they can of the civil rights movement. So, we'll probably hear about Parks's involvement with groups linked to the Communist Party. And if Rosa Parks ever made any bad judgements or strange public statements, I'm sure we'll be reminded of them by the good people at the _American Spectator_. Happily, though, the _rest_ of us can remind _them_ that they were on the _wrong_ side of the greatest moral issue this country's ever faced.
Harlan, Rosa Parks may have lived to see the depradations of gangsta culture. But we both know everything _else_ she lived to see. She helped bring forth the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965. She saw the establishment and growth of an enfranchised black middle class. She saw black men and women elected to high office, even in her home state. Before she had to endure the likes of Suge Knight, she witnessed dozens of black entertainers rise in America not as novelty acts or minstrel performers, but as exemplars of talent and genius.
Sorry for posting twice in a day Rick, just wanted to answer Mike Jacka's question
Mike, the quote is from "Hey Jealousy" by the Gin Blossoms
MORBID CURIOSITY
Can't help wondering how NATIONAL REVIEW and other conservative publications are going to treat the news of Rosa Parks's death. They probably broke out the champagne as soon as they heard the news. Bastards.
S.P.I.D.E.R. story discussions
There are currently two stories waiting for discussion/comments from you in the "other place" (see link above):
The Face of Helene Bournouwe (from Deathbird Stories) (bottom of page)
and
Paulie Charmed the Sleeping Woman (from Approaching Oblivion) (top of page)
Cheers,
Jan
A question and a “wonderin’”
Question – Does anyone know the source of the following quote? “The past is gone and something might be found to take its place.” Some quick research has yielded no results.
Wonderin’ – I was wonderin’ what people outside of Arizona are thinking about the proposed merger of the Phoenix-based New Times Media with Village Voice Media. We hear rumblings that those who love the Village Voice see it as the end of times (no pun intended). Those of us growing up in Phoenix have always seen the New Times as the only real alternative to Arizona (read conservative) reporting. And my understanding is that this continued with their expansion into San Francisco, Denver, etc.
Then again, maybe we in Arizona are the only ones noticing this is happening.
Thanks
Mike
Jason,
"by teachers in elementary schools and parents of white kids - to a woman who was tired and didn't want to move from her seat."
I can at least report - admittedly, from my OWN naive, vacuum sealed world - that I'd never heard that. The recounting of Rosa Parks given to me was always in the context of her courage, and the mentality she was up against. The SAD part of it, on the other hand, is that I'd never heard or her until I was in high school. I don't remember anyone in elementary school telling us about her.
Over the last several years, what's come to intrigue me is the set of conditions in the northern and westerns states in the early 60's while the civil rights movement was dealing directly withe South. Places like Chicago - a particularly dangerous place for blacks at the time - and Los Angeles were ostensibly free of the Jim Crow laws gripping the South but imbedded in racial hatred; a state of segregation differing from that in the South. The latter was instituted through law enforcers, giving King, the NAACP, and many black groups a clear legal target to blueprint a strategy. But in the north, what the law claimed and what was being invoked by both police and white neighborhoods ran on 2 different rails. No one, it seemed, quite understood what was going on in these regions - even as progress was made in the South - and, so, from what I took in, Watts confused President Johnson and most of Whitey World; the fuse had been going for sometime but no one noticed, figuring all the trouble was resting in the Southern states.
...and confronting ALL those issues directly was owed to Rosa Parks.
Cheesesteaks cont. & Package Received
Alex Jay: I would agree that Geno's and Pat's are not once they once were, but they are still light years ahead of anything I can find here in Minneapolis. Don't know Tony Luke's, but may give it a try when I am back in Philly in December. My last trip in, my dad took me to a very good place just south of Cottman Mall in Northeast Philly. Don't remember the name, though.
Susan: Edgeworks 2 arrived yesterday, thank you so much for sending it so promptly, I cannot wait to start re-reading it.
Adam-Troy: hopefully you made it through the hurricane OK. The stories on CNN made it appear that the storm caused more damage than originally anticipated.
Finally, it is a happy day, as news broke that "Scooter" Libby may have lied to the Fitzpatrick in the TreasonGate investigation and that his notes showed that Cheney was involved. I know the chances of it happening are very remote, but the idea of Rove and Cheney being prosecuted for perjury and/or treason is enough to put a smile on my face. Of course, I do realize that both of them would receive Presidential Pardons before they would ever serve jail time....
Courage
Mr. Ellison -
I beg to differ. When I was a few years out of college, I saw, on live TV, a Chinese man standing in front of a tank, holding bags of groceries. That was the same kind of courage; not a planned protest, but a simple refusal to give in by someone who could just have easily gone on along his way.
Sadly, it's also a lesson in how not all heros succeed.
I suspect that for every Rosa Parks, who said "enough is enough", stood up (er...well, sat down) and fought for her rights, there were hundreds of black men and women who stood up, said "enough is enough" and were lynched or beaten.
This is not a reason to honor Rosa Parks less. This is a reason to honor her more.
Many may not see the courage because they have been raised on a diet of movies where the heros always win and where courage and standing up for your rights is always honored with success.
I don't understand the impulse behind trying to pick the "greatest movie of all time". In fact it seems to me to be a monstrous waste of time.
Assuming you can even get two people to agree on their choice, what the hell criteria do you use?
GOODFELLAS wouldn't even make my top 50. Good god I don't HAVE a top 50!
I still say it should be "The Spirit is Willing."
http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20051024/113017896000.html
Rosa Parks
Today's Detroit Free Press addressed the issue of Rosa Parks having been "tired" that day, recalling a 1995 interview with her. Quote:
Parks has said one of her biggest regrets is that numerous news stories reported that she refused to give up her seat because she was tired after a day of work. She was not. She was tired of the mistreatment of black people.
"I was not tired physically, or no more tired than I usually was at the end of a working day," she said in her autobiography. "I was not old, although some people have an image of me as being old the. I was 42. No, the only tired I was, was tired of giving in."
Unquote.
It would seem that over the years people either misremembered what sense of the word "tired" she was using, or had misunderstood her meaning in the first place.
On the other hand, I remember a statement from Rosa Parks herself in which she'd essentially said she hadn't planned to kick start the Civil Rights Movement. Some people may have interpreted that to mean she was just tired. To me, it meant she'd decided to make a personal protest.
But now, back to work. The paper I work for is busy putting together stories about Rosa Parks and her importance to the country, the world, as well as to people on a personal level, and I've got a 1 p.m. (eastern) deadline.
Rick
P.S. I met her briefly in 1993 during a lecture by Archbishop Tutu at the Masonic Temple in Detroit.
Planned
Jason Michelitch,
I don't know that kids today are being taught about Rosa Parks at all. From my school memories, I remember being taught that Rosa Parks was a black woman that refused to give up her seat in a day that black people were expected to do so. Not much more, not much less.
I don't think that the idea that she planned the refusal makes the action any more admirable. I actually think the opposite.
Anyway, I never got the idea that many people think of Parks as someone who just didn't get up because she was tired.
Islands
Brent, if this was Islands by Marta Randall (I think it was and I betcha HE will correct me if I'm wrong), you'll find it as an ebook at www.fictionwise.com for about $7.50 or $8.
Bests,
--tr
Discovery
Does anyone own a copy of Islands from Harlan's Discovery series? Seems to me that was a part of it, a 5 or so book series that had great intros from Harlan, with tasty stories inside. I've been reading the other books in the series again, which are fantastic, and can't seem to find Islands. I think Marta Randall was the author. Anyway, I could be imagining the whole thing.
Brian Siano:
"As for the story's style, I kept wanting to know where he'd published it first. I have a lot of odd vignettes and sketches (which aren't gross-out bits like Palhaniuk's) that could probably stand publication."
I read that the story "Guts" was first published in Playboy.
ROSA PARKS
What I find most frustrating about the common memory of Rosa Parks is how her role in the civil rights movement is always reduced - by teachers in elementary schools and parents of white kids - to a woman who was tired and didn't want to move from her seat. Almost everyone I know (including myself, until I got set straight) grew up ignorant of the fact that Parks's refusal to move was a planned protest, and that it was not only her personal dignity which caused her to refuse to be moved, but her intelligence, bravery, and dedication to a righteous cause which kept her rooted to that seat.
If there is a god, surely Rosa Parks gets a permanent place at his dinner table.
She was an angel, and a true hero.
It boggles the mind that it was only 50 years ago she defiantly stood up...or rather sat down...for her right to dignity and respect. (50 years, its only twice my age...my parents are older than that) Only 50 years, but the average American treats the event like it happened a million years ago. It scares me how many kids out there don't grasp the magnitude of her actions (popculture has already trivialized her in rap music and in film) and worse yet....there are kids out there that don't know who she is. Dammit, f*cking morons worship 2Pac as some sort of messiah, but Parks....it often seems our society downgraded her to a Trivial Persuit answer. A factoid more than the L*E*G*E*N*D she is.
She was beautiful....just beautiful.
No one under the age of fifty can today even BEGIN to comprehend
the freightload of courage it took to do the simple, deadly dangerous thing Rosa Parks did. It was an unparalleled act of personal heroism that not even men under fire on a beachhead can
approach for sheer in-the-face-of-death. It makes me damn near weep to watch the gangsta crap and hip-hop "outrage" of history-ignorant black kids ... that this is what Rosa Parks, a great American hero, had to live to see become of her people.
Truly, a Rosa Parks is humanity at its noblest, its most decent, its most golden and, yes, it's most black is beautiful.
Requiescat in pace.
Honoring her greatness,
Harlan Ellison
Thanks all for the book/story recommendations. (And to Barney etc for the fannish lore! There are filk songs about Harlan too.)
Wandering through Costco I stumbled on the Val Lewton collection for $38.99! I snapped it up - that will keep my happy for several nights! Tower Records didn't even HAVE it! (Anything there that is not on sale tends to be a rip off; up to 30 bucks for stuff that's not even recent and has few extras! Though they were having a Criterion Collection sale and I drooled over the 3 disc premium director-approved edition of BRAZIL. Not to mention weird things like the Elvis Monopoly set, where the Boardwalk space is Graceland...naw, I'm not an Elvis worshipper.) my b-day is 11/28 so my wishlist is always for both that and Xmas....
Oooh, there are a lot of wonderfully creepy Harlan stories...several of those in STRANGE WINE for instance, as well as the aforementioned ANGRY CANDY items. And IHNMAIMS freaked me out too...I read it on the plane on my way home from the 92 Worldcon because it was in the 50th-anniversary greatest Hugo Winners anthology.)
Hum, several of MY Harlan signed books are autographed in blue or turquoise (Felt tip?) ink and they are ALL personalized, bought at conventions, bookstore signings or Susan's wonderful mail order service....Harlan, no offense but I was looking at you, not wht you were using for a pen! My MINDSCAPES art book (the ABAHD/Repent cassette set too), purchased at Foolscap is signed in silver-tip like that for signing photos. Do they make blue-green fountain pen ink? Or glitter silver fountain pen ink? (My STRANGE WINE from the L.A. store signing definitely looks felt tip but I'd have to ask those who were there since I ordered it long distance) No, I don't mind! I don't care what ink it is since I KNOW for SURE they are genuine and treasure them!!!
Would love to hear from Adam-Troy but it looks like a lot of electricity in Florida is out right now.
Kristin
While I love the first BORDERLANDS volume, after all, it has an Ellison story in it, I'm sort of partial to the fifth one...
farewell
Rosa Parks died today, of natural causes, at the age of 92. With her simple but incredibly brave gesture, a catalyst for other's actions, she demonstrated the ability for an individual to make a difference. Would that her legacy will live on in others and in ourselves.
BRIAN: I first read this Palahniuk story in Playboy. Can't remember if it was early this year or late last year. I don't know if Playboy would generally go for something like this, but they do love Chuck. Sometimes I think their taste in fiction is really slipping--not based on "Guts," but on a very short piece about a fisherman and a genie a few months ago. For the most part, I enjoy their selections. And I'd loooove to have that paycheck!
Two memorable horror tales from the Borderlands...
The first and best BORDERLANDS anthology kicks off with a story I have never forgotten: 'The Calling' by David B. Silva. That one got through the armour and festers still.
A more recent BORDERLANDS book (vol #5 I think) features another memorable tale, 'N0072-JK1' by Adam Corbin Fusco.
At present, I'm reading more Clark Ashton Smith...just working through my collection of yellowed UK edition paperbacks while I commute to and from work.
David Loftus -
Thanks for the link. I miss reading Simon in New York Magazine.
The Pinter "poem" he quotes reminds me of another Simon quote, apropos of (if I remember correctly) Robert Creeley. Something like:
"There are two things to say about the poems of [Creeley?]: 1. They are short. 2. They are not short enough."
Aussie bait?
Mark,
You an aussie? You said something about uni the other day, reminding me of Aussie slang.
I saw the Sherlock Holmes episode of which you speak. I loved Basil Rathbone in the role of Holmes when I was a kid watching Saturday morning matinees. However, when I saw Jeremy Brett's Holmes, Rathbone's performance suddenly appeared a hollow mask to Brett's fully realized character.
Rupert Everett was a decent Holmes, but the mystery was disappointing. I was ahead of Holmes and Watson (and the killer) the whole way. There were no surprises. And about half-way through, when it became glaringly obvious that there was a "twin" scenario, I about laughed my ass off: surely, I thought, they wouldn't be pulling the old "twin" scenario. I thought it a ruse, a little M. Night Shyamalan misdirection. But no. Sadly, it was, as Don Adams as Maxwell Smart might say, "the old twin-serial-killer-in-the-fog-along-the-Thames trick."
I did like that they were marrying off Watson to an American Doctor, and that at the beginning Holmes and Watson seemed to be coming together again after what appeared to be some time gone by. A series with them has potential. But Jeremy Brett WAS Holmes. Everett merely plays him. Just like Tom Baker IS Doctor Who. If anyone wants to argue that, I'll meet them out in the parking lot.
And David Silver: Thanks for the joke.
-Keith
I don't read much horror, but I do remember being spooked by Jack London's short, "The Red One". It's from 1918, or thereabouts, but still has the power to thrill.
Gotta go with Simon on this one. The Pinter nomination is a disappointment. I'm not a world-lit reader so I can't compare to the non-English writers that have been awarded recently, but when I think of V.S. Naipaul, or Seamus Heaney, or Toni Morrison, or hell, William Golding or Saul Bellow or Isaac Singer...I don't also think of Harold Pinter. Kind of a yawner, this pick. Underwhelmed.
dogfight
John Simon goes after Harold Pinter in his inimitable fashion:
http://www.radaronline.com/web-only/kulture-klub/2005/10/ignoble-nobel-let-us-pause.php
I seem to recall that Harlan has expressed respect and admiration for both men's work. It's always a bit bewildering when one writer you admire goes after another you also admire. With whom to side? Who's right?
First of all, here's hoping the Castros are alive, healthy, well-sheltered and maybe even _dry_ in Florida.
Second: The Palhaniuk story. It's a nice, vivid image, and it's always fun to write something to elicit a severe, visceral reaction (like "Bleeding Stones"). But I was reminded of a story that turned up on rotten.com, complete with photograph: to put it with as little shock and fanfare as possible, a weightlifter had experienced a sudden and violent prolapse of his lower intestine during a weightlifting competition.
As for the story's style, I kept wanting to know where he'd published it first. I have a lot of odd vignettes and sketches (which aren't gross-out bits like Palhaniuk's) that could probably stand publication.
Working my way through the Val Lewton collection. Wonderful stuff, especially Karloff in _The Body Snatcher_.
In related news, the website for Peter Jackson's _King Kong_ remake tells of how collector Bob Burns, shooting his cameo in the film, brought along the metal skeleton of what is purported to be the original King Kong model. (I'd always thought it had been lost, or remade into Mighty Joe Young.) There's a neat film there, downloadable at http://www.kongisking.net/perl/newsview/15/1129998737, as Jackson and crew all get to touch and handle the structure... and just at the end they, decide to try animating it old-school. And for that brief, wonderful moment, King Kong Lives Again.
I read the story "Guts" online.
I think CP's goal was to come up with the most shocking gross-out he could. In this he succeeded.
The story does have an amusement factor, amidst all the eewwww. Is it great literature? Uh, no.
I'm still getting the YB Fantasy & Horror #18, as I normally do every year.
For the atheists on this board I recommend Diana Narciso's book LIKE ROLLING UPHILL. It's an honest statement of unbelief that I think you'll enjoy.
Readers: I commend your attention to PAPER FISH, by Tina De Rosa. This little-known book is possibly one of the most gorgeous things in the universe. It's available on Amazon.com for a song. You'll thank yourself.
Auguri,
Justin
Coupla' things
I have a general question which youse learned types may know the answer (I know, I'm kind of treating this board as a Shell Station, but I think you'll understand why this one): I heard today on the KTLA Morning News that the founder of the Crips, Stanley Williams, was a nominee for a Nobel Prize. I was under the impression that nominees weren't to disclose that fact, either before or after the fact. No?
________________________________________________
Note from this morning's headlines: "Keys Residents Say Wilma is No Katrina". Hopefully the same sentiment is found in the Castro household.
________________________________________________
Went to the Tut exhibit at LACMA yesterday. Very disappointed. Went to the Pissarro/Cezanne exhibit as well. Thrilled by it. Tut = $30 each, Pissarro = $15. A good ad campaign does not an exhibit make...
________________________________________________
Reread "Skeleton" and "I Have..." over the weekend. Yup, them's good scareys.
SB
sundry
Alex Jay Berman: Not to knock your wurst, but I'd be doing half my family a disservice if I didn't proclaim the braut as the best of the wurst. Here's why: sweat - but don't saute - some onions in a saucepan whilst grilling the brauts; I recommend the Johnsonville brand. Shortly before you pull the brauts off the grill, add a can of cheap Wisconsin beer to the onions; throw the grilled brauts in and let them simmer for twenty minutes or so... the longer, the better. Serve on a bun thick enough to hold it's own in a fight with the stewed onions and mustard on top. Saukraut, too, if that's how you roll but those onions are all I've ever needed.
David Silver: Hee. I'll be sharing that with teachers today; you'll have inspired a laugh or three among those that need 'em on a cold October Monday.
Sean: Short fiction horror? Not to be needlessly pedestrian, but my vote goes for King's early work, Richard Matheson and Clive Barker. With King, it's for his use of crowds and ugly human nature ('The Mist' always comes to mind, though there are better examples); Matheson for the almost campy, oogy thrill of it (; Barker for incessantly playing with sexual themes. There are others, but for a general top three those are the who and why for me.
Did anyone watch the Quill Awards on NBC this past weekend? What a sad affair. It looked like it was held at a disused VFW lodge. Every time a nominee was mentioned there was this pathetic smattering of applause that begged for some audio sweetening. Al Roker single-mindedly gushed about Harry Potter the whole time, stopping just short of sticking his dick in the book.
There was a four minute homage to Deepak Chopra.
Elmo was a presenter. Fucking ELMO.
The chance to make a book award show a major event was utterly wasted. At no point was the thrill of reading a book even mentioned. They should drop the concept. I'd rather see MTV run a book award show that see another dry, unenjoyable Quill.
Peg and Alex Jay
Thank you.
Mike
ATC: Keeping a good thought for you and your wife and hoping you both get through Wilma unscathed.
HARLAN: Did you watch the Sherlock Holmes movie on PBS? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on it. Of course that invitation also extends to all fellow Webderlanders. Personally, I thought they should have titled it "CSI: Baker Street." And, like me, I'm sure devoted fans had other issues with the production. But I thought Rupert Everett was good as Holmes.
Best,
Mark W.
Harlan & Susan:
I'm sending off a typo-free, spiffier version of the essay in the proper mail. You may do with it as you please.
To those who asked about the flood: I think I can easily replace the comics. I've yet to attend to about eight other boxes that were sitting in 8 inches of water; I'm kind of afraid to. The only Ellsion related items were the Kent Bash lithos for "All the Lies." I appreciate the concern as well as the nice words regarding the BU appearance. Cheers. TR
ON HOT DOGS: Don't eat 'em.
I'm spoiled, see, because what I DO eat are Hebrew National Knockwurst. Boiled, Broiled, grilled, makes no nevermind to me; they are to hotdogs what a peppercorn-crusted steak in brandy sauce is to the late-night special at Friendly's. Truly, knocks are the ne plus ultra of meat by-products.
(Though I will on occasion partake of a hot swawsidge from a vendor's truck ...)
Oh--and either (spicy brown) mustard, mustard with hot sauce, or chili. Anything else would be uncivilized.
MARK: Sorry, friend, but Geno's and Pat's (and even Jim's) have become tourist traps, shades of their former gustatory selves. You want to go to Tony Luke's, where the cheesesteak is a thing of beauty unto the tongue; where you will see monosyllabic truckers ordering their steaks with broccoli rabe without hesitation or pretension.
But yes; the White House still makes good steaks.
ADAM T-C: Well, Wilma's weakened, but a Ct 2 or 3 is still nothing to laugh at. Take care, wouldja?
(Oh--and am I a bad person for, as I saw at several places where Palahniuk was going with his story, laughing?)
JON: Horseradish is good; I recommend you get some daikon and make your own.
(I made habanero horseradish a few years back for a party. Grown men wept and howled; it was a beautiful thing.)
Ooh! 'Nother recommendation: Go out and get some wasabi.
(But be aware that you will almost never get real wasabi in America; because of the short supply of the very temperamental wasabia japonica plant, the "wasabi" paste you'll get in restaurants or supermarkets is actually made up of mostly horseradish, Chinese mustard, and green food coloring. There are a few places starting to farm it in North America, though ...)
TIM: Allow me to add my somewhat envious thanks.
EZRA: And thank YOU for the beautiful picture of the celestial coming of the Flying Spaghetti Monster; may His Noodly Appendage touch us all.
(I'm kidding; it's really a picture of Invader Zim.)
(and yes; I was looking at the picture for October 23)
ANGRY CANDY: Love it. I would say more, but I've already written FAR too damned much about it in the Reviews part of the site.
MIKE: I'm very happy for all your happy endings, and am sorry you and your friends had to push through all those shitty middles.
>I don't know: maybe I have a different definition of a horror story, or maybe I'm unnerved by different things, but I read Palahniuk's "Guts", thought it was gross, deliberatley shocking...and nothing more.<
Ditto. Palahniuk takes his reputation one step farther away from any thing resembling literature and a possible claim for a lasting place in letters. Next time keep it in the drawer, Chuck. You don't have to share everything. You show your wife your soiled toilet paper, too?
Staggering down Memory Lane...
HARLAN: I'll cough up a fiver for the full song and dance.
Thanks you guys for sending me down memory lane to the library of Carolina Elementary School in Hartsville, SC, where during the 5th and 6th grades, I lost myself in those very Alfred Hitchcock collections--along with The Three Investigators (wicked cool tales).
Just got back from a spin around the Web seeing what has accumulated on the detecting trio over the years.
Wow...
And my fave from ANGRY CANDY is "Paladin of the Lost Hour", though it fair near makes me weep every time I read it--as it should.
Thanks in advance for DREAM CORRIDOR!
Kind regards to you and the missus.
Long days and pleasant nights...
A joke from an old lady that MUST be shared...
I stopped by to see my mom this afternoon, and she had some visitors there for coffee. Among them, an 88 year old woman told this joke, and I almost wet my pants when I heard it!
This guy hears about a popular new pub, and he wants to try it out, but it uses robot bartenders instead of people. He's skeptical, but a buddy tells him the robots are absolutely brilliant and make the best drinks in town.
So the next day, right after work, he wanders in, steps up to the bar, and one of the robots leans over to ask him, "What can I serve you?"
He thinks about it, and says, "I'd really go for a vodka martini."
A minute later the robot pours the drink for of the fellow, who takes a sip and realizes it IS the best he's tasted in years. Then the robot, seeing the guy is sitting alone, asks him, "Would you care for some conversation?"
The man thinks, what the heck, I have nothing to lose, and says, "Okay, sure, let's talk."
So the robot asks, "May I first know your approximate IQ?"
Well, this dude isn't a dummy, he's a very successful businessman and he knows his IQ was measured well above average at 120 when he was in high school, but he decides to play a little trick on the robot and says, "Oh, no problem...my IQ is 160."
The robot immediately inquires, "Then would you like to talk about philosophy, physics, world literature, or fine arts?"
The man chooses philosophy, and the robot talks him around in circles for nearly an hour.
He returns to the pub another night, orders another martini, and once again the robot asks if he would like to engage in conversation. When the topic of IQ comes up, this time he tells the truth and explains that he tested around 120. The robot asks, "Then would you like to talk about politics, space, popular literature, or travel?" He chooses travel and has a wonderful conversation to complement his tasty drink.
Another evening, same bar, same drink, same question about conversation, but this time the fellow is curious and tells the robot his IQ is a very average 100. The robot asks, "Then would you like to talk about sports, television, movies, or girls?" He chooses girls and enjoys a good laugh through much of the conversation.
He returns to the bar yet again, orders the same drink and listens to the same inquiry about conversation, but this time decides to REALLY have some fun with the IQ issue. So he tells the robot his IQ is only 50.
The robot immediately blurts out, "Why the hell did you vote for Bush?!"
Hitchcock anthologies
*** Steve Barber & Rick K ***
The Robert Arthur edited anthologies you guys are remembering are the large HC's that were distributed pretty widely in children's libraries in the 1970's. They were great. I still remember where I was when I read THE BEHINDER. But the anthologies Harlan refers to were the ones done mostly as BOMC HC's from... Random House, I think, with all the PB editions coming from Dell. In the early 1960's these were what I think of as the "sawed off" size and usually had some photo cover of Hitchcock. The later Dell PB editions had funnier painted covers. I've got at least 30 of them and they went through tons of reprintings. They're really pretty good. There is some Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine filler but tons of great stuff by Gerald Kersh, George Mac Donald, Robert Bloch, H.R.F. Keating, Donald Westlake, John Wyndham and at least one from our patron.
Oh man. I just did a little biblio-surfing on Gordon R. Dickson. Ninety six books? Not counting the ghosting? If you can't get ahead of the curve with 96 books to your credit why the hell even start?
- Barney
Who once filk-sang the Gordy Dickson drinking song to the tune of "Oh My Darling" with some of his friends and Filthy Pierre on piano.
Gordy Dickson Gordy Dickson
Gordy Dickson is the one!
Others passed out on the sofa,
Gordy Dickson's having fun.
Goodnight Gordy.
I don't know: maybe I have a different definition of a horror story, or maybe I'm unnerved by different things, but I read Palahniuk's "Guts", thought it was gross, deliberatley shocking...and nothing more. It didn't resonate or illuminate or move me to think about the human condition in any way as much as it gave me a brief, nasty aftertaste in my mouth, like the time I tried uni.
Now, "A Distant Episode" by Paul Bowles - jaysis. "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"? Couldn't read a n y t h i n g for about a week after I finished that one. Conrad's _The Heart of Darkness_ never loses its power to disturb me. And include me with the group that loves "The Function of Dream Sleep" - unsettling, but deeply humane and compassionate.
For What It's Worth,
Mark W.
Sean,
Horror? Some, though I'd call much of it weird fiction.
I'm currently reading the new Thomas Ligotti collection "The Shadow at the Bottom of the World." The book collects several of Ligotti's previously published stories...and let me tell ya, there ain't a bum in the lot. Ligotti is a genius.
Also on my reading list is Neil Gaiman's "Anansi Boys," a new collection by Caitlin R. Kiernan (To Charles Fort, With Love), the 18th Annual Year's Best Fantasy & Horror (on order due to the recent comments on the story "Guts" by Palahniuk, which I now MUST read), plus I'm working my way through the new three volume "Encyclopedia of Supernatual Fiction," edited by S.T. Joshi and Stephen Dziemianowicz. On top of all that I'm just finishing Lovecraft's Letters from New York.
That about wraps it up for the month of October.
Thank you
Harlan -- Rick K is right that there is a reference to Arthur's "invaluable assistance" in the dedication. Dickson may have edited, but there's no reference I can find and several websites seem to confirm Arthur. No matter, Dickson gave us a the marvelous Dorsai and will always be one of my favorite authors.
_________________________________________
Tony - Thank you. Now, however, I genuinely do feel like an idiot for having not made that pull. it was all there for me: skeletons, Bradbury, and my own little collection of shots I've called October Country (http://www.photosig.com/go/users/viewportfolio?id=146793). It's one of those moments of stunning clarity a day too late. Thank you, though, it's now on my "to reread" pile.
_________________________________________
Last evening my wife was playing a private party for artist Phillip Luth. I had a wonderful reminder of how very fortunate I am to be married to this person. Just thought I'd share...
_________________________________________
(Best wishes to the Castros and any other Floridians as Wilma turns northeast. Keep the galoshes handy.)
Horror
Hello all.
Just wondered what you people liked in the way of horror short fiction (without getting too bogged down in the genre defenition thing). There's a hell of a lot of good stuff out there, but not always easy to track down.
Incidentally, Mr Ellison, (if you're reading this), thanks: when I started reading your work as a little boy it made me feel that it WAS possible to be angry and to have opinions others would disagree with without being a damn fool about it. Keep up the good work, if it pleases you to do so!
Hitchcock anthologies
Harlan,
You wrote that the Hitchcock anthologies were ghost-edited by the late Gordon R. Dickson. I have to disagree- at least with regard to the two anthologies Steve Barber cited. Both “Alfred Hitchcock's Ghostly Gallery” and “Alfred Hitchcock’s Monster Museum” were edited by the late, great Robert Arthur, creator of the “Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators” mystery series (far superior to the Hardy Boys), and co-creator (with David Kogan) of the “Mysterious Traveler” radio show.
Information about Arthur’s involvement in these anthologies can be found at his daughter, Elizabeth’s website: http://www.elizabetharthur.org/bio/rarthur.html
I believe the books themselves also confirm Arthur’s involvement (through a “special thanks to Robert Arthur” or words to that effect on the indicia page). However, I don’t have the books in front of me as I write this.
Could you be thinking of some other Hitchcock anthologies that Mr. Dickson was involved with?
For the record, some biographies confuse Robert Arthur with a man named Robert Arthur Felder. These are two different individuals.
Information related to this confusion can be found here: http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:ovrxYBMMbWMJ:www.threeinvestigators.net/SD.html+%22Robert+Arthur%22++%2B+%22Startling+Discoveries%22&hl=en
(this is cached file; for some reason, the actual site- also run by Elizabeth Arthur- is currently down).
Rick
fountain pens
Hmmm, I have a signed copy of "All The Lies That Are My Life". I don't go to book signings, I just picked it up in a book shop many years ago. Thing is, the signature is scrawled in turquoise felt tip. How rare can that be?
I don't care. I bought the book to read, and enjoyed the story - though probably not as much as Harlan obviously enjoyed writing it.
Ash (owner of a dozen or so fountain pens, but only one refill)
LIFE HUTCH DREAM
The other night I had a dream...whereby the theater of my mind was open ... paid to get in ....gave the ticket to the taker at the gate and proceeded to my middle-of-the theater seat looked upon the screen and the credits came on.....LIFE HUTCH...starring me because everything was from my POV. I walked out of the crippled starfighter...and just as I entered the hutch...that damnable robot comes out of his niche grabs me and throws me over the pool table....it was then I woke up!
My wife of 37 years snoring in blissful slumber next to me. I just smiled and didn't dream the rest of the night. Wife of course asked me why I kicked her in the leg last night...again...I just smiled. This has happened to me before, and usually after reading an Ellison story. Whenever I read and re-read his stories, it amazes me how he can evoke a REM like dream just in the way he tells a story. May you and your muse live long and prosper Unca Harlan.
STEVE BARBER:
The "Hitchcock-edited" anthologies were ghost-edited by the late Gordon R. Dickson, a wonderful guy, a smart and classy writer, a long-time friend of
Yr. pal, Harlan
Guts Short Story
Someone mentioned the short story guts... I went out and bought the anthology today, and then I noticed the sotry is free online on his website.
So, if you want to read it:
http://www.chuckpalahniuk.net/books/haunted/guts.php
Susan - thanks for the lowdown. Think I'll be ordering one of the trade paperbacks then.
Mike Jacka - congratulations on your successful treatment! (but keep an eye on the bastard...) I can empathize with you, about the weight of such a time bearing on you. Hope the load lightens soon...
TIM: Great post. I saved that one. I'm really sorry to hear that your things got trashed by the latest flood. Obviously I can't do anything about YOUR work, but is there any "stuff" (comics, etc.) in particular you're looking to replace? E-mail me if you like; I don't mind looking. I've got "Finder" creds and everything. ;)
Skeleton
Steve,
Believe that story is "Skeleton," by Bradbury and you should find it included in THE OCTOBER COUNTRY.
Bests,
--tr
And re: fountain pens. I use 'em too. Waterman low end models are nice and affordable. One of these years, when I can figure out some way to justify it to my bank balance, I'll spring for a Pelikan or a MontBlanc.
Scary Stories
I have on my bookshelf, just two levels above this computer, two books from my childhood that set the tone, literarily, for my adult tastes. Both are aimed at young readers, though even now they can give a good scare, especially on the right kind of night.
Whether Alfred Hitchcock actually edited either book is doubtful, but "Alfred Hitchcock's Ghostly Gallery" and "Monster Museum" rank as two of my all time favorite childhood books, reprinting such classic spook stories as "The Man Who Sold Rope to the Gnoles" by Idris Seabright; "Shadow, Shadow on the Wall" by Ted Sturgeon; "The Desrick on Yandro", Manly Wade Wellman; "The Upper Berth", F. Marion Crawford; and twenty some-odd others of equal merit. Truly raw material for a deranged adult mind.
The single most frightening image I have ever gotten from a book came as a man wanders down a dark street encountering a strange individual sucking at the marrow of a bone and making a flute from the ivory. It has to do with a doctor who promises to rid a patient of the cause of his misery: his skeleton.
Lord help me, I don't remember the author [embarassingly, I think it's either Ellison or Bradbury] or the actual story name, though someone out there surely will set me straight -- ? I've pulled six books each from my Ellisonia and Bradburiana and can't readily find it.
(Okay, kids, tell me how ig'nant I am... what was this?????)
____________________________________________________
Susan - Thank you. Clearly, this indicates the rest of the tapes are okay, which is a good thing. Hopefully a head didn't roll but merely flopped to the side for a moment or two....
Dream Sleep
the thanatos mouth still haunts my nights
Angry Candy
Todd,
"The Function of Dream Sleep" is one of my favorite stories in Angry Candy. I'm not sure if I like the written story better, or the recording. After pulling my copy off the shelf last night and paging through it again, I ended up putting down "Kite Runner" (which I have only just started), and started re-reading some of the Ellison Classics in Angry Candy.
Add procrastination to my list of faults.
One of my other favorite stories in Angry Candy is "Quicktime," and I always end up with a huge smile on my face at the end, even though I KNOW the punchline. It seems to me a Laumer-esque story, with a hint of Bradbury and a Collier finish.
But of course, it's impossible to classify Harlan. Legions have tried, but he keeps moving too fast.
Harlan, I forgot to mention: loved the song. I got a ducat right here fo ya, pal.
-keither
The Function of Harlan Ellison
Last month I had the opportunity to combine a business trip with pleasure. My business trip was to Montana and my pleasure was a visit to Yellowstone NP – a bizarre landscape that constantly fascinates me.
I flew into Billings and the next day drove to Yellowstone. To keep me company, I brought along “The Voice From the Edge” – five discs of Harlan reading. I will not go into the extended surrealism that occurs hearing these stories as you are led by columns of steam into the geyser basins. Instead, I’ll move forward three days.
I tried to check in at my hotel in Bozeman, but the room wasn’t ready. With no where to go, I parked in front of a K-Mart and listened to the last disc – “The Function of Dream Sleep”.
No distractions, no concerns. Just listening to Harlan read the story.
I’ve read the story many times before, but listening to Harlan’s interpretation (as well as the postscript) brought new meaning to me. I’m sure part of this is because it struck home more. You see (and I apologize for what this is turning into), the department I work in has had kind of a rough time of it. There are twelve of us (counting our Director and VP, who are close friends and, in a second, you’ll see why I included them) and, in the last year and a half (in chronological order), one person was diagnosed with lung cancer (it wasn’t, but they didn’t find that out until they took out half his lung), another died of a heart attack (at 40 years old), I was diagnosed with prostate cancer (two weeks ago I found that the treatment seems to have been successful), the wife of the individual diagnosed with lung cancer was herself diagnosed (one year to the date of his diagnosis) with breast cancer (a successful surgery and she is now clean), and, last month, just before the trip, our VP was diagnosed with colon cancer (and his surgery was likewise successful).
We cannot wait for 2006.
All but one of these have happy endings, but the weight of that history followed me into that K-Mart parking lot.
I started this intending to just share an appreciation for the story, and it has turned into a little more. But I guess that is the power of words, and the power of Harlan’s writing – it has the strength to speak different (important) words at different times in our lives.
A lot of words to just indicate that this is an incredible story.
Mike
Todd, "The Function Of Dream Sleep" is one of my favorites, too, and one that isn't usually mentioned.
Angry Candy contains one of my favorite Harlan stories; a story whose words remain the same, and yet the emotion it drags out of you will differ depending on your mood when you read and re-read.
Disturbing? Uplifting? Horrifying? Lyrical?
Yes.
The Function of Dream Sleep.
-TODD
Steve: I will send you another copy.
Peg: WE have a few copies of the limited ESSENTIAL ELLISON available. The HERC discounted Trade Paperback is available from Morpheus. As for a Hardcover: Morpheus did do one in 2001, you could try contacting them, or try online...but WE don't have any for sale.
Lost HERC member: Paul J. Nelson from Falls Church, VA. If you're reading this Paul, please contact HERC.
Thank you.
Susan
The Region Between
Because I have the attention span of a quark.
-cramer
Do not ask me what happened. I hit the furshluginner button once't and only once't. I try, kids, s'help I do try, but the intercrapthing is clearly beyond me. But I do know all the words to "Silver Dollar," a great Jack Teagarden number.
"Ohhhhhhh you c'n throw a silvuh dolluh DOWN t'the groun'...an' it'll roe-ell...cuz it's rownd...
"Uh woman nevuh know what a good man she got, until she puts him dowe-n...
"So lissen...
"Lissen...
"Lissen't'me...ah'll trytuh make yew unnerstan'...
"Duh WAY a silver dollah go fum han' tew han'...
"Assa way a WOMAN go fum man...tew man!"
---------------------------------------------------------
For one dollar, I comes to yo howse an' sings six seven choruses, A cap-uh-luh, maybe even two, three cap-uh-luhs.
---------------------------------------------------------
Lyrically, Yr. pal, Harlan
KEITH:
Ooooooooo, this sounds Goooooode, Keith!
Tell me, do tell me, which what story am it in ANGRY CANDY you cannot (as yet) (after all these years) read?!!!????
Inquiring mind (namely mine) wanna know.
Yr. pal, expectantly,
Harlan
KEITH:
Ooooooooo, this sounds Goooooode, Keith!
Tell me, do tell me, which what story am it in ANGRY CANDY you cannot (as yet) (after all these years) read?!!!????
Inquiring mind (namely mine) wanna know.
Yr. pal, expectantly,
Harlan
Teat for Tat
Harlan:
That's cool. Standing offer. I live to grovel. Among the multitudes my large self contains is one of the great bean counters of our time, I'm sorry to say.
By the way, everybody -- the Nixon reference wasn't in either of the Teats at all, apparently. A sharp-eyed Webderlurker emailed me privately with the following piece of enlightenment:
> The column you were looking for was from "The Harlan Ellison
> Hornbook": "In Which the Imp of Delight Tries to Make the
> World Smile." It first ran the 23rd of August 1973. If you
> have Edgeworks 3, it starts on page 166. He talks about the
> healing power of good coffee and Enter the Dragon in it, too.
> (Hey, it also lambastes Dr. Atkins, thirty-two years ago...)
Learn something every day. (Or, more often, re-learn. . . .)
DAVID LOFTUS:
Indexing the TEATS. I don't have an answer. But I'll get one when the publisher, Joe Stefko, gets back from his honeymoon.
Do nothing, say nothing, just sit on that lovely Loftus offer till I ascertain the status quo of said aspect of the project.
he
BRENT:
I have more than 100 fountain pens. I use nothing else, as anyone who has ever been at one of my signings will attest.
Harlan Ellison
JONO & EVERYONE ELSE INVOLVED IN THE
"COLLECTING HARLAN" ADVENTURE, INTO
WHICH I WAS DRAGGED, KICKING &
SCREAMING:
No, I haven't sent out the "prizes," though they've all been selected and are lying in up in my office atop a box of long- unanswered mail and "deadline work," the deadlines for which are--in some cases--ten years' past. I know I know I know I know they have to go out, but to be absolutely candid with youse guys, I have bigger fish to fry, desperater work to turn out, more pressing matters to tackle.
I WILL SEND YOU YOUR FILTHY SWAG!!!!!!!
Give me time, give me a break, give me a surcease from guilt. I WILL TEND TO THIS CHORE. But at the moment I'm trying to juggle twelve balls, two of which are my own.
I would love to pay attention to Jono's obsession before I finish work on the books ready to go to print, but...well...
You'll all just have to bide. Quietly. First, THE LAST DANGEROUS VISIONS, then your Collecting Harlan goodies. Bide. Quietly.
Yr. pal, Harlan
The IRONY!
Erika (or should I say, Fiddy-Cent),
You'll like Angry Candy. Good find.
For 50 cents.
The same amount of money Harlan fined you in Cleveland for your grammatically incorrect usage of "like," twice.
Haha! Excellent.
Angry Candy contains a story I have not yet been able to read...
someday I will.
I don't know anything about book of poetry by OWH. Sorry.
-Keith
Here in the Great Political Barnyard, there are three types of creatures: Elephants, Donkeys and People. The first and second eat grass. The third's relationship to the first two is as follows:
Elephants -> great for piano keys / really gouche umbrella holders.
Donkeys -> Really cheap Mexican food or source of "entertainment" in Tijuana.
Found an me an Ellison book.
... Today here at the library book sale, for 50 cents.
Shut up, Keith. >:)
Anyway, I found "Angry Candy", paperback, 1988, Plume. It's not a familiar title to me, since I'm still discovering Harlan's works, but I'm eager to begin reading it. =)
I also found a small book, published March 23rd, 1898: "Selected Poems" by Oliver Wendell Holmes with introduction and notes by H.E. Turpin. It appears to be part of a series, published bi-weekly, by Maynard, Merrill & Co of New York.
Does anyone know anything about said series, or author? It seemed too unique to pass it up. I plan on Googling for more info about it, but I would also 'preciate any knowledge from anyone here. =)
ENOUGH!
ROB, ET..AL
I don't give a tinkers damn about any of it anymore! You guys and gals who call yourself liberal have your own agenda....I have my own agenda thank you and nothing on this big blue ball we call Earth...will ever change my mind. So there! Let us all get back to what this page is here for....discussing the works and life of Harlan Ellison.....PLEASE!
Concrete Forever
Here's a nice mention of Paul Chadwick's work, in The A.V. Club's Underrated List: http://avclub.com/content/node/41706/2
Also, thanks to Finder and Tim for recounting their experiences in Boston.
D.
Great post Tim. A memory to treasure!
Hope you didn't lose any of your HE collection in the flood. My own book collection has expanded throughout the basement and, even though I have an insurance rider for sewer backups, I live in mortal fear of rainstorms!
I've been informed that HE posted a couple of weeks ago regarding the Collecting Harlan! contest (being away for awhile, I only went back as far as the Penny Arcade fracus - went 'Yuk. Poor Rick', and continued on). So HE did get the winners-letter, then it's all good, and I'll sign off that topic right smartly before I have to throw myself in a puddle of Harlan's ire so HE can cross safely.
luv to all,
jono
Steve:
re: Typos
I hate when I add or change a few words, send something off and .. oh fuck.
"...the grandeur of the setting..." "...whose manner and visage..."
Ah well. Sorry HE. Sorry for the double post Rick.
TIM: That was a wonderful post, man. Just wonderful. It's good to know that Harlan's legacy will be preserved as it should be.
Thanks.
Mark W.
THE GOTLIEB ARCHIVES
TIM R: Thanks for sharing that story about the induction of Harlan's papers into the Gotlieb Archives at Boston University. I was properly impressed by his nomination for that literary prize which begins with an N (and shall go unnamed in keeping with the rules), but Harlan's induction into Gotlieb Archives is even more awe-inspiring. And Dr. Gotlieb's toast was one helluva compliment to HE's talents and accomplishments as well.
Thanks again for sharing (perhaps you should find a way to include the story in your forthcoming book -- in the intro or something -- if there's still time).
--DTS
Have you guys read about the "new" pterosaur? I would not want anyone to miss this! (not for the faint at heart)
photo: http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/erde/0,1518,grossbild-531127-380656,00.html
story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9739746/
Thanks Tim
Tim,
Thank you for sharing your description of what sounds like an incredibly memorable evening.
Adam-Troy, you are still in my thoughts, and it looks like the hurricane may hit with less force than originally anticipated. Even so, a category 3 or 4 hurricane is one damn powerful storm.
Susan, did you receive my check for my HERC renewal and the order for Edgeworks 2?
A god's eye view
I posted this link over at the other place but some pictures are just so awesome that it behooves us to dwell on them a while.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
So stare at this for a time, let it sink in, gaze at it until it makes you a little giddy...
Steve:
Will look into this. Heads will roll. Someone will most likely bite the big one.
Cheers--Susan
Jon Stover: As a direct result of your post I will adding the phrase "beef adventure" to my quiver.
Once, in an attempt to use up all my leftovers before grocery shopping, I grilled up some hot and sweet sausage, a little diced red pepper, and topped it off with the last heapin' spoonful of 'kraut in the bottle. Scooped the whole pile on top of a bowl of noodles with a little olive oil.
Bliss.
Eloquent
El-O-quent dammit.
Effing spellcheck never works when you need it.
Tim
Thank you. A most elequent retelling of an important evening.
Steve B
____________________________________________
Side Note to Susan:
(Everyone else can ignore this part, just carry on about your business, nothing else to see)
Thank you for the cassette of Prince M in my recent order. Unfortunately my copy is completely silent on both sides. Do not feel obligated to replace it (the rest of the package is still occupying my time nicely), but you may wish to double check your stock and make sure it's the exception and not the rule.
This is originating handwritten, on paper;only fitting. The Great Flood of 2005, the third Great Flood of 2005, has abluted my library. Lost in the wash was a box of comics, several movie posters and my computer with numerous unsaved files. Yes, I know, always save to disk, but this isn't about that. It's about last Tuesday night in Boston, an Ellison evening that clearly stands apart from any other, and trust me I've attended more than my share. A night so profoundly significant both publicly and personally, that I was reticent to write about it.
To understand the overall importance you have to understand the reason for the Ellison visit in the first place. Located in the one of the libraries at Boston University is a well-known special collection of manuscripts, letters, documents and other ephemera known as the Gotlieb Archives. Dr. Howard Gotlieb began the collection over forty years ago and is also the founder of the "Friends of the Library," a group of benefactors interested in the preservation and exhibition of literary treasures. He's been called "the emperor of the 20th century archives," and "the father of modern archiving." It was his desire to acquire a cache of Harlan's papers for the collection that initiated the BU reception and lecture.
Prior to the event, managing director Vita Paladino gave the Ellisons, my wife Andrea, daughter Alexa, and I a tour of the archive. Among the noted luminaries preserved under glass, were the likes of Freud, Poe, Martin Luther King Jr., H.L. Menkin, and King Henry VIII. The list is long and staggeringly impressive. Clearly, this is a place of honor and prestige, proper company from a sampling of Harlan’s letters.
After about an hour of inspecting the current smattering of acquisitions, we were escorted to the auditorium where the reception was held. Again, quite a departure from the obligatory convention-like atmosphere, even in the best of situations.
Hors d’oeuvres, an open bar, potted greenery, Alexa, whose done this since she was ten, looked at me and said, “Wow they really went all out for this one!” Indeed they had.
Following a photo session with the Boston Globe and a lengthily signing/meet and greet, Harlan took the stage. Throughout the hour the capacity audience, comprised of scholars, academics, students, writers like Paul Di Fillipo and Alan Steele, even Dr. Gotlieb himself, laughed, and applauded. In the end, another signing line formed without a wookie, or a vulcan in the lot. Despite all the years, the thousands of lectures, Harlan was forging new territory.
The evening culminated in a reasonably small gathering at the Algonquin Club, an exclusive gentlemen’s gathering place founded in 1886. As we stood in the foyer mumbling and attempting to absorb grandeur the setting, Dr, Gotlieb, who had been in the front row at the lecture, approached and introduced himself. “I just want to tell you I thought you were magnificent,” he said extending his hand. Harlan looked at him wide-eyed, “Really?” he said. “I didn’t think you liked me. It looked like you were scowling.”
Gotlieb, who visage and manner is reminiscent of Peter Ustinov, laughed and explained that he always looked like that and that he was overjoyed with the success of the event. Yet another moment in a long night to remember.
The trek up four flights of stairs to the dining room was worth not being in an elevator with seven other people: I have my reasons. We arrived to find most of the other guests seated in the elegant main dining room of dark wood, high ceilings and velvet curtains. Andrea and I sat across from Dr. Gotlieb, whose conversations with Susan intimated a friendship with Hemingway and distaste for crabmeat. Harlan, who was merrily eavesdropping on the conversation, leaned over to Gotlieb and said, “I love you.” The Dr., not missing a beat replied, “Yes, but do you have the ring to prove it?”
While Harlan entertained with stories of Bruce Lee, Charlie Mingus, and Tony Bennet, Andrea and I ate and chatted with the other guests, basking in the glow of a rare occasion whose ultimate purpose had yet to reveal itself.
After the meal was cleared, Dr. Gotlieb, who had been sitting quietly for some time, spontaneously rose from his seat and began to tap his glass. In a voice that resonated throughout the hall, he proceeded to deliver the most eloquent appreciation I have ever heard. “In my six decades as a scholar,” he began. “If you were to ask me what I have learned from the various authors and speakers that have come to the university I would say, not much. Until tonight.” Through the flickering candlelight I could see Harlan’ face redden, his hand covering his mouth. Gotlieb went on to note that the Harlan’s presence had established a new constituency, the first time students had mingled with academics in such numbers. “And more than just a great writer, you possess a human quality that is rarely seen.” We raised our glasses as Harlan sat speechless, wiping his eyes and trying to find the proper words. Finally able to collect his thoughts, he invoked the spirit of his mother and how proud she would be to have witnessed this moment. As Harlan humbly took his seat Dr. Gotlieb pounded the table with an authoritative palm while the entire party applauded and wiped away the mist.
The surreal nature of the evening hung without adequate description for days, it’s taken me a week to write this. I am not openly sentimental and would opt to keep most personal insights to myself, and a few close friends. Despite all that, this needed to find a forum and risk chance comment.
From my chair, I saw my friend, Harlan Ellison, son of Louis and Serita, who swung his was way from the nosebleed schoolyards of Painsville Ohio, embraced by the immortals. Harlan, in his own time, in a room where the specters of Twain, Hemingway and Steinbeck loom large, lauded outside the pigeonhole of genre by a congregation of scholars and academics, most of whom had never heard him speak.
On the way out as we walked down the stairs I put my hand on Harlan’s shoulder and said, “This was one hell of a night.” He looked at me still foggy and nodded, “It sure was kiddo. It sure was.”
Wilma / "Guts"
That seems to be what's happening with Wilma, but who knows; she is moving slower, and it may now be several days before she gets here.
Answer to Neal on "Guts": it compares very well, actually. It's not just a grossout. It owes much of its impact to the evocative power of its language, and its attention to the psychic aftermath of its terrible event. The terror lies not just in what happens, but in having to live with everybody looking at you afterward.
Fuzzy politics break out on Webderland, like an electronic form of avian bird flu. Those who haven't caught it scream in horror at what it does to their loved ones, and hope for the development of some kind of vaccine.
Anyone else here like horseradish? I seem to be developing a real thing for it when eating beef (but if anyone knows what else to do with it, do tell). The hotter the better, and finding the good stuff often involves a search.
But boyohboy, horseradish -- it makes even an inferior cut of beef into a an adventure.
Cheers, Jon
Communism not the agenda? Speak for yourself. Ah nuts, I've blown my cover. Dear Leader is goin to have my hide.
Liberals don't want to control anyone's lives, Stan. You can do pretty much what ever you want. Go nuts! We just want people to be healthy and safe; hence our push for environmental regulations, gun control, and social services that keep the poorest of us alive and well.
Besides, Stan, Conservatives tell homosexuals they can't marry. That's a form of control. Conservatives can't wait till Row V Wade is overturned and abortion illegalized. That's control. How about censorship of the media (both entertainment and news). That's control.
Rules. Both sides have them. Liberal rules concern the physical word. To help keep our bodies and our environment healthy. Conservative rules concern the spiritual world. Neo-cons do what they do supposedly to save our souls.
Stan,
"Also Liberals want the government to control everyones lives from birth to death."
This is the most obnoxious of the ignorant cliches you subspecies called Conservatives inhale and exhale day by day without ever researching the facts.
Liberals want government to protect Americans from your corporate assholes who are having a field day hording the wealth at YOUR expense AND mine right now; liberals want the programs and the safety nets for the disadvantaged. Stan...talking more from your end of it, we can go too far in EITHER direction: we can go too far to Corporate free enterprise OR we can go too far with government; BOTH lead to the same corruption, the same deterioration of the country, the same RESULT. It's about BALANCE. The majority of the LEFT wants the checks and balances held in place. That 's in danger right NOW....thanks to YOUR voting habits and disallowance of researched information.
Stan, do yourself a favor for once - possibly the first time in that vacuum you call your life...read about the situation (I don't mean from Rush Limbaugh): read the cost per person in taxes these programs (including welfare) go for versus the white collar crimes we pay for (now it's the Bush administration itself); read about the checks and balances necessary in a system like this. THAT'S what the Liberals want.
Your stupid comment enrages me because it's a byproduct of 15 years of Conservative propaganda pounded out almost daily, using generalities and distortions to misrepresent and mischaracterize the ideas, intents, and issues of the Left; while we sat here until only recently allowing that shit to go on without rebuttal from the other side. It's dangerous because these misconceptions are handing the country to those who really are destroying it.
Even if you could argue some "Lefties" would go too far in government sponsored support, that some want change but not necessarily for the benefit of all(????????), since when were the Conservatives interested in pursuing ANYTHING that wasn't self-interest; the Conservative agenda is INHERENTLY to the detriment of country's greater good.
The fuckin' stupidity of comparing the Liberal agenda to Communism - I thought - went out with the McCarthy era. You are a fossil, Stan.
I'll let you in on a couple of facts. Russia is not doing well right NOW either. Economically, they were doing FAR better when the country was Communist. The only reason it didn't hold was because of the expense of the arms race; put that aside - and I am, to make a point, leaving out the autocratic component - their economy was very strong and it would have held well for another 100 years if there had been NO arms race.
But that's another animal. NOW...the country is being run by organized crime. A FEW hording the wealth at the expense of the many. A LITTLE like what's starting to happen in THIS country NOW.
I'm very depressed. Because fossil though you may be, many people in this country think as YOU do. They hold to blind idealism like a pillow to their faces; and they never take the pillow away to learn or to see if they have the facts wrong. So, many, in fact, that, as YOU yourself said...we are in DEEP shit.
NOW...if you have anything else to say, I'll discuss it with you on the other side. Given your refusal to learn anything new I doubt you will.
No more from my end...okay?
I have had it up to my eyeballs with all this rhetoric and political football stuff going on in this room. I am going to leave it alone and go back to the purpose of this page...to analyze, critique or comment on the writings of Harlan Ellison. Enough said...no more political or religous comment from my end....okay?
Conservative "thinking"
"Liberal thinking was and is still up there...they seek change. What I have issue is...sometimes the change is not for the good of all.
Also Liberals want the government to control everyones lives from birth to death. (Hmmm sounds like Communism does it not? Russia found out after almost eighty years it does not work)
I have one question for you....Are you for or against free enterprise...the one thing that makes big business and small business possible?"
I just love how so many false assumptions can be put into so little space.
1) The GOP has, for the past 30 years, been the party most likely to say they're out to "change" things (though they use the more loaded word "reform.")
2) Though no one in their right mind can be as general as you have been, the 'left' tends to want to regulate business while leaving individuals free to do as best suits them; while the 'right' wants to control private lives, while letting big business do whatever they want.
3) Name calling (why do so many neo-cons always equate liberals to communists?) proves little save for your lack of imagination.
4) "Free Enterprise" is a great excuse or untrammeled corporate power, but as the middle ages proved, putting too much power into the hands of too few is a very bad idea.
There is increasingly a distinction between economic conservatives and social conservatives. Bush is a social conservative or "neo" conservative going more for the fundamentalist Christian crowd than traditional libertarian conservatives. He has alienated many in his own party by spending money (on the war and on subsidies for cronies businesses) and by raising the national debt. Liberals tend to favor taxation and more government programs, while conservatives say government should not spend money at all. Neoconservatives spend just as much; they just borrow the money instead of obtaining it through taxation.
I don't know how long the neo-conservative faction in the Republican party is going to hold up. It seems a very strange-bedfellows coalition that is likely to fall apart - many people vote against their own economic interests to put a fundamentalist in the White House, for instance. Republicans remain the party of the rich...and of Christians who are not all rich except for some of the high profile ones.
Kristin
but i thought hot dogs was better than POLITICS....
> Liberals want the government to control everyones lives from birth to death<
Hyperbolic, pat generalizations like these are obviously false just from a logical standpoint: there's no way ALL members of a huge group like "liberals," who we can assume comprise close to half the electorate, would agree to such a thing.
The statement also reeks of "this or that" thinking and depends on a term that remains undefined by the writer. Just what or who is a "liberal?" A union member? A Mapplethorpe funder? A tree-hugger?
And what is meant by controlling a life? Some would argue we're already there, and that the Patriot Act, sponsored by "conservatives," gave us a good nudge in that direction. "Control" is a freighted word, and I think it's very incorrrectly used here. Is your gripe the proposed National ID? Social Security? HMOs?
I recommend a good dose of mental draino to clear out the fuzzy, dark-side-of-the-force thinking. Political beliefs are generally much more sophisticated than this trope, and to lump people you evidently disagree with into some amorphous group and attribute such a motive to all of them strikes me as pretty simplistic, to say nothing of a little paranoid.
Adam-Troy:
Here's hoping Wilma withers down to a sneeze by the time it makes landfall. Enough already.
Chuck
Susan - Thanks for the nifty newsletter! Ok, so there's the trade paperback of the 50th Essential Ellison. Do you still have the special edition? And, do you offer a regular hardback edition? (Reason I ask is I prefer hardback but the cost of the special edition is, while justifiable to my own self, a bit difficult to rationalize to my better half!).
My limited statement on politics: Try being a "liberal democrat" in Texas while employed in the oil industry. ( I use the terms loosely... I am not so much moderate as I am a mix of positions both liberal and conservative, but more on the left side both socially and economically...) My colleagues forgive my supposedly misguided notions. ;-)
Peg
TO STEVE, ROB AND OTHER INTERESTED
STEVE....I bow to your incisive and intellectual remarks regarding what I posted on here. I too, am a working stiff, middle class person...I worked for years in the lumber industry and witness the lies from a former Oregon State Senator when our mill went down in 1978. By the way he was a Democrat too.
I became both Republican and Conservative on a moral issue anyway...I still believe any type of abortion is tandemount to wholesale murder, much worse than either Stalin or Hitler ever thought of doing. Nothing can change my mind about it and so long as the Republican Party stands behind right-to-life issues I will stay a Republican. Well...here I go again...posting political stuff...this is all I will say about it...there will be no more posts from me regarding politics, religion et al....
ROB...I said it all in the first paragraph (above). Liberal thinking was and is still up there...they seek change. What I have issue is...sometimes the change is not for the good of all.
Also Liberals want the government to control everyones lives from birth to death. (Hmmm sounds like Communism does it not? Russia found out after almost eighty years it does not work)
I have one question for you....Are you for or against free enterprise...the one thing that makes big business and small business possible?
A-TC
agreed Adam-Troy
definitely gruesomer than "Survivor Type"
although all that fainting stuff sounds like hyperbole; Chuck draws a pretty mean crowd, after all--but who knows
but Adam-Troy, how do you rate "Guts" on literary merit, compared to say...the gruesome ending of "A Boy and His Dog", por ejemplo?
Regards,
Neal
Harlan Ellison Strikes Back!!
5 Dooms - Great issue. But for those who don't want to spend $17 and do want to see the story in colour, it was reprinted a few years back in Avengers Volume 3 #27. Pretty common back issue; you can usually get it for cover price ($3) at any decent comic shop.
And speaking of comics... Time magazine put out a list of 100 greatest novels (post 1920-now), and one graphic novel made the cut: Alan Moore's "Watchmen".
Still Not Prepared!
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/41676
Wilma Update / "Guts"
Wilma is expected to be a Cat 2 or 3 when it makes landfall in Florida. We've ridden out Cat 2s before -- indeed, that was Katrina's strength, when it passed over our neighborhood last time. We have guarded optimism.
On another subject:
For months now, I have been hearing radio stories and reading news coverage of a short story by Chuck Pahluniuk (author of FIGHT CLUB) so horrifying that listeners have been fainting during his public readings of it.
I have read a lot of awfully horrifying stuff, and written some more, so I imagined myself immune from its effects. My interest in it was eager, but academic.
The story in question, "Guts," is reprinted in the latest Datlow/Link YEAR'S BEST FANTASY AND HORROR.
I haven't sprung for that volume yet (though I always do); but I read the story over coffee at Barnes and Noble.
Holy Freaking Mother of God.
Folks, this may be one of the two or three most intensely horrifying stories I have ever, repeat, EVER, read. During its two-page climax, I kept thinking, Oh, God, he's not going to do this. Oh God, he did just do it. Oh, God, he can't go farther than that. Oh God, he just did.
It gets darker and darker, up to a very VERY nasty eleventh-hour twist, and a last line that ties the psychic aftermath in a bow.
And GRAPHIC...! Jesus H. Mother of Christ.
All in prose as vivid and as visual as documentary footage of the terrifyingly possible events described therein.
I know a lot of folks who shouldn't go anywhere near this thing.
Posting the above comments elsewhere, I was asked if it was worse than Stephen King's notorious "Survivor Type"...and I said, "Yes."
Whoa...
Dang!
For Harlan completists: Marvel's Essential series (black-and white reprints of various series) will be releasing their latest Avengers (70's era) volume which contains "Five Dooms To Save Tomorrow" from a story by Harlan and adapted by Roy Thomas, issue #101.
--------------------------------------------------------
ESSENTIAL AVENGERS VOL. 5 TPB
Written by ROY THOMAS, HARLAN ELLISON, CHRIS CLAREMONT, STEVE ENGLEHART & STEVE GERBER
Penciled by BARRY WINDSOR-SMITH, RICH BUCKLER, JOHN BUSCEMA, GEORGE TUSKA, JIM STARLIN, DON HECK, BOB BROWN, DAVE COCKRUM, SAL BUSCEMA, SAM KWESKIN & SYD SHORES
Cover by BARRY WINDSOR-SMITH
From the Sentinels and the Savage Land Mutates to Loki, Dormammu and Thanos, the Avengers prove the universe's worst are no match for their best! Magnetic mayhem and nuclear nostalgia! Featuring Golden Age guest stars, mythic menaces and more! Plus: the Avengers-Defenders War and Hawkeye vs. Daredevil! Includes rare Marvel work by best-selling author Harlan Ellison! Collects AVENGERS #98-126, DAREDEVIL #99, DEFENDERS #8-11 and GIANT-SIZE AVENGERS #1.
600 PGS./All Ages ...$16.99
ISBN: 0-7851-2087-4
Question about the Teats
If I had known what the weather was like outdoors this morning, I probably wouldn't have gone out. But the alarm rang at 6:20, I did some stretching, and then I hit the street for a four-mile run. (There's Ellison content here, rest assured; I'm building up to it.)
After arriving back home feeling like a drowned rat, I sat on the toilet in the nude, drying off and warming up, and cutting my nails (both hands and feet). Something about that position reminded me of a memorable item somewhere in one of the Glass Teats.
Harlan is trying to cheer up the presumably depressed reader (probably reeling after something Harlan hit her or him with, a paragraph or column before), and he says: you know how you have to look back behind you at the toilet paper to see whether it's still picking up solid matter or is relatively clean? Well, President Nixon has to do that, just like you do. Isn't that comforting?
This was an image that just never occurred to me before -- with regard to ANYONE else, never mind the President of the United States -- so I found it oddly charming and obviously never forgot it.
The question is, where would one find that reference?
And I was reminded of a notice I'd seen recently that the two Glass Teats are about to be reissued, sometime in the next year . . . perhaps united into one volume? Clothbound? This raised the ultimate question, which I put to Harlan here--
HARLAN:
Will the new edition of The Glass Teat and The Other Glass Teat be indexed? So we can find Richard Nixon and Chuck Barris and Peggy Lipton and Sally Field and all the others quickly, rather than having to page madly through our copy looking for the story of your abortive appearance on the Dating Game and the many smaller jewels that don't necessarily relate directly to the title of the particular column they're in?
If that's a question that's still up in the air; if the publisher hadn't planned on it, but is still open to the idea; if you need someone to do the gruntwork, FOR FREE . . . I'll do it, just so I and the rest of The Devoted will have an edition of the Glass Teat that's truly serviceable and better than all the rest.
Fountain Pens
I just bought an 85 year old fountain pen.
Anyone else here use them?
Stan
Speaking as a liberal-leaning moderate Democrat who has, at times, paid the salaries of "other working stiffs" I would like to challenge your whole premise that only Republicans and/or conservatives contribute to the economy of the less fortunate. I have employed others and at other times been myself the employed. In fact, currently I am on the payroll of a megacorporation which I hardly detest (in addition to owning half of a small business and working in the arts part-time), and have in the past swallowed tremendous amounts of bugjuice at my own expense. And still, wow, I like big business which has been, for the most part, very good to me.
I have been a victimized stockholder, employee and citizen. I have seen my net worth increase to and drop from seven figures. On a daily basis I work quite happily with other working stiffs who are of a different political persuasion than I.
I eat hot dogs, sometimes with ketchup and sometimes au naturel.
The point I'm making is that Conservative Republicanism is a social statement not an economic one. Liberal Democratism is the same. True, the majority of upper-income individuals (though well below "all") may be republican-leaning. Many, many working stiffs are conservative as well. And many, many independently wealthy people are liberals.
Argue with the ideology all you like, but adding an economic priority and blanket social-responsibility comments to a select grouping of political attitudes (Democrats) does neither side any good.
Steve "Well-meaningandrelativelywell-offsocialliberalwithright-leaningpositionsonahadfulofissueshotdogeatingModerate" Barber
Good Wishes for Adam & Judy & Other thoughts
Adam & Judy, you are in my thoughts and I wish you guys the best. According to CNN, Wilma has reduced in intensity, down to a Category 4 hurricane, but that it is still one mother of a storm.
John Pacer, not sure why there was a difference in the rolls as I know for a fact that they both use D'Amoroso's breads. From what I have heard there is , ahem, strong encouragement to use that particular provider, notwithstanding the fact that their breads are absolutely sublime.
Stan, why do you make such broad statements? Liberals hate big business? While I would hardly claim to speak for all Liberals, I would say that claim is nonsense. We want to see businesses act in a responsible manner through such wild and crazy notions as not dumping toxic chemicals into our waterways, putting labels on food products so you know what you are eating and actually being held responsible if their product injures or kills someone. Boy, we Liberals are just wacky Communists for actually expecting responsibility from corporations, huh?
Would you like to expand this discussion to address the topic of why the gap between the top executive and the lowest paid worker is exponentially larger here in the US, as compared with any other country? How about the fact that Americans work much longer work weeks and have shorter vacation time accrued than almost any other country?
Notice I am not even bringing up the fact that there are, by some estimates, 20 million Americans who are working, yet have no health care coverage because they work for small employers who cannot provide coverage to their employees.
You ask, if we are all Americans, and the answer is yes. Unfortunately, we are also rapidly developing a caste system within this country, similar to medieval Europe or India. The last thing the framers of the Constitution ever wanted to see in the US was the creation of a Brahmin style class within its borders, yet that is what the current Administration is attempting to achieve.
Barbeque? Did someone actually suggest charring the delicate hot dog over open flame? Why not just throw ‘em in the nuker and suck the juices out that way? *blech*
No, no, my children, although I will grant the certain ambiance that comes with picnicking, if you don’t have one of these:
http://www.hedonics.com/store/prodinfo.asp?number=0552&variation=&aitem=1&mitem=1
Boiling is the civilized way to go!
Adam-Troy:
Belated conga rats on your new book contract for ‘Amazing Race’. Hopefully fleeing from Wilma won’t become part of your background research. The latest report I’ve seen suggests Wilma is lessening in strength and may not hit Florida until Monday, so I’m hoping that you and all the Webderlanders in the area will be safe and sound.
By the way, I’m not sure global warming has anything to do with the storms of the last few years; Somehow, someway I’d bet that Vossoff and Nimmitz are to blame!
What Jon said.
Hearty congrats and thanks Rick!
Hiya Charlie!
Been doing the house-husband thing for awhile now and not paying much attention to the internet. Did Harlan ever send you your prize from the Collecting Harlan contest?
Luv to all,
jono
Holy Moley!
Did the 10th anniversary of the Webderland bulletin board community go uncommented upon in late August? In any case, congratulations and thanks to Rick Wyatt for doing this for ten years with grace.
Cheers, Jon
Stan,
You are using ONE premise to make an entire argument, at the expense of far more crucial, starker realities. (And to be fair, Frank often does too; he does not always convey the level-headedness of the GREATER Left).
To begin with, your great "wage payers" often pay rates below the standard of living. The problem with poor and middle class people is that they're poor and middle class. They don't have that much in the way of assets. They chew up their assets just LIVING, and so a medical catastrophe or a car accident will wipe them out - they'll go from $2K to - $48K, not $50K to $0K. They AREN'T making enough from those wages - I mean MANY, not ALL - to pull their weight in the face of a catastrophe.
Big Businesses often give their CEOs the hikes, while lowering wages for lower level employees.
(Read how the Republicans are now pushing to cut Medicare. That was on the news yesterday. What are the people who haven't any money going to do when the only option is expensive private health care?)
AND, btw, Corporations pay just about ZERO in Fed income tax. That means YOU pay a shitload more proportionately. Where the fuck do you think FEMA could have gotten its funds had Bush not ingratiated these White Collar bastards with multi-trillion dollar tax cuts? (You guys never get this. You NEVER get this. And then, constantly, you vote against your own interests because you buy into a one-premise argument without considering the broader picture. This is the reason your votes are getting us into so much trouble).
"Big Business" is an inevitable outcome of any growing economy. No capitalist economy can grow without them. But...BUT: as it becomes part of the infrastructure it tends to eat away at its host (history has shown this to be true INVARIABLY). It's the NATURE of the beast we're going after here. Left unregulated, B.B. hordes. It uses its powerful lobby at the expense of the American people, thereby ultimately taking far more than it gives. Hey, the country's economy loses more to White Collar crime than anything else.
Of course, whether making the argument for the Left or the Right, it always helps to specify the most abusive industries.
The insurance companies, the drug companies, the fast food industry, real estate developers, the oil companies...they all TAKE and TAKE and TAKE...far more from us than they pay in wages to their humble employees.
Right now, probably the most notorious anti-consumer entity is the credit card companies, who have grown rich from their increasingly revolting loan shark-like tactics, don't want to pay the price of their reliance on these obscene methods. They want the ability to engage in any kind of shady marketing they can, eagerly promoting the virtues of almost unlimited debt to people they know to be unsound risks, but when the loans don't pay off they don't want to suffer the consequences. Credit card companies are among the primary backers of a bankruptcy bill about to be passed in Congress, which is largely designed to shield them from taking responsibility for their own loan portfolios.
Unless it's CAREFULLY regulated "Big Business", STAN, on the WHOLE, takes from America more than it gives.
If you want a REAL overview of the Nature of the Beast and its dynamics, read Eric Schlosser's FAST FOOD NATION. I've always seen it as the modern day version of Upton Sinclair's THE JUNGLE.
Right = Ignorance (YOU'RE the ones who got us where we are NOW)
Left = Fact gathering (rather than using ONE premise to make an argument)
A Boy and His Dog on FLIX tonight... now,actually, this moment-- in Texas. Pressing the info button a line appears;" From the book by Harlan Ellsion."
Don't know if any of y'all already mentioned it. If so, please pardon,
Cindy
TO FRANK CHURCH...AGAIN!
Frank...Frank...Frank. Come on buddy. Not all Conservatives are thinking the way Boortz is expounding on his show. It does however bring up an interesting question though...have you ever heard of a liberal Democrat working stiff paying the wages of other working stiffs? Come on now! Just like not all rich people are Conservative...some of the richest and snobbish people in the USA live in Hollywood or around it and upstate New YOrk or somewhere near Central Park in NYC....and yes...some of these people profess being both Liberal and Democrat..can you explain that? Liberals such as yourself, hate big business...yet...its big business that pays the wages to poor and so called down trodden masses of the working people in this country! I wish you would get off that liberal high horse of yours...geewhiz...WE ARE ALL AMERICANS AREN'T WE?
ketchup on hot dogs?!?!?
c'mon... is this the best topic you can come up with?!
yes?
ok, then.... never, EVER, put ketchup on a hotdog. it's mustard, you a#@! a Chicago dog is the best food invention. please don't ruin it for everyone!
For those too financially challenged to get the boxed set, there's a Val Lewton marathon on Turner Classic Movies - Right. Now. (Sorry for the late notice-I just found out about it).
Eric – I’ll have to try Mustard's Last Stand. I used to live in Chicago proper, but now I’m in Wilmette and luckily only a block from Irving’s, one of my favorites. And, yes, celery salt is vital, and ketchup is verboten, but it’s not a Chicago dog without the radioactive green relish. I grew up in Indiana, and the first time my mom took me downtown we had lunch to the soon-to-be-late-and-lamented-Marshall Field’s, where my eight year-old eyes bugged out at the glowing green goo slathered on the dog.
Veggie things
Indeed, "riblets" are as good as (or better than) actual boneless ribs from a fast food place. The Girlfriend and I were amazed at the texture and taste. I like them on a kaiser roll with melted cheese or on rice myself.
As far as veggie dogs, I have to agree that most suck. Except for the ones that I recently found. I can't recall the brand name, but they are made with portobello mushrooms (and soy) and are just fine. When I find them again I will post the name.
Kristin
You are correct. Pink's was recently advertising the fact that they are going to have a location at the Aladin in Las Vegas. Not necessarily good news. However, for those of us who have to travel to Vegas for work, it is an alternative that might represent something close to good food. (Kind of like when they put a Garduno's in the Palms. No it's not the best New Mexican restaurant - but still better than anything else I was able to find [even trying the best bet - hole-in-the-wall ones] anywhere else in Vegas.
Lee
"The quibble in bits"
Laugh-out-loud funny
Mike
(And please forgive typos - I'm entering this from the lobby of an Embassy Suites hotel)
Colbert Report - Hillarious. But I agree with Brian, its going to be tuff in the long run to keep the show running after a season or two. In an interview with Robert Siegel, Colbert said aside from the reports and interviews, part of the show is going to develop and reveal a personal life for his character. That certainly gives the show more to play with.
And here's a link to Terry Gross' interview with Colbert; funny stuff:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4583007
Frank,
You also put the chomp in Chomsky.
The lye in lyrical.
The quibbles in bits.
And the left in leftovers.
The ham in hambone.
The sting in interesting.
The con in conversation.
And the sin in Cindy.
A Frank haiku:
Black helicopters
Whip dust clouds over mass graves
Freedom’s voices stilled
I, for one, am happy to have you back.
Why did you leave? Where have you been?
Susan: I got my first HERC package! Great stuff. Thanks for all the extra goodies. This is a sweet treat.
Mark Goldberg: I have to say I definately prefer Pat's to Geno's. Geno's rolls are to dry whenever I'm there. Last time I was there something funky was goin' on with the onions, too. Either way, though, it's all about the whiz wit'. I remember the first time I got the whiz I was skeptical and thought my friends were trying to play some cruel trick on me. I'm now a true believer.
-John
I live in the Chicago area and I usually ask the counter to hold the mustard, since they tend to slather it on like there was no tomorrow. Mustard is a strong condiment, and should be used sparingly. Specifying "easy mustard" encourages the server to make up the perceived lack of mass with an excess of something else, like relish.
Both ketchup and mustard are usually available at the counter to self-apply. That works the best. A good Chicago dog has two traits: a distinct snap after biting into it, and just the right amount of celery salt. I recommend Mustard's Last Stand (ironic title), right next to Ryan Field in Evanston.
>Yea, conservatives aren't Nazi's. Then why do they keep proving it.
Bit of a s'low learner, aren't we?
Speaking of slow learners, the conservative=Nazi formulation was popular with me when I was in high school. That was before I learned the world was sort of, you know...complex. But it's easier to think like Ann Coulter's mirror opposite, isn't it?
The One True Dog
Here I thought I would GET the answer -- but how is a sandwich meat agnostic to adopt a faith if everyone has a different sworn verity?!?! Initially I thought the best burger was delivered at the Denny's on Colorado in Pasadena around the month of October 1996, but meditation showed that it was only true for me: Interior reasons stemming from a lack of breakfast, long flight, drive across LA in dark of night, low expectations (Denny's), all conspiring to create a few moments of transport. Crispy bun. Crispy pink meat. Hot cheese. Pickles. Ketchup on the side. Vague memories of lettuce-things. And so agnosticism reigned down through the years, while I STILL long for the certainty that says the One True Dog lives at Spanky's on Michigan in Chicago, between the car park and the Kinkos and no where else. But I know it wll be only becuse I've walked too long in the rain, eaten nothing Chinese lately, lost my rental keys, seen that nifty Oscar Meyer car scooting about, or heard a wiff of jazz tune out a doorway. My faith is broken and won't start. Probably a baseball thing, I don't know.
Finder Doug -- late to the game I have to THANK YOU for the piece on Harlan at BU. Vivid pictures as if I were watching footage. It does my heart such good to hear how Harlan was honored, welcomed and dined (if not wined) among worthies and admirers in such a setting as the Algonquin -- though I've never seen, but feel as if I have. Yes, seen the whole thing. Ah, but I CAN'T imagine the lecture...
Harlan, it sounds golden. May it be and shine golden, man! We don't talk often, but you remain among my very few Northern Stars.
Mark Zug
Yea, you conservatives really love Jesus. Neil Boortz, libertarian idiot, goes on his talkshow and says that the rich deserve to be saved before the poor, when there is a natural disaster, because the poor are a 'drag' on society.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200510140006
Yea, conservatives aren't Nazi's. Then why do they keep proving it.
--------------
Kristine, I have them all around my finger. I bait, they follow. Look at all the postings started because of one of my rants. Hell, without me they would have nothing to talk about.
I am the rock in their Christmas stockings, the lump in their undies, but I am such a mild mannered child of the living Christ that I lurch into the fall leaves shaking my head at how low they think my motives are. I only march in love, I put wreathes on their doors, a song of the dolphin in their souls.
Sorry, I need a tissue.
Burp.
Kristin:
Have you tried veggie ribs? The whole idea of it seems very strange to me, but I tasted 'em and was hooked. The texture/consistency is very convincing . . . of course, the sauce is what really makes it. Can't remember the brand offhand, but Carole and I eat them regularly.
Adam and Judi: I wish words over the Internet _could_ be of some severe material help for you. Is there an evac plan in your area? How solid is your home? Think you might be able to lay in some well-protected food supplies in advance, stuff that can stay in the package and not go bad for a few days? I'd stock up on a few gallons of water, too... and make sure the administrative logistics of insurance, title deeds, checkbooks and the like are in order and in s safe location.
I don't _mean_ to sound like Mr. Survivalist. Sorry 'bout that.
Has anyone checked out _The Colbert Report_ yet? The first two shows have been terrifically funny. Colbert's got a real knack for working utterly insane patter into an impression of a clueless media-clown who _has_ to look Determined and Authoritative. As a parody of Bill O'Reilly, it's pretty good, but Colbert's thin and gentle-looking physique reminds us that most of the news pundits are manicured, college-boy fetuses. (O'Reilly's just a Central Casting "bartender" performer, needy for authenticity: he genuinely wishes that he smelled like beer nuts.)
The best parts of the show were Colbert's riffs on current issues. They started off as O'Reilly-like complaints, and quickly skated off into implosions of surreality. The bullet-points were hilarious, too. It's not as surreal as _The Day Today_, the BBC's parody news show that birthed Chris Morris, Stev Coogan, Patrick Marber and Armando Iannucci, but few things are.
The low points were when Colbert had to stray from the behind-the-desk pontificating, and fill out the half hour. An interview with a minor official in a Georgia voting district was hilarious, but it was a bit too close to the _Daily Show_'s segments. But... Well, here's what I mean. The opening show had an interview with Stone Phillips, and a gravitas-off with Phillips. The second segment was _wonderful_. But the interview, while amusing, seemed a bit pointless.
And as a recent _Slate_ review pointed out, who is Colbert going to get in the future? Jon Stewart can ask serious questions, but Colbert's character _can't_ switch from an O'Reilly parody into semi-serious interview mode. It just won't work with real guests. It would certainly work with actors _playing_ talk-show guests. Or, it might work if the guests visited remotely, as on _Nightline_ or _Space Ghost_, to puncture the authoritarian nature of giving the host a cut-off switch.
Colbert's got a _lot_ of work to do. He has to fill out a half hour, and unlike O'Reilly, he can't just spout off with ignorant ranting: he has to fill his time with severely funny material. This show could burn itself out very, very quickly, but so far, it's terrific.
Wilma
Hurricane Wilma is now a Category Five, and is according to some sources showing the lowest barometric pressures in all of recorded history.
It is expected to make a sharp turn east and hit Florida. Right now, Southwest Florida. We may be within its most intense winds.
This one may make Katrina look like a firecracker.
We expect to be hit on Saturday.
Folks: I may not believe in prayers, but we can sure as hell use your thoughts.
A-TC
Cheesesteak
Mark,
Of course, you are right. Pat and Mike seem to be interchangeable in my scrambled brain. It's probably racist, too, like calling a paddy-wagon a paddy-wagon.
Best cheesesteak I ever had was at Pat's, across the street diagonally from Geno's.
However, now it looks like I'll have to try The White House...
-Keith (ever on the lookout for new meat) Cramer
Kristin, muh deah, thatz thuh trew south, that is, JAWJUH, or in the way of the infidel, GEORGIA. Florida, psssshaaaw!
Rob is right, enough of this madness! Let's argue about something really important...
BARBECUE!
C heesesteaks and Harlan Appearance
Harlan will be appearing at Minicon in April 2006, information on his appearance can be found at http://mnstf.org/minicon/
Keith, I am a Philly native and I have never heard of Mike's. In Philly the best place to go for a cheesesteak has to be Geno's. I know many people have heard of Pat's, where the cheesesteak was born, but Geno's, which is right across the street is better.
However, I must say that the best cheesesteak to be found on the face of the earth is not found in Philly, but in Atlantic City, NJ. The White House is a legendary place that I visited all the time in my youth, and brought a buddy of mine to sample their wares about a decade ago. It remained as good as I remembered
appearances
Does anyone know if there is a list of where Harlan will be appearing? The news page here at the website hasn't been updated in over a year.
It looks like he was recently at Boston University. I also read that he will be the guest of honor at a convention in Minneapolis early next year.
Cackling
Ketchup? Mustard? Relish?
What the hell IS this? A church social? The Mickey Mouse Club? Mormons working for Blockbuster?
Steve Barber seems to be the only one here who understands a disturbing image when he's faced with one. I mean I'm actually losing sleep for having revived that little memory.
Quit goin' on, you silly twits. This reminds me a bit of the time I had to explain a Monty Python movie to my mom when I was 13.
Eastbay: Sounds to me like you're a vegetarian/vegan. Yeah, we eat STICKS OF DEAD COW AND PIG! no seriously, I wouldn't actually go around mocking others' dietary choices, especially when vegetarians tend to live longer...exactly where in the east bay are you from???
Ezra: South WEST or south EAST? I never mentioned the south EAST (Florida? Alabama?) I'll take just about any style of hot dog, (non) ketchup and chili dogs included. When passing through Chicago airport, find a TCBYs (if you can't locate a locally owned hot dog stand...those serve better ones but even TCBYs has local style dogs) and say yes to the celery salt, no to the ketchup.
Ooh, Mike, a hot dog pilgrimage!! I read somewhere (was it National Geographic?) that Pinks is selling their menu to fancy hotel restaurants in Las Vegas. Now there's a scary thought....
Frank, how come you can't ever seem to resist feeding the troll? These people are baiting, you know...
Kristin
I like veggie *burgers* (soy or grain) well enough, but soy hot dogs are...yeechy..
Ah Ha!
"Hot dogs give me gas and they taste awful."
You all mocked me when I declaimed of K.C.'s extraplanetary origins, but THERE is the proof--do you not see it?!
D.
A Day at the Races
(Just catching up on the daily feed after having spent a hellacious time over at le City of LB ECOC trying to 'splain why my employer had picked this very special day to knock out dial tone over half of SoCal. Hmm, that glass o' Burgundy looking good right about now.)
______________________________________________
From Mr Rob:
""Rob, this is sooo wrong on so many, many levels."
I...I don't understand.
Ezra,
Nevuh mind the Kezshup OR th' mustid OR any vestigial condiments. This...OBJECT...was laid to the BARE skin, BABY!
Even the BREAD - so caressing and light - seemed to drop away.
And it was the Jonah story all over again.
Not the snapshot you wanna send home to the kids."
Actually, I think you got the argument right about right, sir. Like I said, so many levels.
BTW, after a day of debate, the best dogs are Ball Park all-beef bun-length slow roasted over a barbecue 'til the burnt edges are kind of flakey while the center is still a bit raw-red, sourdough bun with a thin wisp of mustard down one side of the weiner and a thin strip of ketchup on the other, a plateful of Fritos and an ice-cold beer-of-your-choice to wash it down. (Corona with lime for the SoCal set.)
IMHO.
And as for me, it's 2Bucktime.
SB
Eastbay, right on!
Jono, nice to hear from ya.
I have to put in a word for the flat-sided hot dog bun, which is the bun of choice here in Boston. Easy to slather with butter and grill till golden brown. And speaking of heart failure, there is a seafood restaurant a block down from my house that serves the deadliest dog I have ever encountered in my frank-lovin' life. And it is this: a foot-long dog nestled between two strips of crispy bacon, covered with melted American cheese and served on said flat-sided, butter-grilled bun. I tried it once...and chewed a couple of aspirin tablets soon after...for precaution's sake.
And will anyone sing the praises of the fried baloney sandwich?
TIM: I think it was a the guy who ran the MASSPirg office at SMU who clued me into you writing for The Other One. And you know, I may have an issue tucked into a box of my college stuff somewhere. I'll see if I can dig it up.
Mark W.
Hotdogs? Yech. An Amy's veggie burger wit' Rudy's BBQ sause (sic), or tofu smothered in peanut sauce...now thems good eats.
Picked up some great reads today including this number which I recommend: "The Murrow Boys: Pioneers on the Front Lines of Journalism" by Lynne Olson and Stanley Cloud.
Ah, the joy of the humble Hot Dog!
What to coat this culinary delight has been the obsession of many, from the starving student who lathers on everything in hopes of mimicking a balanced meal to the epicurean in the stands, to whom it’s all good, as long as the Blue Jays are winning.
Those in the know in Ontario will point to Denniger’s German-style hot dogs (the ones with the crunchy skin). Properly boiled, with only a single dignified line of hot mustard but suitably weighted down with sauerkraut! Mmm, heaven!
Luv to all,
jono
Debunking the pseudo-science of CSICOP. Exposing unbalanced materialist ideologue Richard Dawkins.
http://www.alternativescience.com/
Hot dogs give me gas
and they taste awful. I'll take a Philly Cheesesteak from Mike's, please. No ketchup.
floor scraps
only oscar mayer hotdogs with equal parts catsup and mustard on a steamed bun
I am the healthiest eater in the world, except for this:
My favorite snack after a long day of physical activity: A single pull-tab can of reduced fat "Vienna Sausages," you know, the ones with the ingredient list that begins with "MECHANICALLY SEPERATED CHICKEN."
I eat all eight of the tiny little things, one at a time, then suck down the juice left in the can. Must be the electrolytes.
No ketchup, catsup, or anything else needed.
No wonder Mozart died so young.
I once had a foreign waiter at an upscale restaurant ask me if I would like American sauce to accompany my meal. "What's American sauce?" asks I. You already know his gleefully smug answer.
It's difficult to be viewed as an epicurean when you're from the land of Spam.
Hots
One of WNY's regional specialties (along with chicken wings and the beef on 'weck) is the white hot. It's made with pork. I can't abide it myself; but, many other's love it. I, personally, never much cared for mustard; pass the ketchup, please.
The real Maine hotdog is stuffed in natural casings dyed bright red. I bought 2.5 lbs of 'em last weekend at the Hannaford in Skowhegan, ME.
You just can't seem to get those things anyplace else. Lobster? Who knows? The package says "variety meats" so it could be brains and gizards and who knows what else. I wouldn't rule out lobster if one fell on the factory floor or something.
Anyway, those things are best cooked on a stick in a campfire. And we always ate 'em with ketchup, mustard, and my grandmother's relish (several varieties). Raw onion is also a nice addition.
I look forward to them every summah. Glad to have scored and froze some to eat with baked beans in the wintuh.
I always took hot dogs with my ketcup myself. Ever and always. . .
I always have ketchup or catsup on hot dogs; just never had that big a jones about mustard. To me, sour meat is an odd combination. But at times I do eat a hot dog with mustard, so that makes me one odd dude. But you already know this.
---------------
Conservative Rationalist: Yea, walking the party line and letting the powerful loot the country is what you like, eh? Why not bring back the Sedition laws and put all of us in jail. You might get off on that. Don't want you cumming all over your new brown shirt.
I guess all your buddies being indicted is a sign of great times ahead for your kind. I know, it's all a liberal conspiracy to stain your great leader, President mush.
MAINE "DOGS"
EZRA: Hate to be the one to break it to ya binky, but those aren't _true_ hotdogs you've been pushing down your gullet lo these many years. EVERY true hotdog afficionado knows that Maine hotdogs are actually made with "Lahb-stuh" meat (Mainly because in 1876, a state-wide ordinace was passed which prohibits the hunting, grinding and packing of stray poodles, dachshunds and terriers -- the, uh, mainstay of meatpackers churning out Oscar Meyers and other related weenie products).
Would I lie to you?
Informationally,
the Man
Here in Phoenix, we have a delicacy called the Sonoran Hot Dog, which I haven't sampled. Some come with beans and salsa, mustard and onions, but the most important feature seems to be wrapping the dog in bacon.
This has set vendors at odds with health inspectors, chronicled here:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/issues/2004-07-01/news/news.html
I've preferred just mustard for years. But I like my burgers with both.
while we're on the subject of hot dogs...
Is Maine the only place with red hotdogs? People in other locals look at me askance when I raise the topic of my home state's hot dogs, and I'm starting to wonder.
Kristin I sprang from southern lands where ketchup is put on anything that is not physically capable of movement. I was an adult before I was initiated by some Yankees into the pleasures of the unadorned weenie.
But I ask you not to think harshly of my southern brothers and sisters. Contemplate instead the frozen, hermetically wrapped grocery store dog, full of ingredients that would have made H P Lovecraft shudder to think on them.
Naturally Bubba takes to his ketchup the way an 18th century Frenchman took to his snuffbox when facing the prospect of crossing the flowing brown rivulets of a street in Paris.
People are driven to strange and terrible actions. Heating up a hot dog in a microwave, or, and I can barely force myself to say it, putting mayonnaise on a bun.
"I run to the burnt weenie sandwich, and the burnt weenie sandwich meets me as fast...and all my pleasures are like yesterday."
I'm an ex New Yorker (downstate and upstate) and it was sauerkraut and mustard on a hot dog. Ketchup on a hot dog?? Never ever. I have to refrain from saying anything when my wife or company does it.
David
A week ago Sunday our family took a vacation to LA. We arrived early Sunday morning to ensure we were in time for the 1:00 tickets we had for the King Tut exhibit – far too early. We visited the tar pits and the Page Museum.
At 10:30 (I told you we were early) we were hungry – too hungry to wait for a true lunchtime. So I drove my wife and son to Pinks. I go there often when visiting LA for work, but no one else in the family knew the rapture. Forgive what we had (my wife went with the millennium dog, my son had something that was a combination of mayonnaise and mushrooms, and I am always a sucker for the chili dog [just chili, no onions, no cheese – just chili, dog, and bun, the way God meant for us to enjoy chili dogs]). Instead, join me in reliving the joy of their introduction to the perfect hot dog as we all sat out in the glorious California Sunday morning.
Mike
Ketchup attitudes reveal where you're from?
I have always taken the ketchup/mustard/relish combination for granted, but then my mom is from New England, which is said to be a pro-ketchup region. In Chicago, hot-dog makers consider "ketchup" a dirty word and putting ketchup on a local style dog is considered blasphemy against the Hot Dog God. In California (and the southwest) I suppose chili dogs are the regional form; ketchup doesn't exactly mix well with chili&cheese. On the other hand, many of us here are transplants :)..I wasn't raised with chili dogs especially. Philadelphia seems to side with the midwest on the ketchup issue - at least my friend from South Jersey, whose nearest large city is Philly, says "Ketchup on a hot dog? Yeech!" It is a fact, though, that ketchup (and a lot of the cheaper mustard, too) is loaded with sugar&salt so it drowns the flavor of the meat - whatever you put ketchup on, takes like ketchup. Little kids like it. As I've gotten older I've found I want to go easy on the cheap condiments.
I've found diced tomatoes so much better...or you could puree tomatoes into homemade ketchup....
Nice post, Amy!
Kristin
California Native
Steve Barber,
"Rob, this is sooo wrong on so many, many levels."
I...I don't understand.
Ezra,
Nevuh mind the Kezshup OR th' mustid OR any vestigial condiments. This...OBJECT...was laid to the BARE skin, BABY!
Even the BREAD - so caressing and light - seemed to drop away.
And it was the Jonah story all over again.
Not the snapshot you wanna send home to the kids.
...and now to the LIGHTER side:
Steven Utley,
I am in awe of Little Nemo In Slumberland, esp. as a guy with interest in the animation field. Windsor McCay: THERE'S an innovator.
Duane,
I don't care watcha' say...LA sucks!
I was flipping through the channels late 2 nights ago, and caught Bill Maher on the Howard Stern Show. Maher was debating with a member of the KKK and 3 mentally retarded individuals. Topics included abortion rights, stem cell research. It was bizare, but then again everything that happens on Stern's show is more than a bit strange.
Are Hal Foster, Alex Raymond and Milton Caniff geniuses? Of course. They didn't have abstract/whimsical/dreamlike styles of McCay, Herriman, or Cray but keep in mind the subject matter Foster, Caniff and Raymond were working with. Tarzan, Prince Valiant, Terry and the Pirates, Flash Gordon...these strips needed to be done with a fair amount of realism. All three gentlemen certainly had distinct styles; you see their work, you recognize it instantly. Take any panel from any strip these men worked on and it could stand on its on own as a work of art. Despite lacking the sense of play found in Nemo or Krazy Cat, Foster and Raymond put out genius level work in terms of overall composition and story telling.
Wally Wood got his start in strips. Genius. No doubt about it.
LA rules, regardless of weather.
TIM: I'm so sorry to hear that the weather smacked you. I lived on a flood-prone property in NY, so I know how depressing it is to bail everything out and start over. I enjoyed meeting you and your lovely wife last week. I wish I could've chatted with you both more -- that whole day was a chaotic blur to me! I hope we meet again when I'm a bit more relaxed.
DOUG: Man, you nailed it. I'm glad you remembered some of the details, because I was a little overwhelmed by it all. I only remember how the evening made me feel -- how happy I was for Harlan and Susan; how honored I felt to be there to witness it. Despite scaring Harlan badly enough to make him cry for Susan, I wouldn't trade that night for anything.
HARLAN, SUSAN: Thank you. Between the Algonquin, the company, and the priceless treasure of your friendship, it was easily worth the trip.
Still trying to finish the Boston piece. My nearest computer/keyboard is at work. Hopefully, tomorrow. I'm not messing around. I want to make sure it's just right.
Mark: Holy shit! "The Other One." How did you know I wrote for those guys? I actually thought I was a silent partner, that no one knew I was involved. It was a fun time. I got to hang out with the likes of Allen Ginsberg and Gregory Corso who were allowing us to publish their stuff. Do you have any copies? As far as I know, I only have one. Go figure. Me who saves everything didn't think enough to preserve my own work. To make it more difficult Don Machado, the editor, lost all the originals. Ah, well.
Gore Vidal and Harold Pinter are spiritless automatons and their writings have already become the literary equivalent of lava lamps. It's because of party-hacks like these that accounts for The National Endowment for the Arts "Reading at Risk" statistics. They perfectly embody the sniffing egocentric complacency that has given the humanities the intellectual slum status it well deserves. And nobody reads their atheistic unimaginative junk except neurotic ivy leaguers in Reeboks.
PS
I guess Pinter has no scruples in sharing a trophy with Henry Kissenger, but it's nice getting away to the South of France. Even the likes of Jean Paul Sartre had stronger convictions.
Little Nemo in Slumberland
It so happens that during the past week I have been re-reading my Titan collections of THE COMPLETE LITTLE NEMO IN SLUMBERLAND at bedtime (when else?). What a gorgeous goddamn comic strip. There is no doubt in my mind that Winsor McCay was one of the funny pages' authentic geniuses, alongside George Herriman and probably Cliff Sterrett and maybe Roy Crane ... but I'm not sure who else. Hal Foster, Alex Raymond, and Milt Caniff were terrific, innovative illustrators -- but geniuses? I'm just not sure. Opinions, Harlan -- anybody?
Harlan, I understand your concern, especially knowing that Rob and the others take some of my corning way too seriously, as well. I am quite ok and know that Rob is our special lil' chew toy. Aint he cute. Momma musta held him by his ears, like he was sweet corn.
Yes, I knew you were jerking his chain. But I do know that Susan keeps the lights off when you two make merry.
-------------
Lee, you lit up my neon heart lamp. Thanks for the sweet chuckle. Sometimes we need softness through all the barbs.
Prince Myshkin, and Hold the Relish.
Ketchup?
Only please fehhhhhhhh!
Don't you people read the core texts?
They contain ALL revelations.
Thoth-Harlan
Another news piece
There's a report on Harlan's B.U. appearance at http://www.dailyfreepress.com/news/2005/10/12/News/Writer.Shares.Career.Highlights.At.Metcalf-1018068.shtml
Ketchup on a hotdog? Spicy mustard surely, armoracia rusticana perhaps, but ketchup?
Yuck.
As a stockholder in Hedonism, Inc and believing as I do that quality of life trumps length of life, I must say that if you tell me the chocolate cake and the lobster will take a year off my life then I say, it's a bargain. Of course this does not mean that I would similiarly approve such a trade that involved cigarettes and eating McShit.
My sweetie was on duty over the weekend so I spent a couple of days curled up on the couch dipping into the Val Lewton boxed set. It had been years since I had seen any of these movies, and then in butchered prints on late night TV, so it was effin fantastic to see the quality with which the set was produced.
The commentaries are hit or miss as such things usually are. The documentary is mainly aimed at people who aren't familiar with VL's work and makes the case for his importance. That's ok but as someone who didn't need any convincing I would have preferred a group of say Mr Ellison, Richard Matheson and Neil Gaiman sitting together discussing the films.
Mr Ellison doesn't get much face time in the doc but typically gets off the best line ("the flesh mask") towards the end.
I won't spoil it for the rest of you by quoting it but, Well said, Sir!
TIM: First, I'm sorry to hear about your rain-related problems. Given the 500+ people who had to evacuate their homes in Framingham, we got off rather light, having to tear up and throw out the carpet tiles in our basement. A kick in the head, sure, but not much in the grand scheme of things. So, I hope your woes were closer to ours than the people in Framingham.
Second, when I read your post and got to the words Pearly Baker Band, I nearly fell off my chair. I must have seen six or seven of your shows in the mid 80s. And I can remember a morning spent in the SMU commuter cafe with my buddy Ken as we tried to remember the song that mentions PB (which, if I remember correctly today, is "Wharf Rat"). Now it's really starting to come together. Here's another name to jog your memory: The Other One. You wrote for that alternative paper at SMU, didn't you?
Damn, I never forget a face. I'm sure we must have met, but I can't say where or when.
Best,
Mark W.
Images and Weather Reports
"I was holding Harlan's hand as he was stuffing a ketchup-less hot dog down his gullet. (This is neither a concoction nor even an exaggeration)"
Rob, this is sooo wrong on so many, many levels.
No KETCHUP?
*sigh*
_______________________________________________
Also:
For those of you who have been reporting delugious weather in other parts of this fair nation, the LA metro area was hit by some pretty nasty and spectacular thunderstorms last evening. Used to be (before the advent of "no global warming"*) that we would have one or two of these a decade.
We were in Hollywood having dinner -- Prizzi's Piazza, for those who love garlic bread, is the best Italian jobber in these here parts, bar none -- and found the Southbound 101 towards downtown LA to be an inland sea of apocalypic proportions.
Later in the evening, as the tempest continued to temp, we discovered that two adults and two full-grown, previously-fearless 70 pound Dalmatians won't fit into a King bed, California or otherwise.
Who says there's a drought?
(*George W Bush, President of Ye Olde Red States and wannabe weatherman)
Brian, thanks for that info. My great-uncle from Lebanon learned English from reading the comics, including Little Nemo, as well as comparing his arabic/english bibles side by side. The pictures in the comics provided the clues to the words. The system worked well because he later became a well known speaker, politician, & attorney in Boston.
The Little Nemo book is just another fine example of self publication. I'm reading a self published book by George Tamura entitled Reflections, about his life in a California internment camp during WWII. It's such a raw, emotional read that is as relevant today as it was when it happened 60 years ago. He is also a brilliant artist and he was featured on the PBS show History Detectives.
The Road to Penury
Okay, people, between the Val Lewton DVD box set, the compleat _Calvin and Hobbes_ at Barnes and Noble, about the upcoming _King Kong_ DVD, many of us are probably about to spend ourselves into some form of indentured servitude.
So guess what comes along?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/17/books/17nemo.html?8hpib
"But Peter Maresca, a comics collector, wasn't happy, he said in a recent telephone interview. Even the best preserved pages of "Little Nemo in Slumberland" were fast deteriorating. Soon no one would be able to see them the way they originally looked. Mr. Maresca wanted, he said, to publish a selection of Little Nemo comics just the way they appeared in the Sunday funnies: in the same colors, on rough matte paper that looked like newsprint, and at the same size."
I already HAVE the reprints of the complete run, as well as John Canemaker's biography of McCay... but Jesus Christ, this is _Little Nemo_, full-size, proper color, and pretty much as close to an original as I'll ever have.
Real Time...
Harlan, you were on PI numerious times and it seemed like you and Maher got along well, how come you have not been on Real Time? Have you not been asked or have you turned down offers?
Susan: Thank you! My H.E.R.C. package came as well, and I was thrilled. The Boston trip was a positive experience for all of us. We'll never forget it.
Steve Dooner
Harlan & Susan
Dealing with the deluge... I''ve written a piece on the rainy night in Boston. If all goes well I'll post it tomorrow. The power went out, the waters rose, my computer is toast. I'm wet, very wet.
Mark Walsh: Yes, I did go to SMU (1983-1986). Or, if you've ever seen the Pearly Baker Band, you may recognize me from that as well. We are in New Bedford at the Bullpen on Tuesday. Come and introduce yourself. That goes for you too Bill Gauthier.
Thanks to do-gooders like Harlan Ellison film's like Assault On Precinct 13 (1976) can no longer be made. With it's great little girl being shot through the chest while buying ice cream sequence.
not 'can', but came. apologies.
MW
SAUSAN: Your package arrived yesterday and at the perfect time! After a day spent at a tedious teaching seminar, I can home to find my wife fighting off flood water in the basement. I can tell you that my shifts spent sitting on the john, monitoring to outflow of water into the tub were lightened by reading the issues of The Rabbit Hole. And big THANKS for the 'supplemental' material. What a treat! You helped me get through an ash pit of a day.
All Best,
Mark W.
Keeping abreast of music...
This falls under "truth is stranger than fiction"...
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1570835.html
Breast - uh, Best to all,
Michael
Harlan,
"You didn't show"
I MAY not have been watching the time, exactly, but I was at every one of those crossings yesterday. HARLAN...I thought you learned this when I came to your house: I am THE PROCRASTINATOR.
Steve Barber,
"What were YOU doing at Pink's the first time you met?"
Truth be tellin' ya, I was holding Harlan's hand as he was stuffing a ketchup-less hot dog down his gullet. (This is neither a concoction nor even an exaggeration) It's one of these stories that, should it get out, could ruin a man's career. And what's allowed me to turn the thumbscrew on this guy whenever my WANTS are to be heard. I've lived quite comfortably for the last few years thanks to our little arrangement.
Und Tracy...
There's pale or fair, and then there's yer unhealthy pallor - clayish, corpselike - as from overwork and/or poor dieting, or whatever unspeakable, vile self-abuses from the pits of hell you can dig UP. Das iz wats we talkin' 'bout. Right?
As Halloween is near...
Chalky isn't a word I would use to describe Harlan today.
I was lucky enough to see Harlan in Chicago just a few weeks after his open heart surgery. His coloration at the time was scary. Sort of a pale green/grey, pasty color. I suppose, had he taken off his shirt then, one could have compared him to the Frankenstein Monster---complete with zipper-like scars.
Compared to then, his cheeks today are downright rosy.
Vocabulary time - My favorite new word of the day...popinjay. A vain/talkative person. Heard it in a debate between Hitchens and MP Galloway.
Oh, and there's a new bio on Will Eisner by Bob Andelman, my fellow St. Petersburgian, called Will Eisner: A Spirited Life, 352 pp., $14.95. The SP Times gave it a thumbs up and he'll be appearing at our reading festival on the 29th. Hope to snag a signed copy.
Between bites of smoked whitefish....
Wasn't "Pale Writer" that Clint Eastwood flick?
I saw Harlan before any of you, so there.
It's true. I saw Harlan charge up San Juan Hill with Teddy Roosevelt. He was a fresh-faced second looey in the Rough Riders, and I was just the drummer boy, but when it was all over he clapped me on the shoulder and announced we was pardners forever. Why would I lie about something like that?
LEE:
That has got to be the best, the very best, post that has ever been posted here. What a treasure!
Harlan
Sometime after mid-night, my three year old fell butt first into the toilet and wedged in tight. She took it pretty well, all in all. Rather than screams of fear or cries for help, there was just soft plashing and tiny mutterings drifting into the bedroom as she tried in vain to get out of the jam.
I staggered over to the kid’s bath, and there she was: nothing but head, shoulders and feet above the rim of the seat. She stopped struggling and looked at me for a moment and said, “Willow says I’m a stupid sister.” A familiar surreal feeling drifted over the scene as I replied, “Do you think you are stupid?”
“No…but I’m stuck in the toilet. And my bum is cold.”
Joking, huh?
I saw Harlan parked at the corner of Venice and Centinella, gunning the engine and watching the crosswalk rather intensely.
He had a groundhog in his lap.
(Bigtime aside: Rob, oh mighty eater of natural foods. What were YOU doing at Pink's the first time you met?)
Didn't Gordon "Chalky" Pallor play shortstop for the Indians in the 1950's?
Cheers, Jon
Hey, Frank ...
I K N O W Rob knows I'm just clowning around.
I T H O U G H T I knew that EVERYONE knew I was just clowning around. But, unless Y O U are clowning around, uh, let me assure you:
I'm uh, er, heh, jus' clowning around with Rob.
Frank! Frank boy! Talk to me, son ... talk to me!!!!!
Yr. worried pal, Harlan
P.S. Jes clownin.
Rob is hiding under his Momma's skirts. Maybe you should move to Germany, boyo, Harlan would never get to you then.
Thanks to the goatgod that someone else is in the shithouse.
"Chalk Is For Blackboards"
So cold, so unkind--I too am light complected. No, I don't tan. I bake. I fry. But I'm proud of it. I'd rather have the complexion of ream of computer paper than exist as a Samsonite alligator, scrabbling from the shelf at TJ Maxx.
This is very discomfitting. Whoever started this topic has proven to me that human beings did have sex with buffalos.
Have a nice day.
I was parked at the curb, motor running, on the corner of Bundy and Olympic at 7:22 AM. You didn't show.
I was in an alley just up from the intersection of Bundy and Pico at 8:21. You didn't show.
At 9:42 AM I was in the empty parking lot at Sunset and Via de la Paz, gunning the engine. You didn't show.
The intersection of La Tijera and Sepulveda was closed due to street maintenance. I circled the other way, back over the Howard Hughes Expressway. 10:45 AM. Must've missed you.
12:50 PM, stopped at the Rose Cafe for a piece of chocolate cake and a cuppa. I was back in the car, in a driveway on Rose Avenue, in full sight of Lincoln, by 1 PM. You didn't show. I went back and had another piece of chocolate cake.
2:55 PM at Sunset and Mandeville Canyon. Parked with the other softball-momma cars at the park entrance. Motor running. You didn't show.
Venice and Centinella at at 5:15 till 6:00. You didn't show.
6:30 PM, Kenter and Sunset. Fell asleep behind the wheel.
7:45 PM, waited in what used to be the parking lot of Ships Restaurant, Overland and Venice. You didn't show.
8:00, I came home.
Why dintchu tell me you don't do it on Saturday??!!!???!!!!????
Goddam %$3@*)((>k`@ing mu***************toad bastid!
Healthier than thou, Harlan
George W. Bush in freefall
I have been reading Galsworthy's Forsyte Saga this week, and reprints of various comic strips -- Winsor McCay's gorgeous LITTLE NEMO IN SLUMBERLAND, now 100 years old, is perfect bedtime reading -- but for terrific mindless fun I heartily recommend to you all the animation at the other end of this link:
http://www.yeeguy.com/freefall/
Insolence Spelled Backward Is Luuuv
Yes, but...
Well, what I REALLY meant was...
Listen, dammit, it’s like this...
Could you please keep your voice down? Everyone is LOOKING.
Harlan:
"but please send me your address, and all the nearby crosswalks, intersections, and stretches of highway where a head of steam can be built up"
The intersections and times where you can find me daily:
7:30am, drinking my coffee while, looking forward to another fucked-up day, at Bundy Drive and Olympic Boulevard.
At 8:30 I am at Bundy Drive and Pico Boulevard.
Then at 9:45 I am at Via de la Paz and Sunset Boulevard
10:30, Sepulveda Boulevard and La Tijera Boulevard
1:00pm, Lincoln Boulevard and Rose Avenue
3:00pm, Sunset Boulevard and Mandeville Canyon Road
5:30, Venice Boulevard and Centinela Avenue
6:45, Kenter Avenue and Sunset Boulevard
8:00, Overland Boulevard and Venice Boulevard
9:00, Sepulveda Boulevard and Venice Boulevard
...But it is at Ocean Park Boulevard and 7th Street SPECIFICALLY where most of my JEWISH friends seem to greet me with the gas pedal. Once, I had to dart back to the curb 3 times in one week!
Now...be advised that this has become quite a routine. And over the years my FEET have - by Lamarckian adaptive principles of survival - taken on gressorial characteristics from the ceaseless birdlike multiple quick-steps in my walking patterns. So, if you really think you have a chance of tagging me, you better be good behind that wheel.
Now...if you could just shaddup for a second, I'll buy you a drink, and clarify a bit about my choice phrasing:
First off, I'm too privy, hip, and "WITH it" to expose myself to them ultraviolets out there. So, don’t be tossin' me in with the outdoor extremists.
Secondly, I'm not a vege freak; I DO eat meat, though very little. (last few months I've been eating fish each weekend, looking forward to the high mercury readings in my bloodstream)
Thirdly, I dunno, but I think it’s kinda erroneous, as I see it, to equate honest concern - even when it’s jabbing - with "insolence".
...but now to the heart of the matter: it HAS admittedly been 3 years since I’d last seen you in person. (Unlike Stacy, I haven't even seen photos of you since them days) My brash reference was based on what I saw THEN. I forgot to take that into account, so my line was probably very unfair. That was a long time ago; had I considered that before yapping off, I would not have spoken "insolently". I don’t KNOW what you look like right now. I never got to experience your exquisite rosiness; only what I perceived as a once-"chalky" pallor. If your skin is looking good I am ecstatic. So, I’m sorry for slapping you with the "pallor" bit if it is so misplaced.
For the record, though, I WILL tell you openly that the FIRST couple of times I ever saw you in person (the VERY first being at Pinks), you were very, VERY pale. You looked overworked, I remember thinking to myself. A little like you’d been to the Borinage Coal Mines. And with all that, you were eating some pretty fucked-up food.
So, ya got what ya call yer ex nihilo nihil fit. My wording was not groundless. It surged from pent-up concern that you might not be taking care of yourself. And then a guy like Frank comes along and says how nifty n’ terrific you’re doing with your bold "non-diet". However good your complexion might be now, if you still AREN’T dieting all that well I think it SUCKS. It DOES catch up with you.
Having said that, OBVIOUSLY I’m delighted knowing you and Susan are happy; I wouldn’t have it any other way. I just hope you’re keeping light on the crappy food.
I’ll be waiting for you at Ocean Park and 7th.
Let's hear it for "Pale Writers"!
Skin cancer? I already had that. A mere carcinoma, which, after surgery, left a rather lumpy scar on my shoulder the size of a fifty-cent piece. (remember them?)
I don't fear the sun, but I do treat it with respect.
Let's hear it for "chalky pallor"!
Chuck
"Search", of course...
Weird Tales
Doug, put down the sreach engine.
http://www.wildsidepress.com/view_category.asp?cat=236
(And, once again, I must use caution when reading Pavilion notes whilst sipping a hot cup of coffee. Adam-Troy Castro's note burned my nasals like no tomorrow...)
Steve B
*** Adam T-C *** That was funny.
*** Doug *** Very very nice. Sorry I missed that. I mean REAALLLY sorry. Once in 28 years and instead of missing the HoJo or the diner I miss the Algonquin Club. Story of my life. Ah, well.
*** Whoever *** I don't have all the details on this one but I'm offering a heads-up anyway. From my good friend Kenton;
"I was pleasantly surprised to see that there was a new issue of Weird Tales out (published in King of Prussia and with John Betancourt back as publisher, which is a good thing). With Jack Ketchum, Jack Williamson, Clark Ashton Smith, William F. Nolan, and Douglas E. Winter featured, I just might resubscribe. Anyway, Betancourt mentions an upcoming special issue featuring Harlan Ellison."
Here's the link to the newest home page I could find;
http://www.oivas.com/weirdtales/index.html
But that only really takes up to a "forthcoming" SPRING 2005 so there may be newer information. Maybe someone other than Doug can do the heavy lifting on this one. ;-)
Oh my god - SUNSHINE!!!! I gotta go.
- Barney
Another one I owe, Harlan
I've been fighting with a contractor for two months now and it looks like I'm the one still standing.
Weary from the battle, I read your "chalky pallor" message and laughed harder than I have in weeks!
I owe you a big wet one on the cheek of your choice.
Much love to you and Susan,
Tony
I'd rather be chalky than tan and leathery like a suitcase. Visit any sun worshipper ten years from now and you'll see something resembling the creatures in Jim Hensons DARK CRYSTAL.
complexions, men, and women
Well Harlan, I happen to agree with your wife and with Stacy, (about the cute thing, and that sure, you are light skinned, but not corpse-pale for whateversake!) then we're girls (G) I don't think any woman can ever truly understand what male bonding is, at least not on a gut level - we got the wrong chromosomes.
Some say writing from the point of view of the opposite gender is harder than writing from the point of view of an extra-terrestrial species! I can believe that. Happily married people may be best at it. I mean, not ALWAYS of course, but it sure doesn't hurt.
Good wishes and work hard, Stacy!
Kristin
hey, ya go out in the sun, you can get skin cancer and die. Me, I don't tan, I BURN (except where I'm blotchy and freckly and ugly from too much sun...the only REALLY healthy tan is one you're born with.) Sunblock is a good invention. :)
Easy, Harlan, easy. I happen to think you're looking good. I compared some recent pictures of you with the ones we took in New Hampshire oh so many moons ago and I'd say you're holding up well. I'm feeling pretty good about myself too; all those hours working as a guard got my figure down from it's sendentary bulk (though working at an IT helpdesk has kept me slightly above 200 pounds).
Just thought I'd drop you a quick line, see how you were. I know things have been. . .eclectic around here to say the least. Glad to see things are more or less on an even keel.
I'm planning on enrolling in the National Novel Writing Month contest for November. I feel I've gotten myself into a position where I'm ready to stop putting my ambitions aside and give my writing the attention it deserves and stop second-guessing myself.
Warmest regards to you and Susan,
Stacy
The Revelations of Ellison
"I beheld a pale writer, and his name was death..."
Chalky? I gotcher chalky! Right'chere, I gotcher fuggin' chalky.
Nuncio "D'Nunchcuk" Scarponetti
FinderDoug unselfconsciously urped, "...no fannish preening..."
Until now. Mein Gott, I got cavities from reading that post.
ummm....
Rob lives in or up Shit Crick
At least Abraham Lincoln didn't suddenly appear out of the past and call you a "charming Negress."
Sick of a crummy world? Tired of an increasingly brutish megacountry run by a sub-human aberration? Soaked to the bone with with cynicism and despair? Fed up with fear, anger, paranoia, and the ever-mounting chances of being killed by a disease that came from a goddamn CHICKEN?
Go outside. Write something. Or go to the movies, and see WALLACE & GROMIT IN THE CURSE OF THE WERE-RABBIT. Afterwards, you'll actually begin to think, "maybe things won't turn out so bad after all."
Try it. It's very refreshing.
Chalky pallor??????!!!!!!!?????
Did you disengorge the phrase "Chalky" fuckin' "pallor"????!!!!!
CHALKY
PALLOR
???????????
Am I getting this right, you impertinent snot? Chalky YO MOMMA pallor????!!!!!
My complexion is FAIR
not
CHALKY.
I may be fifty-five lbs. overweight from my lifetime average of 135, and on the verge of plotzing in a rice-paddy, and will not quibble with you even one scintilla about being somewhat rotund.
But...
You wretched spokeworm for the Vegan Elite, my complexion is healthy and rosey and just the way I like it, and my wife thinks I'm cute and unwrinkled, and she marvels at my good skin-genes every day, as the rest of you rot and fester and bake under the sun till skin cancer gnaws away the flesh to the bone!!!!!!!!!
C H A L K Y ??????
Do not for a moment, Rob, you weasel, think I am taking even the teensiest umbrage, a fit of pique, self-denial, animosity, loathing, spitefulness, contumely, vengeful daydreams, hatred and the desire to pummel with the bloody chewed-off leg of the detractor ... I love you still, you loose grommet in the rusty machinery of the universe ... yes, I am still your greatest admirer ... but please send me your address, and all the nearby crosswalks, intersections, and stretches of highway where a head of steam can be built up, as I am inclined to want so desperately to bond bond bond with you, as only two he-men CAN, and plan to drive over--with a head of steam--to visit you in a crosswalk. Intersection. 7-Eleven. Industrial park. Basement.
Chalky complexion, my pink-complected ass!!!!!!
Mrmee mrmee mrmee mrmee....
Calmy, extremely calmly,
I'm sayin' C A L M LY, muthuh-fugguh, Yr. pal,
Rosey-pink, cherubic Harlan
I found Pinter through his "Comedies of Menace", specifically his play The Birthday Party which was filmed twice (first version shot by William Friedkin). But this recent honor reminded me that I need to get back to him, shovel a pile of his stuff into my room, and read far more.
...and to address Frank's addle-brained admiration for Harlan's "bold non-diet"...well, that's what I would humbly call, at best, ruinous advice and total bullshit. Yeah, I've seen Harlan eat garbage food, adding to them extra pounds and a chalky pallor, and I HATED seeing it, and I hate KNOWING he still does it.
Hey, even people in their 20's need to eat right; but anyone 30 and over REALLY have to control the regimen. Some hold out against a lousy diet better than others because of a "magic gene", but it eventually catches up with EVERYONE, and we wind up losing some dude or dudette we care about or VALUE sooner than it had to be.
Somebody kindly slap a gag on Frank. Lock him away in a backroom at Burger King - no, what the hell, let's make it Arby's...he DESERVES the best - for a month and see what he has to say about diet after THAT...assuming he'll still be alive.
Slight Corrections
Correction of KB's assessment of Pinter's attitude:
"If America's 'Government and Arch Conservatives' are for it, I'm against it."
The same statement could be applied to a growing and awakening majority here at home.
___________________________________________
Personal Correction:
In yesterday's description of Horror, I may have created an intentionally humorous image.
Please change "Horror follows us, haunts us, and makes the dark fluid"
to "Horror follows us, haunts us, and makes the darkNESS fluid".
Then again, it may be a good pun.
___________________________________________
Correction to Websters Collegiate: A new definition for the word and concept of "class" must be entered. (Quoting)
"I am ecstatic that HAROLD PINTER, one of my favorite writers, has won the Nobel Prize for Literature, 2005.
Do not fret on my account, folks. He is FAR MORE deserving than I; and among those who deserve accolades before I get any, Pinter is well up in the forefront.
I am just as thrilled as I can be!!!!!! Hot diggity!!!!!!"
Yr admirer,
Steve B
KB is right of course. For instance Borges wasn't considered because he was perceived as being a rightist. The folks in Stockholm have political correctness down to a fine art.
But let's be clear. I'm not disparaging Mr Pinter's worth as an artist, but other factors than artistic worthiness definitely play a part.
>His mind and moral leanings earn the Frank Church seal of approval.
Go to www.icdsm.org, sign up, and you maybe can have the thrill of seeing your name listed as a member of the committee, along with Mr. Pinter.
You'll know you've reached the website when you see FREE SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC in big bold letters.
I've admired some of Pinter's plays and don't believe his politics should have anything to do with his getting the Nobel, though they almost certainly did. Hell, I'd have been happy to see Pound get it, even if they wouldn't have let him leave St. Elizabeth's to go to Stockholm. Pinter is an improvement on some other recent winners, but his moral compass rests firmly on a big magnet labeled IF AMERICA'S FOR IT, I'M AGAINST IT.
I am biased about Pinter, being that he is a great activist and radical critic of the criminal Bush war. His mind and moral leanings earn the Frank Church seal of approval.
--------------
Jack Ketchum has been off his game, as of late. His recent book plots have been really bad. Off Season may be the single most thrilling horror novel ever written. I bought a pulpy paperback of that one, when I was a kid, on a trip to Colorado. Sure, the violence and gore in that book is amazing in its brutality, but boy does that book throw down. Sure, it spits blood on your white drapes, but you were going to clean them anyway.
--------------
I envy Harlan's ability to eat anything he likes and he still is so active and spry, for a man over 70. No diets for him, no sir. Hand slap from a fellow foodie.
Mininova
If Mininova is inspired by the old Suprnova bitorrent site, then the "e-mail us and we'll remove copyrighted links" is likely just a poor attempt at a legal shield. (Especially given that a cursory glance makes it look like everything on the site is copyrighted.) They may well remove the links if you ask, but I suspect they'll pop up again.
The MPAA and RIAA have been able to drive some of these sites off the web, but clones have just popped up in countries with less stringent laws.
Anyone even thinking about downloading such stuff should be going here instead: http://www.ereader.com/search?keywords=harlan+ellison&x=0&y=0 And I want thank Mr. Ellison for joining the ranks of authors whose works are legally available electronically. All the more reason to clamp down those who are offering illegal downloads.
Finder Doug: Thanks for the description of a thoroughly amazing evening. My day is brightened just hearing that Harlan got to enjoy a night of recognition of that caliber.
Horror Fiction Not Well Written...???
As always, there are exceptions, and you will be given pause by the prose of Jack Ketchum, and Michael Marshall, and John Shirley, and...
Pirates. ATTN HARLAN
Harlan,
I was googling you and found this bit-torrent link for some dude (dudette?) who is pirating books, including your own works.
http://www.mininova.org/det/12881
If you click "General Information" it leads to the link/portal for bit-torrent users to download the illgotten goods. Mininova seems to be a bit-torrent directory. In the "Gen Info" there is a link to http://www.sladinki007.net
At the bottom of the sladinki007 page is this:
"To owners of copyright licensed material which could be linked on this site, please E-mail Me and I will see to it that it gets deleted ASAP"
The E-mail address for the webmaster of sladinski007 is sladinki007@hotmail.com
(Also I have a question for you. On the back cover photograph to "Partners in Wonder" you are posing with an interesting scultpure. An abstract piece, brown, with 2 huge eyes. Who made it? And does it have a title?)
All,
I have a music recommendation. Jon Hassel...a trumpet player...a damned good one. http://www.jonhassell.com/
Allot of people took my questions the way I meant them. In my mind, horror would mean different things to different people. I see that, in this sampling, I was right.
I'm sure somewhere, someone has actually established a true definition of horror, but I would certainly hope that no one would actually buy into it.
I would say that what makes for good horror, regardless of it's setting, is the idea that what is transpiring could actually happen. The setting itself can be fantastic, but the concepts need to have real world merrit.
The story of Dracula is a prime example of the fantastic having real world merrit. We know that the idea of imortal bloodsucking beings is ludicrous, however, the things that the vampire represent are very real. They are our animalistic side, our sexuality, and our need for power. In all reality, we are the monster and we are indeed trapped in the real world.
There are more examples that I can think of, but I would like to keep this semi-short.
BTW, I hate being wrong.
If you see me being wrong, STOP ME.
Make me right again.
What is Horror...
I've seen this debate before. The simple, obvious answer is that the word 'horror' describes an EMOTION. Therefore horror exists in all genres. Science fiction, to use one example, needs to have specific trappings to qualify as such. The term 'science fiction' is a category of fiction, not a literary effect.
(Standard Disclaimer: All generalisations are danagerous, including this one.)
Green with envy!
...had a lot of bills to pay (like $500 in dental work, $330 to finish up with the car insurance...)& couldn't go running off on another plane trip so soon, but it sounds like this gig was really awesome!!!! (Was soembody audio&video taping? How come Barney didn't make it? He lives darn closer than me!!!
I forget where you live, FinderDoug....
Belatedly, thank you HE&Susan for being kind to ME at Foolscap...hope to see you at some event in future.
Kristin
BTW the horror thread... the "Nelson" posting sounds like pure flamebait, and his this guy even read any of Harlan's stuff? OR is it because Harlan *likes* Gaiman's stuff? (Although I don't think Harlan can be pigeonholed as a horror writer any more than as an sf/f or mystery writer...and HE has won awards in *all three* genres while *creating* his own genre.)
Ah, Boston...
When Harlan, after dinner, suggested that Amy or I would have to write something up about what happened at the Algonquin Club, I shook my head and told him “Uh-uh - I’m keeping this fiery little chestnut for myself.” But who am I to say no to a man who introduces me to everyone I keep his company with as “the guy who can find anything”?
I can’t do the evening justice, though - so much of magic is spirit of place, the moment in which it occurs, the temperature of the air, the ambient noise, the people around you.
For the full effect, you had to be there.
I wish I could speak to the lecture portion of the program, but radar issues at Logan conspired with other elements of timing - such as meeting up with Amy, rental car procurement, hotel check-ins, and finding the damned parking lot (whoever laid that city out should be dug up and killed again) - to make us excessively late for the lecture. We managed to catch the last ten minutes, catching up briefly with Susan on the way in. I will say that Harlan’s spirits were running high down the home stretch, talking about how he has no typical days, rolling right into a tale of Robin Williams and the joke Robin phoned him with while on vacation. I’m told Harlan started late because he was intent on signing everything presented to him before the lecture, and he came back to sign more after he left the stage, while servers circulated with hors d'oeuvres and the open bar got a workout. They know how to throw a lecture event at Boston University. Met up with Tim Richmond and his wife Andrea, made small talk, and finally got a hearty hello from Harlan... more in the form of "Doug Lane - where the hell have you been?" Said with concern, mind you. Radar woes had victimized the Ellisons the day before.
I was pleased to find myself invited along as a guest for the dinner held by the Friends of the Library in Harlan’s honor - Harlan and Susan, Tim and Andrea, Amy, me, and eight stellar individuals associated with the Friends of the Library descended on the historic Algonquin Club. We were slowly herded to the fourth floor dining room - one does not rush through the Algonquin Club; one savors the decor, the atmosphere, the artistry that’s gone into crafting and maintaining every room. My first thought was that this was what the Cobalt Club would have looked like if Walter Gibson had fashioned it as an architect instead of an author. Glistening hardwoods. Ornate fixtures and ceilings and staircases. Opulently furnished rooms that convey the full sense of history and wealth and personality this building has witnessed. Membership does indeed have its privileges.
Dinner was elegant. Excellent food skillfully prepared, leisurely paced, plenty of time for small pockets of conversation to develop, daisy-chain, evolve into other tangents. Occasionally, one-on-one discussion dropped off to silence as Harlan, from his end of the table, favored us with an anecdote - the night Charles Mingus slugged Eric Dolphy; Bruce Lee’s incredible demonstration of his speed and agility for a producer who, as a result, wet himself; that particular dinner at Roddy McDowell’s where Susan took on a Scientologist - wonderful, rich snapshots of things Harlan witnessed and, in some cases, was amused or amazed by.
This was no mere post-appearance burger and fries - no gossip about how crazy this particular author was, no fannish preening, no incessant questioning about Ellison minutiae so fine it could sift through silk. It was adult conversation and interplay and laughter, but never heavy or stuffy, for Harlan is as constant as the northern star, and will play with the curtains, or straighten a painting, or walk a piece of his lobster entree down the length of the table - WITH the drawn butter - so some other hearty soul can have a taste (and the lobster was to die for, by the by - thanks again, Harlan.)
The event of the evening became the post-dinner toast. Harlan, I must apologize because I am terrible with names - I only remember my own because I’ve been writing it in notebooks, on checks, and in my clothes for 37 years - so if you can provide the gentleman’s name, I would be very appreciative. Toasting on behalf of the Friends of the Library, this gentleman noted he has been in academia for 60 years, and proceed to offer a dignified and heartfelt appraisal of Harlan and his work.
A transcript might do it justice, but none exists, and I can only recount it up to a point. It was a moment that - well, like I said, you had to be there.
The Toaster opened by noting that Harlan’s lecture was unique in his experience because of the number of students that attended - students simply didn’t attend their lectures. And it wasn’t just that there were students, but there were people from all walks of life - academics, yes, but also people who worked in the ‘real’ world. It was clear that Harlan’s work touched people across all generational boundaries. He expounded on the humanity of Harlan’s work, and its importance, and HIS importance - and at this point, I get hazy, because that was when I chanced to glance at Harlan.
His eyes were wide, and his mouth was slightly ajar - not agape, much more narrow than that - a look of dawning awe. I’ve seen a smaller version of this expression. He’s not impossible to amaze - difficult, but not impossible. As the toast ended with praise, with appreciation, and with sincere recognition of talent and accomplishment from a man who has been around hallowed halls since before Harlan tapped out “Glowworm”, as glasses were raised to a chorus of agreement, Harlan was gobsmacked. Astounded. Overcome.
If you pay attention to Harlan live and in person, you learn something early on: he will bluster, he will rage, he will take your ignorance and thrash you about the head and shoulders with it if you give him the means and motive - but he is, ultimately, humble. If you asked him, he would name a dozen writers past (and another dozen present) for whom he feels unfit to sharpen pencils, much less be mentioned alongside in a list of “writers”. He takes pride in his accomplishments and his skill, but inside he’s still a skinny kid from Ohio who caught some breaks and made some other opportunities for himself and marvels at what a great life he has.
Nevertheless, I saw Harlan Ellison rendered utterly speechless in the Dining Room of the Algonquin Club - mouth-open-and-moving-but-no-sound-issuing-forth SPEECHLESS, for at least a full minute. Thoughts could not form into voice. When they finally did, that voice had a little bit of a quiver. If I were a betting man, I’d say that at age 71, the kid that Painesville was too small to contain, who found that he could string words together with no minor grace, and who had something meaningful to say about the passions that drive us finally felt like he’d arrived, that he was understood.
He responded (a little aghast that he had to stand up to do so) by recounting the lecture at the Yale University Political Union which he flew his mother in from Florida to attend, how some of the students had asked her for her autograph on his books, and how she kvelled, so proud of him. He smiled and said to us, “She would have loved this.” Thanks and humility and astonishment followed in equal measure, and he closed with a request that we talk amongst ourselves while he reeled. My word, not his. I'm sure his was much sharper.
As dessert came around, Harlan joined us at our end of the table, chit-chatting, clearly affected by what had been said. You can’t fake the joy in the smile he flashed. By the time dessert finished, it was pushing midnight, and the party broke up quickly thereafter. Harlan isn’t one for long goodbyes, and in a lot of ways it’s reassuring to have his casual optimism that you will see him again before too long.
We made our ways to respective cars, offered up by the valets. Harlan went to his walking on air, tired but still with that amazed ember-glow at his center.
It’s one thing to be wooed as a visiting lecturer at a major institution.
It’s another thing entirely to be recognized as the person you’ve always striven to be.
===================
That said, THANK YOU, Harlan and Susan, for having me as your guest. I cannot repay the kindness enough, and I’m only sorry schedules didn’t line up Wednesday morning so we could overindulge on Faneuil Hall’s culinary excesses. It wound up working out - my flight left earlier than expected, and I still got to crawl a bookstore or two - but you so seldom get East . Very, very glad I made the trip last -minute, in spite of it all.
Tim, Amy - feel free to color in any holes in the telling. Hell, correct grammar and spelling too if you want - it's 2 am - I need to be up in three hours for work. Thank Jeebus it's Friday...
HARLAN
Consider it done. Glad to help.
I appreciate the attention/correction - but then, 'Garry' ain't no thang. I prefer it to Greg, of which I get a lot. I've been slowly cultivating the moniker 'Gravity,' but it's not quite there yet.
Best,
G
REPLY TO RIA:
Didn't get the e.mail Sunday, but thank you for speaking to David English. I am substantially sad that he chose not to come to see an old friend at Boston U.
It's been such a long time and, well, his choosing to shine it on just, well, it brings me down.
If/when you see him/speak to him again, please pass on my best good wishes, and hopes that his life has been a cheery and productive one.
Thank you again. Harlan Ellison
By the way: GARY WALLEN has only one "r" in his first name. For a moment there (as Gil Lamont used to explain) "I was possessed by the demon-spirit of an imbecile."
Sorry, baby.
Harlan
I am ecstatic that HAROLD PINTER, one of my favorite writers, has won the Nobel Prize for Literature, 2005.
Do not fret on my account, folks. He is FAR MORE deserving than I; and among those who deserve accolades before I get any, Pinter is well up in the forefront.
I am just as thrilled as I can be!!!!!! Hot diggity!!!!!!
Yr. pal, Harlan
REPLY TO GARRY WALLEN:
By all means, send 'em...send 'em!
Send'm c/o HERC -- PO Box 55548 / Sherman Oaks, CA 91413 -- and many thanks. I can use whatever extra copies you've got. For the files, and for Barney.
Tuesday night, both the actual BU lecture and the Friends of the Library-hosted dinner at the exclusive and elegant private Algonquin Club thereafter, became one of the most important, pivotal nights of my life.
Perhaps you can implore Tim Richmond or Amy Kostyn-Jenkins or FinderDoug to comment on the event(s). They were there; and I find the experience much too affecting to be able to talk about it, much less comment on what it meant to me, so soon after the rising of the cratered moon.
Thank you, Garry.
Yr. pal, Harlan
TO STEVE BARBER
STEVE...Yes, some or maybe even all of Harlan's writing is not hard science fiction...I think LIFE HUTCH, THE SILVER CORRIDOR, and THE SKY IS BURNING! ... come the closest. Yet when I read these stories I see psycho-drama as Harlan takes WHAT IF...and then adds...WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF, into his stories. He took LIFE HUTCH for instance used the standard formula of MAN AGAINST MACHINE...added A MAN ALONE WITH A MACHINE and actually made you feel what Terence was feeling as he confronts a crazed robot in an R&R hutch on an isolated asteroid, with little or no hope of getting out of the situation. Of course, in the end the man overcomes the machine by keeping his wits about him through pain and suffering and observing where is the weakness to defeat such an enemy. Now...that is more a psychological piece than science fiction to me. I think Harlan doesn't want anyone to think of his work as purely science fiction...it is more dramatic fiction set in a science fiction areana.
STAN
http://www.cronyjobs.com/
That's it for now.
It's a bit like porn...
... horror, that is. A Supreme Court justice (1964, Potter Stewart) once observed that he couldn't define pornography (or obscenity) "but I know it when I see it..."
The same with Horror. So much of what passes for horror these days is more difficult to define than ever before. It used to be easy. "Dracula" and "Frankenstein" were horror movies. Now we have too many terms to define the same thing, and so few things that fit into a solitary definition. Was "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" a horror tv show? A comedy film? A metaphorical teen-angst drama?
Harlan has gotten into trouble by redefining his fiction as "Not Science Fiction", and he's right in that his stuff is not *hard* SF. Never has been, never will be (though some, not Tom Cruise, would argue that Psychology is a science, and much of Harlan's stuff smacks of psychological speculative fiction). Vonnegut makes the same claim -- and why these two brilliant souls are rarely lumped together is beyond me.
Horror, Steve from Dallas, is that thing which reaches into our soul and frightens us beyond a mild fear. It sickens us, defines us and lets us walk amongst the headstones on Halloween night with our heart running fast mambo with a drug-crazed Krupa on drums. Horror follows us, haunts us, and makes the dark fluid.
Horror goes beyond the merely scary, it terrifies us and makes us want to close the book, close our eyes, turn our head, turn on the light. And, if truly effective horror, permits us to do none of that.
My two cents.
Steve from LB
_______________________________________________
Too bad Pinter won the Nobel. You'd think that some day they'd honor a REALLY good writer. (And THAT, people, is the fantasy movie shuffling around MY little noggin.)
directing this message to HE himself as a follow-up to the e-mail you may or may not have gotten Sunday(?)-ish...
I did speakw with David English and he decided not to go to the lecture.
Frank - WFMU is straight outta New Jersey.
Pinter. Hm. Well, if they had to give the Nobel to a member of the International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic, better Pinter than Stan Goff... Granted, No Man's Land is a very funny play, but you have to be sure to hear the voices of Gielgud and Richardson in your head as you're reading it.
AT THE RISK OF GETTING VIRTUALLY BITCH-SLAPPED BY RICK...
I hit the send button before adding a P.S. (which I wanted to keep low profile) to that last post.
HARLAN: Yeah, Pinter's deserving, and Pinter's cool. But I still think they made the wrong choice. You rule, buddy. --DTS
WHY YOU SHOULD RETURN TO MARS
"Veronica Mars," that is. And you if haven't been to Mars yet, set your VCRs to record the show while you watch lost (I do the opposite, but still check out both shows in the end).
ANY of you guys out there that haven't checked our Veronica Mars -- and who appreciate the good quality stuff on the Tube of late ("Lost," "Desperate Housewives," "Grey's Anatomy," etc) -- should pick up a copy of the 1st Season on DVD. Not only has each season featured a core mystery (which carries viewers from beginning to end), like the Lily Kane mystery in the first season, both seasons have included lots of interesting subplots (missing neighbors, chicanery and vandalism, etc), solid characters (anyone who loves to hate Logan still couldn't help but be moved to sympathy by the scene at the end of a first season show where he goes to a closet full of leather, brass buckled belts and pulls one out for his father), snappy dialogue and talented actors (not to mention just a lot of film homage, dropped willy-nilly, in the titles of episodes -- "The Wrath of Con" -- and an ocassional scene, such as the final one in "Like A Virgin"). And as the title character, Kristen Bell is the cat's PJs.
Hurry up now! Get to the store, pick up the 1st season, catch up as much as you can, and then check out next week's episode so you can try to figure out the main mystery (why the bus driver drover himself and lots o' students over a cliff) as well as what the new girlfriend of Vericona's dad isn't telling anyone, and...well, you get the idea. This show exemplifies a line from the writing of Charles Dickens: "A wonderful fact to reflect upon, that every human creature is constituted to be that profound secret and mystery to every other."
Yes, indeed.
--DTS
I'm just amused at how "Nelson" includes "faux-left cliches" as a literary sin, and in the next overworked breath, denounces Harry Potter as a "crypto-fascist."
This just in: Playwright Harold Pinter wins the Nobel Prize in Literature for 2005!
(pause)
Maybe next year, Harlan.
NELSON: There are so many things I object to in your post, it's a shame to pick out one, but here goes: The "technical jerry-rigging of language" (or style) of a piece of writing isn't separate from the "meaning" or "story" it conveys; never has been, never will be. Oh, and I seriously doubt you've ever read much China Mieville, since the five qualities you list only apply to his work in the most superficial way. (Your post DID remind me that HORROR: ANOTHER 100 BEST BOOKS is out, so I guess it wasn't a total loss.)
Frank,
I'm always looking for new music; thanks for the post! Also, I'd like to recommend a local station: http://www.wruw.org/ They have an eclectic roster of programs, and stream live online. I heart WRUW.
=)
I have found a great new source for music: WFMU, which is an experimental radio station, from Michigan, has a great site, where they have their entire archives available for download. You can listen to any of their shows, and there are millions of them, it seems. If you like weird, obscure music, mixed with any style of music you can think of, this station has some great stuff. I have challenged their search page and have found almost any song I like on there. If you want crazy, oddball sounds, this is the shit.
------------
Horror fiction is scary, but the main problem is most new horror fiction just isn't very well written. Just because this stuff has been guettoized into a genre prison, doesn't take into account how hard this stuff really is to do well. The key is to understand what lurks under the darkness of humanity, but be able to wash yourself back into the lamb's light when you are done. You don't want to be tainted by it.
Most horror fiction is either stupid monster crap or serial killers, preferably one's with cool ways of killing and torturing--which is not horror, but sick.
Frank Herbert is the name to look for, when looking for good british horror.
I don't, as a rule, read much supernatural, horror, or sci-fi. I just finished one of Michael Dibdin's Aurelio Zen mysteries, and am currently reading Gao Xingjian's _Soul Mountain_ -- admittedly, for one of my book discussion groups -- and Robert M. Hazen's _Genesis: the scientific quest for life's origin_ (not as tough sledding as, and even more interesting than, I expected) to review for the California Literary Review.
I have to say that Neil Gaiman is one of the most interesting novelists currently writing. And much of what is great about his current work has very little to do with horror or the supernatural, which are only a couple of the many tools in his chest.
By the way, if anyone's interested, my review of a new bio of Patrick O'Brian ran in Sunday's Oregonian:
http://www.oregonlive.com/books/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/entertainment/1128603229112860.xml&coll=7
Gaiman
Having just finished "Anansi Boys", it's hard not to be more than a bit irked at Nelson's pronouncements. But then, if he thinks "The Dark Tower" is the epitome of horror, it's hard to take him seriously.
"The Dark Tower" series is most interesting in the way it encapsulates the career of a blockbuster writer in one story. The first book is wonderfully inventive but immature. The next few are the tight expressions of a writer at his prime. The last three are long-winded, self-indulgent and in desperate need of an editor. Christ, how can you praise King as being better than "self indulgent" British authors when the man's last book featured himself as not only a character, but a character that was the key to the universe?
I'm hard pressed to think what Rowlings shares with these people other than nationality.
But I'm also currently enjoying Mieville's "Looking for Jake", which is (mostly) true horror, so I'm sure Nelson doesn't think much of my taste. Oddly enough, it seems to me that these authors have a lot more in common with Harlan Ellison from a literary standpoint the most of the dreck that is most fantasy. (And aren't his stories urban, atheistic and left of center?)
Some british fantasy is worthwhile!
Nelson (from somewhere in the U.S.) dismissed Neil Gaiman as "1980's upstart who polluted comics"; and later attacked Harry Potter as "that little uniform wearing crypto-fascist".
Now, I'm not going to say that all modern british writers are brilliant, by any means; and, I am unfamiliar with several of the others that Nelson cites. However, Neil Gaiman is one of the better writers included in the wave of brits that invaded U.S. comics, starting in the 1980s (arguably lead by Alan Moore--a pretty imaginitive fellow, in his own right). Now, Nelson is primarily concerned with horror writers, and I would classify Mr. Gaiman as a fantasist who writes horror, instead. But, his body of work (Sandman, the Death graphic novels, The Books of Magic, his Miracle Man work, etc.) speaks for itself.
As for J.K. Rowling (since it makes more sense to discuss the author, and not the fictional character), she certainly does not belong on any list of top 100 horror or fantasy writers of all time; yet, I could easily argue that she is a fine contemporary writer of fantasy, who's work will at least endure with the Narnia books, the Prydain Chronicles (by Lloyde Alexander), and other examples of fantastic children's literature.
Nelson does make a good point. Too many genre stories are escapist, as if the writer has little interest in real life. I always wonder what motivates such writers besides the desire to see one's name in print. Writing is hard and lonely work. Is it really worth the time and toil to offer nothing more than clever variations on well-worn plots? If all one wants is to escape, why not go to a movie? Shouldn't books offer something a little meatier? Isn't a book, at heart, a vehicle for lively interaction between the writer and reader?
As far as horror goes, the best practitioners have always offered more than escape. Lovecraft's stories reflect what he believed, that the universe is vast, indifferent to human concerns, and ultimately a mystery. Poe reflected the dark places in the psyche. More recently, Clive Barker has delved deep into areas of taboo, unveiling the unease our sexuality and fear of death evoke.
Good writing is born of immediacy. Learning the basic elements of structure are important, but it seems to me that a strong point-of-view often finds its own technique.
The horror....the horror
Personally I don't get that much out of horror books or flicks. I don't get that spookified kick. Fiction just isn't scary. I think of fictional horror as either science fiction and/or fantasy. Fictional comedy can make me laugh, fictional drama can make me cry, but fictional horror doesn't get my emotions in the way its trying to.
Real horror is the fact George Bush is running this country.
There's real horror in being a young gay man in straight man's world; being threatened by former friends, being fired by the monsters at B&N for being the wrong sexuality.
There's some great stuff out there called horror: Swamp Thing comics, Richard Matheson's (Legend of) Hell House, E.A. Poe's The Raven. Great reads, but they ain't 1/1000th as spooky as the shit real life comes up with.
(I was watching Antique Roadshow on PBS. Saw some lady who owns a photograph of Poe; only like 6 photos of him are known to exist, and that lucky gal's got one. She picked it up from some antiques store that appearently didn't know who the photo was of.)
Clarification
I would like to see Horror defined. What does it mean to the individual? What do you get out of it? If you don't like it, why?
Sure, these seem like fairly simple questions, but I wonder just how much of it we've come to take for granted.
P.S. Thanks everyone for not killing me. I hope you don't mind if I stick around for awhile.
Susan - Package arrived today; thanks! Harlan's soo good looking in those Dream Corridor pages. :)
Ah, I see the mandatory October Halloween Horror Thread is up!
Great reporting from Boston folks!
Kristin
I think contemporary British "supernatural" writing is really pathetic. Sickly specimens are routinely cobbled together by Brits, Stephen Jones and Kim Newman. Peter Straub prates about the "amplitude" and "rich bounty" of this kind of writing but it only consists of a number of idea-fixes that neurotic contemporary British writers repeat over and over.
For example:
1. A belief that literature is about the technical jerry-rigging of language as opposed to meaning or story. The incondite artifice of a Jonathan Lethem.
2. Atheism.
3. Urbanism.
4. Faux-leftist (race, gender, environmental) political clichés.
5. Academic faddism; Umberto Ecco, gnosticism, etc.
Among others.
What can account for these postmodernist pathologies? Probably with the case of Jones/Newman the explanation is that they're aware that British literature is moribund and wallowing in nihilistic self indulgence. Stephen King is the last master of a form that British writers in earlier years had excelled at crystallizing let's say with C.S. Lewis & J.R.R. Tolkien and going into steep decline with Michael Moorcock & J.G. Ballard. And this fact irks them terribly. The droning interior monologues and psychologism of Ramsey Campbell can't possibly compete with King's imaginative ebullience. As for the rest; Neil Gaiman (1980's upstart who polluted comics), Christopher Fowler, Clive Barker and the epitome of this phosphorescent cultural decay, China Mieville (unless the distinction belongs to that little uniform wearing crypto-fascist Harry Potter) they will solicit good reviews from S.T. Joshi and Publishers Weekly and then quietly slide off the face of the Earth like dead slugs. It's amusing that in the appendix to their hackneyed Baedeker of ageing punk rock wannabe's and overweight Goth dominatrix drag-queen's; Horror Another 100 Best Books there is only one Stephen King title, Misery a lesser more mundane effort while his Summa, the Dark Tower books are not mentioned. A more stark symptom of displaced resentment from lesser authors would be hard to think of. As if their little book would even exist without the Hugo award winning Dance Macabre.
>Bram Stoker doesn't deserve to be overrated. <
I'm not sure if Stoker is over-rated, but I agree with Ben that listing him with genre masters like Lovecraft and King is dicey. Stoker was a writer, and he wrote some interesting, in one case marvelous, things, but his total body of quality horror work is a little thin. Even Dracula has its longuers.
I wouldn't want to list Mary Shelley in there either, although her horror canon is even thinner. These 19th-century examples (Poe is another one) were forerunners of the genre, not really embodiments of it.
the BU gig
Allow me to second the second, round third, and head for home: Mr. Ellison's extemporaneous talk was a delight. Mark and Steve, it was good to meet you guys, too.
The event was everything we’ve learned to expect from Da Man. Who’da thunk, where Novi, MI got its name?
Mr. Ellison, on the off-chance you might want for archives the piece by the student newspaper (“How old are you?” “Eighteen.” “Shit!”), I grabbed a handful today. Just say the word.
All this, and I evaded the meter maid, too.
I wanna thank you guys for 2 things:
Teaching me how to spell "Darren" (the sway and power of someone else's misspelling)
And bringing up THE CHALLENGE, which I've never seen. I'll sniff it out, dig it up, and bring back the carcass.
McGavin in THE CHALLENGE
Ezra,
Yes, forgotten for decades, but as soon as I saw your post, I remembered "The Challenge" like I just saw it yesterday. I was in grammar school when it first aired. Ancient history! If I remember correctly, Mako played the other combatant. It was a grueling sort of cat and mouse battle, each stalking the other in different ways and laying traps on this island in the middle of nowhere. I believe it had a major impact on my creative juices when I was so young, I now recall talking about it (and probably played acting it) for weeks with my friends, but the memory since then was living quietly in the back of my adult mind. I would really like to see it again, even if it doesn't live up to my childhood vision. Same sort of rediscovery occurred about ten years ago when I stumbled across "Jack the Giant Killer", a film I first saw when I was about six, and had seemed to have totally forgotten for decades, until I revisited that amazing experience seeing it on cable. I felt like I was six all over again, my memory had not betrayed me, and it was wonderful!
David Silver
....and before my wife slaps me, yes, she attended that dinner as well.
-TODD
Back in the 70's, while in 7th or 8th grade, I dreamed of having a portable device that played movies. It was such an exciting dream (keep in mind, this was before the days of clunky VCRs available for everyday public use and attached to your teevee and remote by a long wire to trip anyone walking by).
I dreamed I had this hand held device and recent movies to watch. Granted, I was watching Mark Of The Devil (a splatter picture playing at our local ancient theater and never to be seen by someone of my age), but the quality of my movie-viewing selection was beside the point.
I always remember that dream.
Today, when I take my dogs out to run around in the backyard each night, I bring along my portable DVD player and watch movies. I have hundreds on my shelves to choose from.
Ahhh, the dreams of youth.
Hey, come to think of it, in my youth I also dreamed of winning some contest to have dinner with Harlan Ellison and shitting my pants with intimidation about having to attend......then, two years ago, I had dinner with Harlan Ellsion....and Susan, and Shane, and Justin-wherever-he-may-be and I actually did not shit my pants. My undies thanked me that evening.
-TODD
Dream Movies
I once dreamed a movie that started with credits, had theme music, scratches in the film, and bad splices. I remember its plot in vivid detail. Alas, it ended when the film snapped and the projector started showing white. I woke up at precisely that point.
Dream Movies
I once dreamed that Spielberg, instead of making Jurrasic Park, held off on the third Indiana Jones movie until the CGI dinosaur technology was up and running. Then set the third act of Last Crusade in some lost valley where the Grail came to rest. Nazi tanks hunted Allosauri. The guardian knight defended the chamber from raptors. Indy has a ten minute scene where he grabs the diary and is chased through the jungle and decaying ruins by nazis and all manner of dinosaurs. There was even a scene near the end where he learns his near-consumption by a number of thunder-lizards has cured him of his fear of snakes (the inverse of the waterfall scene from Jurrasic Park II).
In my dream I watched this film at an old drive-in here in CT.
I also recall a dream film where Groucho Marx accidentally ends up in Pellucidar.
Oh good golly! I just took posession of my very own copy of the new Val Lewton collection. Where to start, where to start? THE GHOST SHIP I think simply because that's the one I've never seen before. Wasn't it pulled out of circulation for some reason? I guess all that will be in the documentary, huh?
I know which one I'll save for last...
"I run to death, and death meets me as fast...and all my pleasures are like yesterday."
Dream movies
Last night I dreamed a movie no one will ever see. This isn't the first time -- some years ago, I dreamed the movie serial Orson Welles made for Republic during the early 1950s, when he couldn't find other work in Hollywood. Imagine TOUCH OF EVIL crossed with FIGHTING DEVIL DOGS.
Anyhoo, about last night: I believe this was a hitherto unreleased, unsuspected film by Stanley Kubrick, though that may just be wishful thinking, and in a dream, yet (fancy that). It was set during the Vietnam War but set IN a way-rear-echelon area -- Japan -- where members of the little-known U.S. Army Corps of Philosophers were resting and recreating, presumably after a grueling tour of wrestling with the nature of being and meaning and stuff in the Southeast Asian boondocks. Possibly they called themselves Hell's Hegelians, or Kant's Kommandos. A considerable portion of the action, such as it was, involved an older, gruffer American's inability to order what he wanted in Tokyo eateries; also, a bacchanalia occurred in a bathhouse, and Playboy bunnies were in attendance. One guy refused to be envious of another's success with a certain blonde number. "I don't just want to be with a woman," he said, "I want to be back in the real world with a woman." The end credits started rolling, i.e., I awoke, before anybody could respond, "Define what you mean by 'real.'"
You tell me.
APROPOS of NOTHING BELOW
ALL: Apropos of absolutely nothing below -- except maybe for talk of good writing (on TV or otherwise) -- I wanted to recommend a movie to you folks: "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants." That's right, one of those flicks that is labeled a chick flick. Worse (perhaps), a young-chick flick. Just watched it on DVD with my daughter yesterday (she'd already seen it with friends at the theater earlier this year). Sure, there's shameless set-up in one of the sub-plots. Sure, the script (and I'm guessing the book) manipulates the audience -- but so what? All good, memorable stories do that. Despite an ending that seems to be feel good, it ends with a lot of things unresolved -- which was a nice touch. And man, the actresses --Amber Tamblyn, America Ferrera, Blake Lively, Alexis Bledel(one or two of which is probably known to some of you) -- do a terrific job. Especially Jenna Boyd as "Bailey" -- man, that kid can act!
Call me a Nancy Boy, but I almost cried -- twice! (Which is saying a lot for a GUY in AMERICA -- especially one with a dysfunctional past). Hell of a flick, folks.
--DTS
The school teacher/friend Steve mentioned is Tim Richmond, who is assembling the Harlan bibliography Fingerprints on the Sky. And I swear is someone I went to college with. Is this true, Tim? Did you attend Southeastern Massachusett University circa 1984-88? Damn you looked familiar.
Steve and I also met Gary, a fellow Webderlander. Just wanted to give a shout out and say I enjoyed talking with you!
Anyway, let me also second Steve on Harlan's lecture. It's been a while since I've laughed so hard for so long. We also had a chance to talk with Susan, which was a delight.
Mark W.
Bram Stoker doesn't deserve to be overrated. DRACULA was such an explosive phenomenon, it evolved above and beyond its creator. The rest of his work isn't all that breathtaking. (LAIR OF THE WHITE WORM has only achieved a degree of recognition thanks primarily to Ken Russell's infamous adaptation.)
Hello All,
Last night, Mark Walsh and I were fortunate enough to attend Harlan's BU lecture, to meet the very kind Susan Ellsion and to witness Harlan's dazzling footwork as he charmed a crowd of slightly suspicious library trustees with his wit and wisdom.
Worth noting: Harlan was questioned about why he became a writer, and he segued into a deeply affecting point about a friend who teaches troubled kids who grow up in difficult circumstances. He also mentioned his own life on the road and the cold reality of hard work.
It was a privilege to watch the master do his thang.
Steve Dooner
THANKS
Many thanks to those who chimed in about TZ books. I'm off to the library/bookstore/ebay in search of whatever I can find.
Cheers,
Jason
*wince*
I doubt I carry enough weight to have caused concern with my pre-emptively posthumous recognition, but for the record:
Matheson is alive. I am an ignoramus.
The good news is, apparently, mortal embarassment doesn't actually kill you. The bad news is mortal embarassment doesn't kill you.
That is what is known as homage to the original series, which is Hollywoodspeak for cheap, grave-robbing, shameless ripoff.
Just so ya know.
Chuck
Speaking of Darren McGavin; I watched the pilot episode of the new Night Stalker (actually, I watched the first few minutes and then fast forwarded through the rest) and I notice that they superimposed ole Darren himself in a very brief, blink'n'missit scan of the newsroom.
Does anyone know the point of that shot? Was it something cutesy, or have subsequent episodes featured more 70's McGavin superimposed over 2005 television shit?
PS, Frankieboy, you are a very strange man (but you knew that). Are you seriously claiming that FOX was the only news network to raise a day+ hubbub over the NYC Subway Terror Hoax? Do you watch the news? Do you read the newspaper? If you think FOX is the only news organization to jump all over that story, then I have a bridge up in Lake Havasu I would like to sell you.
-TODD
Not Gallery! Anybody but Gallery!
When I think of Darren McGavin I remember one of those old 90 minute Movies of the Week that used to be shown on Tues nights waaaay back when. Anybody remember THE CHALLENGE from 1970?
In order to avoid a full scale nuclear confrontation the USA and a small Asian nation choose individual warriors to meet and fight it out on a small island in the South Pacific. McGavin was terrific as the hard boiled but honorable veteran soldier Jacob Gallery. I have this on VHS tape and like a lot of those TV movies it seems to have been lost in the rush to DVD. (Admittedly most of them were crap but they got a few good ones in there.)
CNN has confirmed that NY terror plot was a hoax. Great, especially FOX has egg on its face now. They reported on this lie all day long, like it was the coming of the next big attack. This is why I say, never trust the government. Boy, do the neo-con FOX shills have their heads in the toilet. I think I will email them and laugh at them.
"Darrin McGavin is actually interesting to watch"
Otherwise known as understatement by the inexperienced viewer.
First off, Darrin McGavin was a damn talented actor. Carl Kolchack was HIS baby. His trademark character. A wonderful, hilarious, annoying (the ceaseless bur in the butt of authority) icon in the era of political cynicism. The "monster of the week" format was the dressing; but Carl was the Waldorf Salad. I should add that McGavin - who co-produced the series - worked his ass off to give Kolchack his charm and dimension.
His manic scream matches with his boss, from objects flying across the office to shattering glass doors, Tony Vincenzo (Simon Oakland), whom, incidentally, he managed to get fired twice in the course of the 2 pilot films - The Night Stalker and The Night Strangler, respectively - were funny as hell. But this new bullshit series - a laconic bastardization of a semi-classic series which had genuine heart behind it - is a cheap cash-in on the X-Files (which, itself, was inspired by the original McGavin series).
Anyone who knows the original show at all could recognize this fact just from the ABC previews; I knew what this bone-headed new show was about and decided not to give it a moment of my time.
My advice: rent the two pilot episodes from the original series. You learn words like "sufferance" versus "sufferage"; you meet a beautiful female dancer whose boyfriend is an overweight butch lady who dresses like a plumber and is wary and ready to pummel any male who so much as glances at her gorgeous mate; and you get to watch Vincenzo swig a shitload of over-the-counter for his ulcers.
You don't need anything else.
Matheson - The Nightstalker
I've read the novel of the original The Nightstalker by M and Rice and quite liked it. On the strength of it I tuned in to watch the re-imagining (sp?) of the series with Stuart Townsend as Carl Kolchak. Awful, boring, and just plain horrible. Nearly Unwatchable. Because I'm slightly masochistic when it comes to TV and movies I thought I'd download episode one of the original and see what made them (producers, network executives, etc) think a second round was necessary or even a good idea.
The show (the original) is fine, basically a monster of the week type of show with a better script than the remake but unlike Stuart Townsend, Darrin McGavin is actually interesting to watch.
I suppose it's a given that old or odd, interesting looking characters can't headline TV anymore but does every single show on the tube have to feature a former model whose definition of emote is to smile an orthadontal-award-winning smile and tell the audience outright the he's sad or he's feeling pensive or he's clearly broken up about he death of his wife.
Don't get me wrong I'm the first one to forgive a mediocre episode of the new Battlestar Galactica as long as Grace Park gets enough screen time, spoken lines or not. Sex appeal counts for a lot but when you're hanging an entire series on a single actor it would be nice, occasionally, if that actor was also interesting to watch and had the ability to elicit an emotion or two out of the audience. It's why, everytime they need serious emotional payoff on the series, they bring out Edward James Olmos or Mary Macdonell.
BSG at least had the good sense to make their remake better than the original (subjective I know, but I was a preteen fan of the original and I jumped ship faster than you say, "death of my childhood"). The producers of the new The NightStalker should have buried the remake in the desert and prayed no one's dog accidentally dug it up.
> When the Vidal's, Ellison's and Chomsky's of the world trip into the next world, where will I be? Lost is the word, kids.
You're already a bit lo'st, dude.
Matheson
That Matheson line made me cringe, as well.
more news, greatly exagerated
***Elijah*** Leaving aside for the moment that few of the writers you mention are direct literary descendants of other writers you mention - if such a thing is even possible - it should be noted that Richard Matheson is still alive. Unless you're privy to some late breaking news, and I hope your not.
Also, Matheson and King have some severe overlap. King started up in the early 1970's or very late 1960's, depending on where you want to draw the line and Richard Matheson had a new novel published in 2003.
But I agree that thought and art don't stop happening just because your favorite artists and thinkers take the dirt nap.
- Barney
you were waxing sarcastic, right?
"When the Vidal's, Ellison's and Chomsky's of the world trip into the next world, where will I be? Lost is the word, kids."
Oh, come on. I'm going to (hopefully) sidestep the slings and arrows that might follow a direct comparison by focusing on a narrower subset of authors:
What happened when Bram Stoker died? H.P. Lovecraft came about. When Lovecraft died? Richard Matheson came about. What happened when Matheson died? Stephen King came about.
Now, I like Stephen King a great deal, but he's no Stoker, nor Lovecraft, nor Matheson. And why should he be? Their written works persist, and their social commentaries are as apt as the changing times allow.
I've no desire to see any of the worthies you mentioned pass from view, but the idea that coming generations will never equal or surpass their genius is foolish. Hell, as Harlan himself stated, the lot of us are standing on the shoulders of those who came before. Well, a few are standing anyway. A great many of us are still stooping and, yeah, there's the odd double-dozen who've fallen clean off. But you get my drift.
A reply to Mark Walsh
Thank you very much for telling me about your (and Mr. Dooner's) experience. I did call BU yesterday before posting here, but they apparently had the day off. The USPS had a holiday as well, thus my request for info here. I called again today and everything was straightened out.
Again, thanks. Hope you guys have a great time.
Kindest regards,
Bob
HERC Renewal
Susan,
I am placing a copy of my HERC renewal in the mail today, along with an order for Edgeworks 2. Hopefully, we will not have a repeat of the mail problems I experienced earlier.
Also, attached is a link to a CNN article on the Nobel prize, which looks to be awarded on Thursday. Apparently, there is some controversy over last year's winner
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/10/11/nobel.literature.ap/index.html
Genius
No, Harlan was not recognized as a genius when he was twenty. He made up for that by still being called a hot young talent when he was fifty...
Gary, you need to aquaint yourself with the comma.
Best minds
It's not that the best minds are only among the senior set. It's that it takes time to recognize them. How many people called Ellison a genius when he was twenty?
Hell, most genius are dead before they are entirely recognized.
My generation doesn't have Ellison and Vidal, but it does have Mieville and David Foster Wallace, so don't give up on us yet.
If the so called Rare Earth arguments of certain physicists are correct arguments that are fundamentally anti-Copernican then it would suggest that those with a psychological need to be atheists and/or materialists have their beliefs undermined to a certain degree. If life on Earth is such an anomalous event particularly the apparent unique intelligence of the human species then there is no reason why personal immortality after physical dissolution should be statistically impossible. A universe teeming with highly intelligent technologically advanced civilizations would argue more strongly for personal mortality at death without proving it.
Bob:
Steve Dooner purchased our tickets a few weeks ago and he received them only recently. He had a similar concern and called BU and was told that if you paid for tickets then your name will be on a list of attendees. So, I'd say call BU. The BU website has a two contact people listed with phone numbers and email addresses. Here's the URL: http://www.bu.edu/phpbin/news/releases/display.php?id=1005
Good luck!
Best,
Mark
There are a few smart people who are youngins, but from my experience I notice that the best minds are of the senior age. The old folk just have more wisdom and are usually better read and informed. Time crosses more t's and dots more i's. Why do you think all my favorite people are old goats.
When the Vidal's, Ellison's and Chomsky's of the world trip into the next world, where will I be? Lost is the word, kids.
------------
There is a book out that says todays television is actually much better than it was in the old days. You have to admit, the writing quality has really gotten better. The Green Acres style of writing has gone to the toolshed of culture.
Sure, culture promotes ignorance and arrogance and addiction to having and consuming things, but at least watching tv is not as shameful as it once was.
tickets for Mr. Ellison in Boston tomorrow
First time poster, long time lurker.
I was just wondering if anyone else got their tickets for Mr. Ellison tomorrow. I ordered them a few weeks ago and was told they would mail them to me. Of course, they're not here, and I was wondering if anyone else had the same problem or if they were told of a different arrangement.
Any comments are greatly appreciated. Thanks.
STRANGE: Walter B. Gibson's TWILIGHT ZONE books
Barney - Short form? No idea.
Twilight Zone trivia
Philip Marlowe's Manners
JASON MICHELITCH
Apropos, I guess, of recent local inter-generational tea-kettle tempests, Gore Vidal, in his novel BURR, remarks that we naturally do not like for those older than ourselves to be also wiser -- it is bad enough that they came before us and got all the good things -- while S. Fowler Wright tells us in one of his books that the reactions of age to the youth that succeeds it are the supreme evidences of character.
Jason, I always thought The Twilight Zone Companion by Marc Zicree was a good book on the subject.
TO JASON MICHELITCH
Twilight Zone Books...Know Any Good Ones?
Susan, I received Rabbit Hole #38 today. Only 8 days since the postmark... Another superlative issue.
Mr. Ellison,
STEVE:
Mr. Ellison,
Oooops, my error.
REPLY TO STEVE IN DALLAS, TEXAS
%$#@
Dear Steve:
the beholder
Shocked
Susan:
Did you see Anna Quindlen's column in Newsweek where she hints that Bush's problem is *not* watching TV??
Reminds me of a comeback Rodney Dangerfield had for a heckler: "Save your breath, pal. You're gonna need it for you inflatable date."
the end of civilization
Thanks, Barney
Al Gore adopts my theory that television is the big fat sh*tpipe
FINGERPRINTS ON THE SKY: THE AUTHORIZED HARLAN ELLISON BIBLIOGRAPHY Compiled & Edited by Tim Richmond
TO JASON IN ENGLAND AND FRANK CHURCH
Minicon
The Robin Williams, Harlan relationship has always been a strange one. You would think those two would have nothing in common. Harlan is a classic, angry, eye poker, while Robin seems to be a pretty easy going, humanist, mushy hearted type--highly intelligent, but mushy. Sometimes, it seems, oil and water do that dance.
Kristin
Kristin wrote
HARLAN ELLISON PRESENTS
Neal...
slow week on the board...
Okay...
THE BIG SCREEN AND little too.
HEY ROB
CORRECTION!!
Harlan, just a note to tell you how much I enjoyed seeing you in SHADOWS IN THE NIGHT, the documentary on Val Lewton included in the DVD box set of Lewton's nine horror classics that just came out Tuesday. Don't you hate it, though, when the crew makes a mess of your home with their lights, cameras, microphones, etc. and spend (I'm guessing) at least an hour interviewing you, and then you end up on-screen for five or six minutes, tops?
affects, affects, affects...grrr.
Rob, you lob this easy one over the wall and expect I cannot find it and whap it back to you.
Venus
Kristin - I didn't do nuthin' - you Google of your OWN accord.
"After all, Harlan's OWN critiquing style is a bit like Cowell's."
United States
No More rantings from me
Susan, still no Rabbit Hole #38. Very strange that HERC members more distant from Southern California than me already have the issue. I'll give it a few more days before requesting another copy. While I'm posting, Susan, is the Swedish edition of the Essential Ellison still available? Thank you.
What is with this HEAT bomb today? It's fuckin' thermo-nuclear temperatures here, man! My brain feels like a water blister!
correction:
Got my hands on a whole buncha issues of Grant Morrison's 'Doom Patrol'. And for real cheap; 25cents an issue. Brilliant. Hilarious. Crazy Jane, Danny the Street, Red Jack, Men from N.O.W.H.E.R.E. ....that guy's got to have a few screws loose to come up with this kind of stuff.
I imagine you'd be the crowd to ask.
Hi, FinderDoug. Do you know what you did? You had me Googling "Khachaturian." I'm eavesdropping on your music swaps! Word of mouth (or word of keyboard) is the best way to get recommendations for anything! The first link (to some history site) was dead but I clicked the Amzazon one. There's an Aram Khatchaturian piece on of all things, Jamse Galway's Greatest Hits, (an irishman performing stuff from Armenia? Wow, cross-culture) ..What's your/Harlan's fave- the Spartacus one (Vienna Philharmonic) ? or. ..there's also the Scottish National Orchestra one with Piano Concerto, Gavaneh Ballet Suite, Masquerade Suite; and the Concertos for Piano and Violin which looks like a CD reissue of vinyl so it is lower quality but features A.K. himself as well as Oborin, Ostraikh, Mravinsky etc. That one's the Praga label and the only Amazon review is one star! because newer recordings are better quality...although I think cd's are spoiling people. The guy says it's for music historians only. (In which case you probably have the vinyl, but...)
Strings: a second!
Gunther Schmidl: thank you for the tip. Now to see if I can download that stuff without irradiating myself.
Rabbit Hole 38 hit western upstate New York today. Many thanks as always for the good news & continuing bibliography. (The Val Lewton movies box will be coming home with me sometime within the week.)
Ditto
I guess I have a new goal in life: the next workshop Harlan does, I gotta be there.
Harlan: We are all looking forward to your appearance here in Boston next week, and I hope Susan and you will have time to get over to Durgin Park for some lobster.
New found respect for the chicken
American Idol
Finally checking in post-Foolscap, which was as much fun as I've had at a convention in a long time. Nice to meet new Webderlanders, and it's always fun to catch up with the usual suspects (though there's never enough time, it seems.)
The workshop
Somewhere, in an interstitial sub-dimension where all the missing works of literature exist, there are ornately-bound editions of Flaubert's letters, Byron's memoirs, Hemingway's first novel (the one before THE SUN ALSO RISES), Sylvia Plath's second novel (the one after THE BELL JAR), Shakespeare's LOVE'S LABOUR'S WON, the complete plays of Sophocles and Aeschylus, Gogol's sequel to DEAD SOULS . . .
OK - Susan.. just sent order form with 2 checks one made out to HERC (renewal) and one to Kilimanjaro (book/magazine order) -both have my membership number on them in the comment line.
US mail is really bizarre. I haven't received Rabbit Hole #38 as of today and yet last week I sent a return to buy.com in CA via Media Mail and it took only 2 days not the 5 or 6 the post office said it would...
Miss Susan:
Gunther, welcome back. How are things out there?
Long-time lurker, rare poster here. Bought my ticket today for next week’s event at Boston University. I’m looking forward to seeing Mr. & Mrs. E again, and meeting any other Webderfolk who’ll be there. I’ll be slipping out of work early to sidle across town to BU, might we arrange a special cheering section? a secret milkshake? I mean, handshake?
REPLY TO JEFF R.:
It's Chanukah on Rosh Hashonnah! Yowza.
L'shanah tovah!
Developing a talent is hard work
I am hope
Package
KEVIN:
I question the efficaciousness of Tori Amos in her rape prevention organization, or whatever it is, I think that rape victims are to Tori Amos what people with AIDS were to Princess Diana, walk-ons in their respective psychodramas. I never liked Neil Gaiman very much I think he introduced a turgid cynicism into an innocent childhood art-form and academicized it.
Support for Red Cross hurricane relief
For shame for us not mentioning his passing. A great, grand man. May his ghost not become a myth.
I have a new slant on the ID debate: the religious creeps say that the complexity of the human genome proves that an intelligence must have created such a thing. As we all know, the human body is really badly made, compared to our animal cousins, so the complex nature of our genome's don't help in any way in creating a perfect human--which doesn't exist.
Less than three hours...
Ezra,
Workshop
coinkydinks . . . (es)
Your magazines are on hold.
Thanks for the Val Lewton link, Mark. I for one am really looking forward to this collection, especially THE SEVENTH VICTIM, my own favorite.
John Clellon Holmes, and self-expression and Warren Zevon
Susan re: Rabbit Hole
Congrats!
blathering a bit...
Val Lewton review (w Harlan reference)
John Clellon Holmes
STEVEN UTLEY --
Business and techno-crap
PAB wrote:
Hi Susan,
slight commentary on David Loftus's recent post
BSG
HARLAN ELLISON APPEARANCE AT BOSTON UNIVERSITY
art-fully speaking
I shall act on the suggestions to find LOST as soon as I learn whether I'll be able to play DVDs on my laptop (the only computer in the house) or have to make do with videotape, as our pioneer forebears did. I received the laptop as a birthday gift last year (from a dame who evidently thinks a lot of me), and undoubtedly it still has bells and whistles I've yet to hear. I'm no Luddite, but I always proceed cautiously around machinery, for fear of setting myself on fire.
Harlan on the Beats redux
Eastbay, the first season of BG is out on dvd. Buy or rent 'em. Well worth your time.
Howl
As a Penny Arcade fan who appreciates the works of Harlan Ellison, I have to put in that the generalization that we are all gamer-tots is inaccurate.
The LOST Question
TV & Movie Comments
It's interesting to read all this good stuff about the "new" BATTLESTAR GALACTICA. I can only suppose that they've made some, uh, changes since the original show? Do the fighters still woooooosh when they violate those pesky laws of physics?
I try to get into Lost, but cannot seem to. There have been so many movies and television shows done on the concept of someone being lost on an island that Lost just lost me. Just not my cup of tea. But, I will look at it again. Maybe I missed something the first time.
Cronenberg
The Matthews quote that Robert Morales posted gives me some understanding of the frustrations exhibited by The Author in response to our posts in the SPIDER forums.
Robert
***Robert*** You really shouldn't bury quotes that good in a post that starts out talking about Spielberg's WAR OF THE WORLDS. I almost stopped reading, and if I had, would have denied myself two of the most profound and useful quotes about writing I've ever had the good fortune to come across. The Matthews is just genius. I guess this is another guy I've been missing the boat on. Thanks for putting that in front of me. The Barthelme, I started out disagreeing with, but by the end of the paragraph he sort of won me over. I don't think all great writing needs to proceed from a state of near cluelessness, but he's certainly correct about the decision process, and how, the more thoughtful one is, the more restrictions and stumbling blocks you can end up putting in your own way. And the Beckett pull quote - Jebus. That's almost too much on half a cup of coffee. But thanks.
ATC: Where did you see his last name? Also, we know Locke must have had an accident, considering his condition when he went to Australia. He might have had a "near death experience."
The Boob Tube
Reply to PAB
Ugh, I know - "ripe" is spelled without a "d." (I blame my accent.)
TERENCE:
One of us is LOST
Bringing up the rear of the parade . . .
I think the great science fiction film War of the Worlds (2005) by Steven Spielberg would have been more effective yet if the scene where a tripod (surely the most accurate realization of H.G. Wells description ever filmed) is harvesting human blood (also from the novel) from a man through a retractable syringe like device had been a woman instead. Ellison's disapproval of depictions of violence against women in film is intellectually indefensible; women (especially if young and attractive) elicit more empathy and concern from readers/viewers then men do, a dramatic trope established in the character of Lavinia in Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus onwards. That is also why the feminized remake of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003) fails so abysmally, because the director doesn't understand fundamentals of dramaturgy in his eagerness to demonstrate how courante he is in his liberal sanctimonies. Ergo for the same reason, Spielberg made the right decision in having children as the sacrificial objects (although incongruously the heart extraction scene is committed on a grown man) in Temple of Doom, a film Ellison has vilified in his ignorance. On the other hand Ellison's criticism of Spielberg's maudlin sentimentality is quite accurate.
Ahh...Amy..you think YOU are nervous? well I wasn't prepared...that was most of it (and Harlan's aphorism from Louis Pasteur was very relevant)...I wish I could do it again, not to prove I can really write so much as to prove to myself that I don't always trip over every word or stammer or have trouble reading my own handwriting!
Me Talk Pretty Some Day
And speaking of knock-out television
Hmm. Harlan?
KEITH:
KRISTIN:
correction
Earth, Calling Barney. Come in, Barney!
Tom--Always concerned about the delivery times. Thank you. We'll keep a magazine for you.
Barney's story about the workshop was pretty gripping...I read it twice. I don't write fiction, but I can imagine the pressure and angst one would feel in that situation, and am impressed that you all pulled through it. Clever idea with the artwork...it prevents people from bringing in large chapters of unfinished novels that would eat time.
Thanks
There's Arzt on You, Dude
Harlan:
I've been following every episode of Lost (except a couple of times when I had a little trouble with the opposable thumb thing when setting the timer on the vcr a couple of times) since I saw the premier. One of the things I've appreceated about the show is the way they allow those of us who are memory-impaired when it comes to setting the infernal recording machine to catch up. Repeating the second season opener, for example. That one recap episode that gave you what has happened so far in a compelling nutshell. An absolute necessity for this show.
Aww, Harlan. Barney says wonderful things about you and all you see is three hurtful words? Well I can imagine how it might have hurt; I hope he didn't really make you cry...we know you haaate those extra pounds that won't go away and who doesn't? I saw you show off your arm muscles too lest anyone underestimate you.....loved every minute :)
Paunchy old man? Cold, muthuhfukkuh, stone cold.
Why not?
Crunch Time in the Boardroom
_Lost_ has been a favorite in the Siano household since Day One. My housemates tend to like the series with continuing storylines, so the TiVo gets loaded up with stuff like _Veronica Mars_, _Alias_, _Lost_, _Battlestar Galactica_, and much more. (One of them likes _Yu-Gi-Oh_, but he's a math teacher, and has to stay up on what the kids are doing.) I don't get into too many shows, but right now, only _Lost_ and _Galactica_ are drawing me back week to week.
Rabbit Hole
LOST hours, indeed
SLAP ONNA BACK & MANLY BICEP PUNCH FOR OLD PAL
How Harlan Helped to Make Me the Bookworm I Is Today
Life is a lot simpler for ME. I just FORCE my stuff on people, beating them senseless if they try to shuffle away. Saves me the trouble of figuring out who my audience should BE.
Quoth Steve Barber
apologies first to rick for prematurely proclaiming the death of this board....pessimism doesnt make people like you, I know....
One other fine item by Tom Reamy
Steve's question
Studs Lonigan and relativity
It's been a fine week for fantasy trawl. There's Neil Gaiman's new novel, _Anansi Boys_. It's a delight, as we can expect from Gaiman, but I got one _leetle_ problem. There are passages where Gaiman's doing riffs on P.G. Wodehouse, and the story's got a dominant Thorne Smith chromosome or two...but did Gaiman have to _tell_ us as much on the Dedications page?
Re: Robert's "Misleading 'THE SHINING' trailer"
Ask and ye shall receive
"Does anyone know the first book to contain a photograph of the author within the book?"
An apology
Recommended reading
REPLY TO BEN S.:
Steve Barber:
Wildfires and A Cool New Car
Harlan made me laugh. Thanks for the giggles, my lord.
ahhh, that's "sprang" to mind...spring/sprang/sprung
I have a question for everyone who is an artist
I recently bought the new Kurt Vonnegut book, A Man Without A Country. It's a quick, brilliant read, filled with his latest essays. I just love his quote from Lincoln when he was in Congress about President Polk during the war with Mexico: "Trusting to escape scrutiny, by fixing the public gaze upon the exceeding brightness of military glory-that attractive rainbow, that rises in showers of blood-that serpent's eye, that charms to destroy-he plunged into war."
heya Reverand...
Misleading "Shining" trailer
I finished "Nights in the Garden of Brooklyn" a while back and wanted to thank Harlan again for the recommendation. I especially enjoyed "The Man in the Toolhouse". :-)
RE: Stomach re-churn
I spent a while trying to figure this out, and it was fun, but I didn't get anywhere. It kind of looks like whoever posted it started by rearranging it some, then they randomly changed letters.
And speaking of giant squid, how freaky is it that its tentacle keeps working even after it's been severed from the squid's body?
Stomach Re-Churn
What a shame. This page is just going down the tubes :(
Hey Harlan!
Just bought one of your books
Gracias to our gracious host
He's right. Snopes covered it years ago: http://www.snopes.com/risque/celebrit/ellison.htm
GENERAL REQUEST TO WEBDERLANDERS
Harlan, Old-Time Radio, Essays, Et al.
My apologies Susan and Harlan; I didn't see the Penelope post (or if I did, I didn't bother to finish reading it after the first few lines made it obvious that it was null signal). Having now read it, it also strikes me that the insult continued the null signal since Susan is obviously quite attractive and I've heard numerous other folk say so as well. Just another idiot who shouts with "courage" when anonymous but would undoubtedly never have the guts to speak publically...as well as not even having the mental capacity to work up an insult which isn't instantly dismissable by those with, oh, call it 20/200 vision who've seen Susan.
Amazing creatures of the deep!
Re: Brian Siano
Ezra Lb.
Stirred them up, didn't ya, Harlan! Attaboy!! Sincere thanks for your service to the State.
I got references
Hi, all. Greetings from another Penny Arcade fan.
Disappointment
MISSING!
Speaking from ignorance
Why do so many people who weren’t present feel compelled to sound off and define the event that occurred at Foolscap? It seems to me that this is just the sort of knee-jerk defense of “their man” that gets in the way of any intelligent discourse in the contemporary public arena.
Not earned?
Huh?
Everybody else
Joining the circus...
Pardon?
One wonders how Mr. Laubacher talks to people for whom he has no affection and respect!
Harlan does not need nor deserve any of this bullshit guff in any way. Not in the slightest.
It would be nice if people followed up a phrase like "with respect" with some, well, respect.
"Penelope"
1 POST PER DAY. SINGULAR!
Poppy Z Brite?
This is very simple, kids, if you have never read Harlan's work then you are IGNORANT, do you get that? Or if you have never heard of Ted Sturgeon or Donald Westlake or Poppy Brite then you are rock stone stupid. Sure, nobody here denegrates comic books, but if that is your only source of reading material, then you areeeeeeeeee aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa putzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....jacking off your small penis on the flagpole of Mickey D's cultural rot. Now be so kind and get the hell out! If you want to discuss Harlan's work, then stay, but if you want to continue this crashup, you WILL lose. We are all just too clever for all of you to overtake.
I came here through Penny Arcade.
Onion
***Harlan*** [Dept. of defending MY honour] That I have sat on my hands for 4 days now, says just how little I wish to comment on this PA crap, but I needed to say this, regarding "Penelope". We both know that in the "real world" if that were a face to face encounter with another woman, Susan would need NO help from us at all, and if it were a man, and had I been there, you'd be reaching for that bail bondsman card right about now. We know that, right? OK. Moving on.
SS
Mars is Heaven
Oops!
New York calling
Robert Fiore: Pot. Kettle. Black.
To a Troll, attention is better than a golden coin
Okay, next time I try to change the subject, I'll try to come up with something more interesting.
[sigh] Greg, Harlan did come on and post that he was not rude to Gabe.
Hmmmmmm
Severe Frustration
Decided I would put in my 2 cents after reading the PA story. I have seen a few interviews of this man over the years and it is obvious that he is nothing more than another arrogant jerk in a world full of them. The first thing he tells people he is "teaching" is to give up, they will never write anything decent. What a pantload. Go drink yourself to death Ellison
In my opinion, if you are going to be rude like that to someone, then everything that comes of it is well deserved. I would like for Harlan to come on and say that he was not rude and mean to Gabe. I have no hopes however, as I don't take him for a lier. So I have no sympathy for him in regards to all the crap he has received. The fact of the matter is, there were ways to avoid this situation. Maybe now those ways will be more clear in the future.
This is priceless. I looked up the message that started it all and it was like staring into the most wonderful, marvelous black hole of stupid . . . I felt like the first conquistador who came all unsuspecting to the lip of the Grand Canyon and looked down, like the lonely Inuit paddling his kayak through fields of towering icebergs . . . and then going back and reading the comments here was like watching a cockroach egg open let loose a horde of little roachlets . . .
Harlan, I missed the comment about Susan too. As one who is also married to a wonderful woman, all I can say is sorry, and I know exactly where you're coming from on this.
Sorry, Susan. As Jim said, you're a kind and terrific person. Those of us lucky enough to have met you shouldn't tolerate anyone insulting you.
In a sense, this is like the aftermath of an emotional battlefield.
Attacking the man's wife is not on
Dear Mr. Ellison,
Poop.
"surly teenager"
What the fuck is going on here"?!? Harlan has a 2 minute confrontation with the 2 PA guys and the shit hits the fan here. I read Harlan's post earlier at work and when I thought it couldn't get worse, some putz insults Susan (I somehow missed that "posting")!! I've met Susan three times in the last 13 years and she is kindness and graciousness personified. I can understand why Haraln loves her. This Penelope should know that Harlan is like the Mossad and will track you down wherever your hole is!
Mr. Ellison, could you critique some of my writing?
Harlan, Susan...
I do hate to pipe in, as this whole affair is Clearly None of My Business (as much as the Internet Mentality does goad us on to invest ourselves emotionally in Other People's Affairs), but I just want to clarify if Mr. Ellison is being sarcastic or ironic (a propensity for either having already been clearly demonstrated) or if I'm simply ignorant of the context:
Tom Reamy
Something Completely Different
"but have not been able to locate the piece in my pretty-extensive Ellison library"
I found this site from another message board that was talking about the battle between the penny arcade and Mr. Ellison. I don't really know who either sides are, but after reading some of the posts, I am ashamed at the pennyarcade site for attacking someones wife. That is just mean and vile.
I think alot of this has been blown out proportion, I think under different circumstances all involved in this conflict could have been good friends. I also don't think Gabe is a teenager.
Boggled latecomer
Harlan on OTR/The Thing on the Fourble Board
Allow me to say, as one of the Penny Arcade fans here, that I thought the comment about Mr. Ellison's wife was reprehensible. I didn't remark on it at the time as I thought of it as internet trash that didn't really want to dignify it with a response. I suppose in retrospect one or more of us ought to have. My apologies.
I've no idea when I first read Ellison. It was probably during my own surly teenage years a couple decades ago. I've probably read everything the man wrote, barring some of the more recent stuff. (Blame that on too little time.) But I got here through PA, as that site is a thrice-weekly ritual for me.
Add me to the list of Those who Failed the Defense of Susan's Honor-- for the same reason Frank Church cited. I didn't even _bother_ reading most of the notes for the past few days. The ones that came from the Penny Arcade groupies weren't worth reading, and I figured, working up an insult for them was just going to get them giggling over how much they'd worked us up. I know mooks too well.
I never read the comment made by the Penolope person, so I will act innocent. So, I went to it and feel a bit ashamed about missing it. I am certain Susan thinks I am a cretin, but yes, she is a kind woman and does not deserve such a jibe, from some person who is a child parasite, way behind the food chain, under the rock--the kind of rock ditch diggers avoid, even when they are ordered to, by their slack faced, red jowled boss. This lady who uttered such vileness should consume a jar of zombie eyeballs and jump into a river of fetid shit.
Not to change the subject...
"The one thing that raises in me a homicidal rage, is the posting of the pustulent rodent whose handle is "Penelope"
The big mishegas
ONE CORRECTION.
Your Wife
MY SECOND, AND FINAL, WORDS ON THIS MATTER
Cockthirsty.
Mike F .... for "Fake"
Well, I’m here to set Ezra right. I am delivering one of my recent posts from The Bunker because it covers this very question.
Fan aof both here, chiming in.
Playing catsup again ...
Powers Combined!
If there is any take-away value from this experience, it is that I learned the definition of the word "foolscap," and I don't think I'll be forgetting it any time soon.
Fan of both
If you can't say something nice....you might be an HE or PA fan
Well, One Last Postscript
Chris
First off, i'm way late to the party. The music's over, the booze is gone, and the girl has already jumped out of the cake. But I have another couple hours before work and nothing better to do, so i'll state my opinion anyway, quite possibly being the last person to post.
Regarding the trolls...
Trolls Gone?
After reading the posts of the last 18-24 hours-------
SILENCE!
For what it's worth, I probably have as much Internet cred as anyone, given that I've been on it for 25 years now and various places where I've worked. I don't read Penny Arcade, although I am familiar with it. What I do note is that in the space of a few months they've managed to tick off two friends of mine, Harlan and Scott McCloud...and Scott both has a rep (and is) of being a very nice and not confrontational person (not to say that Harlan isn't nice, just that in general there's a lot less polarization of opinion about Scott). I'm not impressed, or by the imitative quality of their supporters who are popping up here for no good reason other than to toady. C'mon, if you're going to troll someone else's message board, at least entertain us with original and inventive material. As it is, it's just a null signal, infinite noise situation.
The Rules
At www.penny-arcade.com, Tycho made this wholly astute post:
Gee, and I sought refuge on this message board because I thought I'd bruised some fanboy sensibilities ....
lol
Without having attended a convention in more than 25 years, I attended Foolscap this last weekend and had a great time. I missed the Gabe & Tycho brouhaha, so I can't comment on it.
my take
ANOTHER word from the chair
I have never posted to these boards but as an admirer of Harlan Ellison and his work I must say that after seeing him at three or four ICONs whereat he was asked a myriad of stupid questions, I can only say that he can be blunt, he can be testy, he can even be truculent, but I've never seen him be an asshole. Asking a respected gentleman of Harlan's age to put on a funny hat is insulting, and if he took umbrage who can blame him. If you don't approach a man you don't know with respect, what to you expect?
Uh huh
what a sad old man
Wow. From the sound and fury it appears Harlan tried to anally penetrate the kids with two of his Hugo awards right there on stage. Tell me Harlan pulled a gun on them or kicked them in the nuts or SOMETHING, otherwise these HAVE to be the most hypersensitive fanboys ever.
Okay, who is this little troll who keeps signing in under different names? You're inane, obnoxious and ignorant. You're not fooling anyone. So you're offended because Harlan wouldn't put on a fucking hat? Cry me a river. You're lucky you only had to deal with him and not me. I would have made you eat the thing.
"Take it from someone who was directly contacted by the person who was at the convention that Harlan slapped around: He got off easy. The fact that Ellison left the stage shows HUGE restraint on Harlan's part."
A clarification: Turns out the guy who wrote to me was NOT the same one up on the stage with Ellison. The odds of a guy named Gabe writing to me telling me about someone ELSE name Gabe are pretty long, but there it is.
Sticks & Stones
"Take is from someone who was actually at the convention: Mr. Ellison made a complete ass of himself."
Love the works, not the writer
The "Gabe" in question took it upon himself to write to me and bring his contretemps with Harlan directly to my attention. The fact that he took this extra step--knowing that I'm Harlan's friend and yet telling me that Harlan had been an "asshole"--seals the deal as far as I'm concerned as to just who in this conflict was in the wrong. The following was my response to him and sums up my feeling in the matter:
Hey!
The comment below by Guy P. Srinivasan seems very strange to me. You appear to be saying that Mr. Ellison’s mean-spirited insults and needless use of profanity is somehow acceptable because he chronically engages in such behavior? You’re not doing a very good job of defending him.
Not having read anything about this incident before today, nor really caring that much about it, let me say this. I enjoy Harlan Ellison's stories. I enjoy Penny Arcade's stories. This does not mean I have to like the authors. Nor does anyone. Mr. Ellison's behaviour was completely inappropriate and just serves to reinforce my dislike of a man who has come down against libraries because they cut into his royalty checks. On the other side, the PA folk could have restrained themselves, but at the same time they should not have had to deal with that type of attitude.
Just chiming in after a LOOOOOOOOOOOOONG absence to point out that I love both HE's work and Penny Arcade, and found the entire story hilariously funny. As has been stated, each side's reaction is EXACTLY what I would expect. I think if the mood was just a little lighter on that stage, we would've had some pretty good banter between the two parties, and perhaps a friendship. Oh well, maybe next time.
Don't blame a fire for burning you if you stick your hand in it.
Foolscap
You know, in the end, the things I've learned today are:
"literature" vs. "videogames"
Just a little commentary on the fellow. . .
Foolscap
The unintentional hilarity of the foolscap situation.
Geez
Wow.
Common Courtesy
I'm a fan of Mister Ellison and of Penny Arcade. I'm old enough to have read a lot of Mister Ellison's work as both a child (thanks Dad) and an adult. I'm also enough of an internet shithead to read Penny Arcade thrice weekly.
Oh puh-lease
Speaking of Internet abuse...
Petty Arcaders
hilarious irony
Re: Steve Barber
Geez ...
Luckily I did not or care to know what PA was, so I am not in this fight. You do notice that some of the PA fans are mentioning their ignorance towards Harlan's work, which is the reason these people have no dog to flex its chain. The cult of the videogame is a sad fact of today; techno geeks run around, shooting guns with zero ammo.
I'll start by stating my bias - I am a Penny Arcade fan, and while I've heard of Mr. Ellison, I'd be hard pressed to name any of his work.
I love how...
"NOW what?"
Would everyone just calm down?
Yeah, I'd like to echo what ATC just said. Based on the posts from the penny arcaders, it appears that umbrage was taken, right or wrong, from HE Who Speaks His Mind. However, those same penny arcaders that posted seem to be forgetting those lessons their parents taught in regards to good manners and etiquette. I have no interest in finding out what happened at Foolscap as there are more pressing things I have to do like amputate my right hand 'cause my left hand is jealous of all the time the right hand spends around my dick. You penny arcaders would understand.
I Wasn't At Foolscap, And I Don't Know What Happened, But...
Ah Well
>I'd just like to point out that for every 1 person Harlan has on his side in this issue, 10 side with the Penny-Arcade guys.<
Life's little bombshells
Foolscap
Ego inflation 101.
Give it a rest guys!
penny arcade is all that makes the world good. w/o penny arcade, life would be humorless, and I would have to kill myself.
Wow, you got burned. Being a complete "cunt" is fine and all -- especially when you can talk the talk... But just backing away like that doesn't look good.
Who?
This seems so silly.
While clearly Ellison is more valued by the literary community, there are many of us who hold the creators of Penny Arcade in higher regard as proponents of a new medium of communication. From what we PA fans have been told, Ellison was insulting in an uncalled for manner, holding education and the learning that can come with age or with sheer efforts at increased literacy over a man who was simply trying to engage him in conversation at a convention in which they were both "Guests of honor." Is this the way that Ellison earned his fame, by being nothing more than a critical hefter of insults, not even bothering to aim his "wit" at those targets deserving of a dressing down, but spewing forth vitriolic filth at whatever target comes within sight which doesn't claim the same vocabulary as he?
>Geeewhiz, I seem to have aroused the feral bleats of Gabe & Tycho's aficionados. Return to the Ellison Webderland entry point
FinderDoug writes:
***Most of the stories from Walter's tow TWILIGHT ZONE books were adapted from the scripts from Gibson's STRANGE, an ABC-Radio series that aired in 1955. That series was narrated by Gibson himself, who was billed as “famous author, lecturer and expert on strange and weird events.” The 15-minute series aired five nights a week, and featured a lot of top New York actors including Hal Holbrook.
David Silver <silver@well.com>
San Francisco, CA - Sunday, October 9 2005 19:50:10
To Steve in Dallas:
Thank you for having the sense and sincerity to understand. You, and all the young people like you, are a credit to your generation, and the best hope for all those that follow.
To Neal, who asked "Why don't we name earthquakes?"
Simply because we don't see them coming!
By the way, I was at the very heart of the 1989 earthquake that rocked San Francisco, and was then a major particpant in helping afterwards (as a conscripted civil servant who, among other things, escorted people into their devastated homes for the mandated maximum of ten minutes so they could get whatever they valued most before the buildings collapsed!). Plenty of tales to tell, as many good or humorous as bad, but one thing needs to be stated after all the Katrina travesty. FEMA was friggin' amazing through the entire affair! I should know, far more than most, because their headquarters for the relief effort was in my office!
FinderDoug
- Sunday, October 9 2005 18:3:22
Long story: the 19 stories Serling adapted across the three Bantam collections were all adaptations of his scripts. Whether he did them or not, I don't know. I've never heard of a ghost writer, and given how prolific he was with his scripts, it's not unreasonable that he applied the same work methodology (in which he dictated the script into a dictaphone and then had his secretary commit it to paper) for prose. (Gordon Sanders' bio touches on the speed with which he dictated his scripts, but there's nothing, as I recall, about the adaptations save a mention of Serling capitalizing on his icon status).
One supposes a comparison of the prose of other writings could be compared for style cues to the TZ and Night Gallery paperbacks, if one cared enough to see if there are clues.
By the by, the three Bantam TZ books were apparently Serling. The two published by Grosset & Dunlap ("Rod Serling's The Twilight Zone" and "Rod Serling's The Twilight Zone Revisited") were Walter B. Gibson. Gibson's were part adaptation and part original tales.
Barney Dannelke <dannelke@gmail.com>
Allentown, PA. - Sunday, October 9 2005 14:33:57
Somewhere on the third floor I have a PB box of misc. "S" titles. These are things that didn't make the cut of dwindling shelf space. In this box there are [I think] three different Twilight Zone paperbacks and one or two Night Gallery paperbacks with Serling's name on the spine. I've often wondered/doubted if he actually wrote these. It isn't that the author of REQUIEM FOR A HEAVYWEIGHT couldn't have written these. It just seemed unlikely that he would have bothered. I'm not even sure that all the TZ stories are from Serling teleplays. I suspect Matheson and others might have had strong feelings about being adapted or rewritten in this manner.
So, is this a secret? Is this some Goulart-ish or Malzberg-ian deal made in the dead of night? A complete unknown? Or a legitimate Rod Serling 5 finger excercise?
- Barney
Mildlycurious, PA.
Robert Fiore <bobfiore@comcast.net>
Los Angeles, California - Sunday, October 9 2005 11:33:3
The subject of Philip Marlowe’s manner (which is what they called attitude back then) comes up several times in the novels, and Harlan is probably recalling Farewell My Lovely (full quote: “I’ve had complaints about it,” I said, “But nothing seems to do any good.”). Not that I am criticizing his memory; I mistyped that twice with the text in front of me. Other responses to the “I don’t like your manner[s]” remark might bear on the situation:
From The Big Sleep:
“I’m not crazy about yours,” I said. “I didn’t ask to see you. You sent for me. I don’t mind your ritzing me or drinking your lunch out of a Scotch bottle. I don’t mind your showing me your legs. They’re very swell legs and it’s a pleasure to make their acquaintance. I don’t mind if you don’t like my manners. They’re pretty bad. I grieve over them during the winter evenings. But don’t waste your time trying to cross-examine me.”
From The Lady in the Lake:
“That’s all right,” I said, “I’m not selling it.”
As for respecting or not respecting the younger set, you might look at the discussion of Nellie McKay some time back (new album in December, by the way).
Neal Johnson <beebop_dlux@yahoo.com>
- Sunday, October 9 2005 9:54:33
Good question, Jason.
I do not own the following book, but it looks comprehensive as well as entertaining.
TWILIGHT ZONE COMPANION by Marc Scott Zicree
ISBN 1879505096
Here is a review of the book at Zicree's site:
http://www.zicree.com/zzone.html
Also, I'm not able to locate my copy of CALIFORNIA SORCERY, but I seem to remember a discussion of Rod Serling and the Twilight ZOne mixed in with the biographical material or in the introduction somewhere. (Someone please correct me if I am wrong.) At any rate, that's a very good book to own. Unca Harlan is featured therein.
Warm Regards,
Neal
P.S. Why don't we name earthquakes?
Steven Utley <impatientape@yahoo.com>
Smyrna, Tennessee - Sunday, October 9 2005 9:52:16
Not that I expect everybody present ever to have heard of S. Fowler Wright, or even of Gore Vidal.
Charlie
St. Pete, FL - Sunday, October 9 2005 8:29:10
Harlan, did you ever have the opportunity to be involved with the original TZ?
Stan
Beaverton, Oregon USA - Sunday, October 9 2005 8:27:32
Look in the SCIENCE FICTION SECTION at Barnes & Noble or at Borders Books. You can be surprised at what you can find in local bookstores, especially those dealing with used books.
STAN
Jason Michelitch <jasonmichelitch@gmail.com>
(temporarily exiled to) London, UK - Sunday, October 9 2005 6:34:40
Anyone able to recommend an accurate and well written account of the creation of one of the greatest half hours of television ever known to man, namely the original "Twilight Zone"?
While conventional wisdom (and TV documentaries) hold that Rod Serling created the thing en toto with his Bare Masculine Hands and Dripping Sweat, I am not so naive as to think this is the whole truth, or even a large portion of the truth. I wish to eradicate my ignorance on the subject of who it was that actually ensured the high quality of the series. While I am knowledgeable of the importance of the quality of the individual writers who contributed (such as Richard Matheson, one of my faves), SOMEONE had to be in charge of hiring these writers in the first place, and guiding their work to completion, and I suspect it was not, much as I love his spoken intros, Mr. Serling.
I'm looking into different books myself, but I thought a crowd as hip as this one might already know of some that are good, or at least some that are bogus and which I might avoid.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jason
David Ray <shaneeray@comcast.net>
Bellevue, WA - Saturday, October 8 2005 23:24:44
David
Steve <cryanth@hotmail.com>
Dallas, TX - Saturday, October 8 2005 20:13:31
Thank you. I believe I understand things clearly now.
I mistook your frustration for a blind rebuke. I’m glad I took the time to say something.
I apologize and I want to express my appreciation for your tolerance.
Respectfully,
Steve
HARLAN ELLISON
- Saturday, October 8 2005 19:52:22
We are close to agreement. One small, but basic, exceedingly troubling misassumption continues to crop up in your reply. It is this:
You seem not to credit me with the kindergarten capacity to distinguish between the potential Fermis, Brontes, Gehrigs, Hammetts and Dr. Seusses of your generation, and the howler monkeys. If I've been making that distinction about MY and earlier generations in my work for more than half a century, why would I be locked-out of that parameter when voicing an opinion about the generations newly on the pad?
You persist in making the (absolutely flat-out wrong) assumption that when I pillory the monkeymass, that I am so tunnel-visioned that I include you and the thousands, perhaps millions, who do NOT act like dickwads. I hope you're not making the mistake of believing everyone I know, everyone I consider an equal or better, is my age. MOST of the worthies I know and hang with are younger than I.
Ignorance is pandemic. It breeds contempt. It makes tools of those who have greater potential for living heroic lives. So what would I have others "learn" from all this hurly-burly?
It is this, passim a quotation from Samuel Johnson:
"Almost all absurdity of conduct arises from the imitation of those whom we cannot resemble."
Respectfully, Harlan Ellison
Steve <cryanth@hotmail.com>
Dallas, - Saturday, October 8 2005 19:21:52
There are some items in your reply that I completely disagree with, however, I believe I understand how these assumptions were made, but cannot let them stand.
On the subject of ground-rules, I will openly admit that I am an idealist to a fault. Somewhere, deep inside, I believe that if I ask, someone will answer. I give the same consideration to others. You, sir, gave the same consideration to me. Thank you.
I would like to clarify that I did not demand a response. I said that one would be appreciated. I can see that in some circles such wording can be construed as a demand. This comes back to what I said about appearances being as damning as reality. At this time, I would like to apologize if I offended.
In the matter of the generation war, I have come to the conclusion that you have misunderstood me. As I stated, I have high expectations of my elders. They did in fact lead the way before me. They created the integrated circuit, landed on the moon, and survived The Cold War. I am painfully aware that my generation has yet to make such accomplishments. I know that what my generation accomplishes will be built on the successes of our successors and our offspring will do the same.
My statement regarding the young always winning the generation battle is based solely on the idea that we will die before the next generation does. This statement was meant for entertainment purposes only.
I rail at my betters because I see the untapped potential of my generation and at times feel that it is lost on our elders. In this, I have a vested interest. I never have, nor will I ever believe in the concept of “geezer-feed”, but I cannot stand idle while individuals make gross misjudgments about my generation as a whole based on a couple of entertainers.
For me, the core of the matter has nothing to do with the words you and the “surly teenager” exchanged. The whole thing is entertainment value for me. The core of the matter to me is that there was no clear distinction between the howler monkeys and the rest of us.
In a final word, I would like to thank you again for addressing my post. I am not sure if I have swayed you one way or the other, and frankly, it doesn’t matter. I have spoken my peace, and you have listened and I appreciate that greatly.
Is there anything you would like to see people learn from this experience?
Respectfully,
Steve
HARLAN ELLISON
- Saturday, October 8 2005 15:58:54
It wasn't "H" Green Hubbard, it was "E." for Elbert.
Elbert Green Hubbard, editor and publisher of THE PHILISTINE.
Oopsily, yr. pal, Harlan
HARLAN ELLISON
- Saturday, October 8 2005 12:14:47
P.S. And thank you for the decent post. Ignore those who preceded mine; they seem to like me; and like PA's advocates, they rush to demonstrate that noblest aspect of humanity, friendship. I love them for it, but in truth, yours was an okay request. As H. Green Hubbard, the American publisher and aphorist said, long ago, "To avoid criticism, say nothing, do nothing, be nothing." I can stand the gaff, sir.
Harlan Ellison
h
- Saturday, October 8 2005 12:7:26
Sir:
By what arcane ground-rules do you presume that I have any responsibility to justify myself to a total stranger? That you are "disapointed" (sic) in my response neither troubles nor surprises me. You have a vested interest in believing people your age are somehow more puissant, even nobler, than all those who have gone before you. A vested interest in believing Gabe's codswallop that I was "rude" to him, a total stranger already spoiling for a ruckus, and one who has apparently made his bones doing precisely that...disrespecting others long and loud, publically...dishing it out to a captive audience, but too sophomoric to "take it," even though no one was, in fact, disrespecting him...no matter how hard he, and you, choose to reinterpret that two minute's worth of brief, pointless encounter.
You may delude yourself as much as balms you, that your age-group wins the battle of the generations -- it's understanable that you should think so -- but the simple, unassailable, irrevocable truth is that you have already lost the battle, for you hurl your challenge even as you stand on the shoulders of giants and heroes and just everyday men and women, who have invented, created, cleared away, ventured, dared, and suffered the consequences of building Today so you can rail at your betters. Deeds make greatness, sir; not idle chatter and buying into the bullshit that anyone older than you and your current spokesfolk is geezer-feed, too out of the loop to glean the golden merits of your icons. Horse puckey, sonny.
No matter how insecure you may feel in your secret heart, that those who are older than you MAY, IN FACT, be smarter than you (otherwise, you'd never have posted the "challenge" to me) (clearly, it is an unconscious SELF-revelation, not a gardyloo for "your" generation, as you posit), the core of this matter remains untouched:
I was not rude to the surly teenager (even if he is 22). There was no hat for me, thereby making his entire fit of pique jejune and paralogia at its worst. His readers and minions behaved in a rotten manner, and THEY speak more loudly for their generation than you do. But if you, with some degree of civility and intelligence, wish to align yourself with howler monkeys, that is your privilege.
But do not, for a moment, believe that I--who has spent more than fifty years contributing to the commonweal, to make it a world better for such as you to bitch about my manners--that I actually give a hoot how you perceive me.
As Raymond Chandler's p.i., Philip Marlowe, responded to a potential employer who said, "I don't like your manner, Mr. Marlowe!" ... "Yeah, I get a lot of complaints about that."
Otherwise, respectfully,
Harlan Ellison
(a really terrific guy, in my opinion)
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Saturday, October 8 2005 11:26:47
Crap. Here I was ambling silently along my day when a package arrived at the door. From HERC. "Oh, good," thought I, "some listening stuff for the car and a couple of newsletters." I opened the package and started thumbing through.
Hmmm.
I want that.
And that. And, well, that. And that and that and that and.... ah, crud. This "$15 membership" is gonna cost me a boatload o money.
You guys planned this, didn't you?
Steve B
____________________________________________
(Aside to "Shocked Steve". Not sure why you feel Harlan owes you an explanation for anything. If I hopped up on the PA board demanding an explanation from T&G, I'd have my head served back to me en brochette. Take a note from the very mild response you've received here and set a spell to find out how we really work rather than lob an arrogant demand for explanation from someone who you admit you have never read or heard of prior to the recent furor.)
mfk
- Saturday, October 8 2005 9:59:3
What do you think this is, an English drawing room? He doesn't owe you an answer or any damned thing. We're all men here. It is every man for himself. Do you go up to Ray Bradbury or Norman Mailer and demand an answer or explanation? Why not write a novel yourself and carve out your own niche or something?
Neal Johnson <beebop_dlux@yahoo.com>
- Saturday, October 8 2005 8:45:58
ROB:
i couldn't be any more attractive, frigid or toasty
watched the first two episodes of DEADWOOD last night. outstanding dangerous stuff.
and speaking of dangerous visionaries, Edward Albee spoke here (in Minneapolis) this past week. How refreshing.
Neal
Steve <cryanth@hotmail.com>
Dallas, TX, - Saturday, October 8 2005 3:58:30
Mr. Ellison
Yes. I'm a touch late on the uptake, but sometimes it's better that way. This way, I can look at both sides without seeing all the ugliness real-time.
As entertaining as the altercation is/was/could be, the real disturbing factor has nothing to do with what was said on the stage.
In your second (and final) reply, an entire generation appeared to be under attack. I understand that this may or may not be the case, however, appearance can be just as damning as reality.
Pardon me for being flippant, but the young always win the generation battle. They pick our retirement homes.
Humor aside, sweeping generalizations based solely on demographics leads to gross errors. I am pushing 30. I fall into the same age bracket as Tycho and Gabe. I had no idea who you were, Mr. Ellison, until I looked you up on the net. Looking at your resume, I can see that you had a hand in creating the genre that I enjoy most.
There is a key item I want you to think about. The guys at PA were shooting their mouths off and because of that, I discovered you existed. First I looked at your resume and thought that I might have found something worthwhile. Next, I looked at your response to the PA flood. I was disapointed to see that your response did not live up to your credientials.
I do not shy away from discourse on this matter. I would appreciate a response from you, if you see fit. As you expect the worst from my generation, I expect the best from yours.
Sincerely,
Steve
Douglas Harrison
Northeastern BC - Friday, October 7 2005 22:31:9
Received Rabbit Hole #38 yesterday, a mere six days after it entered THE SYSTEM. That's a decided improvement over last time, and not long at all considering the lengthy journey by dogsled from the border.
The soft pink colour was a good choice; it soothed my overworked peepers.
Thanks & regards,
D.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Friday, October 7 2005 22:19:36
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9466928/site/newsweek/
Sigh....it doesn't seem "pro" television so much as just pragmatic. I suppose Al Gore wishes TV would just go away. Let's dream on...
The Gore article is very, very intelligent as well as idealistic. (Yes, I read it.) Of course, what the heck do you *do* about the fact that our brains evolved to be drawn to television rather than print? Once television was invented, it was bound to eclipse everything else. This has been going n for decades.
I think Gore would make a great president but as Quindlen points out, "it's the masses who decide elections." Conservatives use "elitist" as an insult, and being branded as snobbish is a kiss of death politically.
Kristin
what do we do? The thought of a political generation shaped by reality shows like Survivor and The Apprentics is really scary...
Chuck
- Friday, October 7 2005 22:5:7
Chuck
Robert Morales
New York City, - Friday, October 7 2005 21:17:57
http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary_Navigation=Articles&Action=View_Article&Content_ID=242710
Lee
- Friday, October 7 2005 18:13:32
John H et al.
Thanks for helping burn away yet another little pocket of ignorance.
I guess I'll never be entirely well educated, but it's sure fun trying.
Darryl <No>
Bay Area, CA - Friday, October 7 2005 14:41:20
Great recommendation.
Cindy, please email me at ncognito at sideman dot com. Thanks.
Allow me to pile on - thanks, Rick Wyatt, for all you do for our loose community of readers.
Barney Dannelke <dannelke@gmail.com >
Allentown, PA. - Friday, October 7 2005 13:51:13
Hey,
I'm going to ask you to ignore the lightly partisan stuff at the beginning of this and hang in there. I don't know who or what lit a fire under Al Gore. I wish he had been HALF this articulate 6 years ago - but nevermind that now. Gore is after some REALLY BIG fish here. He's railing against the death of the print journalism and entertainment as a substitution for thought. He also talks about what the long term consequences of sucking at the Glass Teat of television has been and what this has done to the level of discourse in our society.
Then he throws in some German philosophy, some Paine and Jefferson and tops it off with some Jon Stewart for good measure.
Please ignore the http source and give it a read. This is the smartest thing I've seen on the net in weeks and weeks.
- Barney
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/print.php?sid=23048
Eastbay
- Friday, October 7 2005 13:8:50
http://www.overlookconnection.com/ellguide.htm
This thing sounds really really cool. But have to wait until next May for it to come out.
Stan
Beaverton, Oregon USA - Friday, October 7 2005 11:50:1
TO FRANK CHURCH...........Well now....thank you...thank you very much! Ha!Ha!Ha! Bird flu pandemic my royal rear end!
TO JASON IN ENGLAND
Too bad we aren't rich or at least have money to burn....yep...Our dream job or jobs....are just that, because we don't have the money to make them come true...those that do, well...more power to them.
STAN
Mark Goldberg <markabaddon@aol.com>
Minneapolis, - Friday, October 7 2005 9:40:31
Kristen, you purchase a membership to MiniCon, if you are unable to find a form on their website, you might want to contact Dreamhaven books directly. The owner of Dreamhaven is one of the people organizing MiniCon and either he or the staff there may be able to direct you towards a registration form. Get a chance to check out Dreamhaven anyway, it is a great store, the best collectible/comic/used book store in the Minneapolis area.
By the way, Harlan or Susan, I heard that you would be doing a speaking engagement the night before MiniCon, when will information on that become available?
While I do love living in Minneapolis, I have to admit that the freezing temperatures this morning made me wishing I was living back east. It feels like Fall lasts 2 days out here......
Frank Church
- Friday, October 7 2005 8:56:31
And, with all the bad films Robin has done in his career, you would have thought Harlan would have said something to piss him off, by now. hehe.
------------
Thank you all you fucking, selfish conservatives for the bird flu pandemic, about to strike. Social Darwinism, crucified on a folded up dollar bill.
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Friday, October 7 2005 7:59:44
I downloaded the RW/HE interview on iTunes and had nary a problem. I've actually been very pleased with the quality of the iTunes downloads and I like the flexibility it offers (you can burn a copy -- for strictly personal use mind you) as well as the library they have online. The interview itself is a lot of fun though, as is pointed out, Robin hardly gets a word in edgewise.
Speaking of which:
HARLAN! In that interview you start telling Robin why you really like and respect his wife, but both of you get sidetracked before you finish. Care to conclude the thought?
And, re: Lost. The butler did it.
(Actually, it has some major, major revellations. Enjoy your weekend viewing.)
Steve B
Ezra Lb.
- Friday, October 7 2005 6:47:42
"If Michael Moore parodied one of Harlan's titles maybe it would be on every week."
Now you had to know that one wouldn't just slip by...
THE BEAST THAT SHOUTED TAX CUTS FOR THE UPPER 1% AT THE HEART OF THE WORLD
THE MAN WHO ROWED CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS ASHORE AND PARTICIPATED IN THE GENOCIDE AND ENSLAVEMENT OF NATIVE AMERICANS
"REPENT HARLEQUIN, ACCEPT JESUS INTO YOUR HEART, OVERTURN ROE V WADE, KEEP PLAN B OFF THE MARKET, AND TEACH CREATIONISM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS," SAID THE TICTOCKMAN
Jason Michelitch <jasonmichelitch@gmail.com>
(temporarily in) London, UK - Friday, October 7 2005 6:47:5
As a fledgling screenwriter and director, I would have to say that having a hand in creating "HARLAN ELLISON PRESENTS..." would be maybe one of my top five dream jobs. If only I had millions of dollars at hand...
Rob
- Friday, October 7 2005 1:41:10
Yeah, ok. You take the blow torch and I'll take the parka and we'll all be sweet, nice, and pretty again.
...this damn stupid desert...what the HELL am I doing here, anyway? Oh, yeah - the girl. It's ALWAYS the girl.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, Bay Area, CA - Thursday, October 6 2005 23:23:26
Must have something to do with Jewish holidays....
Waiting till the weekend (probably) to watch my LOST tape.(Back when I was trying to catch up with seasons 1-4 of Babylon 5 every dratted weekday on the cable reruns I stayed up till one am every night playing back the tape and then leaving it in the right place for the next ep....)
Stan: I think Bradbury is considered really cool in Hollywood these days because of ...Michael Moore. If Michael Moore parodied one of Harlan's titles maybe it would be on every week.
Neal: Yeah, I know Minneapolis is cold...northerly latitude. Say, are they selling Minicon memberships yet? It doesn't have a website! I went in 1995 (one of the last party-mad free-bheer supermaxicons before they tried downsizing it...)..noticed it's moved back to Bloomington. ?? (In 95 I flew there for practically free because I had a big voucher after getting bumped off a Northwest flight to the 94 Worldcon! It never occured to the airline *that many* people could be going to Winnipeg...)
It's around 80F here in the afternoons. Mornings you wake up and there is all this chilly fog so you put on a sweater, but pretty soon you have to take it off. Indian-summer, anyone?
High fire danger...(that goes for both nor and so cal this time of year)
How many people here have the Harlan/Robin Williams program from Audible.com? I bought it(both eps) and then spent just ages on the phone, over a 2 day period, with 2 different customer service reps, in remote-control let-them-take-over-yr machine mode trying to fix the glitches with Audible's software, my laptop's CD-ROM drive which it thought did not exist because the Roxio CD burning software had vanished into a black hole, and my Creative Zen Micro MP3 player, which needed a firmware upgrade, and then needed a totally erased hard drive (the player, not the PC) before you could put the spoken-word stuff on it without getting an error message....Actually they were pretty helpful, but the battery on my cell-phone ran down all the way (either I stay home and tie up the landline with dialup, or I go to a cyber-cafe and get on wifi..) I don't *know* why shitty things like that happen, but the company did seem anxious to resolve the issue, so I'd buy more from them...
Kristin
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Thursday, October 6 2005 16:11:17
.... is NOBODY going to mention the freaking LOST Ep last night???!!!!
And yes, it's nasty hot today.
SB
Stan
Beaverton, OR/USA - Thursday, October 6 2005 16:10:22
Harlan and all Ellisonphiles...It is about time now! Time to get all or most of those great short stories Harlan has written from the early fifties right up to now...made into movies or television series. Hey if Bradbury can get his stories on the tube...why not Harlan. There is got to be (other than me)somebody out there who would love to see those stories visually.
Somebody who has the money and influence to get er done! Whether we, who love the written word, like it or not....the 21st Century will probably become the Electronic Visual Century...the written word will not die away, but be relegated to libraries and book stores and private owners of books and stories. It would be wonderful to see, even at late night like ten at night....HARLAN ELLISON PRESENTS. Maybe it's a pipedream...well...for now at this present time in my life, it is my pipedream...would anyone else there like to share in the dream?
Neal Johnson
- Thursday, October 6 2005 15:7:3
enjoy your heat bomb, tonite we freeze in Minneapolis
shitsicles,
Neal
John Heatter
Lehigh Valley, PA - Thursday, October 6 2005 14:2:21
Thanks, gang! I seem to be too busy to research much right now. This is about the extent of my computer use.
Lee: Thanks, I did know about the character from Vonnegut's work, that's why I found it so damn funny when I spotted it on a legitimate book shelf. And the photo on the back was a big enough hint that it was a gag.
You've solved a mystery for me. Thanks again. I love Farmer's work and that makes it even more delightful. I also have his OZ book A BARNSTORMER IN OZ. Another book that I found without any previous knowledge of its existence.
Jeff R.
Philly, - Thursday, October 6 2005 10:8:58
The exact title is, of course, SHADOWS IN THE DARK: THE VAL LEWTON LEGACY. Sorry about that. Look, I never was the brightest bulb on the dressing room mirror frame...
Jeff R.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Thursday, October 6 2005 9:42:31
Frank Church
- Thursday, October 6 2005 8:45:23
Frank Church
- Thursday, October 6 2005 8:44:12
I saw a program about how draconian the contract is on American Idol; the producer basically owns that performer, like a virtual slave. He gets to take much more from record profits than the usual greedy record mogel, and he puts the winning artist into such a never ending cattle call that it would make even the best trooper fall into tatters. So, it is you, Robbie, who doesn't have a clue.
Just the shitty songs that the artists sing is enough to hate that show. That kind of show effects how the entire music bizz does buisiness. Why do you think there is no Beatles or Rolling Stones cultivated anymore?
You have these bean counters running record companies that make the book publishers look like heros of the First Amendment. They are non-music people, who use focus groups and radio payola to hatch their scheme; to make America as lame and lump headed as possible. We cultivate that bad taste around the world.
---------
Harlan asked why Garth Brooks is so popular, or was. He has a nice guy sincerity in his music and act that people connect with. And, to be honest, his music is not that bad. There is a grudging catchy quality to some of it. He also gives his audience a good live show; doesn't just stand there, sniffing down on his audience. America has been bred on that sincere jive.
Julian Stam <comical@woolverinegames.com>
Wellsboro, PA - Thursday, October 6 2005 6:57:48
Yes, "Venus" was written by Farmer, and my memory tells me that the print run was a bit larger than many would imagine, with at least 6 printings of the original paperback. I think there were even a couple hardcover releases (which goes against the very premise of the book) but I don't have more time to verify the publisher/date today.
Running some quick searches, I found the following tidbits:
From Amazon
Reviewer: "spirituallyunaware" (Denver, CO USA):
"The reason Vonnegut was so mad when this was published is that he got thousands of letters from his fans saying, "Kurt, this is the funniest thing you've ever written." In his anger, he withdrew permission for additional Trout novels."
with plenty of additional reviews in the same vein.
More related info and fun:
http://www.vonnegutweb.com/vonnegutia/trout/
which includes this paragraph, "KV: ''That's about a third of the story. This Farmer wanted to forge on and write a whole series of books 'by' Trout -- and I understand he's capable of knocking out a pretty decent Vonnegut book every six weeks. I hardly know Mr. Farmer. I've never met him and most of our contacts have been indirect, so I asked him, please, not to do it. And I asked my publisher, please, not to publish any more of his Trout books because the whole thing had become very upsetting to me. I understand he was really burned up about my decision. I heard he had made more money in that one 'Kilgore Trout year' than he had ever made before -- in case you're too polite to ask, I didn't get any of the money."
and
http://ookworld.com/troutfishin.html
http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/4953/trout.html
FinderDoug
- Thursday, October 6 2005 6:30:59
I can't speak to Harlan's favorites, but the disc I'm spinning is indeed the Decca Masters CD of Khachaturian's "Spartacus" and "Gayane", Ernest Ansermet conducting the Vienna Philharmonic - it's a wonderful recording of a beautiful selection of music.
And the "farewell tour" remark was just a quip. I was goofing on the man. He will, it turn, at some still-unwritten date, drop a heavy light fixture on me in a ballroom full of people before pitching me down an elevator shaft, and he'll never do a DAY in the slam, because it's what he does. Or SOMETHING like that.
But no one - and I mean NO ONE - gets anything from the stash of magic elixers. Not since my brother got into that bottle I secured from the Jibaro Indians... poor Timmy...
Eastbay and Eric are correct - Farmer is the author (as Trout) of "Venus On The Half-Shell". It finally appeared in print under his name with the 1988 Bantam paperback reprint. Farmer recounts, somewhat bitterly, the tale of the Trout at http://www.pjfarmer.com/trout.htm. Sadly, the link on that page to the interview with Vonnegut about Farmer and Trout is dead.
Elijah Newton
Ypsilanti, MI - Thursday, October 6 2005 5:28:1
ow. Owwwww.
I know you supported with evidence and such, but that comparison simply hurts my brain.
Eric Martin
- Thursday, October 6 2005 5:10:7
I'm pretty sure Venus on the Half Shell was written by Philip Jose Farmer, with Vonnegut's blessing. The paperback I have has a photo of "Trout" on the back, which I also believe is Farmer in a fake beard.
Lee
- Thursday, October 6 2005 4:44:27
John,
Kilgore Trout is a character from Kurt Vonnegut's novels. "Venus..." was written by Vonnegut.
In Vonnegut's novels, Trout is an unsuccessful science fiction writer that can only get his stories published in porn magazines. Though I'm no scholar, I assume Vonnegut was making an ironic reference to how hard it was for novels like his own to be esteemed as highly as those of a Serious Author. Trout definitely appears in "Slaughterhouse 5", "Breakfast of Champions" and some others, too. I can't remember all the novels clearly enough to say which ones.
I don't know why Vonnegut decided to have Kilgore "publish" a novel. Urban legend says that "Trout" is a take off on "Sturgeon", who was a great sf writer contemporary w/ Vonnegut. I don't know if this is actually true.
Stan
Beaverton, OR - Wednesday, October 5 2005 23:0:23
That's right...if I don't get blocked again. I am now only posting stuff related to Harlan's writings...past and present.
David Ray <shaneeray@comcast.net>
Bellevue, WA - Wednesday, October 5 2005 21:36:11
David
Rob
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 20:43:48
Anyway...
I rather LIKE Simon Cowell's schtick - even when he can go too far (that's why Paula Abdul is there to give him shit). After all, Harlan's OWN critiquing style is a bit like Cowell's.
Frank, as always, leaps into the arena with only half the information he needs to characterize and size up an item with accuracy, and goes on about how, essentially, Cowell and American Idol project the notion that stardom is what makes a person better.
No. It's actually a cut above that. What they do is push those kids into aiming for SOMETHING beyond a Kareoke take on a pop performance, something that is more an extension of themselves, something with a semblance of originality. Most of the contestants come on thinking they're hot shit; that this is gonna be a breeze. But they find instead, LIKE life itself, the process of pursuing a career is hard work, competitive, and often filled with grueling disappointments.
I will not take away from Harlan his point that the show is otherwise pretty mindless. And even an Atheist has to start believing there's a GOD when he has that mute button to cope with most of the horrific tunes the contestants yoink from their bags. (Occasionally, there's a surprise - as when a Blues song is performed) Yet, I EMPATHIZE with those contestants, perhaps because I am in a Masters program - putting up with SOME professors who tend to be quite hard to satisfy. I'm walking that razor's edge of hope and determination and anxiety and frustration; and persevering in spite of all my shaky confidence. While granting that this is my own take on the show, American Idol strikes the note of a metaphor for life's struggle. That is why, when I chanced upon it a few seasons ago, it drew me in.
Traditionally, the art critiquing process is broken down into 4 areas: Description, Analysis, Interpretation and Judgment. This order helps you to organize your thoughts and to make intelligent and educated statements in a critique. When that work is sorely lacking, either technically or in originality, it tends to get very, VERY candid knocks. And you better find the humility to understand WHY it's getting knocked if you hope to improve as any kind of artist or artisan.
That's largely the message - as far as I'm concerned - Cowell sends to those contestants.
Look at how tough Harlan can be on would-be writers. Harlan, in fact, was on my mind the first time I was watching AI. I suppose that subliminal cross-reference secured my partial addiction to the show.
(An additional note before closing, Fantasia, a lady who had her daughter when she was only around 17 and seemed to be doing one helluva job raising her child on her own, was legitimately talented and won the finals 2 seasons ago; Cowell, while tough on her at the right times - though when she gave him shit it was great - revealed his compassion for her strength and her achievement, and genuine admiration for her talent in the final nights of the show. "This is why this show is so important", Cowell said. Not because stardom makes one person better than another, but because there is a human being out there with real talent getting access to roads that would otherwise be denied her. I'm here to tell you - whether it's Frank, Harlan, or anyone else - that it was genuinely moving and inspiring. And I have to say NO total mediocrity accomplishes THAT)
Eastbay
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 19:13:37
that should read: Grant Morrison's run on 'Doom Patrol'
Eastbay
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 19:6:49
Anyone else reading any good comics (new or old)?
Barney,
Thanks for Harlan's old beat post.
John Heatter,
Here's some info on 'Venus on a Half Shell' authored by Philip Jose Farmer under the moniker Kilgore Trout.
http://ookworld.com/troutfishin.html
John Heatter
Lehigh Valley, PA - Wednesday, October 5 2005 18:31:39
I was rearranging my paperback collection the other day and came across a book I had forgotten about. Some years back I found it in a used book store. I laughed aloud right there as I read the title: VENUS ON A HALF SHELL by Kilgore Trout. Bought it immediately. Had a cheesy cover too, fabulous.
I never heard of this book before or since. Anybody got any backstory? How the hell did this thing come to be? A publicity stunt perhaps? Hell, it's novel length! Somebody spent some time on it.
It's one of those things that just brightens a day.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Wednesday, October 5 2005 18:8:14
As for farewell tour, I'm sure it's partly a joke and I certainly can't speak for Harlan, but if you were a septuagenarian nine years after a quadruple heart bypass how much traveling would you do? Maybe you can dig up a magic elixir to restore his youthful vigor? Just thank Susan and whatever runs the universe that he's still with us at all! (Harlan we luv ya, that goes without saying, so we'll understand if you never leave L.A. again.)
Looking forward to the Glass Teat reissue although I can't afford a lettered edition (the spectacule of people paying $1,000 - well no prices yet but that's what Charnel House asks and gets for leatherbounds - for a counter-culture classic once passed hand to hand by class after class of starving students till they fell apart is pretty strange....but it will last to be read by your great-grandchildren)..I probably will eventually buy a copy. "Did TV sets really used to be GLASS Grandpa?? And did they look like ...BOOBS?" (I think some LCD ones are plastic...this computer monitor is plastic....)The numbered editions look like a good buy, much better bound than many "slipcased" ones that are similarly priced.
If I said any of this already--apologies-- there were a couple posts I tried to make from my other machine that never went through and aren't saved on this one.
Kristin
if you are a young rebel...do you get to be an old rebel...or do you just get filthy rich?!?!? Well, people pay a fortune for Beatles memorabilia...
Mark O.
The frost is on the pumpkin in New York, New York, - Wednesday, October 5 2005 16:36:26
Adam-Troy: Funny you should mention “Strings”; I just watched it last night. Amazing picture. It’s hard to believe no one thought this would be worth a theatrical release stateside. The scene of the puppet-baby being born, with her strings floating down from Heaven, was one of the most ineffably moving things I’ve seen all year. Also, the final scene, with the bird flying away, was a perfect end (potential viewers: don’t worry, that wasn’t a spoiler).
Everybody else: drop this one into your Netflix queue, you won’t be disappointed.
Mark
who in the same breath suggests you should also check out “They Came Back”, an unusual and very well made take on the “living dead” genre, from France no less. Also available from Netflix.
Steven Utley <impatientape@yahoo.com>
Smyrna, Tennessee - Wednesday, October 5 2005 13:59:32
I have never seen AMERICAN IDOL or THE ANNA NICOLE SHOW or the one where Donald Trump fires people, et and cetera, but just the descriptions thereof put me in mind of a hilariously funny SCTV episode, ca. 1982, about supposed Soviet television shows such as "What Fits Into Russia?"
David Jessup <dgjessup@hotmail.com>
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 13:55:52
All best - Dave
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 13:6:41
What Brian said about Harlan's workshop. (Anything coming up in the La-la land area, Susan?)
_____________________________________________
I had an unusual reaction yesterday, which kinda' dovetails into my question about audiences.
I've posted some of my portfolio on this little website called PhotoSIG. The site is for photographers who want to both show work as well as receive (constructive) criticism from other photographers. Some are well-known pros, some are rank amateurs, and some are in the middle.
I uploaded a shot which is a partial abstract of the Las Vegas strip (http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1620270), which received two reviews in relatively short order, one positive and the other negative. No real problem, except the one who was negative clearly didn't understand the intent. The art of the shot, as it were. And my hackles went up.
So -- in my haste -- I posted a somewhat strongly worded note to the effect that "if you don't get it, quietly walk away and mutter silently to yourself, but don't denigrate the work just because you don't like or understand the style. In other words, if you don't like the shot, find yourself a pretty little animal picture and talk about how cute the kitten with the ball of string is". That sort of thing.
After a couple of minutes I pulled the note down and left the comment unresponded to.
So what if the audience, or at least half of it, had responded negatively? As the artist I can either have the confidence to let the work stand on its own or I can go crazy trying to defend it. Luckily my ego is healthy enough that I know I have the approval of those I need it from.
It's about knowing WHO your audience is, not just that there IS an audience. I know. D'oh. But I had to share.
__________________________________________________
Susan, second note: if you haven't rec'd it yet there is a check in the mail for my membership in HERC, and a couple of recordings.
Steve B
Brian Siano
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 11:7:1
For your attention, however, here's a neat article on how computers are damaging childrens' education: http://www.oriononline.org/pages/om/05-5om/Monke.html
And to satisfy my own egomania, have a browse over to my website, http://www.briansiano.com, and read the article on public relations and science. What with recent books by Marcia Angell and Chris Mooney on how corporations and Republicans are corrupting and misusing science, I figured I oughta get some props for writing about such things seven years ago.
If I do a fiction workshop, I might squeak by, barely... but when it comes to essays, I am _killer_.
Steve Dooner <sdooner@earthlink.net>
South Weymouth, MA - Wednesday, October 5 2005 10:59:33
I wonder, have you ever taken in the natural history museum at Harvard? It's housed in a rickety old building, and always reminds me of repressed, Victorian-era naturalists circa the time of the Parkman murder.
Its dinosaur collection features a remarkable Kronosaurus skeleton--real, not a cast--as well as splendid giant sloth, mastodon and dodo exhibits. The museum is not as well-financed as the New York Museum of Natural History, but it does have character.
I also wonder if you've ever visted the Museum of Fine Arts for its Egyptian artifacts and post-impressionists or the Isabella Stuart Gardner for its Renaissance painting?
I honestly don't know how your taste in museums runs, so I thought I would ask.
Safe journey to you both,
Steve Dooner
Ezra Lb.
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 7:48:15
Over at his blog Paul Riddell points out that October 5th is the 100th anniversary of the formal classification of the Tyrannosaurus rex, the archetypal and iconic dinosaur.
Of course each of us can celebrate in our own way (god bless the USA!) but in lieu of stalking and killing a triceratops, I think I'll mosey on up the street from my apartment to the Discovery Channel corporate headquarters and look through the wall of glass into their lobby where they have a nice specimen on display.
Adam-Troy Castro <adam-troy@sff.net>
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 5:26:21
I don't watch much reality tv, aside from AMAZING RACE, which I'm writing a book about. But I do watch the opening weeks of AMERICAN IDOL, mostly because I find the truly clueless -- i.e. the wannabees with voices like helium balloons, who think they're owed stardom as a birthright -- perversely fascinating. I see those episodes as a strange, compelling documentary on unearned senses of entitlement. That, to me, is the attraction of the show.
Once it gets weeded down to those with theoretical potential, the show becomes more about forcing singers into plastic molds, and becomes sufficiently distasteful that I stop watching.
(PS. Wanna see a great, and I do mean great, fantasy film you've never heard of? Get STRINGS.)
FinderDoug
- Wednesday, October 5 2005 5:25:1
I have nothing extraordinary to add to the workshop tales offered so far, save for three teensy notes: first, I'm grateful to have had the opportunity to run this gauntlet with one of the three writers who made me want to take up a pen in the first place - and it more than made up for that wretched semester at Binghamton with Ron Hansen flogging the workshop; second, Harlan didn't get the picture he wanted - I chose the one he had his eye on, to his slight consternation; and third, I'll take Harlan's "not bad" in response to what I cobbled together and wear it like an honors ribbon, since I absolutely hate hate HATE working in a confined time frame. (His later assessment of my efforts, lovingly offered to the lecture audience before he read his new story, I'll let slide, for I know the spirit it was intended in...)
And hey - HARLAN - what's this "farewell tour" crap? Who are you, The Eagles?
If I bring anything else away from the Pacific Northwest, it's a) chance favors the prepared mind, but never trust a parrot named Sugar; b) don't bother looking for breakfast in Bellvue, because it appears to be the least important meal of the day; and c) using a manual typewriter builds a kung-fu grip that would make GI Joe khaki green with envy.
Had the weekend not ended with a hastily arranged trip to NY for my stepmom's dad's funeral - almost as I stepped from the red eye in DC Monday morning - it might have been absolutely perfect. (I'm happy to report I've moved from "Exhausted" back to merely "Fatigued" on the O'Madden - Fitzsimmons Sliding Alertness Scale, though the Yankees in the playoffs will make short work of that.) Special thanks to the Foolscap Sunday Dinner Contingency for being engaging and amusing and keeping me from dwelling. I had round trip drive from VA to NY for that.
Harlan - I came home day before yesterday to your box on my doorstep. You're a mensch of the highest order. Such largesse - and such taste. The Khachaturian disc would have been 'thank you' enough. As it is, a thousand thanks back to you for the fresh sounds. Man - I won't need to hit Tower Records until November.
Susan - Rabbit Hole #38 arrived Monday as well. You two even travel through the postal currents together. :) Thanks for the Charnel House/Glass Teat news – their product is always top-notch.
Todd - Costco has the Complete C&H!?!?! Thanks for the heads-up! I may have to get started on my Christmas shopping…
Inabif - Never give Mr. Dannelke a big dollop of gratitude. It leads to a phone call in the dead of night, months later, with a raspy voice you will initially mistake for an obscene phone call, finally whispering "It is now time to return the favor..." followed by a long list of research items you will need to ferret out or, less frequently, people you will be expected to noogie. Just say no.
Barney - Why are you lookin' at me like that?
James Strocel <James.Strocel@gmail.com>
Vancouver, BC - Wednesday, October 5 2005 0:27:33
Here's my account of the Show me a story workshop at Foolscap.
Harlan, your copy will be in the mail tomorrow morning.
http://www.james-strocel.com
Sincerely,
James Strocel
Jim Davis
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 22:49:13
. . . and every Webderland post that Harlan has ever lost.
KRISTIN: Oh, that T.Monk/Coltrane at Carnegie Hall disc is manna, absolute manna. Now, if they could only dig up an actual recording of Buddy Bolden to top things off, my year would be complete.
(R.I.P. August Wilson & Charles Harness.)
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Tuesday, October 4 2005 21:38:46
Been listening to the new release Thelonious Monk/John Coltrane At Carnegie Hall. Anybody here into bop jazz? Harlan (and others ) have you heard it? I bought it electronically, which means the CD you burn doesn't have the packaging/liner notes but it's about $4 cheaper. Still thinking of the real cd for Christmas giftgiving etc. It's cool! awesome combo...may let you have my existing CD when i get another, etc.
Yeouch, yes, those posts DO disapper if you click the Retrieve Last Post/Save button (or Reset button) by mistake!!!! Infuriating...Windows has a program called Notepad that is a text editor and a slightly fancier one called WordPad. Either lets you enter text, save it as plain .txt file. Then you CTRL-A (select all), CTRL-C (copy to clipboard) and CTRL-V (paste it in here). Can't remember that? Right-clicking brings up the cut/paste menu (just remember to CTRL-A first so you select all the text.)
It's best to compose a long message in something other than the message board editor. I lost stuff when I was trying to post from another machine & its ip addy was blocked..
There's a book by Laura Lee called THE POCKET ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AGGRAVATION. The entry on technology (actually it's I for Improvements (that make things worse) quotes Edward Tenner's WHY THINGS BITE BACK, noting what Tanner calls "revenge effects." (When computers metaphorically suck your blood.) There's actually a German word for this....Schlimmbesserung or "worse betterment." The Yiddish near equivalent is "farpotschket." (HE, did I spell that right? I can't read my own handwriting..anyway, I'm just quoting, don't blame me...) What a great way to insult a computer. Of course, you can just keep calling it scatological things or insulting its parentage, or whatever.
Intelligent Design: Complexity does not mean there's a God. I picked up a used hardcover (published around 1990 or 91, but still very interesting) called COMPLEXITY: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos by M.Mitchell Waldrop. It's about the brilliant maverick minds who founded the scientific think tank Santa Fe Institute (which is now celebrating its 20th anniversary...www.santafe.edu.) Anyway the book doesn't take on ID specifically, but talks a lot about how complex things can emerge from simple rules (e.g. "A-life") and the work of Stuart Kauffman, John Holland, Chris Langton (try googling these) ...even Murray Gell-Mann is on their board of directors/science board. I bet they have a few things to say about refuting the silly God-stuff. No, you don't have to blame it on God, but it does take a new kind of science to explain biology (or model economics and other fields of study on biology, which is another thing they do.)
American Idol...is Simon Cowell still on it? Well, I'd been avoiding it for the silly reason that only AT&T/Cingular Wireless cellphone customers (as opposed to Verizon Wireless cellphone customers like me) could vote via text-message, which struck me as unfair when the old-fashioned-phone method (I hear) gives you mostly busy signals unless you win the connection-lotto game. Unless they have changed it the system is bad bad bad and technology favoritism (for their@*(&! SPONSOR). Yuk.
Kristin
I hit Preview several times while composing this message, so drafts would be saved to Clipboard...were I to open Notepad and right-click, a version of my message would be copied into Notepad...aw never mind.
David Ray <shaneeray@comcast.net>
Bellevue, WA - Tuesday, October 4 2005 21:30:48
Todd Haney <allazar@earthlink.net>
Catawba, NC - Tuesday, October 4 2005 19:43:31
RH#38 came in for a landing today. Excellent news about the Teat volume--I finally read both of them in the early '90's while at Ohio University (Athens) and enjoyed each page.
Great work on another issue.
Kind regards to you and the Mister....
Chuck
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 18:29:27
Rick, thanks for keeping the board up. Keep the faith.
Chuck
Gary Wallen <garydotwallen at gmail>
Ashland, MA - Tuesday, October 4 2005 18:28:43
yrs in perplexity over etiquette,
Gary
HARLAN ELLISON
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 17:22:6
Just lost a long, detailed response to your Veronica Lake question re "The Resurgence of Miss Ankle-Strap Wedgie." Crap!
The brief, though, is this: V.L. does INDEED mean Veronica Lake, as well as Valerie Lone. I did it ON PURPOSE. It was intended to evoke the memory of Veronica Lake ... and I went into long, historical detail about it ... in the posting now lost...CRAP! Oh, and, also
CRAP!
Yr. exasperated pal, Harlan
(P>S> NOW you figure it out...NOW???!!! Decades later? Talk about slow readers.)
Todd Cassel
AZ / USofA - Tuesday, October 4 2005 16:48:22
Not only does the new Rabbit Hole appear in the mailbox (with an announcement of the publication ((next summer, dammit)) of The Glass Teat and the Other Glass Teat), not only do I pick up Neil Gaiman's Anansi Boys, not only do the Val Lewton Collection, Alofred Hitchcock Presents Season One, Cronenberg's The Fly Special Edition and Abbott And Costello Movie Collection Volume 4 arrive at the stores to empty my wallet.
Not only that......but today, at Costco for almost half price....the ultimate......The Complete Calvin and Hobbes hardcover. A beautiful book and a great comic strip. I imagine ole C&H being right up Harlan's alley, though I'm not sure if he's ever commented on the strip.
Harlan, if you missed it when it lived, trust me: you'll love it.
-TODD
Alex Krislov <Alexkrislov@cs.com>
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 15:4:10
Happy New Year to Harlan and Susan, and everyone else here who is remotely Jewish. Comes to that, Chanukkah starts on Christmas this year, so L'shanah tovah to all you gents in the aisles, too. I'm easy.
Susan, the new "Rabbit Hole" reached Cleveland yesterday. I'd have told you then, but I tripped over a fifth-of-a-shilling squeezebox and couldn't get in. Excellent news about Charnel House!
Duane
Los Angeles, - Tuesday, October 4 2005 13:34:55
American Idol is a good show! And it's perfectly ok to watch some of these "contestants," who down to their bones believe they are God's gift, get taken down on national television.
In a way, I feel bad for them, because they were likely surrounded by people who convinced them that everything they did was simply genius, and who didn't teach them as children to find their REAL talents, whether they be in music or some other field.
That being said, I honestly believe that most of those who make it through the process into the "final 12" or whatever really do have talent, but unfortunately they have never taken the time to refine it by travelling through the slow, painful process of self-discovery, building a repetoire, and building an audience.
American Idol is a shortcut to short term success, and although Randy Jackson is fond of saying that they are looking to find artists who will have long term careers, it's just so many empty words.
Rick Wyatt <webmaster@harlanellison.com>
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 13:32:33
Thinking on Neil Gaiman, I am forced to remember the "bebop poet duel" scene in which a demon and Morpheus contend to conjure visions that trump each other. The demon's ultimate salvo sets him as the "anti-life", the "end of everything", destructor of all.
Morpheus's response? "I am hope."
No. Not the work of a cynic.
On the subject of hope, I was out of town for the past 4 days and was deeply tempted to shut down this board for the sake of my own pocketbook's safety. I was even encouraged to do so by Harlan. But I left it up, and I'm pleasantly surprised to see what has transpired while I was gone. A few of you broke rules and will be receiving narsty e-mails, but these were only fragmentary glitches.
I do so enjoy being occaisionally wrong about the nature of mobs and the Internet. Thank you.
Colleen
Honolulu, HI - Tuesday, October 4 2005 13:26:6
Hi Harlan:
Just got back from the mainland and opened the package you sent.
What a terrific selection of music! Mahalo nui loa!
Cheers,
Colleen
Robert Morales
New York City, - Tuesday, October 4 2005 13:4:40
Tori Amos is a rape survivor; Neil Gaiman is perhaps the last writer I can think of to whom the charge of cynicism could apply; comics have never been the sole province of children. Therefore, your comments are as uninformed as they are callow. Grow the fuck up.
EVERYBODY:
Harry Mathews spells his name with one "t." Honest.
P.A. BERMAN:
I've never been a fan of "Bleeding Stones" - growing up Catholic maxs one out on apocalyptic scenarios. But given that story's horror show premise, it would be hard to single any one instance of violence as more gratuitous or salacious than the next.
Kevin
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 12:42:47
Peg
Houston, TX - Tuesday, October 4 2005 12:19:56
I've already posted this on the other board, but thought it worth the circulation here. Here's an easy way to help tomorrow night...as long as you're up for dinner.
Dine for America: October 5
http://www.dineforamerica.org/
http://www.redcross.org/article/0,1072,0_312_4697,00.html
On October 5, 2005, restaurants across the country will band together in a "Dine for America" day, a national fundraising effort for the American Red Cross to help the survivors, their families and other arising needs from the Hurricane Katrina and Rita disasters.
Search link to locate participating restaurants; listings tell how the restaurant is participating (e.g., 10% of profits, collecting donations, etc.)
http://click.redcross-email.org/e/click/100210002415243/574/4863
Coming on the heels of Katrina, Rita seems like the storm that cried wolf. Agencies like Red Cross, are reporting that donations are down substantially for Rita as well. Sadly, though it might not have packed the punch Katrina did or hit a major US city, Rita still laid waste and made many homeless. So check the site, find a place, and head out for some pukka tuck tomorrow to help out those still in need!
August Wilson's Ghost
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 12:16:3
Frank Church
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 11:37:20
I still don't understand this aspect of evolution. Birds, dogs and the other animals have these great eyes, great noses, strong strides that help them run better, a way to consume more germs without getting sick. Rats and cockroaches prove just how unfair the real world is. An intelligent God or force or whatever could not have created such an odd world. The religious folks have no way to get around that hedge.
Basically, what I am saying is that humans suck.
---------
Harlan mentioned American Idol and it reminds me of why I hate current pop culture--or at least our corporate pop culture. American Idol is based on the idea that being famous is more important than being great at what you do. The singing and especially the songs are beside the point, what this kind of show is about is how lame one can be, especially how safe one can be without being seen as too 'artsy fartsy,' what the commonweal falls on their swords to avoid being seen as. So you have culture as safe as a bunny in a basket and you strip all danger out of your performance, to be welcomed and anointed by the young, culturally diseased state of being that is todays cultural rot. Then, you present some snake like Simon Cowell, who plays the fake elitist, railing on about how bad these misplaced performers are, feeling it is his right to belittle people, like a bully--crazy, since his sense of what is actually good is no better than the taste of the twinks who admire most of what is our awful culture. Cowell plays the set-up curmudgeon, making us feel better about our own sense of bad taste. The lie runs loose, commits cultural suicide, but stays alive in the history of all that is dull. A loud thud is all that you hear, but the people think it is applause.
------------
Gunther, welcome back. School these fucks--Europe has a pretty good thing going with its semi-socialist ecomony?
Love ya kitten.
Jeff R.
Philadelphia, Pa. - Tuesday, October 4 2005 11:7:12
...until I'm done with work for the day and get to purchase the Val Lewton DVD set. Remembering Harlan's "The Three Faces of Fear" essay, i can't wait to hear his comments on the DVDs.
Years after first reading "The Resurgence of Miss Ankle-Strap Wedgie," I finally noticed that Valerie Lone has the same initials as Veronica Lake, who disappeared in a similar fashion n the early Fifties. Coincidence, Harlan?
Rob
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 10:39:50
"The disc features MURDERS IN THE RUE MORGUE (1932), where Bela is the star, but also THE BLACK CAT (1934) and THE RAVEN (1935), where he shares equal billing with Boris Karloff, and THE INVISIBLE RAY (1937) and BLACK FRIDAY (1940) where he is in a supporting role to Karloff's lead.
The jewels of this collection for me are THE BLACK CAT and my very favorite, THE INVISIBLE RAY. I'm afraid I'm not a big fan of Bela Lugosi, he was not nearly the actor Karloff was and I don't think the original DRACULA holds up very well."
Rue Morgue sucked. I rented it about a year-and-a-half ago and found it very disappointing.
I like a LOT of things about the Browning Dracula - complete with its non-existent music score - even though the director himself was wooden and unremarkable, and the movie cannot compete with Murnau's Nosferatu.
...and nothing...NOTHING is "good" about a King Kong remake. I'm disgusted by the prospect; weary of these guys turning to great classics to make an easy buck.
Jan <ancoraio@web.de>
República Federal de Alemania - Tuesday, October 4 2005 9:59:6
Barney: "I won’t savage you and you don’t savage me was rule of the day and worked out fine."
And no comments from the man? Otherwise shame on you for leaving out such an interesting part! :-)
[A quote from Bret Easton Ellis' excellent new book (he also gave writing classes): "... my students looked at me in awe. While critiquing their stories I tried to ignore their expressions of fear and alarm."]
P.S. Barney, will you remember to tell us about your book, as soon as there is something definite?
David Loftus <dloft59@earthlink.net>
Portland, OR - Tuesday, October 4 2005 9:19:43
Wow, what a great night!
When I got home from work yesterday, I had no way of knowing that by the end of the evening I would have gotten to hear more of my "As You Like It" comrades strut their stuff, fallen in love with the voice and phrasing of a chanteuse who favors torch ballads (although her rendition of Etta James's "At Last" had some balls to it; and as I was leaving she thanked me for doing the Beach Boys' "God Only Knows"), and had the unique experience of seeing a tall, imposing M2F transsexual belt Black Sabbath's "War Pigs" (gratifyingly, at least the third anti-war song of the evening, including my pallid performance of Buffalo Springfield's "For What It's Worth").
In a word, there was an invitation on my home answering machine to go out to do karaoke at 9:00 p.m.
But what was even more unforeseen was that when I went with my original plan to go see Neil Gaiman speak and read at First Congregational Church at 7:30, he not only picked me to ask a question and mentioned my man Harlan Ellison in his answer, but read from his brand new novel _Anansi Boys_, in which the patriarch god of the title dies singing karaoke (apparently, he grabs a woman's tube top on his way to the floor, so that his son has the striking experience of having a strange woman's boobs staring at him as his father dies), after which his two sons go out on the town to mourn his passing and end up at a karaoke bar! Now, how cool is that?!!
(By the way, Gaiman said the Terry Gilliam film of "Good Omens" project is not quite dead; as some of you know, three years ago Gilliam secured $45 million overseas with Johnny Depp, Kirsten Dunst, and Robin Williams to star, but couldn't scare up the last $15 million domestically. Gaiman recently heard the project is not quite dead; he said he likes to say it's now lying in its coffin surrounded by seven dwarves.]
By the way, for those who care, this month's Story Time for Grownups is next Monday, Oct. 10. In honor of the Jewish New Year, I'll read a selection of stories on Jewish themes by a variety of storytellers, from Isaac Bashevis Singer and Mark Helprin to Joseph Epstein and Nathan Englander, at Grendel's Coffee House, 729 E. Burnside in Portland, 503-595-9550, 7:30 p.m.
From an Eastern European folk tale to a Middle Eastern war front, from a widower in Chicago to an Orthodox rabbi whose wife makes him hire on as a department store Santa in downtown Manhattan every Christmas to make ends meet, these stories portray the breadth of the Jewish experience, often with considerable humor. As always, admission is free, tho' the coffee and munchies are not.
SUSAN ELLISON
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 9:12:38
To answer your questions:
We will not offer the text book. You could try Amazon.
MEFISTO IN ONYX is in the collection SLIPPAGE.
Thank you. All best--Susan
Ezra Lb.
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 9:7:7
But there is another collection that has just come out that shouldn't go unremarked and that is THE BELA LUGOSI COLLECTION, somewhat misnamed as it is.
The disc features MURDERS IN THE RUE MORGUE (1932), where Bela is the star, but also THE BLACK CAT (1934) and THE RAVEN (1935), where he shares equal billing with Boris Karloff, and THE INVISIBLE RAY (1937) and BLACK FRIDAY (1940) where he is in a supporting role to Karloff's lead.
The jewels of this collection for me are THE BLACK CAT and my very favorite, THE INVISIBLE RAY. I'm afraid I'm not a big fan of Bela Lugosi, he was not nearly the actor Karloff was and I don't think the original DRACULA holds up very well.
Speaking of DRACULA, has anyone ever seen the BBC version with Louis Jordan as the thirsty Count? If you called it the "Masterpiece Theater" version you would not be far wrong, and because they did it in mini-series format they were very faithful to the book. The only major change I recall was eliminating one of Lucy's suitors. Jordan was terrific and the guy who played Renfield was also terrific. Some of the BBC stuff has made it onto DVD but I've never seen the DRACULA series. (And while I'm at it, I've seen DR WHO on DVD, where the heck is BLAKE'S 7?)
And the greatest thing about the upcoming KING KONG remake is that one of the likely byproducts will be a shiny version of the original on DVD, still magical to me.
John Adams <jadams01@sprynet.com>
Hot Springs, Arkansas - Tuesday, October 4 2005 8:36:28
John Clellon Holmes was one of my two great teachers (the other was the more recently departed Jim Whitehead--I hardly go a day without thinking of him), and he was indeed a kind and gentle man who'd stared hard at the worst in life and remained, as he said in his poem "Death Drag", 'avid for life in Dachau's time'. Fast, too--when I handed him that chapbook, open to that poem, and told him that was the poem that made me want to write again, he put his head in his hand for a moment, then wrote:
"For John, who wanted it here"
(Coincidentally, I started that custom of inscriptions on inner pages when I asked Harlan to sign my copy of _The Other Glass Teat_ [since stolen, and I know who, and I will have it back someday] on a page with a column that meant a lot to me.)
Eventually, I'll write about John, just like I'll write about Jim, but it's like John said in his journal when he heard the news about Kerouac's death, "I have always addressed my sentences to him, to his canny eye, and it will be different to write from now on." That journal entry starts the essay "Gone in October", and later, at the viewing of Kerouac's body: " 'It will be different to write from now on...': the words came back, and I hoped that no one would ever mourn me so self-centeredly."
John never got his due--he was not the spectactular stylist that so many of the Beats were, yet he wasn't conventional enough to meet the needs of those who love convention. I never could decide whether he was of the Beats but not with them, or with the Beats but not of them (probably this is closer), but either way, that in-betweenness--but +never+ lukewarmness--did his career no good, and that's probably why he spent enough time teaching to not get his fourth novel finished before he died, and that's a goddam shame.
Anyway, about writing for an audience versus writing for yourself: In the early eighties, _Rolling Stone_ ran a cover story, and interview with Warren Zevon, after he'd gotten off the sauce, and he said that, at a certain point in his sobering up, he wrote a song. It wasn't a very good song, he said, but it was the song he needed to write for himself. (I'm paraphrasing from memory, and I could have some details wrong.) I don't believe he ever performed that song or published it, but I'm sure glad he wrote it--what a great performer, what a a brilliant songwriter, what wonderful albums from the first to the last, what a loss.
Tony <hobgad95@aol.com>
Indy, - Tuesday, October 4 2005 8:31:23
Hi Susan,
I was wanting to reserve one the last Hemispheres you have listed in the current Rabbit Hole. I can have a check out by tomorrow. Also, will the Teat books be available through HERC or just the publisher?
Much thanks,
Tony Adams
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Tuesday, October 4 2005 7:53:33
Elijah -- Allow me to be among the first Webderlanders to wish you a hearty congratulations on your pending package. Wonderful news. Hope all goes smoothly!
______________________________________________________
Point about writing and audiences: even if you're not currently or expecting to be paid (payment rec'd being the definition of professional versus amateur in many books), you can still create art for an intended audience. I know very few writers who will sit down to write for the sheer joy of it. Many consider it agony, only a little less agonizing thatn NOT writing.
Performance art is a little more dicey. You can dance and sing for the simple pleasure it brings, and there's no necessary audience for that aspect of the art. On the other hand, few people would engage in modern dance for the sole reason of prancing about the house. My wife sings for both her own pleasure (I'll hear her humming a little tune while working on music charts or the like) while at the same time she very much does work her vocal talents for an audience -- and that, as was pointed out, is with the intention of receiving a check.
Quoting an old joke: A man walks into a bar and sidles up to a very attractive woman. "Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?" he asks. She surveys him head to toe and replies, "Yes, I guess so".
"So, would you sleep with me for ten dollars?"
"Of course not," she cries, "what do you take me for?"
(everyone)
"Well, we've established THAT," he smiles, "we're merely haggling over price."
Elijah Newton
Ypsilanti, MI - Tuesday, October 4 2005 7:8:51
Barney - thanks for the reposting. After reading the question, I was curious, too.
The topic may have passed by, but belatedly: I think the question of writing for self vs. writing for an audience is a snake which eats its own tail.
When I write I'm writing with the idea that, when finished, I will have something to share with other people. While I hold that goal in mind and use it as a motivator, the act of writing is a very personal thing, done both for my enjoyment and self-expression.
Skewing the question shows the same sort of push-me/pull-me relationship: I am not employed as a writer because nobody will pay me to do so (understandable, as I've produced no finished work), but neither can it be said that lacking an audience is the sole factor that keeps me from writing. At the end of a day, worn out from doing what puts bread on the table, I make the personal choice to engage in non-writing activities. Because, as we all know, writing is work and food needs to be made, conversation enjoyed, laundry/dishes done, etc etc.
So (in an unasked for aside) I'm struggling more with a sort of career inertia than questions of motivation. I'm generally feeling more and more like I have to spend my time doing 'responsible' things, much as I'd rather pursue the decidedly less certain goal of being a published author. Good things willing, you see, my wife and I will have a child come March. :)
Mark Goldberg <markabaddon@aol.com>
Minneapolis, - Tuesday, October 4 2005 6:32:37
Good review of the recently released Val Lewton collection in today's Minneapolis Star Tribune, with a mention of Harlan appearing on the documentary that accompanies the films.
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/5648577.html
Susan, I received Rabbit Hole #38, and will be sending in my check for a renewal very shortly, as soon as I decide whether I want to order a new copy of Edgeworks #2 (I loaned my original out to a friend who has since left my life) or the 50 Year Retrospective, to replace the 35 Year Retrospective I currently possess.
I know that Mefisto in Onyx is included in the 50 Year Retro, is it included in any other collections?
Inabif <inabif@aol.com>
New England - Tuesday, October 4 2005 6:12:43
A big dollop of gratitude to Mr. E for trumpeting John Clellon Holmes and to Mr. Dannelke for reminding us of the trumpeting. Holmes was a first–rate scribe and as marvelous as were his novels (GO, THE HORN, GET HOME FREE), his essays and general non-fiction pieces were a rare treat – Holmes thought as richly and as beautifully as he wrote. U of Arkansas Press issued a three volume set of his essays a few years back. His portrait of Kerouac’s last years is amazing – achingly poignant without ever allowing a single word to risk cheap sentiment. And from what I’ve heard from others who knew him: though not without his own demons, he was a warm and generous individual.
Gunther Schmidl
Linz, Austria - Tuesday, October 4 2005 4:45:9
no matter what your operating system, using either VideoLAN Client ( http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ ) or Mplayer (http://www.google.com/search?q=mplayer ) should allow you to play those DVDs.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Monday, October 3 2005 23:45:24
Susan - just got Rabbit Hole #38. Oops that means I gotta renew, and can you reserve me one of those last HEMISPHERES?? I might order some other stuff too (makes the shipping charge more efficient) ...I was just listening to my Audible.com downloads of HE and Robin Williams...AWESOME!!!!!!!!!! Unfortunately the audible software refuses to detect either my laptop's CD-ROM drive or my portable device (which won't activate because it thinks it's not there) so I can only listen to it on the computer. Arrrrgh.....
If you are reading this this IP addy (my father's desktop) is okay - the one my laptop was using on T-Mobile at Starbucks Coffee in my hometown must have been used by a troller/hate poster, it's blocked! And that was an expensive connection, wouldn't you guess. Oh well I downloaded some music (such as the new Coltrane/Thelonious Monk album), all legally&paid for, burned a CD and put them on my Creative Zen Micro wth the WMP sync feature which DOES know my device is there.
Technology bites.
Kristin
Lee <leelinda1@hotmail.com>
- Monday, October 3 2005 19:32:7
David L,
There’s no law against enjoying activities that are self-expressive. I can prance around the basement with my four year old until we are both out of breath and happy as can be, and what a wonderful way to spend an afternoon. Make some Keith Haring doodles on the wall paper with a blue crayon. Maybe a hundred years from now it will be hanging in a museum, credited to “Anonymous”. In the meantime, you had a ball. If it feels like art, then call it art and go have a sandwich.
But when you are a professional, you damn well do it for the audience. You may have started because you are good at it, you may have some real joy from the music moving through you, or whatever the feeling is that you have when you’re doing your artsy thing.
But it’s the audience that gets you paid.
There is probably no topic that can be approached with less precision than a generalized discussion about art. In the words of one of the great Russian dancers, on having a choreographer start explaining the back story of an abstract piece:
“Oh, please! Don’t tell me what it means.”
Chuck
- Monday, October 3 2005 19:20:19
Also, we know Locke must have had an accident, considering his condition when he went to Australia. He might have had a "near death experience."
There's also the possibility that Locke's paralysis was psychosomatic. A result of the way his bio-dad used and abandoned him.
Sooner or later, we'll find out.
Chuck
Mark Walsh
- Monday, October 3 2005 16:54:29
Steve and I have our tickets and our looking forward to meeting you and Harlan next week.
All Best,
Mark W.
Hank Graham <foolscap@comcast.net>
Seattle, WA - Monday, October 3 2005 16:44:10
David Loftus wrote:
> Although I’m about to take issue with the above, I did set off
> a firestorm many years ago on some Usenet group or other when
> I suggested much the same, declaring that Emily Dickinson’s
> poetry did not qualify as such until long after her death,
> AFTER other people got to see it, sort of under the principle
> of the tree falling in the forest.
I think part of the answer on this one was written about by Proust, in his "In Search of Lost Time." (Specifically, this is in "The Guermantes Way.")
"People of taste tell us nowadays that Renoir is a great nineteenth-century painter. But in so saying they forget the element of Time, and that it took a great deal of time, even at the height of the nineteenth century, for Renoir to be hailed as a great artist. To succeed thus in gaining recognition, the original painter or the original writer proceeds on the lines of the oculist. The course of treatment they give us by their painting or their prose is not always pleasant. When it is at an end the practitioner says to us: 'Now look!' And, lo and behold, the world ar4ound us (which was not created once and for all, but is created afresh as often as an original artist is born) appears to us entirely different from the old world, but perfectly clear. Women pass in the street, different from those we formerly saw, because they are Renoirs, those Renoirs we persistently refused to see as women."
I suspect Dickenson shared her work with some of the people around her. But in her case, her work was so different from what was expected of poetry in her time, it took a while for appreciation of what she'd wrought to catch up.
best,
Hank
Steven Burnap <webderland@burnap.net>
Walnut Creek, CA - Monday, October 3 2005 16:28:20
You can't really compare the new Battlestar Galactica with the old as they really have little in common other than some of the basic setting. The producers have as much as said that the name was mostly to sell it to the money people.
The spaceships do go woosh, though somewhere or another (the DVD extras I think) the producers mentioned that this was at the insistence of the people holding the purse strings and that they minimized it as much as they could.
They strive not so much for realism as the appearance of realism. There was a line from one of them that I loved (paraphrased from memory): "the plot drives everything but otherwise we try to err on the side of realism". Not for the sake of accuracy so much as to *look* accurate. (Often at the expense of easy viewing. Many of the action scenes look like they were shot by a scared shitless journalist.)
That's one of the best things about that show. It's gritty and dirty and not even slightly camp. It's hard to imagine how it could be any more unlike the original Battlestar Galactica.
But the thing that makes it great isn't whether or not the spaceships go "woosh". It's got good acting, good writing and good direction. Which is, of course, why "Lost" is so great. The networks have thrown up fifty "Lost" clones this season, but from what I've seen, they all lack one or more of those, and so aren't worth anyone's time.
The other show I've been watching that is just outstanding is "Rome", on HBO. I've never seen anything that so perfectly captures what Rome was actually like. I've only seen the first four episodes, so I'm not sure how it will be long-term, but it's pretty damn good so far.
It's shows like these that have convinced me that TV as a medium is improving.
SUSAN ELLISON
- Monday, October 3 2005 16:13:27
HE WILL APPEAR AT BOSTON UNIVERSITY:
775 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215
Metcalf Hall--Second Floor / George Sherman Union
Tuesday, 11 October 2005 at 6:00pm
Preview Reception at 5:00pm (approx)
Tickets are $25.00 each (B.U. students--Free)
To R.S.V.P. (617) 353-3697 For Information: (617) 353-3696
Email: friends@bu.edu
David Loftus <dloft59@earthlink.net>
Portland, OR - Monday, October 3 2005 14:19:10
Lee wrote:
> As for who you do it for: art needs both artist and audience to exist at all.
Although I’m about to take issue with the above, I did set off a firestorm many years ago on some Usenet group or other when I suggested much the same, declaring that Emily Dickinson’s poetry did not qualify as such until long after her death, AFTER other people got to see it, sort of under the principle of the tree falling in the forest. To qualify as art, it has to mean something to others, it has to communicate; if it stays locked in a trunk, then in some sense it is not (yet) art.
But that’s a different issue from why we strive to do it, I think. Even if there was no audience, even if it never reached an audience, wouldn’t you still be doing what you do, one way or another? If that’s the case, then how can you say we do it “for” the audience?
Michael Blum’s take was:
> I know that when I am on the stage acting that my goal is at least
> partially selfish, the ego-boo of applause,
Hmmm. I have to say the applause is almost an afterthought for me, and hardly a goal of the performance. If I had a really bad performance – not that this has ever happened, though there have been plenty of middling ones – and it was greeted with thunderous applause at the conclusion, I can’t say I’d feel much better about the work. To me the applause would just mean the audience was enthusiastic about something else, or really had no standards of taste at all. I think a good, unforeseen laugh or gasp from the audience in the middle of the show is worth more than a pro forma ovation at the end.
> but there is also the great joy of challenging oneself to create a
> performance that will reach people, that will create a moment
> of insight or emotion in the viewer.
A laudable goal. But how would you know when you’ve done that?
> Directing, however, is entirely about the audience; about transforming
> the words on paper to create a reality that will inform or amuse or
> enlighten, to CHANGE the viewer in some way, great or small. There
> are also several intangibles in the creative impulse as well – ideally,
> art should reflect some truth that the artist feels is important, and
> hopefully that impulse is to change the world for the better, even if
> it’s just one person.
The question remains the same as above. Another way of putting it is: If you never hear from anyone that you’ve done this, does that make all your effort a failure? Would you keep doing it if no one ever said anything to you? If the houses were all empty? (This certainly approximates the general experience of the writer!) And if so, then why would you be doing it?
> Then there are those times when the art itself drives the artist, when
> some piece or performance or whatever demands that you take action.
Exactly. For me, that’s what it comes down to. Doing something I can feel proud of, that I learn from, from which I grow as a person and/or as an artist, whether or not there’s anyone else there to witness it.
> This from me having just stepped off a stage in front of 700 people
> not an hour ago, for what that’s worth.
We did five shows last week, before crowds ranging from maybe 80 to 300. Most memorable was Saturday, when, about a quarter of the way into the play, just as the heroine was making her final speeches before dying, a wave of thunder rolled across the sky, followed immediately by an uncharacteristically heavy downpour (for Oregon), which drove cast and audience indoors at a sprint. They were with us all the way after that, and we did a pretty good job finishing it up!
Steven Utley <impatientape@yahoo.com>
Smyrna, Tennessee - Monday, October 3 2005 14:13:13
Back when I used manual typewriters in emulation of muh heroes Bradbury and Ellison, my second-favorite machine was a lima-bean-green Hermes office model that rather resembled (and weighed almost as much as) the front end of a 1954 Chevrolet. My favorite, however, was a viceless 1950s-vintage Olympia portable Lisa Tuttle had got, if memory serves, from her pa. I really should've bought or stolen it off her before she relocated to Old Blighty. It was a peach.
Barney Dannelke <dannelke@gmail.com>
Allentown, PA. - Monday, October 3 2005 13:50:46
***Eastbay***
Here is Harlan on the beats from 2002. I removed a little before and after stuff to Jim Davis and myself to make this a standalone post. Other than that I'm reposting it as it was. - B.
HARLAN ELLISON
- Tuesday, December 31 2002 10:38:38
I will say THIS about the Beats: I find it amusing as hell that all you tots, such a feisty literary lynch-mob of parvenus, johnnies-come-lately, naifs, broken-nosed thugs and yeggs, thump your chests about how "the Beats don't mean shit-all to me" ... even as you offer oblations at the altars of arty contemporary authors who wouldn't be writing as well as they do, as freely as they do, as innovatively as they do, had the Beat writers not gotten there first, sucked up the bullets first, paved the way first, built the pontoon bridges first. Fascinating to me, the self-centered lack of historical perspective persistently demonstrated by those of you who arrogantly trumpet a demeanor that says IF IT HAPPENED BEFORE I NOTICED IT, THEN IT DON'T MEAN SHIT TO ME. Since most of you haven't even READ the best of the Beats--and I'm not speaking of Ginsburg or Corso or Ferlinghetti or Lawrence Lipton or even Kerouac--brilliant writers...like John Clellon Holmes's GO or THE HORN, or Burroughs's JUNKIE (under the name Billy Lee), or Chandler Brossard or Harvey Swados...well, your protestations of pooh-pooh and freedom from veneration are merely the ignorant posturing of Me Generation twerps. In my view.
Barney, thus, misquotes me. Or, rather, he misEMPHASIZES what I said to him, that night. What I said, and what he should have heard, was that I was just getting started when the Beat Movement was at its peak, and I had already been "formed" by other writers' work. So I wasn't "part of that crowd." But was I influenced by the Beats? Yes. Definitely. To the good? Yes. Definitely. Did I then, and do I now, respect and admire a great deal of what they wrote and the effect they had on world, not just American, literature? Yes. Definitely. I wasn't a Beat Writer, but I would not be writing today what I write today, had I not read TRISTESSA and THE SUBTERRANEANS and THE BOLD SABOTEURS and OUT WENT THE CANDLE, to name just a few that still stand forth in memory after fifty years.
Yr. Pal, Harlan
Charlie
St. Pete, FL - Monday, October 3 2005 13:11:38
Bibliophiles: Does anyone have an answer to the question as to the first book that contained a photograph of the author within the book?
Eastbay
- Monday, October 3 2005 13:0:12
For those in the SF area (or who are going to be in the SF area late this week and next)
http://www.litquake.org/index.php?cat=2
I've read Howl several dozen times over the past couple of years (since when I first picked it up) but it never occured to me that 2005 is its 50th b-day. Was reading the Sunday paper (that's the print version, the monster mass of ink and paper the cat loves to tear to shreds... proud to say this young, hip 20something doesn't just get his news from the net) and lo and behold there was an article about the poem's anniversary.
From Ginsberg I went to Kerouac to Cassady to Snyder...(and from there to Buddhist texts). Besides being a damned good piece of writing Howl introduced me to a whole different universe of poetry and lit.
Harlan did you ever cross paths and talk shop with any of the Beat writers? What was/is your impression of these gentlemen and their work?
Feel like I've found myself in on Bizarro world...people talking about how great Battlestar Galatica is. You've guys have got me curious. Kinda wish I had the Sci-Fi (ugh) Channel to see what this new version is like.
Personally I'm a Law and Order junkie.
Knight of the Black Rose
Cincinnati, OH - Monday, October 3 2005 10:44:56
I can also safely say that by following their comic and their page's posts that they are, in fact, jerks. They admitted as much in their original post which described the fight.
From reading your explanation here, it sounds like they probably took offense at something and perceived there to be a fight when there wasn't one. Such misunderstandings happen.
I have often felt that if I ever met any of the great writers whom I love that they would probably hate me. Because of this, I try not to take personal sides in these types of things. Still, I hope the PA guys come to their senses and that you can all get along in the future if you should happen to cross paths again.
Rob
- Monday, October 3 2005 10:18:50
I kept bypassing the show because the characters looked like the usual nauseating tv cliches: the Hot Babe in Short Shorts, the Nurd, the Cool Studzy Dude, the Professor and Mary Ann, etc.
...not to mention the same flatulent "dramatic" expressions I see on EVERY modern show (I mean we're talkin' real actin' range here)...
...and while I generally trust my instincts, this required a critiquing from someone like Harlan to draw my attention back for a second look.
I'll see what they're really up to.
And then report back here to tell you whether or not Harlan was fulla shit.
Mark Goldberg <markabaddon@aol.com>
Minneapolis, - Monday, October 3 2005 10:10:8
I have not seen Lost but, from everyone I know that watches the show, it certainly sounds like an original and well written show. I may ask Hanukkah Harry to leave Season 1 on DVD as a gift in December.
Ezra, the new Battlestar Galactica is the only show on TV that I regularly watch now. They have really tried to both modernize the show and bring a sense of realism to the situation facing the survivors of the Colonial Attack.
The role of the military has been greatly enhanced in this series, and it is very insightful to talk with a buddy of mine, who is ex-military and also a fan of the show, to see how accurately military protocols are followed. So far, they are pretty accurate.
Galactica also won a Hugo last year for the Best Science Fiction Writing on television. I realize that the competition was not that tough, but that does not take away the fact that this is truly a well written and very intense show.
As for A History of Violence, I have not seen it yet but am very intrigued by the film. In recent interviews, I have heard that Cronenberg and Mortensen have talked about this film as being a metaphor for American foreign policy. Specifically, that Viggo's character feels justified in using violence against "bad guys" but does not realize the consequences of his actions until later.
Ezra Lb.
- Monday, October 3 2005 9:40:30
I saw A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE over the weekend. Excellent movie that works on many levels (and it is a helluva "western"). Who knew Viggo could actually act? Ed Harris and William Hurt both are used to best effect as well. The center of the movie though is the kid who plays Viggo's son whose name escapes me right now.
And all of it because two murderous thugs walk into the wrong damn diner.
Hey PAB you should worry about our ability to debate AFTER you try to make your case NOT before.
Frank Church
- Monday, October 3 2005 9:19:6
Now, the new season of the West Wing is stellar. Great writing and it seems Jeaneane Garafalo has turned out to be a great actress.
----------
They have at least three new crime scene investigation, dead body on a slab shows. And, the shows just get more gory and more unseemly. There is this contest on how one can outsleaze the other.
I have noticed that media has become more violent since Bush got elected. Republicans love to stick the knife in and break it off.
Jim Lewis <jlew32@hotmail.com>
Savannah, GA - Monday, October 3 2005 9:17:47
I quote Adam-Troy Castro...
"...Cronenberg's A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, which though set in contemporary Indiana, and concluding in Pennsylvania, is the best western in years..."
I had not thought of AHOV as a western, but it makes sense. Just in terms of Cronenberg's own films, I saw flashes of DEAD RINGERS and THE DEAD ZONE (and maybe even a little CRASH, too).
I am still trying to puzzle out what his comments on violence were. Is it good, bad, or merely pragmatic in a case-by-case basis? I may even be trying to place value where there is none. Cronenberg is notorious for being "amoral" on certain subjects. I don't mean this in a bad way...it is just that Cronenberg never seems to place his pictures in a "this is good/that is bad" argument. He simply shows the audience what is happening.
I remember reading somewhere that HE thought that Cronenberg was one of the few directors that he would like to work with. That would be an interesting combination...HE's nostalgia with Cronenberg's technological view. What would JEFFTY IS FIVE look like?
rich
- Monday, October 3 2005 8:13:36
I'm not saying that's how HE is or does or feels or whatever, but, to me at least, I'm more aware of the limitations of writer and reader. It was one of those things that I knew (and you probably did too), but to have it put in so succinct a manner makes me feel like Szilard when he crossed that street in 1933. _Ah, of course_!
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Monday, October 3 2005 7:54:34
Wonderful, wonderful quotes. I plan to use them as ammunition at the next Writers' Bloc party ... well, parts of them (my memorization skills being what they are).
The quote from Matthews hits home given that the vast majority of non-performance art -- written, penciled, painted, drawn, shot, etc -- necessitates a lot of work prior to an audience's participation. Unlike the performing arts, which acquire an immediate reaction, it's often the case with non-performing works where the "audience" must relate their reactions, versus the often limited capability of the artist to witness them. This allows the audience to filter their true visceral reactions, which may or may not be a good thing.
I kind of figure this is why readings and "openings" are simultaneously so popular and unpopular with writers and artists. It's a chance to see the results of your work, but at the same time it's likely to be the most naked an artist ever feels.
Steve B
_________________________________________________
"Firefly in the archives"
I hear there's an ointment for that.
Barney Dannelke <dannelke@gmail.com>
Allentown, PA. - Monday, October 3 2005 7:35:56
***Harlan*** The ONE LIFE FURNISHED... quote made me wonder, if I'd had one of those beachcomber metal detectors this past February in Painesville, if Finder Doug and I might have found a cache of tin soldiers (or the cheaper soft lead bendable ones) anywhere near that gnarled old tree?
[Harlan Ellison true fact. There is an ENORMOUS old tree deforming the curb just to the right of Harlan's house in Painesville. Nowadays you would describe it as one of Tolkien's Ents but it instantly reminded me of the cranky old trees that throw apples at Dorothy in the Wizard of OZ. I paid attention to this thing when I was out there this past winter because I had some old apple trees in my yard when I was a kid. When you're locked in mortal combat with childhood, certain trees can make up a decent part of your personal mythology, like an imaginary friend or a really quiet and stationary pet. I asked Harlan and he did indeed remember the tree.]
***Keith*** I left out details about the story because it's no good to pre-tell a short-short like that. The reason I didn't link the art was because at first I couldn't find Daniels part of the site AND THEN I realized I didn't want to cut into the gosh-wow factor if it ended up being a cover a few months from now. Leave 'em wanting more was the idea. But since Harlan doesn't mind, here's a direct link;
http://elfwood.lysator.liu.se/art/h/u/hubert/nirvana_.jpg.html
***everybody else*** I checked with Harlan yesterday. We're cool in our crazy Uncle versus the impertinant snot sort of way. And yes, it was mean, closing the piece with that, but if I can't insult him on physicality I got nothin'. It's like the Republican senior senator who once told Clinton privately that if they didn't occasionally cheat when attacking Clinton, they'd never win. And now, we've talked it too much and ruined the fun. Y'see?
- Barney
Back to the Ivory Tower of cleaning out my garage on a glorious Fall day.
P.A. Berman
- Monday, October 3 2005 7:24:38
Robert Morales said, "Harlan is against the GRATUITOUS or SALACIOUS depiction of violence toward women. "
Ever read "Bleeding Stones"? I think your above statement is very much debatable. The question is, can it be debated *here*?
PAB
Gunther Schmidl
Linz, Austria - Monday, October 3 2005 6:25:7
I agree with the praise heaped on Lost (although some of the characters do annoy the hell out of me), but personally find Battlestar Galactica to be *the* best show of the last, oh, decade or so. Certainly the most gripping and watchable and sf since Babylon 5 came out.
And Brian -- I don't know if you've watched Veronica Mars, but that show sucked me in from episode 1. Tightly written and compelling, in my opinion, at least as far as I've seen it.
Oh, and for those who don't know it -- Television Without Pity provides snarky weekly recaps of all three shows, and I find them well worth reading. They also have recaps of (among other shows) Firefly in the archives.
Adam-Troy Castro <adamcastro999@yahoo.com>
- Monday, October 3 2005 5:52:53
From his last name.
Also, the guy in the episode died, so he couldn't have been Locke.
Saw SERENITY last night. Now, 'taint a great film, by any means. It's a space opera, based on a tv show. But when it ended, my friends and I whoo-hooed. It's so unusual to see one of these things (by which I mean, not only sf-adventure films, but action movies in general), with decent dialogue, protagonists defined by more than one character trait, and a defining moment where flawed people find themselves moved to do the right thing, that it emerged as exceptional. Truly, well done.
This, the same weekend as the local release of Cronenberg's A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, which though set in contemporary Indiana, and concluding in Pennsylvania, is the best western in years...!
Robert Morales
New York City, - Monday, October 3 2005 4:9:59
Robert Morales
New York City, - Monday, October 3 2005 3:44:19
Since Spielberg deviated from Wells' novel, to have the tripods buried on Earth for millennia, waiting for a riped opportunity to eradicate humanity - wouldn't it have been MORE shocking (and by your sense of art, more effective) if they'd arisen during the Nativity and speared the Holy Mother and the Blessed Fetus? IMHO, I think they pissed away a heck of a chance to "go for it."
Harlan is against the GRATUITOUS or SALACIOUS depiction of violence toward women. He's not against the shower scene in a famous thriller; both his Jack the Ripper and Kitty Genovese stories are brutally -- yet empathetically -- graphic.
Cliches work to the extent that, given a new context, they're useful tropes. To hit them sans context is fetishism; and while all art is fetishistic in part, little fetish rises to the level of art. And as any junkie will tell you, hitting the same spot again and again results in a collapsed vein.
By the way, do your homework: Harlan LIKES Tobe Hooper and INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM. So do I.
STEVE BARBER -- Re: Writers and their audience, these quotes:
“…If we can agree that satisfaction finds expression in participation, we are faced with the inevitable question: How can you be satisfied in the act of writing, sitting alone at your desk? What can you participate in? Whom do you participate with?
“To the last of these questions the answer must take the shape of that legendary beast, The Reader. Let me remind you of something you have probably found out for yourselves: the writer has no communication with his actual readers (aside from himself). To elaborate the point: for a number of reasons, we cling to the notion that the writer communicates with the reader the way a speaker communicates with a listener, or a letter writer with a correspondent. These analogies can only mislead us. When I speak to you in conversation, I can tell I am communicating with you by your response (or lack of response, which is only another kind of response). I can expect an answer to a letter I write; the answer will validate my communication. A writer never receives that validation from his readers, no matter how strongly they feel about what he has written. They provide no feedback, without which direct communication, since it depends on a two-way relationship, disappears. You may point out that readers can tell me about what I have written in conversation, letters, reviews. These apparent exceptions only confirm the rule, because they always come hopelessly late – weeks, months, or years after the moment when I was writing my poem or story or essay. These comments have lost all relevance, and they almost always embarrass more than they please me. My reader is discussing an event that lies dead and buried in the past. I invariably feel that I’m being told how beautiful my ex-wife is.
“The question of how to participate with your reader therefore remains an urgent one. Solving it – and understanding how it may be solved – means replacing our intuitive notion that the writer is ‘saying something’ to the reader with a new conception of their relationship. I suggest that in order to guarantee his participation with the reader, a writer does two things. First, he gives up his claim to be the one in the relationship who creates. Second, to establish a space in which participation can take place, he chooses as the innermost substance of what he is writing a terrain unfamiliar to both the reader and himself…”
-- Harry Mathews, IMMEASURABLE DISTANCES: The Collected Essays (The Lapin Press, 1991)
“…It’s appropriate to pause and say that the writer is one who, embarking upon a task, does not know what to do. …Writing is a process of dealing with not-knowing, a forcing of what and how. We have all heard novelists testify to the fact that, beginning a new book, they are utterly baffled as to how to proceed, what should be written and how it might be written, even though they’ve done a dozen. At best there’s a slender intuition, not much greater than an inch. The anxiety attached to this situation is not inconsiderable. ‘Nothing to paint and nothing to paint with,’ as Beckett says of Bram van Velde. The not-knowing is not simple, because it’s hedged about with prohibitions, roads that may not be taken. The more serious the artist, the more problems he takes into account and the more considerations limit his possible initiatives …”
-- Donald Barthelme, NOT-KNOWING: The Essays and Interviews (Vintage, 1997)
...and, in my mind somehow conflating the sentiments expressed by Mathews and Barthelme, this handy metaphor:
“…To one side of the path I had always buried my toy soldiers. For no other reason than to bury them, know I had a secret place, and later dig them up again, as if finding treasure.”
-- Harlan Ellison, “One Life, Furnished in Early Poverty” (1969)
P.A. Berman
- Sunday, October 2 2005 20:10:33
Adam Troy Castro: What makes you think that person was S&B's dad? (I'm not spoilering this b/c if you haven't been watching the show, you won't have any idea what I'm talking about, and by the time you catch up, you will most definitely have forgotten this in all the craziness). I thought that the guy you're talking about was Locke. That would make more sense IMO, but if you have compelling evidence to the contrary, please e-mail me (my address is easily available on the Forum memberlist).
Yours in LOST obsession,
PAB
Otto <ottomaniac@yahoo.com>
- Sunday, October 2 2005 18:45:31
Heys, y'all - I used to be a quasi-regular on the old board back around 1998-2000, and drifted away partially because I have the attention span of a toaster, partially because my Internet addiction problems grew too vast to be contained within a single bulletin board.
That having been said, I'm sorry to confess that it's the Penny Arcade furor that's brought me back, giggling all the way. I'm another one who's got to confess that I enjoy the work on both sides of the equation, and I'm sorry things didn't go well, sorry it bizarrely became such an online ruckus, and most of all sorry I wasn't at Foolscap because it sounds like it was a wicked good time.
I'm glad to see the board has kept on keepin' on, and I applaud those who are able to maintain a really pretty damn cool intellectual life going on here.
Terence
U.S.A. - Sunday, October 2 2005 18:44:52
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Sunday, October 2 2005 17:16:47
I had already scribbled in what my father calls a Ukranian Palm Pilot (that was what he wrote on the cover as a joke; he has a real Palm Pilot now) while eating lunch, a story of sorts inspired by Art Widner's car! No, it really was. Eventually I typed it and gave it to him, saying yeah, this is amateur shit, although you're welcome to it if you want it for your fanzine, or just to puff up your own ego! I'd written for his letterzine years back - I don't think I even remember what; the kind of thing one might blog on LiveJournal these days, maybe....I don't even know how to reach the man since I quit subscribing/contributing. Oh well. I also typed the workshop thing even though revising was supposed to be a no-no (what use is handwriting that small? I might as well have written it on my arm or something) and gave it to Kathleen whatzername, for better or for worse - it's not like we were all going to send this stuff to publishers.
I don't know if I can afford to go to another con anytime soon and I might start doubting my OWN sanity if I did.
Mr Widner told me his friend who painted the car was half Aborigine....Oops, I think I mistook it for Native American, although I tried to avoid too many overt cultural references, maybe it came across and I hope I didn't offend, but then I'll never know, if we don't have each other's snail mail addresses.
yeah, HE, I know you & Barney go way back, so you can josh...you have to know someone awfully well before you can josh with them and not have them take it wrong...most of my own attempts at being funny go down with a thud and make me afraid to open my mouth.....
IF the parrot incident starts getting around fandom...unfortunately people who don't like Harlan might start cheering for the parrot. I don't dare tell that story to many people I know, because they would get it wrong. They'll think someone deliberately set it on him, (not true!) or that it was avenging every poor innocent fanboy (and not so innocent person who nevertheless parades his wounds and plays victim to get sympathy) Harlan has allegedly "bitten" in the last 50 years! I dunno - the bird's owner seemed to want to go around telling people! You can tell the absolute truth and still create an urban legend because your friends tell their friends who tell THEIRS and the tale grows in the telling until it gets out of hand.
Kristin
Amy Kostyn-Jenkins <akojenkins@aol.com>
- Sunday, October 2 2005 12:26:52
BARNEY, you lying, mo'fo' son of a Yeti! *I* chose last! Yes, it was I, the one who held up the whole damned workshop while agonizing over the three-picture choice, none of which sparked synapse one in my tired li'l brain. I was the one who drew the gentle ire of our lovely host by not making my decision--well, DECISIVELY enough! Apparently "fine" doesn't cut it in Workshopland.
I expected to be intimidated by writing in a group setting. I was not. I expected to be awed and frightened into silence by writing in front of Harlan. Again, no. Not at all. I expected my brain to kick up something worthwhile, because it so rarely misfires. Well, shit. The bitch wouldn't turn over. It left me there, fingers moving, pen on paper, with absolutely NOTHING to say. C'est le guerre. So, however I might've appeared--shy, nervous, fill in the appropriate weak emotion here--I was not. I was ANGRY. I'm not concerned about disappointing others. I worry about letting myself down. And on that day, I did. Completely.
But enough with the wah-wah.
I did learn from the workshop. Not about my writing, but myself.
1) I try WAY too hard to avoid stepping on people's toes. The three pictures that DID interest me as they passed by? Barney's, Doug's and Harlan's. No lie. Did I say anything? Did I lay claim to ANY of them as they touched my fingers and imagination? Nope. Why? Because EVERYONE deserved to see them before we made our choices. So you'd think I'd speak up as they were offered up to the group. Did I jump? No. I played the fucking wallflower coward and let them go--all of them. By the time it came down to the final three unclaimed pictures, I honestly did not care which one I got, because none of them spoke to me. So, really--I got what I deserved.
2) I need to practice reading my work aloud. I don't differentiate between characters, and I don't project. I say the words, but I do not PERFORM. Part of what makes Harlan so dynamic is the life he breathes into each word he speaks. I want that for myself. I don't think it's too late to learn.
3) Keep your arms away from large parrots.
And a suggestion for future workshops. Don't give people a choice. Pass out the pictures face-down, randomly, hit the timer and go. THAT will put everyone on level ground.
LOST
I'm new to the show. I've seen the first two episodes of season two. I like it a lot. Shows I enjoy tend to get cancelled right away, so if this happens to "Lost," you might as well go ahead and blame me. I'm used to it.
Neal Johnson
- Sunday, October 2 2005 11:53:51
ya'll dig DEADWOOD, c'rect?
great cocksucker of a show, that one
Neal
J. Jacobs <hateotron@yahoo.com>
Alabama - Sunday, October 2 2005 10:53:39
In a fantasy knife fight between you and Kurt Vonnegut, who do you think would win?
HARLAN ELLISON
- Sunday, October 2 2005 10:44:26
No big secret about the piece of art I chose. I guess Barney just overlooked including it in his essay. No big deal.
Go to that elfwood.com site, punch up the name Hubert J. Daniel, and the piece is titled "Nirvana."
Okay?
Yr. pal, Harlan
HARLAN ELLISON
- Sunday, October 2 2005 10:36:24
I was joshing with Barney.
he
Keith Cramer <remarck@hotmail.com>
Arlington, VA - Sunday, October 2 2005 9:58:37
That should be "What WAS Harlan's poison?"
and
"the" Aitch-ster.
sheesh. being in Boston this weekend really makes me lazy.
-Keith
Keith Cramer <remarck@hotmail.com>
Arlington, VA - Sunday, October 2 2005 9:55:15
Barney,
I loved your piece about the workshop at Foolscap, executed in your typically excellent mock-sardonic style, but WTF?
Here's what you said: "We all picked our poison and Harlan chose last. Moreover he picked a piece, that while extremely well executed, I pegged as about the last thing he would want, as it featured, well, you’ll see."
Well, uh, I'm no seeing, meester. Fess up. What what Harlan's poison?
Unless, heaven and hell forbid, you think we're ALL Kreskin's.
-Keither
PS - my weak and feeble brain has just informed me, after writing the above, that Aitch-ster might not want that info revealed for various reasons.
SUSAN ELLISON
- Sunday, October 2 2005 9:13:32
Peg--No problem. In a few days you should be getting your copy of RABBIT HOLE #38 with the HERC discount on THE ESSENTIAL ELLISON. Please let me know when your RH arrives.
Thank you. --Susan
Eric Martin
- Sunday, October 2 2005 7:8:28
It would be easy to note that HE starts off about one hundred yards ahead of everyone, since he's a working writer and has the love of everyone in the room. But he has to cross the line like everyone else, and read an unedited piece to a group of people whose critical faculties, revved up by having their own work examined, will be hanging on every word. Hats off to you all.
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Sunday, October 2 2005 6:51:32
Thank you to Rob, ReverendTed, Lee, David L, Kristin, Michael and everyone else who responded to my question.
Makes you think, no? I've found that my so-called "zen of photography" is the active motivation when I'm out shooting. Not only do I not consider an audience at that point, but I'm really only attentive to things that catch my eye.
On the other hand, good taste and solid editing keeps me from sharing each and every shot with society ["millions cheer!"]) -- it's the act of editing (yes, photographers edit, in a couple of ways) that leans toward grabbing someone else's attention and saying "lookee what I done!".
_______________________________________________
I learned "writing on command" at the hands of that semi-wretched institution USC's Department of Journalism. Which explains a lot, if you know me.
_______________________________________________
LOST is brilliant. I still maintain that the dude in the hatchy-hole won it from Danielle (the French Woman and Minbari ambassador) in the divorce settlement. My theory and I'm sticking to it.
_______________________________________________
(Hmmm. Point of note. I edited this post five times before posting, with the intent each time of it being viewed by an audience. I may have to rethink something here....)
Adam-Troy Castro <adamcastro999@yahoo.com>
- Sunday, October 2 2005 6:27:47
Enthusiastic second to Harlan's recommendation of LOST. The show has layers upon layers, both in terms of its basic concept, and its unveiling of character. Everything and everybody in it has depths unsuspected at first encounter.
There are no heroes, no villains. Everybody is both right AND wrong. Jack and Locke may see each other as antagonists, but they're both well-meaning, merely operating from different assumptions. And the show deserves some kind of medal for including a sympathetic Iraqi, at this historical moment.
The show reveals even more intricacies if you catch the various indications of unsuspected prior connections between the castaways, such as
SPOILER WARNING
...Hurley owning Locke's place of employment, or last week's fleeting revelation that surgeon Jack presided over the death of Shannon and Boone's father.
One of the best shows tv has seen in years...
Brad Stevens
- Sunday, October 2 2005 3:2:58
"LOST is to wildly inventive and utterly mesmerizing narrative as CITIZEN KANE, THE MAGNIFICENT 7 and THRONE OF BLOOD are to cinema"
THE MAGNIFICENT 7? Did you mean THE SEVEN SAMURAI?
Chuck
- Sunday, October 2 2005 0:42:47
One program I've missed since I had to give up cable back in '03 is Monk. I've managed to get to the end of season two now thanks to Blockbuster Video. Monk is one of the few things I still miss about cable. Assuming it hasn't jumped the shark while I wasn't watching.
Chuck
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Saturday, October 1 2005 23:49:13
Barney, I loved that workshop critique of your work..."gratuitous profanity." (I forget if it was Harlan or one of the other people there who said so, but HE agreed)
Harlan's stories (and speeches) aren't exactly all rated G, but a seasoned professional of proven talent can get away with things a newbie or wannabe absolutely cannot! Think of all the amateurs trying "typewriter tricks" a la THE DEMOLISHED MAN or several Harlan stories I can recall....playing with your computer fonts (ridiculously easy with a Mac or even a PC these days) is the surest way to get your slush-pile manuscript thrown in the trash. You have to know the rules before you can break them.
LOST...the show has been praised by many, many intelligent people; I'm not surprised Harlan is among them. (Although praise from him is considered pretty high praise by those familiar with stuff like THE GLASS TEAT.)Hmm...can you get the DVDs from Netflix? We're thinking of doing that even though my brother works at Hollywood Video and can get the family video rentals for free....mostly with television you either have to buy it all or rent 1-2 episodes at a time; whole series take too long to watch for traditional rentals to really work.
Wednesdays. Just like with Babylon 5 which I had to catch up on in the TNT reruns mostly (depriving myself of sleep for weeks) to have seen it all in time for the 5th season....wednesdays is just not my tv-watching night; it's when I like to gather with fannish friends, and i oftne have to fight over th VCR too, or don't have time to watch the tapes! OK, let's say i get hold of the season one dvds; know of any good online episode guides for catching up with missed episodes?
So many EVERYTHING, so little time. (Barney, can you let me know when your essay on slash fanfiction comes out? I want a copy, although it's not in the the sort of publication you'd find me subscribing to.)
Kristin
Harlan helped me find "Doctor Who" years ago
HARLAN ELLISON
- Saturday, October 1 2005 22:28:36
Written in 9 seconds, in tears / 7 words
h.ellison
Michael D. Blum <leftearpro@hotmail.com>
Albuquerque, NM - Saturday, October 1 2005 22:11:40
STEVE BARBER: Your question of why we make art is one that I have asked myself many times, one that I think every artist SHOULD ask themselves… and I don’t think there is a simple answer. I know that when I am on the stage acting that my goal is at least partially selfish, the ego-boo of applause, but there is also the great joy of challenging oneself to create a performance that will reach people, that will create a moment of insight or emotion in the viewer. Directing, however, is entirely about the audience; about transforming the words on paper to create a reality that will inform or amuse or enlighten, to CHANGE the viewer in some way, great or small. There are also several intangibles in the creative impulse as well – ideally, art should reflect some truth that the artist feels is important, and hopefully that impulse is to change the world for the better, even if it’s just one person. Then there are those times when the art itself drives the artist, when some piece or performance or whatever demands that you take action.
So I guess the short answer is: both.
This from me having just stepped off a stage in front of 700 people not an hour ago, for what that’s worth.
Best to all,
Michael
Barney Dannelke <dannelke@gmail.com>
Allentown, PA. - Saturday, October 1 2005 21:54:35
There is a moment in the hyperactive and wickedly smart comic book series TRANSMETROPOLITAN where Spider Jerusalem, the futuristic political journalist and militant gonzo activist, having just suffered a crippling stroke of some sort, is informed by his Doctor that he has contracted something called I-Pollen Degenerative Disorder, and that in the coming few months as this vicious brain cancer deus ex machina progresses he is going to lose all motor and cognitive skills. As the Doctor reels off the horrible consequences of this, Spider starts grinning, and by the time he’s done Spider looks about as happy as a shark about to eat a baby penguin. When the Doctor asks him why the hell he’s grinning, Spider responds in the royal we of editors and people with tapeworms, “So we’ve got a deadline. We can do deadlines.”
Hallelujah. Indeed. Writers can do deadlines.
I’d like to tell you about a little adventure I had this past weekend. At least for me it was an adventure and a bit of a revelation. I think for others it was probably as fun as learning what flop sweat is like after they thought they had a part nailed in a play or coming face to face with a blood sport Hemingway liked to call “boxing Turgenev.”
The setting was Foolscap VII up in Bellevue Washington. The programming had a nice little break from the usual panel fiascos such as Circular Quest Fantasies: Threat or Menace? and Do Wookies have G-spots? Instead, off to one side, minding it’s own business on Saturday at 3PM was Show Me A Story: A Workshop moderated by Harlan Ellison with Manny Frishberg, Sandra Odell and Amy Thompson. When I saw this on the programming schedule I foolishly assumed we would bring in some finished material that would be tossed around for some tough love and suggestions for a final polish.
Ha! Ha ha ha. When I’m wrong, boys and girls I go right off the rails. You’ll see.
Friday morning I approached the Con chair and was told that the workshop was booked in advance and the event could only accommodate sixteen. Damn. Still, it was reasonable. Even sixteen story critiques in an hour and a half would be pushing it. Still, I clutched my Twain pages and my little horror story to my chest and said, “Well, if anybody drops out or there’s a seat on the wall, let me know. I’ll be quiet and keep a low profile.”
First we lie – then we write.
The panel rolls around and they had three or four dropouts. Like a questionable character in the third reel of a heist film, suddenly, I’m in. And here’s how it went down. Rainier is a conference room that’s just about ALL table. The ambitious dozen take their places and suddenly all I can think of is 12 Angry Men. Looking back on that moment I’m not sure that being verbally abused by Lee J. Cobb would have been so bad in comparison, but that feeling quickly passed. Aside from the four already mentioned, there was Kristin Ruhle on my right and Doug Lane and Amy Kosten-Jenkins from Webderland on my left. Also present was Kathleen Retz who ran the Foolscap art show. If Doug or anybody else wants to cough up the names I’m missing I’d appreciate it. I’m moving on with apologies to those whose names I’ve misplaced.
At this point Harlan laid out the ground rules. Ms. Retz had a folder and in it she had color reproductions of art she had pulled off the Internet. I’m told that much of the art was pulled from Elfwood.com
Ok. I have just been to this site and there are over 600 galleries, each with dozens of pieces so I’m not going to even try to cite the individual works. As I write this I have a query out to Ms. Retz and may know more later. I’m sure Doug and Kristen and Amy remember their pieces. In fact, I suspect we all have our art burned into our brains for good or ill. Adrenalin does wonders for memory.
Back to the “rules.” Harlan said that we were each to pick a piece of art, and then we were going to sit down and WRITE A STORY in approximately the next half hour. These we would then read aloud, and a brief round-robin critique of the story would take place. As Doug likes to say, “Holy Jeebus!” Now you, sitting in front of your monitor at home may square your shoulders and say to yourself “yeah, sure, big deal, I could do that”, but I’m telling you I’m real glad I had the medicine man bless my bulletproof tunic and make me invisible for good measure before we started. This may not have been for keeps but it sure felt like it.
So after a lot of sighing and tooth gnashing and hair pulling and crying and drooling and knuckle chewing [the proceeding 14 words brought to you by Street and Smith and worth 7 cents if appearing in TRAPPED in 1957] we all picked our art. Harlan picked LAST from the four or so remaining pieces. And we began.
Now a note to the cynics among you on how Uncle Harlan is a big stinky cheater. Let me TRY and head you off at the pass. Could Harlan have seen all the art in advance? Could he have then sat down and cobbled up rough story ideas for 16 pieces of art so that he had something to expand on no matter what was handed to him? Could he have worked the room like some sort of double-brained Kresken, hypnotizing and pushing and cajoling us into taking the other pieces and leaving a pre-chosen piece for him? Yeah, sure, I suppose. But I was there and Amy was there and Kristin was there and Doug was there and that’s not what happened. We all picked our poison and Harlan chose last. Moreover he picked a piece, that while extremely well executed, I pegged as about the last thing he would want, as it featured, well, you’ll see.
Thus armed with inspiration, or the poison of our own choosing, we began. Most of us used pen and paper and committed our sins in long hand. Good enough for Shakespeare and Neal R. Stephenson, we figured it was good enough for us. One person had a PDA-keyboard configuration that I thought was keen looking, but a bit too small to work on with out going blind. Harlan pulled out an old manual typewriter provided by the convention and we were off to the races.
Have I ever told you all what a complete and perfect dick Harlan can be? Really? Well, he starts pounding away at this thing and all I can think is word word word word word, now he’s FIVE ahead, word word word word word word SLAM! carriage return, now he’s ELEVEN ahead, word word word clack clack clack… pause, scratch forearm, fold arms over chest, glare a bit, pause hand over keys, then whack whack whack spacebar spacebar spacebar WORD WORD WORD and he’s off again. After a minute or so of this I think we all tuned it out. In fact, in a weird way, very quickly I found it, if not restful, at least sort of focusing. I work at a PC and WORD and MS Office are my friend, but that thwacking ratchety sound IS the sound of creation to me, the way a loud KA-CHING is the proper sound of a cash register drawer opening. So I stared at my painting, chewed my knuckle and started plotting my little story.
I’m cutting a few paragraphs here. Suffice to say I ended up writing a vignette. Approximately 290 words in 25 minutes that told the story of that moment in the painting:
http://www.donatoart.com/gallery/farseekers.html
and gave some back-story and set up some conflicts for scenes to come. At best, it is a crippled fragment that will never see the light of day. First draft, under the stopwatch is NOT my friend. At least Barry Malzberg had bourbon to see him through this in the 1970’s. Who works like this?
Later I was talking to Harlan about the value of this kind of kiln-style writing and we agreed that it was unnatural BUT it does do two things. First, it forces you to finish something. The world is full of project starters who never get around to finishing anything. I know because I’m one of them. The other is that after the pain is over, it can be – and should be – a tremendous confidence booster. It illustrates what Harlan has said for years, that Art or art isn’t really created in ivory towers on crystal mountaintops; it’s usually hammered out by people in basements and attics or sheds behind the house (John Gardner) or even an upright plywood coffin standing like an airless isolation chamber in an otherwise normal living room (Lester Del Rey). The lesson is like the ubiquitous Nike slogan. Just do it.
Back to Harlan being a dick. So, we’re all of us writing to the best of our abilities – and some of those abilities ended up being pretty remarkable. I’m recalling Mr. Frishberg and Mr. Lane and the one by the woman to Mr. Frishberg’s right whose name I don’t recall, when Harlan slams his carriage return for the last time after typing “they were all run over by a bus. The End.” or some such shite, and gets up and steps away from the table like a guy with a winning hand who has called “all in and good night and good luck and your twenty is on the dresser, see you later kiddo, I got a train to catch.”
Seventeen minutes. Last to pick. First to type. First to finish. What do you call that?
So Harlan gives us another 10 minutes. Then he gets a drink and tells us when we hit the five-minute mark. Then time compresses to auto-accident Ballard time and we’re done.
We each read our pieces and offer up some critiques but I don’t think our hearts were into the criticism. I won’t savage you and you don’t savage me was rule of the day and worked out fine. For a LONG and accurate description of workshop dynamics there are essays in the Clarion anthologies that go into exquisite detail on how this can play out and go south quickly when people don’t play well with others.
Besides, we all knew what we were waiting for. Harlan had written a story. A NEW story. Right there, in less than twenty minutes. So, we sat back and said well, let’s see what the oldest enfant terrible has got. He read his story.
Let me be clear. Harlan said this to me after the workshop and I completely agree – “There were NO failures in that workshop. Everybody produced something and everybody learned and everybody took something away that they could use.” That almost never happens in a workshop or any teaching situation for that matter. Moreover, a couple of pieces could probably be published virtually as is, or given a polish and then sent on their way. Two out of twelve would have been a very good day in workshop land.
But it wasn’t two out of twelve because Harlan read his story and showed us how it’s done. Mohammed Ali said, “it ain’t no brag if you can do it.” Boy was he right. And I didn’t even have to get punched in the head by a heavyweight to learn that lesson. Or maybe I did and I’m still taking a standing eight count and wondering just where my corner is.
Either way, I could tell you about it, but it’s 350 words and you’ll read them before too long. It’s called WEARINESS and will almost certainly feature the art of one Hubert J. Daniels who I am told is a young student at the University of Warsaw and I suspect is about to become a “made” man if that’s what he wants.
I asked Harlan how this compared to Clarion, where the writing assignments were overnight affairs and he told me they’re analogous but in a compressed sort of way. “It’s sort of like comparing a good piece of buttered bread to the finest French toast you’ve ever had. Both worthy in their own way.”
So there you have it. Cost of traveling 3,000 miles to see some friends and stay at the Bellevue Sheraton for four days and attend a small science fiction convention? About $850.00 Having your ass and ego handed to you by a paunchy old man with a battered manual typewriter with nothing to gain and no need to prove anything to anyone?
Priceless.
- Barney Dannelke [12:09AM]
Composed in 2 hours 11 minutes / 2,160 words.
Brian Siano
- Saturday, October 1 2005 19:1:55
There's just one thing that bugs me about _Lost_. It's the possibility, the _very real possibility_, that the show might sputter out its mysteries and leave us with something utterly _limp_.
The aforementioned _Twin Peaks_ and _The X-Files_ were improvised, week to week, and they'd spent so much time establishing so many mysteries that they _couldn't_ come to anything like a satisfying conclusion. No, they didn't have to _explain_ everything. But they could never come up with a conclusion that would make the mysteries seem like cheap mindfuckery.
_Babylon 5_ succeeded _because_ it had an ending in sight. Those of us who watched it knew that JMS had an ending, something that made sense (we hoped), and something that was, even if ambiguous, at least _satisfying_. _The Prisoner_'s ending didn't need to make sense: it launched the series into orbit, almost literally. It can be done, people.
So _Lost_ has me worried. It's so damn _good_ that I worry that it'll sputter and turn foul like the others. I'd hate to think that the great backstories, the compelling performances (especially Terry O'Quinn, whom I've enjoyed since _The Stepfather_), and the amazing Events, Clues, and Mysteries established amount to _something_ beyond a grab for my attention. Right now, the writers sure seem to have something truly great in store for us. But as much as I love the show, I'd feel cheated if it turned out that the whole thing was an incoherent improvisation designed to keep me watching the commercials.
Please, oh please, let it all be Worth It...
Tom Morgan <tjmorgan58@cox.net>
Silverado, CA - Saturday, October 1 2005 15:34:34
Susan,
If you are still concerned about delivery times I received RH#38 in Orange County today. Could you put me down for one of the Hemispheres? Thanks. And while Harlan has asked for a move-on allow me to add my personal apology to you for not responding when you were insulted. I post here seldom but read often and saw it. I assumed the deafening silence of reply was actually most peoples reply. I now realize now that the philosophy of "Only reply to those who merit a reply" is far out-trumped by the philosophy of "Always stand up for those who merit standing up for". I feel like one of the New York apartment dwellers looking out their window in "The Whimper.."
Tom Morgan HERC M456
Michael Zuzel <cartographer@islets.net>
Boy-See, Eye-Dee-Hoe - Saturday, October 1 2005 15:32:3
What Harlan said.
And a little more, though lacking his eloquence:
The return of LOST a couple of weeks ago was that rarest of things for American episodic television: a season premiere that actually fulfilled, and then far exceeded, the promises and mysteries of the previous season's cliffhanger. Last week's episode was even more surprising -- it actually went BACK to the events depicted the previous week and filled in the blanks from other characters' viewpoints.
This is crisp, challenging, unpredictable, thought-provoking storytelling, filled with fascinating, multi-dimensional characters who utter (and this is the best part) Dialogue That Doesn't Suck. Another rarity.
I've been smitten by a few shows over the years, and usually later ended up feeling snookered, abused or simply dumped. Maybe this time too. We'll see. But so far, this feels like the real thing. Yippee!!
Zuz
HARLAN ELLISON
- Saturday, October 1 2005 14:48:10
STEVE UTLEY, you ole snakefucker, how the hell are ya, kiddo?
If I indeed saved your brain cells from monkeynut rot by just keeping you away from The OC, Fear Factor, American Idol and The Anna Nicole Show, then let me plead with you to cop to my recommendation now that you run, not walk, that you R--U--N to the nearest cut-rate whereat you can obtain the first season of a programme called LOST, and scarf up the boxed DVD set of Season One. That's ... L.O.S.T. LOST.
Steve, in 57 years of watching, studying, reviewing, commenting on, and abominating television, I have seldom (if ever, even counting my faves) encountered Art at such a level. LOST is to television as MOBY DICK and HUCKLEBERRY FINN and GRAVITY'S RAINBOW are to the rest of American letters. LOST is to wildly inventive and utterly mesmerizing narrative as CITIZEN KANE, THE MAGNIFICENT 7 and THRONE OF BLOOD are to cinema since Edison's "The Kiss." LOST is to artistic creativity and damn skippy inventiveness as Smithson's "Spiral Jetty," Bosch's "Garden of Earthly Delights" and Richard Dadd's "Fairy-Feller's Master Stroke" are to painting.
Smithson said: "Create enigmas, not explanations," and though there is a good-meal-satisfing abundance of the latter (unlike "Twin Peaks" or even "The X-Files," the two great American TV cockteases, each of whose ass was unaware of each's elbow, entangling the viewer, then abandoning high and dripping wet), the sheer intelligent bravura creation seriatum of the former is a high-wire auctorial phenomenon as hypnotic and compelling as, hell, I dunno...as...as...LA STRADA!
Rush out. Now, Steve. Get the first season, last season, on the boxed DVD set. Watch it at a dead run. You'll have to accomodate your dropped jaw at every turn, but you'll find yourself watching it a second time, straight through.
The new season started two, weeks ago. If you RUN OUT. NOW. You'll be ready for this season's third episode next Wednesday.
I cannot plead with you more urgently. Do as I suggest, and you will have one more excellent reason to look upon me with adoration.
I can handle it if you can.
Yr. pal from back in the day in Austin, Harlan
Steven Utley <impatientape@yahoo.com>
Smyrna, Tennessee - Saturday, October 1 2005 12:21:11
In my paragraph below about STUDS LONIGAN, the line should be "both Farrell's work and Dos Passos' just kick" -- not "kicks." Clearly, when I wrote that, I had spent just a little too much time hanging around the pool room with a bunch of hooligans who'd tell you that subject-verb agreement is for pansies.
Today I am trying to decide what to take up next. There's Fitzgerald's TENDER IS THE NIGHT patiently waiting on the big bookcase in the living room (the one with Harlan Ellison titles in the upper lefthand row and Barry Malzberg in the lower righthand row), as well as a coupla novels by Faulkner (I shamefacedly confess that I've read only his short fiction thus far -- but, oh, "Dry September" and "A Rose for Emily"!) and a collection of Captain Future stories by Edmond Hamilton (high and low art determinedly meet smack in the middle of my brow). My books, arranged alphabetically by author, snake through the house, with A through Ellin in the office and Rushdie through Zola in the master bedroom, where I also keep a television set hooked up to a VCR so that I can watch movies. I watch no TV programming, however, in part because Harlan said it would rot my brain. There are things I miss -- THE SIMPSONS, the History and Discovery channels -- but reading is my chief pasttime. I'm uncomfortable in houses that contain no books. And if there aren't books in the afterlife, I say the hell with it.
Rob
- Saturday, October 1 2005 11:42:19
Reverend Ted <reverendted@satx.rr.com>
San Antonio, TX - Saturday, October 1 2005 9:1:11
> Nearly everyone on this board does something artistically.
> My question: For whom do you do it? Yourself, or the
> anticipated audience?
I submit that sometimes the process is undertaken not for the artist or the audience, but simply for the art itself.
A work that takes on a life of its own, becoming an entity unto itself, directing its development without regard for (though not necessarily contrary to) the whims of the artist or desires of any potential audience.
Whether this type of art has no soul, or a truer soul than art performed for the inspiration of an audience or for the satisfaction of the artist is not for me to judge, though I suspect there are probably examples from both sides of the comma.
Lee
- Saturday, October 1 2005 7:8:35
Steve,
Whether you are a bricklayer or a poet, I think one tends to do what one is good at.
As for who you do it for: art needs both artist and audience to exist at all.
The beauty of doing it is in the connection moving through you.
It’s a way of being more than just yourself.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Friday, September 30 2005 23:3:48
Steve B: I am more a hanger-on than an artist; i have written a few "filk songs" (a fannish pastime pioneered by the late Poul Anderson and his wife Karen among others); one of my friends is a real musician (and says I gave her a song idea in one of my own most EMBARRASSING moments.) Maybe I'm a catalyst, not a participant.
My boyfriend dragged me to Burning Man Festival last Labor Day wkend. He wants me to take up welding and carpentry so I can be his trophy more-manly-than-men girlfriend. As opposed to his sexist colleagues' barefoot-in-kitchen trophy wives.
Steven U: great recommendation and I love the quote!
Kristin
I woke up half past midnight Sep 25/26 sweating "I THINK I FORGOT TO TIP!" being in a hurry to catch up& signing the check blindly...I need to track down that waiter in the Bellevue, Washington, Black Angus Crossroads steakhouse and send about $7.00! Oh, and thanks for taking us along, Harlan. If you forgot, well, Susan would remind you, but would you mail them money, or something????
John Adams <jadams01@sprynet.com>
Hot Springs, Arkansas - Friday, September 30 2005 18:58:13
If you can find the one Roger Elwood anthology about which I've heard nothing but good--coincidentally, the only one which I own--get it: Six Science-Fiction Plays. They're all really fine work, and the Tom Reamy screenplay _Sting!_ is among the best.
David Loftus <dloft59@earthlink.net>
Portland, OR - Friday, September 30 2005 16:46:36
Steve Barber said and asked:
> Nearly everyone on this board does something artistically.
> My question: For whom do you do it? Yourself, or the
> anticipated audience?
While I have to tailor the presentation to an anticipated audience, at bottom I commit artistic acts for myself: for what the effort tells me about what I believe and value, and in the case of performance art, for the way I feel while doing it.
Especially in the case of performance art (and I’ve done performance folk dancing, stage acting, reading aloud to live audiences, singing with chamber and symphonic choirs, playing percussion in school bands and to support choral performances, singing and dancing in musical comedies), it isn’t the applause (which is very shortlived), or the money (which is rare and tiny), or the praise from critics (nearly nil so far), or that of friends (more plentiful but cheap and brief, as well). Much the same goes for my writings.
So in the end, I do art to find out what I think, feel, and believe; for the sheer pleasure of doing it; and the subsequent satisfaction of a job well done (if, indeed, it was).
Steven Utley <impatientape@yahoo.com>
Smyrna, Tennessee - Friday, September 30 2005 15:36:29
Can I possibly be forgiven for ducking out of the troll attack this week and instead reading James T. Farrell's STUDS LONIGAN trilogy straight through?
The last trilogy I read was Dos Passos' U.S.A.; not that I am an expert on trilogies or anything, since my tolerance for elves, unicorns, and dark lords is really meagre, but my guess is that both Farrell's work and Dos Passos' just kicks the shit out of what you generally think of when you hear the awful tri- word. STUDS LONIGAN contains, embedded in its account of the eponymous character's no-account existence (the operative phrase in which is "If only"), a perfect one-sentence explanation of Einstein's theory of relativity, whose centennial this is: "Relativity is a theory which assumes that, on a high basis of probability, there is no hitching post in the universe."
Lee
- Friday, September 30 2005 15:1:11
Mike R,
Peg's recommendation is a good one, but kind of big at 1200 or so pages. If you want something smaller I could recommend "Shatterday" which captures many good stories from Harlan's work circa 1970's. There's a little one in it called, "Opium" which is one of the tightest bits of writing I think I've ever read.
There's also the novella, "A Boy and His Dog".
If you like graphic work, his graphic novels, "Vic and Blood" and "Harlan Ellison's Dream Corridor" are good.
If you want just a few of his best known short stories:
"Repent Harlequin, Said the Tick Tock Man"
"On the Downhill Side"
"Basilisk"
"Soldier"
"Jeffty is Five"
"Shattered Like a Glass Goblin"
"Grail"
"I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"
"Adrift Just Off the Islets of Langerhans..."
"Paladin of the Lost Hour"
"Would You Do It For a Penny"
"How's the Night Life on Cissalda"
I'm not sure which story is in which collection, but a net savvy next generation info guy like yourself can find out in about two seconds so I'll leave you to it.
You can buy out-of-print work directly from this site, and receive them signed to boot.
Brian Siano
- Friday, September 30 2005 13:41:35
I mean, couldn't that have waited until the end-of-the-book Acknowledgements? We'd get to the end of the book, sigh with delight over a delightful story well-told... and then get this nice head-pat from the Author when he says (in paraphrase) "By the way, I was going for a Wodehouse feel in some of the descriptions, and the general plot was something Thorne Smith might've played with." And that's when we Smart Guys could congratulate ourselves on our perspicacity. But we don't get that now.
Can't even have the joy of pointing it out to other readers. We'd meet some cute girl in a coffeeshop, reading the book, and we'd _usually_ be able to suggest "Notice how Fat Charlie thinks about people? Or that hangover cure he drinks? That's P.G. Wodehouse." And she might remember seeing one of those BBC segments with Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie and smile with recognition. Or, we might try, "It's kind of a Thorne Smith story. He used to do these stories about supernatural beings playing comedy havoc with peoples' lives back in the Thirties." You get the idea. Sharing cultural knowledge and providing interesting ideas. But _NOW_, she'd slam the cappucino cup on the table and reply, "No shit, Mycroft, he _says_ that right in the fershlugginer _beginning of the book_."
On the other hand, there's the latest _Acme Novelty Library_ from Chris Ware, which is just the opposite. One could appreciate Ware in so many ways: as an artist, as a craftsman, as someone who is consciously trying to use comics as emotionally powerful expresions of an artist's sensibility, as someone with a broad and rich appreciation for nearly-forgotten art styles of the past century, and even as a kind of kindred spirit in certain ways. I am utterly crazy about Chris Ware's work.
But it's suffused with such self-loathing, such recognition of society's wasted and lost lives, such acute appreciation for the cruelties of the Mainstream and the Normals, that I'm amazed that people can read _Acme Novelty Library_ without wanting to slash their wrists. I mean, I read it, and while I'm shrieking with horrified laughter, I'm also crying over finding something in common with the hapless Jimmy Corrigan... or worse, the repulsive fanboy Rusty Brown.
Needless to say, Chris Ware's work isn't likely to open any conversations with cute girls at the local coffeeshop. (Not that I'd risk damaging the book by bringing it there.)
Duane
- Friday, September 30 2005 13:39:46
Imagine, if you will, the release of "The Passion Recut... Again!"
Shots of Our Lord walking with His apostles, doing His thing, minding His business, when suddenly there is a scene showing a "misunderstanding" between Him, one of His apostles, and a Jewish official or two. We then see several very quick shots of troubled looks, someone chopping down a tree and planing it into what looks like a large fence post ("is this person a Quaker?" we may ask), a pair of sweaty, bleeding hands carrying said fence post, then a scene of a single nail falling to the ground. Just as we're wondering "what's this all about?" and "who dropped the nail?" We see a freshly scrubbed, smiling, glowing man shaking hands with some astonished people, while a voice-over intones "There is no conflict known to man that cannot be worked out, one way or another."
Peg
- Friday, September 30 2005 13:36:10
Mike R. - Undoubtedly the book you describe would be "The Essential Ellison" with both 35 Year and 50 Year Retrospective editions published. If you use the link to Resources/Store, you will eventually find information on how to purchase books directly from the Ellisons. I believe the book list is a bit out of date, so best to contact them and get the lastest information. However, I admit I've forgotten which edition(s) of Essential Ellison they have available.
Which reminds me...
Susan - between moving house, a vacation, and a hurricane evac I've still not sent a check. I apologize profusely, and the item you may have held for me can be put up for offer to someone else (if you haven't already).
I'd hoped to get the RH issue mentioned a while back so as to clear up my undue confusion over which edition was being offered for what price. I've not received one and don't know if I missed the mailing, or it's not been issued yet, or you don't have my new address, or my subscriptions out??? I do recall sending a change of address postcard... if you don't have a Houston street address let me know here.
If you (or any other webderfolk) can enlighten me on the which Essential Ellison editions are how much, I'd be most grateful!!
Many thanks and happy weekend,
Peggy
Eastbay
- Friday, September 30 2005 13:27:34
The Bible, but they tore up the picture and never printed that edition again becuase God is a woman.
Kolchak: The Night Stalker (the remake). Enjoyed Frank Spotnitz's writing on X-Files; Daniel Sackheim seemed like a decent director in the past. But something just didn't click. First half of the NS pilot good; second half bad.
Andrew W. Laubacher <AndrewLaubacher@aol.com>
Brockport, NY - Friday, September 30 2005 13:4:55
Before I even go back and read the various posts since yesterday, I extend my apology to Mr. Ellison for being over familiar in my previous post. I am sorry. Even if I think that he was out of line for his castigation of everyone who did not immediately respond to "Penelope"'s attack on Susan, I do not have the familiarity with Mr. Ellison to tell him what to do with himself--no matter how harmlessly it was meant. I hope that he realizes that it was meant in the same spirit as his casual use of the f-bomb at the Foolscap convention and hasn't taken offense.
As for the rest of you, Mr. Ellison is a big boy and I think that he can take a little ribbing, now and then. I doubt that anything I posted added to his troubles; if I am wrong then I hope my apology is sufficient.
Mike Rowlands <magic_lava@hotmail.com>
Chester, Cheshire, UK - Friday, September 30 2005 12:54:51
I dont want to leave the Pavilion with a bad impression of me (too late for some no doubt). I still stand by my first post. Its a pity that my subsequent post, which actually has kind words for Harlan, was deleted because of the "one post per 24 hours" rule.
Anyway to show some reconcilliation (and before anyone else refers to me as "the Rowlands"; good luck on finding that lost IQ by the way), could you suggest "the" book that best sums up Harlans work?
I promise I will buy the book, read it and be less ignorant.
Thank you.
HARLAN ELLISON
- Friday, September 30 2005 11:47:24
Thank you for your good words, and your commonsense. Hope you enjoy whichever of my books you bought, and I'd be VERY interested to know your impressions when you're done with it.
Welcome to the neighborhood. You'll find the Webderlanders a fine and nifty bunch, quite sharp and often very very witty.
Yr. pal, Harlan
Gary Wallen <garydotwallenatgmail>
Ashland, MA - Friday, September 30 2005 11:42:23
“Statement: Nearly everyone on this board does something artistically. My question: For whom do you do it? Yourself, or the anticipated audience?”
For myself. I play in a Javanese gamelan, trying to become conversant on several of the instruments in the ensemble, and I also play a little bit of vibraphone in a band. The band’s been quiet lately, with two of the members becoming daddies within the past year. A hiatus, not an end. Sooner or later we’ll get the next disc out. As to the gamelan… though growing, there’s still not a huge audience for this music of Indonesia. In either case, I get loads more satisfaction from succeeding in laying down a well-turned phrase, than from whether there’s an audience there to hear it.
I daresay most of my colleagues in both enterprises feel much the same as I do.
Mark Goldberg <markabaddon@aol.com>
Minneapolis, - Friday, September 30 2005 11:36:26
Harlan and Susan,
I just read about the wildfires currently raging throughout NW Los Angeles and I hope that you guys, as well as any other Webderlanders in the area, are OK. It is amazing to read about how the fire spread increased 4 fold almost overnight. Makes me think the tornadoes out here ain't so bad....
Also, Nissan just unveiled a new car with an egg shaped cabin that rotates a full 360 degrees. What I want to know is, where are my rocket cars? C'mon, auto designers, Nick Fury of SHIELD has had a car that could fly for decades, it is the 21st century, when do I get my rocket car?
Frank Church
- Friday, September 30 2005 9:21:15
------------
I like this reverend guy. If he is a real reverend, then he must be closer to hell then he perceives, which is just traps and pishers to me. God, as you know invented humor, the day Eve bit into the apple (I know, it was a quince--sue me). The talking snake, the fig leaves on the wee wee and cah cah thingies. Very funny guy, that deity of ours.
We create our own heaven, our own hell. As long as you can laugh over the flames, then that is what it is all about.
Amen.
Charlie
St. Pete, FL - Friday, September 30 2005 9:6:19
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Friday, September 30 2005 8:31:24
(Quick aside: Elijah, I've been communicating with the Reverend on the side, encouraging him to stick around and join in. Seemingly a nice guy.)
Anyway.
I had an interesting lunch yesterday with a couple of friends from the LB Writers' Bloc (I am tolerated, barely, as a fellow artistic soul and have enough writing credentials that they only ridicule me a little). He, a poet of some reputation and publication. She, a social psychologist with six books and hundreds of articles under her belt.
They are both in a moment of retrenchment, examing what they are writing and why. He's experimenting with long-form poetry composed of tens of tens of very short lines, and she is turning her attention to fiction and is approximately 50,000 words into her first novel. They are married, happily, to each other.
The topic of "why do we do this?" came up -- a natural since they are both headed in uncharted (for them) directions. It's an old argument. I maintain that we write -- or sing, paint, take pictures, draw cartoons, dance (professionally), etc -- to express ourselves to an audience. It might be an audience of one, or thousands, or even millions.
Statement: Nearly everyone on this board does something artistically. My question: For whom do you do it? Yourself, or the anticipated audience?
Extra points awarded at random.
(I figured, especially in light of recent events, this would be a damn interesting question to pose.)
Steve B
Charlie
St. Pete, FL - Friday, September 30 2005 8:13:32
Vonnegut also mentions that Huckleberry Finn was the first novel ever typewritten. A question sprung to my mind. Does anyone know the first book to contain a photograph of the author within the book?
Elijah Newton
Ypsilanti, MI - Friday, September 30 2005 7:49:43
Welcome from the guy folded up on a piano stool over in a corner. Others might've taken all the comfy chairs, but there's plenty of seating within earshot. As for all of this, what can I do but wave my cuppa joe vaguely around and shrug? 'Nuff other voices are already in the fray; I'm just waiting on the next line of chatter.
Pull of a chair and stay awhile. How's the weather out your way?
Robert Morales
New York City, - Friday, September 30 2005 7:39:50
http://waxy.org/random/view.php?type=video&filename=shining_redux.mov
Jan <ancoraio@web.de>
Frankfurt, - Friday, September 30 2005 7:31:29
Scott Clark <qarlo@comcast.net>
Boston, MA - Friday, September 30 2005 6:54:19
Harley said: "Some of us PA fans are smarter than you."
What's in the water down in Pennsylvania that makes them smarter than us?
Ha-ha, I make joke.
Scott
cola <cola@at.org>
- Friday, September 30 2005 5:39:0
...Goodness knows what the rest of the cryptogram says, but if that's "incomprehensible" or "comprehensible" it should be spelled with an "n".
Gunther Schmidl
Linz, Austria - Friday, September 30 2005 2:53:47
Also, to those who remember me: hello again.
HARLEY DAVIDSON <squeezebadger@gemini.communism>
Povincial City, Province - Friday, September 30 2005 1:6:27
Dear HE,
Hlel blarmovpts, ie olah beox e box owx zl qorms fzo anmy eeszr. Opwohvr, oxh ereztn axoxrcatio wotz Penny Arcade xpw bzws qloit bowslerone xo te. W ivwnd xt quixw e vose estx son woeyc cowd weocversoos eoeov tx woeisver tnso thso eossrve sx ienoded an o eoa toat sx squitv eocoaprehesibco. Aocoe asx aerv tox eoxurav xz soeefr cko oogveae as zxviei zlwww, O woxlw ivevealxe xz wevwer wozle ale.
Some of us PA fans are smarter than you. Enjoy the puzzle. The solution is very simple and you have everything you need to figure it out.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Thursday, September 29 2005 22:51:55
despite Rick's valiant efforts (and bless you!) it looks like Webderland/Pavilion is on its way to hell now that too many people know about it....
I want to say something nice, but what's the point? Those of us who do seem to get drowned out amid all the screaming in both directions. Even people trying to change the subject altogether get drowned out.
I finally did read the Penelope post - how vile; what she's referring to looks like a professionally done photo - i've seen it several times - and it is sweet as well as gorgeous.
TO those who take the Internet for granted: Yes it is full of information, Unfortunately it is also full of misinformation and time wasting crap. Some of us do pass along internet info that is actually good, to Harlan when we find it. The divide between people who grew up with the Internet and someone like Harlan is something you will never be able to cross.
Foolscap is "comic book oriented?" Huh? I thought they were a book/literary convention - but that crowd is definitely graying; you can see it. Maybe they are taking to inviting comics GOHs to draw a younger crowd, but the organizers strike me as a literary bunch. I'm not a regular there, but their past GOH list includes many BOOK WRITERS. Mr Graham owns a manual typerwriter which he let Harlan borrow. (And me too, unworthy though I am.)
I suppose it had to happen one day, but I'm a little upset that G&T linked to this site. Once that cat is out of the bag you can never get it in again. This was a nice place when the traffic was kept low. But let one high traffic site with a passionate audience put in a link and we all drown in a sea of posts. I don't know if the friendly atmosphere here can ever be recovered. Too many places - physical as well as virtual - are ruined when they get "discovered."
Rick, you are awesome; how many people can spend as many years as you running a site of any kind at all? Webderland is absolutely ancient in so called "internet time!"
Kristin
Erika. <erikaschade at gmail daht com>
Earth. - Thursday, September 29 2005 21:21:46
I've got a great English teacher this year, who was a part of the 60's writing scene here in Cleveland; he knew/still does, some of influental local writers of that time. For our term paper, we're to write something unique regarding Cleveland based poets/writers, such as d a levy, Tom Kryss, Kent Taylor, etc. Before this class, these writers were entirely unfamiliar to me. Not the subject matter that I was expecting our term papers being required to cover, but I'm quite eager to learn about them, and the underground writing scene of Cleveland in the 1960's. I love this town, and am quite a budding Cleveland history buff.
So... The point of my rambling. I'm curious as to whether or not you're familiar with these writers, and if you have any stories to share... =)
-Erika.
Ben S
- Thursday, September 29 2005 21:6:9
While I'm definitely not a gamer-tot or in any way adolescent, I am a successful humorist and a gamer. Thus I am very familiar with Penny Arcade.
I thought you might be interested to know that this case might be one of "No publicity is bad publicity". Regardless of the veracity of either side's statements, or their personal subjective understandings of the events, I believe you both may have gained larger audiences for your work as a result.
It is my hope that I will enjoy your work in science fiction as much as I have enjoyed Penny Arcade's humor.
Best Wishes,
BS
Mike Jacka
Phx, AZ - Thursday, September 29 2005 20:57:50
Rick,
Its been said before, but never more deserved...
Thanks for all you do to keep this ship floating.
Mike
Tad Dunten
Hines, OR - Thursday, September 29 2005 20:26:56
Many thanks for the (hopefully) calming words. I'd just popped in this evening with some trepidation; looking back over the first (chronologically last) page of posts, it seems the forces of reason have won out over the barbarian hordes, who seem to have lost interest and gone home. I'm off now to have my first look at that giant squid, and maybe read a Sturgeon story or two to cleanse my mental palate of the memory of the earlier part of the week.
Gibbering idiot
- Thursday, September 29 2005 19:24:49
HARLAN ELLISON
- Thursday, September 29 2005 17:41:59
Please. Enough is enough. From you, my friends and readers. It is making Rick's life miserable.
"Cocksucker" and "go fuck yourself" are no bother to me as a) I have never sucked a cock, and b) the latter is too pale and watery even to be countenanced.
Since these people may only barely recognize the word "vaudeville" (if at all), we cannot expect them to know that the "what did the blonde say to a little fuck" is straight out of JOE MILLER'S JOKE BOOK, a
publication old when I was born. It was adapted to belittle me by a man named Phil Klass who, had he not been blessed to marry the wonderful Fruma, would likely never ever have gotten laid.
He has admitted publicly that he made up the story...which never happened to me...ever...but apparently like most urban mythology, the uneducated recycle such tomfoolery as if it were real. To buttress no position that is rational.
My request is that you let the gibbering idiots have their sway; let them waste their time, not ours. I ask that nothing having to do with this delusionary "insult" be responded to. I told them the truth; if they choose to deconstruct it and question it, well, there are some who still believe the Earth is flat, too. Let Rick close off the spigot if he must.
Move on, Webderlanders. The world is too important, and too fine, too full of great stuff like a 36-foot-long Giant Squid, to let tiny rodent teeth and teensy rat claws leave their mark on any of us.
Yr. pal, Harlan
Jon Stover
Canada - Thursday, September 29 2005 17:26:17
I'd apologize for not responding to Penelope, but having not been here since Wednesday morning, I missed that one until now. Pretty darned churlish post, natch.
Hey, did anyone (Harlan and Barney Dannelke would be the obvious ones) respond to Tony Tollin's question in his post from Wednesday, September 28 2005 15:51:5? I ask not because I'm friend of Mr. Tollin's, but because, having learned a lot of great stuff about the pulps and especially The Shadow from Mr. Tollin's work, I thought it would be nice to note the apparent unoticed passing of a question during a deluge.
Cheers, Jon
Tom Galloway <tyg@panix.com>
Silicon Valley, - Thursday, September 29 2005 17:17:18
Peg
Houston, TX - Thursday, September 29 2005 16:46:18
For those interested in deep sea discoveries, check this out:
http://www.serpentproject.com/
It's a collaborative effort between businesses and science organizations to tap the power of the ROV technology developed for the deep sea industry and use it to explore and catalog a previously unexplored portion of our seas.
The gallery includes photos and videos of creatures existing at PHENOMENAL depths. Videos of squids swimming around 10000 feet in the Gulf of Mexico. The pressure must be unimagineable (yes, I can calculate it, but I can't imagine it!), and yet the squids and shrimps are swimming around like aquatic butterflies.
This is inspiring stuff folks.
Reverend Ted <reverendted@satx.rr.com>
San Antonio, Texas - Thursday, September 29 2005 16:3:15
(This reply is simply a defense of my wounded pride. It takes a bigger man than I to do the right thing and simply ignore a personal insult lodged by someone who can obviously have no knowledge of my character.)
Please carefully re-read the quoted posts. In particular, take note of the phrase "many months ago". If my post was an accusation of anything, it would be of exaggeration. It would be difficult to have familiarized oneself with anything "many months ago" yet still "within the last 20 days".
However, there are many other possible explanations for such a discrepancy that do not involve deceit. Perhaps he learned of the event, did his research, and susequently forgot the "Penny Arcade" reference over those "many months" in the interim, perhaps considering their juvenile enterprise not worth the cerebral real estate. Perhaps he simply meant to type "many weeks". Perhaps he's exaggerating and perhaps he's lying. Like I said, I'm not in a position to deduct his intentions.
However, I can't blame you for assuming my own intentions were hostile, given the disposition of the vast majority of the new (uninvited) guests to the Pavilion.
As to the other issue, Reverend Ted is not a pseudonym, unless leaving off my surname compels the definition. (And it is most certainly not eponymous, as I'm fairly sure it isn't the source from which anything else draws its name, though I am aware there is a British television show titled "Father Ted".) I am an ordained minister and those around me know me as Ted. (And yes, that's my actual e-mail address as well.)
My pride thus defended, the (most certainly inaccurate) image conjured by my outsider's mind is thus:
The familiar denizens of The Pavilion sit with their patron author in comfortable (yet by no means extravagant) chairs arranged loosely around the periphery of a cozy salon in the prototypical home of a British Author (nevermind that H.E. hails from the States), occupying a unique space whereby the entire cadre may be seated one to a chair in a room with no more than seven chairs. Each casually sips a beverage of their preference while conferring (sometimes in agreement, sometimes not, but almost always politely) regarding whatever it is that engages literary types.
A clamorous knock interrupts the proceedings, and before anyone can do more than turn and cast a quizzical glance at the commotion, the front door bursts open, latch splintering against the force (despite having been unlocked), revealing an enraged throng that proceeds to pour inside, knocking over furniture and positively terrifying the cat.
At which time ensues the verbal abuse - a hundered voices all ranting at once, as loud as possible, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. That is until, one by one, their enthusiasm wanes and they depart as quickly as they arrived, leaving the stunned Webderlanders with me, attempting to curry favor with a flattering allegory regarding the whole affair.
And, having finished my sloppily executed excuse for a sycophantic metaphor, and acknowledging that my very presence as an uninvited interloper in what amounts to a man's space for receiving and entertaining guests and admirers is wholly inappropriate, I am left to endure a few moments of uncomfortable silence under the icy gaze of the regulars, then quietly take my leave.
Eastbay
- Thursday, September 29 2005 14:57:13
Let's chat! As you said, the war on blather.....
You see the pics of the elusive giant squid from yesterday? Man oh man, its amazing how much stuff down here on Earth there is left to find and explore. And a deep sea expedition costs a fraction of the price of a space jaunt. Although deep sea news always stirs up my curiosity about Europa and what marvels await us there.
Rick Watkins
""Your stories and these videogames the surly teenagers are so wrapped up in nowadays are one in the same."
Oh Puh-leeze. I'm no stranger to gaming. Sitting next to me is a NES, a PS2 and a Saturn. If a fire burst out right now threatening to reduce this home to ashes, I'd burst upstairs and save my Ellison, AC Clarke, Joseph Campbell, art and religion books as well as my Alan Moore comic collection. My machines and games would have to just melt in the flames. And I wouldn't spend a second debating that decision.
The Mario Brothers didn't guide my intellectual, moral and artistic growth 1/10th of degree that books did.
Games are fun and all, and a few (for example the Metal Gear Solid trilogy) are pretty amazing works. But the gaming industry still needs to evolve to "be one and the same" as books.
Todd Thompson:
"If you want us to get off your lawn, just say so."
Actually Harlan did post those precise words: 'Get off my lawn'.
We are the same(ish) age. It saddens me to say this but, Dude, our generation for the most part is 'an idiot monkeymass'. Yes we have more access to information but we have more access to disinformation as well. Our peers for the most part can't decern fact from fiction. And y'know Bush won the vote because the youth, "the most politically-knowledgable demographic in America", for the most part didn't bother to go to the polls last Nov.
Our peers don't understand the diffence between art and mere enterainment. Look, just because something has *millions* of followers doesn't make it a high form of art and communication. More of our age group would rather follow the musical careers of blond bimbos and gansta rappers than listen to Bach. But that does not mean Ashley Simpson and 50 Cent are artistically equal to the classical masters. *Millions* of our generation flock to McDonalds...but its still crap. *Millions* of our gen keep shelling out $10 a flick at theatres, even though Hollywood keeps shiping out worse and worse films every year. Our generation is the target audience for the shit companies can't swindle other generations to buy. Why? Becuase our generation is dumb enough to be suckered.
Galen
Fort Worth, Texas - Thursday, September 29 2005 14:47:38
What's that I hear? A strange noise emanating from PA Land? It sounds a bit like "mrmee mrmee mrmee..."
Rick Wyatt <webmaster@harlanellison.com>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 14:30:34
"Ellison’s argument is fundamentally flawed in that it relies upon evidence whose existence is questionable. He says that Hank Graham, the Chairman of the gathering, has stated that he did not have a cap for Mr. Ellison in an attempt to cast doubt upon the truthfulness of PA’s account of events. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find such a claim except in the post of Mr. Ellison."
Hank Graham posted the same thing here, Jeff.
For those of you bewildered by the people who continue to argue this into the ground despite my continued requests to chill, I've linked a "Posts of Interest" page at the top of this one. I've included my requests as well as the posts from Harlan, Gabe, and Hank Graham. I've also included the posts from Gabe and Tycho on their website. Enjoy! This board will probably be shut down over the weekend to let things settle since obviously asking most of you lot to be civil and let sleeping dogs lie is completely useless.
Todd Thompson <twthompsonpublic@gmail.com>
California - Thursday, September 29 2005 14:4:15
There's been a lot of vitriol from both sides here, and it's surprising to see so many otherwise intelligent HE fans using the same broad brush to paint the literally *millions* of PA followers. Do you really think there's so little diversity among the Internet? Do you really think that a handful of "trolls" can speak for a population larger than many countries? Come on, now.
Personally, I'd read Harlan's work long before I found Penny Arcade. I think "Grail" is one of the finest short stories I've ever seen. I've given the illustrated copy of "Repent, Harlequin" as a Ph.D. graduation present to a perpetually-tardy friend. Harlan is a magnificent writer.
And, as I learned today, Harlan is sort of a dick, too.
Like many other Penny Arcade fans, I came here to hear the other side of the story. Not to attack. Not to troll. Neither to excoriate Harlan nor to heap praises upon Gabe and Tycho, but merely to see what the fuss was about.
And it's pretty obvious that what happened at the conference isn't black and white. Both Harlan and Gabe mis-stepped, and neither was entirely angelic. Do you really think Harlan innocently questioned Gabe's education, out of "curiosity"? In public? In front of an audience? Immediately after Gabe displayed ignorance of foolscap? Innocent curiosity is hardly the most parsimonious explanation.
Do you honestly think the follow-up, "Did you go to high school?" question was benign? Or is it possible Harlan was trying to make Gabe look like a fool in front of his "gamer-tots"? Can you, HE fans, imagine asking someone if they finished high school, in front of an audience, in *any* sort of congenial way? Would you do that for any reason but to embarrass someone? My imagination is good, but not that good. I think civility was demonstrably lacking from both sides.
Whatever. It'll blow over. This is a triviality.
Here's what bothers me: it's not merely that Harlan is vilifying the PA community, it's that he's lambasting my generation as a collective whole. Or, in his words, the "gamer-tots"/"idiot monkeymass"/"brain-dead gamers"/"benighted generation".
Which generation is benighted? Ah, yes. The Internet generation.
Let me then reply as a youth: Dude. What the fuck? If you want us to get off your lawn, just say so.
Slightly more eloquently, I'd reply thusly: embracing technology doesn't benight a generation. Broader communication and immediate access to information, if anything, produce a more informed generation than any that have come before. The most politically-knowledgable demographic in America consists of the kids and twenty-somethings who surf the net and watch The Daily Show. For someone who's written so many future-based stories, I'm surprised you can't see the positive sides of the Information Age.
In other words, why *aren't* you on the net? Why would someone who's concerned about ignorance willfully choose to limit his sources of information? Why would you choose to get your news from a handful of sources insteads of the thousands of condensed feeds at news.google.com? There's room for both literature and HTML, and there's room for both a quick e-mail and the lovingly crafted, sealed and stamped letter. Saying otherwise promotes a false dichotomy that strongly hints at an underlying Luddism.
In closing, let me say this: Harlan says of the fan groups that his are "smarter and more skeptical than [theirs]." No. That's crap. Guys, gals, assorted HE fans: you're really not better than we are. You don't have the monopoly on brains. I guarantee that among the PA fans are people every scintilla as intelligent as the smartest among you, Harlan included. I personally know doctors and neuroscientists, authors and lawyers who are PA fans.
There's a natural inclination for people to embrace an air of superiority. Biology suggests this is deeply instinctive. But you Ellison fans actually *aren't* superior; you're just people, like us. And there's a good chance you'd actually enjoy some of Penny Arcade's work, if you gave it a chance. I still enjoy Harlan's work, in spite of the author's insults and condescension.
Todd
Jeff
Tacoma, WA / USA - Thursday, September 29 2005 13:54:31
I have just made my way here via the Penny Arcade site (albeit a couple of days late) to see if I could find Mr. Ellison's version of the events that occurred. Generally, I have found myself disappointed by both the PA Platoon and the Harlan Harlots, as have several other posters. To sum, the later posts seem to agree that attacks on significant others and attacks on the intelligence of a fan base or medium are in poor taste. Additionally, they do not help to reveal the truth of what started this entire spat in the first place: the event on-stage.
Now, I wasn’t there, but for a couple of reasons I’m more inclined to believe PA’s version of events than Mr. Ellison’s.
Ellison’s argument is fundamentally flawed in that it relies upon evidence whose existence is questionable. He says that Hank Graham, the Chairman of the gathering, has stated that he did not have a cap for Mr. Ellison in an attempt to cast doubt upon the truthfulness of PA’s account of events. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find such a claim except in the post of Mr. Ellison. Although it would be much more reliable to find such a quote on a site other than Ellison’s (such as Foolscap.com), I haven’t even seen a post by Mr. Graham on this site or the PA site. All I have to go by is Ellison’s claim, and that just isn’t enough for me. So, while I cannot take it for granted that Ellison received and denied the use of a cap, I don’t know why the Chairman would not have the foresight to bring caps for all of his Guests of Honor to honor them equally, despite the story Ellison relates.
As has already been argued, a claim of I wasn’t saying it to you; I was saying it to some other guy (in regards to, “Fuck off”) is pretty weak. Regardless, it is at this point that Ellison claims that this was the second “snotty remark” that was made toward him. However, if this was the second, the first has somehow been omitted. Perhaps it was just an excited recollection. Perhaps the post is fiction.
Additionally, even Ellison’s account of his attempt to “educate” Gabe on the origin of the pun smacks of arrogance and priggishness. An explanation was called for, but not in the manner Ellison used. A simple, “This is foolscap” would have sufficed. To follow it with questions as to Gabe’s educational background (though Ellison maintains it was innocent inquiry) is not only in bad taste, but a blatant attack.
Now, Ellison seems put out that Gabe did not know of the link between a pad of paper and the word “foolscap,” but as Gabe has pointed out: Mr. Ellison is a professional writer, Gabe is a professional Artist. I would expect a writer to be verbose, I would not expect that of a visual artist, nor would I expect it of an athlete. Writing and visual art use two very different sides of the brain, and the use of one can actually conflict with the use of the other (for more information on this, see Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain by Betty Edwards).
Gabe’s response about Star Wars books is also an attack, but at least his had some sense of jest in it.
Ellison has three reservations about this incident. The first is that nobody defended him. People actually apologized for his rudeness. He claims he is not a rude man, but that is not what I experienced when I met the man several years ago.
When I was a little younger, I went to a small gathering in Portland, Oregon that was put on by Darkhorse Comics. I had come into comics late, having believed all of my life that it was a medium devoid of any intellectual capacity. Instead, until late high school, I read only literature. Fortunately I have since been shown that comics can be not only entertaining, but thought provoking. They are even capable of telling stories impossible to tell through the mere written word or film. I was just entering my appreciation for the medium when the event occurred, and I attended to meet the only man on the program whose name I recognized: Will Eisner, creator of “The Spirit.”
While there, I met Ellison. On a whim, I purchased a book entitled Harlan Ellison’s Dream Corridor: Volume One and got him to sign it. I then proceeded to chat with him to find out more about this man I had just gotten a signature from. He showed himself to be a man who claimed to despise the community he worked within, stating that the only people who wrote good comics were those who never read them. In essence, an ignorance of the medium itself would produce the best results for that medium. He also urged me to never be an author or an artist, to instead do something useful with my life. In all, he struck me as a pompous, disgruntled man; in a word, rude. I went home and tossed the comic into my closet, not to be read for several years.
I have only met him that once. Maybe it was just a bad impression of him. Maybe he had a bad morning; was still working through a hangover caused by festivities the night before; had to endure a red-eye flight to Portland and an inadequate hotel; maybe his underwear came out of the dryer a little moist. I may have seen that side of Ellison for a multitude of reasons, though that is the side of him I saw.
Earlier I critiqued Ellison’s use of evidence that has not been verified, and I realize I am submitting myself to a similar error. However, please excuse it. My encounter with him occurred a number of years ago, and not knowing that in 2005 I would have need of verification, I neither recorded the conversation, nor collected contact information from those who overheard our exchange. So, you are just going to have to trust me on this. Or don’t. It’s up to you.
Surprisingly, since that encounter I have only run into his name twice. Once while reading Neal Gaiman’s The Sandman, and now this incident.
The second thing that troubles Ellison is that Gabe assumed he didn’t like sharing Guest of Honorship. That is a good point. This assumption has probably misled fans of both sides and should be pointed out that it is only an assumption. This is again one of those things without verifying evidence.
The last of Ellison’s troubles has been addressed quite well to date. Penelope was a troll. He / she / they only wanted to make Ellison angry. They succeeded. And not only did they succeed, but Ellison played into Penelope’s hand by stating that it deeply troubled him.
Aside from the conflict between PA and Ellison, I did eventually pick up that book I had him sign and read it. Unfortunately, I was disappointed. It was exactly the sort of thing I had imagined comics to be growing up. Is it his worst work? In fifty years of writing, has he produced something better? I’m willing to give the man’s work another go, because as full of himself as he is, it is possible that he has produced work worth reading.
Let me know.
Rob
- Thursday, September 29 2005 13:45:42
HA - HALP!!
Two days ago, whilst, in my innocence, I was reading the Pavilion posts, I lost 20 IQ points. I only turned my head the other way for a moment, and when I looked back...they were gone! JEEZUS! GONE, like THAT! LOST! It was like watching grains of sand trickle between my fingers. I am attempting to retrieve them asap. I NEED them. I love them SO much. If you have any information - any leads at all as to their whereabouts PLEASE report it to your nearest police bungalow IMMEDIATELY. Officials are putting your tax dollars to work, striving day and night to collect information for their database in their driven hopes for a lead; so, your efforts would be greatly appreciated.
(Put the Rowlands and the Surly Teenagers to bed EARLY tonight. But BATHE them first. They really smell awful)
Steven Burnap <webderland@burnap.net>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 13:22:48
There are some posters here who really ought to read the Penny Arcade writer's forum as the videogame players as lit-ignorant meme has gotten tiresome.
Assuming that they aren't too tech-ignorant to find it.
Andy
Seattle, WA - Thursday, September 29 2005 12:57:47
It strikes me that most people seem to find it very easy to take offense, but often very difficult to listen to and appraise what is actually being said.
Throughout Foolscap, I consistently found Harlan to be provocative in the best sense of the word; able to phrase issues in an entertaining way that provoked thought and intelligent discourse. Unfortunately, for many, thinking and discussion are out the window and outrage is the order of the day when they feel challenged on any front.
I wonder if it is just this all-too-common tendency for so many to overreact that has led to so much of the gutless fiction on the market today. Is it that the publishers are afraid to publish it or is it that writers are afraid to write it?
I’d never met Harlan before and met him only briefly at Foolscap where he picked me out in the audience with what could be interpreted as either a compliment or an insult (depending upon my level of sensitivity or insecurity), I chose to take it as a compliment and ended up enjoying myself immensely.
Joseph Paul Haines <joseph.haines@gmail.com>
Seattle, WA - Thursday, September 29 2005 12:55:52
Someone wrote:
"As far as Mr. Ellison is concerned, I know of his work and respect him for his dedication to the craft. But after reading his post in this forum, I can see that Gabe's illustation of him is spot-on. Mr. Ellison (and most of his fans who have posted here) seem to have this air of superiority that doesn't seem to be earned. Mr. Ellison, you write stories and you seem to have an excellent grasp of the English language, but that's it. You're no better than anyone else simply because you can recite the many definitions of "foolscap"."
Not earned? Not f'ing earned?
Okay, I'm going to take a deep calming breath before I start down this road . . .
Gabe and Tycho exist because of people like Harlan. The next time you're sitting in front of your two-hundred dollar imagination killer, the last two brain cells in your head rappelling down the string of spittle hanging from your bottom lip, please do try to understand that those lovely games and storylines you're crowing about came into existence because of the work people like Harlan have been doing for decades.
Yeah, decades. That's tens of years. Not a couple'a years. Not five or six or ever since those nifty new console stations came out, but since computers took up many floors of a building. Yet it seems that the internet crowd believes that the involved storylines and neat stuff they see on their screens (as long as it's not words, gawd, anything but that) just sprang into existence since noon, last Tuesday.
Someone here called Mr. Ellison a relic. Damned right. But he's a fucking holy relic. Get it straight, will ya?
Earned? Are you serious?
Do you have the slightest clue what this man has done in his life BESIDES writing great fiction? Do you realize that there may be a reason that a comic book oriented convention like Foolscap invited Harlan to be a GOH? That Gabe and Tycho know nothing about Ellison while operating in a comic format says more about them than any of us ever could. That's like playing jazz piano and claiming ignorance of Oscar Peterson and Art Tatum. There was a world before computers, and in it, great things were done.
Look it up some time. Hell, use Google.
And to all of you who say Harlan's got no chance of tracking down the individual who insulted Susan, I say only this: That belief may be the best indicator of your ignorance of Harlan's life.
Keep on believing it. I could use the giggle. Harlan, I'm truly sorry that you've had to put up with all this. You deserve much better, sir.
jack skillingstead <jskillingstead@yahoo.com>
seattle , wa - Thursday, September 29 2005 12:44:26
"Your stories and these videogames the surly teenagers are so wrapped up in nowadays are one in the same."
-- You've got to be kidding.
Kell Brown <deadjohnny@gmail.com>
Toronto, Canada - Thursday, September 29 2005 12:12:24
Since it was directed at "everyone else" I'm as qualified to respond as anyone.
>> Nobody is better than anybody else.
This is patently not true and a horrible myth that most of the population believe. No two men are equal, nor two women or any combination of the set. Some people out there are low-life, baby rapists and I'm not just a little but a great, horking, bit better than them. Others are selfless champions of the downtrodden and such people are certainly cut from a finer cloth than I.
>> This wasn't that big a deal.
You're right, it wasn't a big deal. So why have you and countless others felt the need to get involved, express a witless opinion, or just spew some mindless insult?
Rick Watkins <rcw5459@njit.edu>
Nutley, NJ - Thursday, September 29 2005 11:49:41
I'd like to begin by pointing out that, yes, I'm a Penny-Arcade reader. I rely on Gabe and Tycho's humor to get me through the workday. I respect them as artists and entertainers, but most importantly, I respect their honesty. They've never claimed to be any more than what they are, a pair of goofy guys who draw pictures with word-bubbles for a living.
As far as Mr. Ellison is concerned, I know of his work and respect him for his dedication to the craft. But after reading his post in this forum, I can see that Gabe's illustation of him is spot-on. Mr. Ellison (and most of his fans who have posted here) seem to have this air of superiority that doesn't seem to be earned. Mr. Ellison, you write stories and you seem to have an excellent grasp of the English language, but that's it. You're no better than anyone else simply because you can recite the many definitions of "foolscap". Since I'm an engineer and not a writer, I'm going to organize my thoughts in concise bulletpoints for the sake of everyone reading.
Mr. Ellison:
1. His name is Mike Krahulik, not "surly teenager". He may be surly (though, seemingly, no surlier than yourself), but he is definitely not a teenager...way to "stoop to his level". You can call him Mike, Mr. Krahulik or Gabe, as he at least has the decency to refer to you by your name. Furthermore, open up your thesaurus...your overuse of the word "surly" made my head spin by the time I finished reading your rant.
2. You belittle the PA community as insignificant pests, yet get all bent out of shape when one of them insults your wife. Most of the people posting here are kids who's sole intention is to get your goat (which, apparently, they accomplished). If you really were more mature than this gang of hooligans, you would have simply ignored the remark. Instead you threaten an anonymous being that exists soley in the ether of this vast expanse we call the Internet (which I might add is a violation of one of the rules on your own forum). I would expect a little more from such a distinguished, 70+ gentleman such as yourself.
3. You claim everything you said to Gabe were gestures of friendship, yet everything he said to you were ignorant gibes. Did you ever stop and think for a second that maybe...just maybe...you misunderstood HIS gestures of friendship as well? Maybe you should sit on that for a while instead of playing the "Nuh-uh! He started it!" game.
4. Your stories and these videogames the surly teenagers are so wrapped up in nowadays are one in the same. Both require the same amount of creativity to produce and both have the ability to inspire their respective consumers. My advice would be to investigate this strnage new world of beeps and blips if only to get an idea of how literature is evolving in our current high tech world.
To everyone else:
1. Nobody is better than anybody else. You're all screaming into an abyss trying to prove how superior you are to the other side. This forum reminds me of the monkey cage at the zoo. You can stand on two legs and beat your chest all you want, in the end you're still a monkey.
2. Gabe and Tycho are really incredible individuals. Despite what they want you to believe, they ooze of class and integrity. And I'm certain Harlan shares many of the same qualities (when he's not being a blowhard). As it's been said, they clashed simply because they're so very similar. So to all of you, settle the fuck down. This wasn't that big a deal.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to disrespecting authority while I listen to my iPod (don't get excited, Mr. Ellison...it's just NPR's Health and Science podcast).
Bradley Alexander <actingbrad@mac.com>
Ohio - Thursday, September 29 2005 11:33:46
You know, I really don't know much about Mister Ellison. In all honesty, I don't know anything about him really. What I do know, is that there was a considerable amount of interest placed in him at PA recently. So, being like every other "surly teenager" (a name meant solely for Gabe, I know, but I couldn't help but feel a little annoyed by the fact that Ellison refuses to use his name.) I decided to come and find out a little bit about Ellison. Not really to poke fun at him or his supporters, but really to just educate myself about the man who might have possibly provoked such a large critical following. (I said "may". Don't get all flustered and tell me he didn't provoke it, because I made sure to let you know that I am not saying he deserves this one way or the other)
Upon reading the "Who is Harlan Ellison" portion of this site, the two things I learned were:
1 - Harlan Ellison does not surf the net.
2 - Harlan Ellison feels he is better than most of the people out there who use the internet as a social, educational, and recreational tool.
I then went to check the biographies. Several of which were provided by Mr. Ellison's wife Susan. I am unsure of whether or not she wrote them, but since I do not really see any credits to an author, I must assume that they were written by her. High praise deffinitely for the one that you love. I felt yet again that Mr. Ellison thinks very much of himself and lets others know this quite often. Of course I can not claim that I have not done the same, using my awards (A considerably shorter list than Mister Ellison's, and a different craft altogether) to let people know my accomplishments. It is natural to enjoy the praise of peers and fans. It isn't at all selfish, and I don't judge Mr. Ellison on this count.
I ran through the list of works, and unfortunately could not say I have read any of them. I will however look into a few short stories, just to familiarize myself. But my comments are not on Mr. Ellison's talent.
My final stop was here. Unca Harlan's Art Deco Dining Pavilion. An odd name for a forum, but I guess par for the course when you live in the "Lost Aztec Temple of Mars". (how did you get it to L.A. by the way? :) ) I read a lot of posts, and saw mostly Harlan Fans speaking out against PA members. I saw a few PA posts, but not many. I assume the flaming was deleted quickly by the webmaster. An excellent move on his part. I hate Fan Boy Flaming and a lack of intelligent discussion on a topic.
I guess this is a round about way of saying it, but I did not intend to post when I came to this site. I just thought I would look over the battlefield, shake my head and walk away. Instead I saw a post by Harlan. I had to see what he had to say on the matter. Surprisingly not very much. There were a lot of consistencies with Gabe's story and a lot of unverifiable, and convenient I might add, circumstances that led to Gabe's supposed misunderstanding.
Now Harlan's response seemed intelligent, but instead it was rippled with immaturity. Don't try to pull the over fifty some odd years of experience thing. I have over 20 years of being immature under my belt. I know what it looks like.
You assumed that someone should know what foolscap is. And the first thing you thought was "Did you go to college?". Making an assumption about someone's educational background is rude. Just because someone hasn't gone to college doesn't mean that they are some sort of surly teenage bimbo who is not at all accomplished. I graduated from college, a performance major, spent plenty of time studying Shakespeare, Kushner, Stanislovsky, Miller, Williams, and a handful of other great writers, forms of literature, and theatre, and never once heard the word foolscap used in my composition classes nor any other class I took. The word did not exist in my vocabulary until yesterday.
To make an assumption of someone because they call a pad of paper "A pad of paper" as opposed to references a word originating in the 17th century in a reference to a watermark with a jester's cap, is ludicrous. As you can see by Penny Arcade's success, the lack of a college education does not hinder the popularity, success, or abilities of their staff.
I looked at your website and I saw the site of a man who was rightfully arrogant. Someone who has had a continually successful career for over fifty years and has recieved much acclaim. Then you lashed out at one of the most influential reporters of pop culture of the day and became a relic. Your post shows immaturity, ignorance, and a failure to accept that even if there was a misunderstanding that you did something wrong.
After fifty years of hard work you have finally earned a Fools Cap. Congratualations Mr. Ellison.
Jeff R.
Philadelphia, - Thursday, September 29 2005 11:10:54
M F Korn
Baton Rouge, La - Thursday, September 29 2005 11:9:39
best,
MF Korn
Duane
- Thursday, September 29 2005 11:6:19
Andrew W. Laubacher <AndrewLaubacher@aol.com>
Brockport, New York - Thursday, September 29 2005 10:52:59
Mr. Ellison: It was my judgement that you had no need of my humble self to defend yourself against the idiot trolls who consider themselves supporters of the Penny Arcade folks. Thanks to the sheer mass of such moronic mewlings I had no memory of what "Penelope" had posted, whether it at all concerned the lovely Susan, or even if I had read it at all.
If "Penelope" did, indeed, insult Susan then may he/she/it rot in the nethermost regions of Hell. As for excoriating everyone for not immediately rushing to Susan's defense--with respect, go fuck yourself.
With affection,
Andrew Laubacher
Jay Smith
- Thursday, September 29 2005 9:42:45
Hey guys. In case you didn't read it on this screen or when you posted, there is a ONE POST PER DAY RULE on this side of the aisle.
If you want to continue defending your honor, please take it over to the Forums, sign up and debate away. But at least respect Rick's rules like the rest of us, please?
Thanks
Square721bt <square721bt@gmail.com>
Madison, WI - Thursday, September 29 2005 9:32:54
I can understand Theodore Sturgeon, because his writing and his theories provide a really good link between the golden age and the new wave. And of course, Mr. Ellison was one of the best writers of the new age. But Poppy Z. Brite? I like her writing and she seems really nice, but it seems weird to single her out as some sort of measure of sci-fi literacy.
Again, no offense to Mrs. Brite! I hope she's doing well, and that things return to normal for her very shortly.
Frank Church
- Thursday, September 29 2005 9:27:1
Be nice or go. Simple.
Evan <senjuroko@hotmail.com>
Richmond, VA - Thursday, September 29 2005 9:26:57
The main thing I want to say is that if someone on the internet insults your wife, take it with a grain of salt.
Saying that you'll hunt them down or even any kind of threat just shows all the maturity of a elementary school playground.
That said, someone bringing physcial insults about your wife (who clearly was not involved) also smacks of the playground.
Generalizations about one group or another are a fool's errand. I'm sure both groups are comprised of many individuals who each have some endearing or positive quality.
I am not suggesting we all "be friends", but merely that what happened is over. At the end of our lives, this will not make a difference one little bit.
Louis <sleepyheadkc@yahoo.com>
Kansas City, MO - Thursday, September 29 2005 8:19:41
Reading about this incident reminded me of an interview that HE gave to The Onion AV Club, which you can still find at this link:
http://avclub.com/content/node/24267
Here are a few choice HE quotes:
----------
"This is by you an interview question, right? Let's get a little more specific, since you and I both have a limited amount of life to live and I'd just as soon not turn this interview into a career."
"See, I do go off on these things. And if you ask the wrong question, I get real cranky. "
"Look, kiddo, I don't know you. I have no idea how smart, how dumb, how educated, how ethical, how moral, how courageous you are. You're a telephone voice. You call me to interview me, and I'm supposed to be cute, so the readers won't say, 'Jeezus, what a smartass mean fucker.' But I don't know if you're as smart as I am."
""As you see, I am really very jocular, very pleasant, well-spoken, and sanguine."
------
I'm just sayin' is all.
Barney Dannelke <dannelke@gmail.com>
Allentown, PA. - Thursday, September 29 2005 8:17:56
***Everybody else***
Another great, great essay by Dan Simmons:
http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message.htm
It's a little long and dense, but worth reading. I'm just doing a fair use pull quote on this. It's about 12 pages of text so I don't think I'm giving the game away. *Rick* - IF this is too much of a pull quote, my apologies in advance for the work of deletion. I really just wanted to give folks a taste, not make work for you.
"Imagine then, our world with three quite different species in it * all quite alien to one another, none understanding the basic a priori preconceptions which rule the others' lives: Premodernist, Modernist, and Postmodernist. My guess is that * although we live in a cultural world literally created by Modernist thought and technology * 95% of Americans we know are Premodernist, perhaps 4.5% are Modernist, and 0.5% are Postmodernist."
It's also wonderful to note that he is going to use the harrowing 19th and early 20th century arctic expeditions as the groundwork for his next novel! His last post about the research he was doing made me want to put on a turtleneck and a cable stitch wool sweater in June. Can't imagine how brutal the novel itself will be.
- Barney
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 8:1:43
Okay, I went through all the below messages and was ready to drop it per Rick's sage and stable advice, but...
Anonymity does one very, very bad thing. It allows the person posting the message to write some very nasty, ugly, de-humanizing things that they would never, ever say in person. The vast majority of the people who frequent THIS board either do so publicly, or they control themselves while posting anonymously.
You forget that -- despite all the rhetoric about who said what to whom and what they meant -- it was the PA boarders who assaulted this board, demeaned and insulted everyone on it with no regard to damage. As was pointed out, very few Ellison board posters even said a peep over at PA. That is called restraint.
No, giving my name and saying things publicly does not convey intelligence or even a sense of authority -- I think I can readily prove otherwise in both cases using my own posts (pre-PA) as example.
What anonymity does is open up that little primitive brain way back at the base of the skull and let it have at the world. Littered below are many, many examples of this behavior. The saddest part is that Gabe and Tycho -- the very subjects of this tirade -- are being represented by that behavior. I knew who they were prior to Foolscap. I was not AT Foolscap and so cannot address the He said, He said.
I CAN react when faced with the unmitigated vile that was spewed below, as many of us very forcefully did. Defending this behavior later with "but OBVIOUSLY Penelope was kidding" is bordering on offensive in and of itself.
Gabe and Tycho, rather than reveling in the abuse -- as Gabe does in his PA posting yesterday ("I'm trying very hard not to smile.") -- should have the sense and decency to elevate the debate to something above what it was.
I would suggest that the villains here are not Harlan, Gabe, Tycho or a handful of PA posters who came over to try to make legitimate points. Those very same anonymous posters who refuse to put their names to their words, posting words which demean everyone, effectively "elevating" the discussion to thumb-in-the-ears, waggling fingers and "nyah, nyah, nyah, can't catch me". They are the ones NO one should be proud to have speaking for them.
Not buying your explanation, even for a heartbeat.
__________________________________________________________
Brian Siano -
This is what I WANTED to post, before getting riled:
Congratulations. As someone who has a foot in both worlds, it ain't gonna be as bad as you might think. A roof over your head, paid bills and a full stomach can do wonders for creativity as well. For what it's worth, I have a little essay on this issue called "The Bohemian Hedonist" on my website.
http://mysite.verizon.net/res7n0zi/id7.html
_________________________________________________________
Rick.
Tequila, on me, should we ever meet.
Steve
Ezra Lb.
- Thursday, September 29 2005 7:54:55
robochrist, David et al
In the OTHER PLACE opportunitites have arisen to comment on the future of the space program. This is a subject which is important to me and I will enthusiastically tender my DEEP THOUGHTS at my earliest possible convenience.
Currently, however, I am in a self-imposed hiatus from posting in the OTHER PLACE. This is not the result of a snit or a fluster or a spell but simply because the War On Blather begins at home.
Hmmmmmm....glancing at the, uh, conversation, that has been going on here in THIS PLACE, would anyone care to join me?
Alex Krislov <Alexkrislov@cs.com>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 7:39:38
That'll teach me not to use brackets here. The quote that was supposed to appear below is--
-----------Based on Harlan Ellison's short story "Working with the Little People," Noah and the Gremlins, according to production notes, "tell[s] the story of Noah Raymond, a successful young science fantasy writer with an incurable writer's block, who is visited by a friendly but colorfully cantankerous group of gremlins who plan to ghostwrite stories for Noah by leaping about on his keyboard.---------
Alex Krislov <Alexkrislov@cs.com>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 7:37:35
A new Ellison adaption appears to be in the works, of a story I must confess I don't recall ever reading.
>
Check it out at http://www.playbill.com/news/article/95283.html
And, yes, I am trying to change the subject. Ain't it time?
S.S.
- Thursday, September 29 2005 7:14:36
It seems the concensus of the informed seem to be that, if given the chance, both sides would get along well. Both are respected and popular in their own right. A little misunderstanding from BOTH sides happened, ignorance or whatever you may call it. So here we are. Does anything need to be said past what has? We got explanations from both, a little namecalling from both. They're both known for their "playful banter" and ego. So, good fight, hit the showers and go home.
The wife comment, uncalled for, unfortunately however, it's purpose was filled. A troll as described is someone who attempts to rile up people by targetting that said person or community's soft points. Mr. Ellison took it with voracity and probably made that person's day. The best defense against a troll is to not acknowledge their insults.
I believe a bunch of fans, despite whatever it may be, has it's percentage of the "open mouth and spew" variety. Not necessarily anonymous. Just because your name is attached does not mean you always say brilliant things. You don't get special privledges if you put your name in there, it's not important, so don't use it as a defense. "Oh you're anonymous, so you must be a coward and a retard" Good work Bob Smith.
So to recap, I'm sure Foolscap had some great moments, obviously the GoH thing didn't go as well as it could have but that's life. Now let's all move on with ours. Also, the webmaster, Rick, is awesome. Keep up the good work.
Rick Wyatt <rick@rickwyatt.com>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 7:5:27
I am weighing in here with a personal message rather than the usual webmastery/management stuff.
It is entirely possible, even probably mind you, that the truth of what transpired in that brief and trivial interchange lies somewhere between Harlan's recollection and Gabes. It is also true that much of HOW what happened was perceived is as much a product of both parties' prejudices and perceptions as any real intent on either side. As the proverb goes, the palest ink is better than the best memory.
A prudent course, therefore, would be first to simply recognize that something happened that for whatever reason to create bad blood. Second, to accept the word of those involved - that Harlan really had no problem with sharing Guest of Honor privileges and meant no offense or insult in what he said, that Gabe was truly taken aback and felt he was merely defending himself. So many fights, wars even, are the result of someone assuming they can read the minds and hearts of others and know what they TRULY intended.
Even more prudent would be for those of you presently arguing to recognize that it's unlikely parties on either side are going to change their minds, let alone accept one of your points. For example, the contention that Harlan's posts on the subject of his knowledge of PA are inconsistent. I know which quote Harlan would respond to this with, but there is no reason for debate here. Fans of PA will see this as a smoking gun and assume Harlan is lying. Fans of HE will recognize, knowing Harlan, that it's entirely possible he looked up PA months in advance and a good while later simply failed to (or could not be bothered to) make the connection when prompted to do so. There is no point in arguing about it because neither side is likely to diverge from this. Similarly, the various arguments over whether or not Harlan or Gabe were or are jealous/surly/insulting/cannabilistic/vegetarian/whatever are unlikely to do anything more than preach to respective choirs.
Finally, responding to insults towards either party here is about the worst thing you can do. It allows the insulter to know their message was received and possibly even that they scored a hit. Even better to the offender is if this response is emotional. Harlan, in my opinion, is wrong on this one - nothing would have made the person who said that horrible thing about his amazing and lovely wife more satisfied than a bunch of fans charging in to her defense like drunken knights-errant. It may have made him, her, or you feel a little better, but it only would have made further attacks more likely.
I am the first line of defense here and I take the first shot every singe time. Harlan and you just take the ones that get through me, or that I am obliged to allow based on the rules of the game. Every time one of you just can't help but take a shot at Penny Arcade, its founders, or its fans; every time you prolong an argument or come in long after the fact because you just can't bear to have others deprived of your "take"; every time you challenge the opinion or logic of someone who is obviously never going to change either; everything you do that continues to inflate this ridiculously short interchange to "seven at a blow" status; every time this winds up causing me more difficulty and extends the time over which I am going to have to deal with this. And I would suggest that of ALL the people involved I have done the least to deserve ANY of this shit.
Brian Siano
- Thursday, September 29 2005 6:54:58
The League of Penny Arcade Fans does seem to attract a lot of riff-raff. As has been noted, very few of us Ellison fans have been making PA's life miserable. That's because we tend to be intelligent, somewhat courteous, and we have a sense of what we should be spending our time on. (Also, the _content_ of our messages tends to be a few reading-levels higher than the scrawls of the PA fans.)
Even when they _try_ to make an intelligent point, they fall flat on their faces. Take this Reverend Ted guy who, by citing old posts of Harlan's, tries to cast him as an unscrupulous liar. On the 28th, harlan said he'd checked the site: on the 8th, however, Harlan claimed ignorance of the site. Thus, the pseudonymous Ted claims, Harlan's a liar. Most people'd figure, "Okay, Harlan checked the site out during those twenty days." But, amazingly, Ted doesn't have the wit to see that others _have_ that wit.
Ted must be easy to burglarize; he must leave his doors unlockked, figuring that others couldn't _possibly_ figure out that troublesome "doorknob" thing.
Aaron
Baltimore, - Thursday, September 29 2005 6:2:5
Are yall even reading the previous posts before you jump in? I'm talking specifically about the Penelope post...
Here it is again, so you don't have to dig for it...
******************
Penelope
Ashiya, Japan - Tuesday, September 27 2005 4:16:14
Ego inflation 101.
I'd just like to point out that for every 1 person Harlan has on his side in this issue, 10 side with the Penny-Arcade guys. I think it's ironic that all of those awards haven't earned him enough loyal fans to stand up and defend him.
Oh, and seeing how his one comment on the issue seems to solely be a crack at Gabes physical appearence, I can only come to the conclusion that this man (asside from being a cock-wad) relies soley on insulting others to keep his shallow ego boat afloat.
Yay! I can play that game too.
Sorry, we're not going to be reprinting that insult here. Webderlanders are probably capable of looking it up if they want to know what was said, Aaron. - Ed
*************
One, Penelope's first paragraph is somewhat idiotic, since most of Harlan's fans are going to stick to bookstores and not his website, but that's not what we're talking about.
Harlan made fun, repeatedly, of Gabe's physical appearance. Penelope said this was childish and responded with, basically, "let's all play this game then!" He then "attacked" Penelope.
Now go look at that photo on the first page of Harlan's wife. Obviously she's pretty. This was not a real attack; it was a statement trying to make a point.
Harlan even stated that he couldn't stand sycophants and that he was horrified that all of you took Gabe's account to be true without a second thought. Guess what you're doing right now?
"Sorry Susan, I..."
"Sorry HE, I"
"Gosh, I'm sorry..."
blah blah blah
I *like* Harlan and his writing. He is overreacting though.
And all of you, though well-meaning, are making it worse.
Mike Rowlands <magic_lava@hotmail.com>
Chester, Cheshire/UK - Thursday, September 29 2005 5:52:12
Well, after linking to this site from PA (i'm a fan, but not a fanboy) too see the "other" side of the story, and reading Mr Ellison's 2nd reply I conclude the following:
Mr Ellison, your account doesn’t add up, plus it smacks of someone who has spent a large amount of their time making up excuses/reasons for their behavior. In fact they are the sort of "explanations" I would expect a "surely teenager" to make!
It’s true that if you ask two different people to describe the same event, you will often get two different answers, BUT:
To quote:
“The surly teenager then asked me, not very loudly, "Don't you want to wear your hat?"
As there WAS NO HAT for me, I pretty much let slide the gibe.”
That was a gibe? Sheesh!
“1) Someone in the audience said something to ME, DIRECTLY, that I now understand as not having been heard or linked properly, by the surly teenager. I can't remember what it was, but it was a remark made my someone I knew, in a jocular vein, and I tossed over my shoulder the pro forma fuckyou or gofuckyerself or whatever it was. It was no more serious or rude a fuckyou than a Bart Simpson bite me or eat my shorts.”
Sounds like a VERY poor excuse to me; “I was not saying fuck off to you. No it was to someone else over there. No I can’t remember why. No really! Honest!”
“I asked him, then, not realizing he must have an instant flee-or-fight reaction-formation to anyone questioning his intelligence--whether in reality, or as he perceives it--if he had gone to college. I was merely making chat.”
Uh-huh, so you didn’t see an opportunity to get your own gibe in once you realized that he didn’t know what foolscap was? Honestly? Come on now. Merely making chat?
“I wanted to know what his educational background was.”
Ha ha, Oh stop it now. Where you THAT interested?
Sorry your reply it littered with half-truths and misleading excuses.
Having said that doesn’t everyone know what foolscap is?
One final point. Don’t worry Mr Ellison (I very much doubt that you are anyway), this will all blow over in a couple of days and all will be forgotten in a couple of weeks.
Adam-Troy Castro <adamcastro999@yahoo.com>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 5:50:55
Sigh.
Harlan, I think what happened in my case was being shocked by the Susan comment as well, debating the 24-hour rule, not breaking it, then forgetting all about it and making a more general comment as the idiocy moved on by the next day.
(Shrug) Had it occurred in my presence, I might have exploded. The comment certainly deserved explosion. Here, in delayed-reaction land, thrashing through trolldom, I did what seemed cogent at the time.
I'll note that I never conceded their version of the events, and took no position on the grounds that I didn't know what had happened, commenting only on elements of the tempest here.
(And I didn't do anything as backhanded as "defend" (you) "for being an asshole." I said that everybody's been one, that I've seen you be one, and that you've seen me be one. I also said that I've seen you be much more and that I hoped you would say the same of me. All fair, I think, not saying anything about you I didn't immediately apply to myself, and by doing so take the debatable merits of that characterization outside the realm of my intended point, which I then proceeded to address. Nothing that took a position on the events of Foolscap, which were outside my direct knowledge. Now that I've finally read your own testimony, it strikes me as more sensible, and more in character for everybody involved. It's the version I credit as truth. If I made any error, it was not assuming the existence of such a version, immediately -- but I stayed away from things outside my direct knowledge.)
Anyway.
Meanwhile, I see from the Robert Blake ("Lost Highway") and Cocksucker comments that the idiocy continues.
And I find myself not so much into measured response, anymore.
BOY, DO I FIND MYSELF REALLY, REALLY, REALLY IMPRESSED WITH THE FANS OF TYCHO AND GABE. I'M GETTING MORE AND MORE IMPRESSED WITH THEM EVERY DAY. EVERYTHING THEY SAY MAKES ME WANT TO GENUFLECT AT THE ALTAR OF THEIR UNPARALLELED COOL.
My current suspicion, based entirely on the mileage of this tempest.
This is not the escalating misunderstanding you describe. They went there hoping to leave with an "I beat Harlan" story. They got a few uncomfortable moments on stage and are running with it.
Bob <Bob215487@hotmail.com>
5thplane, Hell - Thursday, September 29 2005 5:49:8
Greg Zapp <gzapp2000@yahoo.com>
Keller, Texas - Thursday, September 29 2005 5:46:32
Robert Fiore
- Thursday, September 29 2005 4:27:14
Incidentally, that comic strip is a total piece of shit.
Eric Martin
- Thursday, September 29 2005 4:14:36
If you need some help with the thumping, just call. Some codes never go out of date.
Douglas Harrison
Northeastern BC - Thursday, September 29 2005 0:42:2
D.
Ori -Gravitron- Klein <=diespamdie=ori_kl@netvision.net.il>
Israel - Thursday, September 29 2005 0:33:41
This is why:
A. Hear all - believe nothing.
B. Don't make generalizations.
C. Pity people instead of being excited over their words.
D. Always have a mosquito killer in place (moths are drawn to flames).
E. Reading books does not make one intelligent nor is being wise mean one has been reading books.
F. Give trolls a golden coin prior to using them for a latrine substitute (public urinals require maintenance, which is not free).
G. The difference between love and hate is a thin line, but apathy knows no border and is armor plated with a carapace as wide and thick as the panzer tank.
Enjoy your life.
"Magic was invented so mankind would have a way to tell reality to go fuck itself!" - annonymous
(If Mike claims that Harlan is such a gigantic asshole, maybe he should recognize his defeat and label himself Harlan-MX, or Harlan could go under psuedonym of Gabe-MX, now there's an antic.)
Dug <harlansuckscock@hotmail.com>
- Thursday, September 29 2005 0:30:46
Saying he is a cocksucker is cool though
Cocksucker
John
- Thursday, September 29 2005 0:4:43
I am a die hard, hard core, PA fan. That said I would like to apologize for my fellow PA fans. I realize that I will raise the ire of any PA fans who see this, but really, attacking your wife? Again, I am sincerely sorry.
Rob (fake name)
LH
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 23:53:25
To H & S~
Finally got to a point where I could post requested link, and discovered you'd already received it. Sorry for being unavoidably detained by houseguests. My most humble and abject apologies.
Hope all is well, foofaraw notwithstanding.
L.
PS. Rules of the house being one post per day, it may have been beyond the posting limit of our fine Webderlanders to berate the dung eater who insulted our dear Susan. Just a thought. In retrospect, if anything has ever been worth breaking the house rules for, that post was it.
Decius
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 23:46:55
As far as I know both of the PA-makers are well advanced in their Twenties, one even married and having a child.
David Ray <shaneeray@comcast.net>
Bellevue, WA - Wednesday, September 28 2005 22:12:28
It is a shame that with all this ka-ka, that there weren't more postings on Foolscap and Harlan's participation in the various panels and his talks.
David
Bill Limoni <billlimonicounterstrikegod@hotmail.com>
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 22:2:24
---
John raced around the corner where he ran into the sexiest pair of legs he had ever seen. He pulled out his government issued mp 83 tacticle lazer pistol, its barrel hard and long as his manhood, and aimed it at the woman in front of him. "Stop or I will shoot!" She didn't, instead aiming an aci 0976 tac. b at his head. His gun went off violently, sending a large wad of lazer into her face melting it like butter on a steaming bag of popcorn, similiar to one John had been at last week with the Amonex model Thidke.
Kristin Ruhle <kristin@rahul.net>
Los Gatos, CA - Wednesday, September 28 2005 20:47:26
My how easy is it for people to misunderstand each other.
Having experienced HE's courtesy first hand (and closer than some others, even, since I've been on this site for a year and joined the webderlander group Harlan took out to dinner) I can say it should not need defending; he went to great lengths to be *very* accessible to over 150-odd people and dind't openly bristle at playing "writing-teacher" (or maybe "babysitter" is a better term?) to a bunch of amateurs (a couple of whom even showed genuine talent! But even the worst of us were only doing it for fun; there's no reason to upbraid anybody for working at their own level.) Harlan, you were a LOT kinder than any of us deserved. Was, are and will be I hope.
I also know you are direct but utterly honest and have never let myself be hurt by anything you said to me. (People here have wondered when I was going to start crying.) Well, I do have a coward's nervous system and wish to God I could trade it in....I've been fretting over the way my body-language betrays me a lot...
...I heard you yell out of Barney's passenger window at that lady with the cell phone, at the red light....a stranger might have thought it was road rage (unfortunately I doubt SHE heard you), but I knew you were really concerned she was putting her child in danger by driving distracted that way.....
Susan, I said it to your face and will again: you are sweet - how could anybody set out to insult you? And I say that well remembering how Harlan chewed me out once on your behalf! No, you are not overpricing anything...that's not the issue of the moment, apparently, but what I mean is that your honor is impeccable. And I really would have given you the "Read a Banned Book" sweat shirt off my back as a peace offering....although it does look a little large for you, and a little small for Harlan. (Size M 38-40 i think) Your love for one another is the most touching thing I have ever seen.
Kristin
Gotta thank Hank for letting even me play with his precious Smith-Corona...did you jam three hammers at once any? Are Olympias really better for typing on at 120wpm? And by the way, why DID they ban you from Brazil? If you have so many words for the G&T idiot trollers (they don't deserve it) can you write that tale up? No, I'm not being impatient....take yr time...In the meantime, Take Care and be careful where you hand out this site's URL in public....
Reverend Ted <reverendted@satx.rr.com>
San Antonio, TX - Wednesday, September 28 2005 20:20:19
HARLAN ELLISON
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 12:56:45
"...and unlike the arrogant stupidity of those who say they've never heard of me, and never read me, and never will, snarky tots and brain-dead gamers, I'm forced to conclude...when I was apprised many months ago that my co-Guests of Honor were Gabe & Tycho, I familiarized myself with their site, their work, their contributions in the community, and the wide audience they had...
HARLAN ELLISON
- Thursday, September 8 2005 12:44:42
"ELIJAH NEWTON: I wish I knew what the hell you're referencing when you mention some sort of liaison among Foolscap, the convention, Penny Arcade (whatever that is), and me. But, sadly, I sit here with a look of Pogo-like bewilderment on mah phizz."
I ask because I don't want to simply assume that this represents some sort of duplicity on Mr. Ellison's part, coming as I do from a perspective wholly lacking in any reference to his demeanor or mannerisms, and would hate to have to call into question the veracity of his "testimony" (as if he's on trial for the heinous dismemberment of some wealthy socialite or seraphic prioress) regarding those earth-shattering, paradigm-shifting events what transpired that fateful day in Bellevue. (*thunder crash*)
As a side note: I am to assume that, at this stage, any denouncement of "Penelope's" comments would be taken as post-hoc toadying, but to not only take the fight outside of the issue itself and into personal insults, but to extend it even further away from any relevent target as such is not only wholly inappropriate, but reprehensible.
PS: One would do well not to mistake grandiloquence for intelligence, yet one would be well served to keep in mind that many people do.
(Ok, fine, so
Marci Kiser <marcik@hotmail.com>
NC - Wednesday, September 28 2005 20:17:20
Harlan,
I found my copy of San Diego Lightfoot Sue while moving a month ago, and quickly re-devoured it.
At any rate, your introduction to Mr. Reamy and his stories is easily one of the 3 best of the 75+ books I have that you've introduced. Has it ever been reprinted outside this poor little collection?
And is there anything else of Mr. Reamy's beyond his novel and stories you could recommend?
Bill Gauthier
New Bedford , MA - Wednesday, September 28 2005 19:45:12
So a friend of mine recently recommended Jerzy Kosinski's THE PAINTED BIRD to me and I'm reading it. Harlan, what're your thoughts on the book or, better yet, Kosinski? His writing reminds me of yours in many ways.
Is the Boston gig still happening? If so, I'm hoping to meet you up there.
Take care,
Bill
EastBay
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 17:37:23
I don't have the answer to your query but I do feel your pain. I have quite a few of HE's books as well and I can never remember where a reference is. What I wouldn't give for a handy reference guide/complete index to his work so I can always find what I need when I need it.
I've read most of the postings by the PA people and am saddened that members of my generation...
1 - feel that video games have equaled (and some feel they have surpassed) literature in depth, intelligence, cultural importance, et cetera. Yes games are fun, and a small few have acheived "A*R*T" status, but as a whole the gaming industry is sophmoric and inferior to the written word.
2 - believe that being ignorant is perfectly ok. That intelligence is an inferior vitue to wit; that being ignorant is something to be proud of. (How many people practicly boasted they hadn't heard of HE, and don't really read) And not only that but their definition of wit is pretty loose. To be witty nowadays is to make some one's wife or just call somebody an asshole.
3 - when faced with 2 sides of a story just go along with the joe who tells his tale first and/or tells it the loudest.
Ezra Lb.
Just done watching the news today. NASA made a statment that since the 70s they've been heading in the wrong direction and have been following the wrong goals and priorities. Of course it only took them 30years and trillions of dollars to figure that out.
Don't get me wrong, I think our space program has been pretty good, but its been a "B-" organization instead of "A+" A lot of wasted oppertunity and a lot of wasted money.
Josey Cash
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 17:24:17
ps, after looking through the pics, I finally know who Mr. Ellison is! I just want to say that I loved you in "Lost Highway" and you really played that character creepy! I didn't understand what your character meant though, could you explain it more?
Orion <Failed_Ascension@hotmail.com>
Vancouver, BC, Canada - Wednesday, September 28 2005 17:13:30
I have never read anything by Harlen and I am not a gamer, I do however have mad respect for anyone who has anything to do with Babylon 5, so hats off to you sir.
I also don't think Gabe or Tycho can be blamed for what their fans do. They have in the fast refered to them as "the fucking Gestapo" for incidents similar to this.
Danny Adams <dda@wwco.com>
Roanoke, VA - Wednesday, September 28 2005 16:28:31
H.E. wrote, "Everyone was laughing. But not necessarily at him."
As I recall, when I was a teenager and people were laughing, I naturally assumed they were laughing at me. Nothing anyone said could convince me otherwise, alas. (Now I enjoy it, at least in certain circumstances.)
If not-so-instant karma is real, perhaps in about fifty years one of the offenders will be standing up on stage with a surly teenager and find out a couple of days later how "rude" he was.
While I've never met Harlan Ellison myself, he has gone out of his way to be kind to people I care about, and that's good enough for me.
Anthony Tollin <sanctumotr@earthlink.net>
San Antonio, Texas - Wednesday, September 28 2005 15:51:5
I'm told that Harlan wrote about Wyllis Cooper's "The Thing on the Fourble Board" in one of his books, but have not been able to locate the piece in my pretty-extensive Ellison library. Does anyone recall where this article was printed, or articles by Harlan on old-time-radio in general?
Steeltemplar
Virginia - Wednesday, September 28 2005 15:43:18
At any rate, I think I might actually end up reading some of Mr. Ellison's writings now. I did know of him before this. I have long wanted to play the computer game based on his work - I Have No Mouth, And I Must Scream. Also, I remember when he hosted a marathon of The Prisoner on the sci-fi channel. I recall his work there favorably.
Steve Burnap <webderland@burnap.net>
Walnut Creek, CA - Wednesday, September 28 2005 15:37:49
I find the whole thing utterly amusing, partly because, in retrospect, it is so utterly predictable. It's two people tailor made to piss each other off put in a room together.
I do hope Mr. Ellison won't take to much offense if I offer some insights that I think will clear up some of his ignorance about the mores of the web. Because the web is mostly free, a site like PA can pull in far more fans than a published author. It takes two seconds effort and no cash to read Penny Arcade while even in the days of Amazon, it takes effort, money and time to read Harlan Ellison. This will give him more income probably, but fewer fans. And more to the point, his fans will be sitting at home in their favorite chairs when they hear him complain about some offense while Penny Arcade readers will be sitting at a machine tailor made to instantly returning fire. Spend any time on USENET and it is easy to find hundreds of examples of ravening hordes launching verbal attacks on other groups for slights, real or imagined. You think this is bad? Check out Slashdot, where mere reportage of "attacks" on the Linux operating system has taken down the phone lines of companies because of the loads of complaints.
In other words, it is not entirely fair to blame Gabe and Tycho for the actions of their fans here. They never linked here, for one. There is no Penny Arcade vetting process and any damn fool can show up and claim to speak for them. It's like blaming "Helter Skelter" for Charles Manson.
As far as this "Penelope" user...to use the vernacular, Mr. Ellison, YHBT. "You Have Been Trolled". There are people on the Internet who get their jollies by anonymously pissing other people off. They come in and poke from behind the curtain, trying to get a reaction. And here they got it. You fed the troll and so he's probably laughing his ass off right now. If you want to know why no one defended you wife's honor, well, I'd guess that some longterm net users were doing exactly what you are supposed to do. Ignoring them. "Don't feed the trolls".
Mr Ellison, while claims that you're going to find the ass who insulted your wife have meaning IRL (In real life), they mean nothing here. I spent the last two years on another forum as a moderator, where my job was to remove the sort of vile shit people post (and if you think what was directed at your wife is bad, I've got some stuff to show you that'll curl your toes.) I've been a software engineer for twenty years and can describe, at length, the protocols that underly the net and I have been in more than one occasion where I would have dearly loved to punch the lights of some idiot troll out. But with nothing but an IP address (probably using a proxy) there just isn't a goddamn thing that you can do. Like it or not, it's an anonymous medium where people can and do write posts specifically to rile people up and keep arguments going. The best way to deal with it is for no one to react and for the moderator to delete the offending post.
In closing, I will change the subject by saying that anyone who likes ultrashort fiction should read http://girlsarepretty.com/. (I have no connection with that site other than as a reader.)
Brian Siano
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 15:2:19
I stuck to reading the comments from those who were there, figuring Harlan was more than capable of explaining his side of things, and more than a little saddened that he had to waste his time over the matter. I mean, other than _this_ imbecile exchange, it sounded as though most people at Foolscap had had a great time, that Harlan had been generous with his time and work, and that it was an event I wish I could have attended.
In an attenmpt to _change the subject_, here's a summary of things going on in _my_ wonderful life. Planning for Philcon continues, and I'm one of the people setting up the Registration procedure, which gives me a chance to flex some administrative muscle.
But the big story is that I'm getting off the ground with a new career, as a self-employed Mortgage Broker. The field seems complicated, but somewhat interesting, and it'd be nice to enable people to buy homes. But it is a little disenheartening to face that fact that my livelihood won't come from any creative talent I have, but from a degree of white-collar skill. Happily, if I can make this work _and_ maintain enough Free Time, I'll be able to have the freedom to accomplish other things-- woodworking, some writing community projects, and the like. But it'll be a Big Adjustment for me.
Okay, that news won't change the subject. Any other ideas?
Frank Church
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 14:15:39
Susan and Harlan, you are loved and respected, even though we piss you guys off on a regular basis.
Hoping these children, who have come into our little nook, will do the wise thing and slink away, back to the parasite lodge, where they were farted from.
And, by the way, Susan is a lovely woman. She is a fox. Whistles like a drunkin sailor.
Ezra Lb.
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 14:14:9
But think I heard my pseudonym used in vain.
I don't think that exploring space is pointless, I fully support an unmanned, peaceful space effort. The Cassini thrills my soul. What is pointless is to spend billions of dollars so that some test pilot can salute the flag on Mars.
Save the Hubble or replace it with something better!
The idea that we can corrupt and despoil this beautiful planet and fly away to some New Jerusalem in the Milky Way saddens and sickens me. A people who think such thoughts prove themselves unworthy of immortality. A people who think such thoughts will destroy themselves long before they can fly away.
Oh good golly be still my beating heart!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9507677/
Jim Davis
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 14:4:29
--a remark of unforgiveable ugliness about my wife.
That none of you, after Susan's many kindnesses, never rose against this gratuitous ugliness, saddens me."
Honestly, Harlan, the posts by the PA trolls were, as a whole, so juvenile and moronic, I didn't see the point of singling out one portion of them, especially if would spur more attacks on the board. (Many others probably felt the same.) But you're right--Susan is a kind and terrific person, and deserved at least a cursory defense from me, even if it was just a few words. If my silence added to her insult in any way, I apologize. (And I'm glad you set the record straight. Gabe's motives hardly look so innocent now, do they?)
"I must say this thread is absolutely hysterical. Another classic PA disaster. :) I hope it keeps going so I have something to read at work again tomorrow."
Jesus, can we say it did and call it a day? I never thought I'd pine for the days of the Kubrick mudfests, but damn if they don't look like the Gilded Age now.
Alex Krislov <Alexkrislov@cs.com>
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 14:2:27
Harlan, for what it's worth, I suspect a lot of us didn't even see that jackass' remark about Susan. I stopped reading most of those messages after a line or two, and didn't see it until it became an issue unto itself. I'd like to think I'd have commented if I had seen it. In truth, though, after 25 years online, I've grown so thick a hide, I might have simply erased it from my head as soon as I saw it. You are right, of course; it is an unforgivable remark.
Unfortunately, it's also all typical of the web. The internet is swamped with witless flotsam, trolls who think themselves brave and clever when they are dull and nasty. These are the spiritual children of Norman Epstein.
And it worries me to think that I've grown so lacking in sensation as a result.
HARLAN ELLISON
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 13:26:32
I excoriated the lot of you for not speaking to the nasty comment by "Penelope" in re Susan.
Steve Barber was offended, and said so.
Thank you, Steve.
Yr. pal, Harlan
Aaron
Baltimore, MD - Wednesday, September 28 2005 13:25:43
I wouldn't get too bent out of shape over the wife comment. I think the guy was just trying to be funny in a "ya momma is so fat she..blah blah". Probably trying to make the point that this whole thread is silly.
I wouldn't get mad at your fans either. Your wife is obviously pretty. Responding to a statement that is so "the sky is not blue" would just be silly, especially when the statement was made absurd to prove a point.
And no, I'm not the guy who posted it. :) I'm not stating my email address just in case some hacker on either side fixates on this posting for some reason.
On another note....I must say this thread is absolutely hysterical. Another classic PA disaster. :) I hope it keeps going so I have something to read at work again tomorrow.
HARLAN ELLISON
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 12:56:45
What the surly teenager posted on his website as having happened, did NOT, in fact, transpire in that way. Like Mr. Tycho's "gut feeling" or "assumption" or "telepathic intuition" or whatever it was, everything the surly teenager posted was HIS perception of an interchange that lasted for less than two minutes. His assumptions and interpretations are his own, and he's entitled to them. Weird and sad and skewed as they may be.
But for him, for Mr. Tycho, and for all of you, I am telling you they are no more accurate than MY understanding of the matter. I don't expect the surly teenager to pause even a moment to consider that his interpretations are wonky, he's incapable, I suspect, of assuming responsibility for ANYTHING he does, like some mook standing in front of Judge Judy. And he certainly isn't going to cop to fronting someone who meant him no harm, not in front of his worshipful gamer-tots. But this is the bottom line:
I did not know them, I had no negative feelings toward them, and I was neither rude nor discourteous to them.
Never insulted them. Never wanted to insult them. Didn't do it consciously or reflexively. Just didn't do it. ALL insults and disparagement came from the surly teenager. Mr. Tycho shouldn't be defending his associate's bad behavior; after all, Mr. Tycho was standing right there beside me.
My assertion is demonstrably more accurate than what the surly teenager posted to arouse his adolescent admirers. As verified by the CHAIRMAN OF THE FOOLSCAP CONVENTION, Hank Graham, who has stated very clearly THERE WAS NO JESTER'S HAT FOR ME. If that is so, then all that follows in the surly teenager's memoir is equally as skewed, equally as misinterpreted, and equally as unfair to me.
We were in each other's company less than two minutes. We were all four--Gabe & Tycho, Hank Graham, myself--on the stage in a small room. They were making "gifts" to the Guests of Honor. The first was an orange peeler. I did the expected "take" and looked at this small plastic kitchen implement with mock humor and confusion. I then got a SECOND one, intended for Kathy Roche-Zujko (my ex-secretary, who now lives in Bellevue, with whom we hung during the weekend, and who had picked Susan and me up at Sea-Tac). It was a thankyou from the ConCommittee for her good offices. With TWO of these items, I continued to do the aversion shtick, edging backward toward the audience, past the surly teenager, with one of the orange peelers behind my back and, openly to the entire room, slipped it to someone in the audience. Everyone laughed.
I then returned to my place next to the surly teenager, as Hank Graham placed jester's caps (signifying "foolscap") on Mr. Tycho and the surly teenager. Mr. Graham then handed me a lined yellow tablet in a plastic sleeve--foolscap, in the classic meaning of the word--and said, "Here's YOUR foolscap." I am a writer. Getting foolscap was appropriate. I am neither a clown nor an asshole, as so many of the PA adolescents who have no idea of my fifty-plus years' work perceive. It was fitting and proper that I should get a pad of ... well ... foolscap.
The surly teenager then asked me, not very loudly, "Don't you want to wear your hat?"
As there WAS NO HAT for me, I pretty much let slide the gibe.
Well, two aspects of the moment that followed:
1) Someone in the audience said something to ME, DIRECTLY, that I now understand as not having been heard or linked properly, by the surly teenager. I can't remember what it was, but it was a remark made my someone I knew, in a jocular vein, and I tossed over my shoulder the pro forma fuckyou or gofuckyerself or whatever it was. It was no more serious or rude a fuckyou than a Bart Simpson bite me or eat my shorts.
But it wasn't addressed to the surly teenager, who had already made snotty remarks at me, not once, but twice.
If the surly teenager misheard and thought he was EVEN IN THE EXCHANGE, I was unaware of it.
Till I got home and saw the foofaraw here.
I was, thus, neither rude nor disrespectful to him.
So he misinterpreted from the git-go.
Which invalidates everything that he says followed. Most of which took place in that arid wasteland between his ears.
Next, I replied to him: "There's no hat for me. HERE is my foolscap, and I held up the pad. He stared at it, slack-jawed, uncomprehendingly. I repeated the word, trying to indicate that writing paper for a writer was originally, and has been traditionally, known as "foolscap," not an unknown word to me, any more than it is to any of you here; nor was its double-entendre lost on the audience, who also knew the word.
(One of the most troubling aspects of the cultural ignorance of surly teenagers is that though they are tabula rasa about most everything but what Shakira is wearing these days, they are insulted and defensive and arrogant and dismissive and rude when one tries, however innocently, to educate them, whether it's about something as minuscule as "foolscap" or something as powerfully important as that the Holocaust really happened. They all have ipods, but very little information.)
(To point out this reality, of course, only imbeds the deeper, the urban legends that anyone old enough to remember FDR simply cannot get "into" the venue of the young. It ain't the young, mi amigos, it's the iggerunt.)
So the surly teenager was clearly as unfamiliar with this common term as he would be of hubris, the Elgin Marbles, Kilroy, and Eddie Cantor. Not to mention Marta Toren, Gertrude Ederle, Jesse Owens, Benito Mussolini, and El Greco. Not STUPID, merely ignorant. Two different things, as I must have pointed out a hundred times in other contexts during my many panels and lectures. I asked him, then, not realizing he must have an instant flee-or-fight reaction-formation to anyone questioning his intelligence--whether in reality, or as he perceives it--if he had gone to college. I was merely making chat. The conversation was between us, and the audience COULD NOT POSSIBLY have heard the interchange, thus putting the interpretatiuonal lie to his assertion in his posting that everyone was laughing at him.
Everyone was laughing. But not necessarily at him.
And definitely not because of our "college" interchange.
He replied, no, he hadn't gone to college.
Now--and he never even considered THIS--I wanted to know what his educational background was. Here was a fellow whose work at PA was accomplished...
...and unlike the arrogant stupidity of those who say they've never heard of me, and never read me, and never will, snarky tots and brain-dead gamers, I'm forced to conclude...when I was apprised many months ago that my co-Guests of Honor were Gabe & Tycho, I familiarized myself with their site, their work, their contributions in the community, and the wide audience they had...
...if they did the same, for me, they gave no indication. In fact, the surly teenager made it clear from the moment we mounted the stage, that he hadn't a clue as to who I was, my fifty-plus years of work, my social activism, or anything else. Like many of his benighted generation, he thinks that being a surly teenager is the noblest state, and the world began when he came into it. He is clearly culturally and historically arid, and that's a shame, but it had nothing to do with me. I do not seek the approbation of monkeys, and that the surly teenager knows me not is as pressing a concern to me as the placement of the swirling rocks in Saturn's inner rings.
Either way, who the hell am I to belittle anyone for not having gone to college? As anyone who knows ANYTHING about me is aware, I was booted out of college after a year and a half. So if anything, I'd be championing anyone who has made a name and place for himself outside that System.
Interested, I then asked him if he'd graduated high school. I think he said yes.
The reason I'm not sure, is because the event-interlude was ending, everyone was leaving the room, Hank Graham was leaving the stage, and Mr. Tycho let him pass, leaned in to me, and said -- and I am not making this up, if Mr. Tycho would care to confirm it -- "We're not all illiterate, I know what foolscap is." I smiled. He seemed a decent sort of fellow and I was no more aware of "rudeness" blah blah blah than I was for the following two days.
But next to me, the surly teenager said, very loudly, truckling to the audience, "I love your 'Star Wars' books." The people down front, who were in the ragged queue trying to get out of the room to go down the hall to my next panel, heard the remark, and went ooooh and ahhhhh. It was a pretty lame gibe, but I've been around some of the cleverest aphorists in the world in my time, some of the wittiest and most acerbic zinger artists, from Robert Bloch and Isaac Asimov to Robin Williams and Whoopi Goldberg. Did he really think such a sophomoric lunge unhinged me? "Ellison stormed off the stage." Yeah, sure.
If I had a dime for every twerp who retold a story in which I come off like a stupefied baboon, in which I'm like the guy in the cartoon whose hat pops off and he falls headfirst out of the panel because of some sharp retort, in which the twerp making the dopey remark is so clever that "Ellison gets shut down," I'd have enough to buy Bavaria. I heard the rermark, and I replied, "Ahhh, so THAT'S how we're going to play!"
And that was the end of it. They left the stage before I did, because they were in front of me. And they went their way, and I went mine. There was no storming. By them, by me. If they were twittered by my "rudeness" they never showed how deeply they'd been excoriated.
With one exception, I never saw either of them again.
The one exception was later that day, or early the next, when I was dragooned to chair a "writers workshop." They put a bunch of us in a room, and we workshopped (I wrote a new story. Not very long, but a new one, nonetheless). At some point, it was about 4:50 PM, a gaggle of people were outside the slightly ajar door to the small meetingroom wherein we worked, and I went out and politely...
...let me say that again...
I
POLITELY
asked them to take their conversation down the hall, because it was disturbing the workshoppers inside. The surly teenager was standing there against the wall with the loud talkers. No one moved. Again, I POLITELY said, "No, really, could you move this now?" All but one of them moved away. Guess who stood there slack-jawed, staring?
What I did not know, and what NOT ONE OF THEM, including the surly teenager, said, was that they were to have taken over that room at 4:30. They had every right to be standing there. And in fact, I was ignorantly unaware that I was in a place they didn't expect me to be, asking THEM to go away!
No one on the ConCommittee had told any of us in the room that we were to be out of there by 4:30. We all thought it was a side-room, a small conference room, and that we would work till we finished. It was the usual convention scheduling gaffe.
Had anyone in that group, especially the surly teenager, opened his mouth and said ANYTHING, I'd have instantly perceived my displacement, and would have instantly moved the group to the small conference room NEXT to us, which is what Kathleen Retz of the ConCommittee did, immediately.
My apologies for encroaching on their time, my innocent error; but I was in no way discourteous. I was IGNORANT, but not rude.
When I got home, I saw the first few postings, and posted my own short reply. Apparently PA's admirers are as defensive as the surly teenager. But all they were going on was HIS slanted and culturally-cringing whine of having been dissed. This from a surly teenager who has made his mark dishing it out, though he clearly cannot take it...even when it isn't being given.
Only three things about this trouble me.
Only three.
The first, is that so many of you replied by making apologies for my alleged rudeness. You accepted his remarks at face value.
I am a courteous person, as any of you who have met me will attest. I am acerbic and express contumely only when someone starts with me. The surly teenager was dismissive of me, and insultingly arrogant, before we even exchanged greetings. The entire incident was less than two minutes in duration, but even in such a short space of time, with no provocation, he had to assert his feelings of inadequacy by pointing out he'd never heard of me.
I was not rude to him. Many of you babbled back without questioning the accuracy of the report, or --in the case of several of you--even going to their website to read the actual memoir. You were no better than his idiot monkeymass. That both surprised and dismayed me. I expect better from you.
You're smarter and more skeptical than they. You argue with me, and call me down, all the time. That's as it should be. I despise sycophants, and unlike the populist arousal of the surly teenager, sic'ing twerp hackers onto this site for "revenge" for a crime never committed...
...how many of you have ever read THE OX-BOW INCIDENT by Walter Van Tilburg Clark...?...
...you should have applied what you've experienced here over the years, and obtained the facts, gotten a different perspective, or kept your mouths shut till you knew what had really happened. Just because something appears on the internet, does not mean you are REQUIRED to add to the blather.
The second thing that troubles me is that Mr. Tycho should disrespect me with a completley bogus "assumption" that I was uncomfortable "sharing" GoHship with him and his surly teenager partner. This, again, is demonstrably codswallop, as it is standard operating procedure at EVERY convention I've attended, either as a Guest or a Guest of Honor, that there are multiple GoHs. There is a writer GoH. An artist GoH. A film or tv media GoH. And on and on. I've shared GoH "spotlight" dozens, if not hundreds, of times since 1952. Never had any problem with it. They do their thing, I do mine. Why Mr. Tycho should cobble up a reason to find me truculent even before we'd met, unmans me. It just wasn't so. But even if his "assumption" has coin, I have gone out of my way to remove him from this matter. I never insulted him then, at the Foolscap, nor in my single posted response. I described him as I'd found him: seemingly decent, mildly charming (we shared only a moment, so my impression was mild) and quite unlike his partner, who struck me then, as now, as arrogant, insecure, meanspirited, immature, a surly bully, and a classic example of that geek generation of wireheads who think theirs is the noblest state possible for a human being.
All that aside, the one last thing that troubles me...
...no, let me be candid...
The one thing that raises in me a homicidal rage, is the posting of the pustulent rodent whose handle is "Penelope"
--a remark of unforgiveable ugliness about my wife.
That none of you, after Susan's many kindnesses, never rose against this gratuitous ugliness, saddens me. That this twerp thinks s/he is beyond my reach for posting it is, well, foolhardy.
You, and the PA monkeymass, can say anything it chooses about me. I do not seek their approbation (they can look it up) or their dubious assertion that they will never read me...as if they ever had...as if they are capable of thought at that level of ratiocination.
But do not for an instant think I will not rain on you if you bring my wife into it. If Mr. Tycho, clearly in SPITE of my taking his peripheral involvement to notice, clearly in SPITE of my excluding him from this ridiculous imbroglio that began and exists only in the truculent psychosis of a surly teenager, if Mr. Tycho wishes to wade into that cesspool, it's his choice.
But NO ONE insults my honey and gets away with it.
Those who know me--Paramount, Xerox, James Cameron, AOL, assorted smartass twerps over the years--know that I will not suffer this vile behavior. I WILL rain on "Penelope." In Japan, or Moscow, or Topeka, or amid the swirling rocks of Saturn's inner rings. "Penelope" can start trumpeting inviolability now; we WILL come face to face.
This is the end of it for me. No more explanations, no more attempts to set the matter straight. Only a fool makes enemies needlessly. If Mr. Tycho wishes to discuss this like civil human beings, absent the posturing so endemic to the cowardly anonymity the web provides, he can get in touch with me personally, via telaphone or in the flesh, by contacting my webmaster, Rick Wyatt. I am open to him 24/7; I have no interest in even the merest congress with the surly teenager. He is welcome to stew in his own demeaning misinterpretations.
I'm here. And will be for, as you put it, the next 150 years.
Keep at it, Mr. Tycho; it'll take you that long even remotely to approach the niftiness of "egomaniacs" like myself.
If anyone knows how to get this to PA, or to Mr. Tycho, I would take it as a kindness for you to pass this message along.
Harlan Ellison
Not Gabe
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 12:28:47
Rick <webmaster@harlanellison.com>
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 12:15:39
In case you're wondering who the hell Alex Jay is replying too, someone posted a fake message claiming to be a moderator on Millarworld. The *real* Mike F. contacted me with bona fides to inform me this was a poser, so I removed the message.
Rob
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 12:13:2
Placing aside the inevitability of our progress into space and Man’s inherent quest for knowledge, our only ultimate survival rests upon it. We’re talking LONG-RUN here, of course; if Ezra is thinking the immediate time, yes, cost is unrealistic. It is a venture that will be paced by necessity and research.
Having dun said that, the way we’re stripping Earth’s resources, damaging the atmosphere, and allowing populations to grow and grow, the urgency to seek out endless sources for mining, more room for expanding civilization, and even, possibly, pharmaceuticals because of how differently chemicals behave in space, will generate the push and the incentives to head further out there. Space will then gradually become a massive incentive drive for profit.
The demands from the crises here on Earth will drive us further out: the solutions lie in the vast resources of the solar system, particularly in the asteroids. They say that there is enough iron there to cover the earth to a depth of one-half mile! At present-day prices, this iron would be worth about $7 billion for each person now alive. Add in nickel, platinum, copper,
gold, uranium and so on, and the total exceeds $100 billion per person.
Do you know that in 1967 the "Outer Space Treaty" was passed, in which the U.S. agreed not to claim national sovereignty over the Moon or Mars, etc.? The treaty does not say anything against private property. Therefore, without claiming sovereignty, the U.S. could recognize land claims made by private companies, regardless of nationality, that establish human settlements on the Moon or Mars. such as space tourism, servicing the space station, etc.
That's one of the reasons they're talking about the Moon again. And the moon itself will be a source, not just for metals but for components like hydrogen.
Between government programs (defense, as usual - I mean where would progress in technology ever be without war or "fear of the enemy"? - is still the most likely catalyst for our mobility out there in the nearer future) and the entrepreneurial rocket nuts who own companies (most of whom were former engineers with outfits like NASA, JPL, etc) and are determined to find the cheap and practical systems that will get larger groups of people out there safely, the basis of an industrialized society will take root in space; and, in line with history here on earth, societies will slowly emerge over hundreds of years from those industrialized operations.
Having said that, in the shorter run, private interests include robotics, rocketry, satellite, repair services (as for space stations, the shuttle, etc), and so on. For down the stretch, there are companies who actually have "Futurism" departments - ideas being laid out for ventures in space, particularly in TOURISM (lots of talk in that area over recent years, for projections in 50 to 100 years from now).
Many private companies are looking at all these things. They're not about to miss out on the prospects.
Unfortunately, yes, for the immediate run, the potential short-term profit sources are much too small to attract the billions of dollars of private capital necessary. So a new, additional incentive is badly needed. The potential value of land on the Moon, Mars, or an asteroid can provide that additional economic incentive for privately funded space settlement. And thank the Four Horsemen we have business fanatics devoted to such wild prospects. I suspect, in large part due to them, we will see unexpected leaps in space
Danny L. Holland, Jr. <udelarandtigress@bellsouth.net>
Savannah, GA - Wednesday, September 28 2005 12:3:34
I discovered HE back in my middle school library. I've since made it a point to purchase any book I see carrying his name. His short story, "The Deathbird" turned my life around by portraying humanistic values in a way my addled teenage mind could understand. If I can be said to be a decent human being now, I owe no small part of that to Mr. Ellison. Sir, if you're reading this, I thank you greatly for your contribution to my life and the world at large.
That in no way changes the fact that you, sir, are a collossal ass. I know that you think that the reason people say this about you is because you attack their sacred cows, but the truth is far simpler: you cannot be trusted to apply a modicum of decency to any venue where you come face-to-face with real people who may have valid (or invalid) criticisms of you. When someone says something that cuts too close, you seeth and rageand file them mentally under "my enemies", and once someone is an enemy of Ellison, they deserve no mercy.
Interestingly, the traditional targets of your political writings do the same.
Now, for the other sacred icon.
"Gabe" and "Tycho", I have read every comic strip available on your website. Your brand of humour appeals to me greatly, and my wife and I respect your talents and enjoy the majority of your comic strips. You've cheered me up on many a dreary morn. "Tycho", your newsposts are erudite and informative, and quite often more enjoyable than the comic for that day. "Gabe", you are always to the point and never afraid to speak your mind.
But Gabe, dude, STFU! Time and time again your mouth has written checks that your brain can't cash. You're a cartoonist. You wear a silly cap and people point at you and laugh. If HE wears a silly cap... people point at him and laugh. The important difference, of course, is that when people laugh at you, it's good for you and your work. When people laugh at a respected icon of literature, it's bad for him and his work.
Also, did it seriously not occur to you to figure out what foolscap actually meant when you were invited to a con called... let me think... Foolscap VII? You're on teh intarwebnetcrawler, dictionary.com is your friend. It might be helpful to know what a con is about and how it got it's name next time you're invited. Just a tip from someone who cares. It might also be a good idea to do at least a wiki search on any people that you're expected to share status with, like co-guests of honor or stuff like that. A dictionary.com search on foolscap takes all of 4 seconds to read on my connection. A Wikipedia search on Harlan Ellison returns about three pages of text. I know that you lead the busy life of drawing three comics a week and playing the video games before they come out, but I'd think you could spare five minutes of prep time, couldn't you?
Here's the really funny thing about this whole thing. If Ellison hadn't had to run off to the writer's workshop (it seems that this is what happened), I feel quite certain he would have put "Gabe" in his place thoroughly. Then "Tycho" would have stepped in with intelligent banter. I have little doubt that there would have been some mutual respect going on if you had stayed.
So, in short, HE, know this: "Gabe" READS the "Star Wars" novels he accused you of penning. Your estimation of him was balls-on.
"Gabe", Ellison has been called a prick by many men whose opinions I value more than yours. I have no reason to doubt your judgement of his social graces any more than theirs.
I consider myself very fortunate in that statistically it is a safe prediction that I will enjoy many more years of work from the three of you.
Alex Jay Berman <alexjay@earthlink.net>
Philadelphia, - Wednesday, September 28 2005 11:42:58
SPACE: A BOFFIN BEYOND: Ezra argues that the journey to the stars is pointless while we are stuck on earth not even bothering to work on renewable or alternative energy sources. If I might ask: Why can’t the two be combined? In the pursuit of another lunar journey or of one to Mars, might a different energy source be more prudent than simple pusher rockets and a combination of inertia and gravitation?
Hell, then some of the cost of research and development could be underwritten by the Commerce and Energy Departments …
Also, the effect and impact of our reaching for the stars cannot be overvalued. Name a field which has made great advances in the past fifty years, and you will almost certainly be naming one which has directly benefited from the space program: Plastics. Computers. Communications. Ceramics. Aerospace. Food preservation. Electronics. Lasers. On and on and on. Without geosynchronous satellites (thank you, Mr. Clarke) in orbit, you wouldn’t have a cell phone or a GPS unit to play with. Your kitchen, just to cite one example, would look a great deal different, and would be a great deal less easy to work in. And, of course, we would never have had the chance to talk on this board. Without all the many, many advances made necessary to make Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, the Shuttle, possible, our world would be a much less technologically-advanced one—and the worse for that.
(Another point: $8 billion a year is peanuts. Absolute pocket change when thought of in the context of a national budget. Think on this: That figure is roughly the cost of a month and a half’s-worth of military operations in Iraq.)
STAN: If all the Nazis ever to serve in WWII were to suddenly die on the spot one day, Simon Wiesenthal’s job—and that of the center he founded—would not be done. There was a great deal more to the man and to his mission than just hunting the Nazis. Sadly, hatred endures. But thanks to those who do not wish to accept this as necessary fact, so does justice—and hope.
MARCI KISER: The TOP TEN miniseries (a spin-off of the world Alan Moore created) to which you refer is scripted by Paul Di Filippo, a writer who has always acknowledged the intellectual debt his work owes to Harlan.
Oh—and in the wake of the utter and complete cockup performed in the wake of Katrina (and for the time being, I’m employed by FEMA, having been drafted along with thousands of other Federal employees, so I know whereof …), some of you folk may take interest in a website which takes the “Find the Brownie” game conceived by Paul Krugman—to seek out and name “obscure but important government job[s] held by [people] whose only apparent qualifications for [those jobs] are political loyalty and personal connections”, named in dubious honor of Michael Brown, the recently-resigned head of FEMA(*)—and make it a reality at http://www.findthebrownie.com
(*) Please note that Brown is STILL employed by the Agency, ostensibly as a consultant helping determine what went wrong in the response to the disaster …
(Could “Well, first they went and hired me …” be the beginning of his report?)
ADAM-TROY: I’ll admit to having a problem with separating the artist from the art. I applauded Ed Harris’ decision to stay firmly in his seat when Elia Kazan was honored at the Academy Awards. Though Leni Riefenstahl was a very talented filmmaker, I cannot forgive her for TRIUMPH OF THE WILL. I will steadfastly not lionize Charles Lindbergh or Errol Flynn, due to their virulent anti-Semitism.
There are a good many writers whose work I will not read due to their public behavior and statements.
Having said that, I find I can sidestep this at times. ON THE WATERFRONT, anti-union propaganda though it may be, is a great film. I cannot help but shiver when I come close to the “Spirit of ‘76” in the National Air & Space Museum. And I admit to enjoying Flynn’s swashbuckling films (this last given a soupcon of glee, knowing how much money he was making for the Jews he so detested). It’s a conundrum; heart versus head.
But yes; as you pointed out, we are all of us assholes; all of us gentlemen. Unless a behavior is consistently shitty, you cannot easily dismiss a person.
MIKE F: Please don’t take this the wrong way, but there are a great many people in the comics community who discount Millarworld to an extent, simply because of the “Hear No Evil” rule. Granted, your board is nowhere near the level of sycophancy hit by, say, the Byrne board, but still. If there is no real discourse—POLITE discourse—allowed, then a board is merely a soapbox rather than a community. Here on this board, damned near every regular poster at some point has been at loggerheads with its patron author, and as long as the debate is civilized (which it must be admitted is not one hundred percent the case), then it is a good thing.
As postscript, may I say how much I truly delight in DeLay’s delegitimization?
Ronin <ronin@kynmore.com>
Tampa, Florida - Wednesday, September 28 2005 11:32:15
Maybe one day, we'll see a comic or graphic novel that comes from a collaboration.
As I see it, HE is a forefather to the likes of Gabe and Tycho. When he was their age (though recorded history doesn't track back that far *zing!*), I'm sur ehis literary elders viewed him in the same light as he might view the PA guys. I'm sure when G&T are of the cured level HE is at now, they will view the "new, hot medium" with a little bit of distain too.
In the end, both parties now have a better understanding of the other, as well as who their true fans are.
So, when do we see "Penny Arcade Presents: Harlan Ellison's "?
Duane
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 10:14:44
Omar G. <omar@terribly-happy.com>
Austin, TX - Wednesday, September 28 2005 10:9:38
Harlan Ellison has been my favorite writer since I was a teenager and continues to be an inspiration for me. He's a large part of why I continued to pursue a career as a writer and I had a brief business dealing with him just after Sept. 11, 2001. He was cordial and professional -- it was a highlight of my carrer to have gotten to work with him, in whatever small capacity.
I started reading Penny Arcade shortly after their first year online and I've never missed a strip. Tycho is also quite a wonderful writer -- his news posts over the years have shown him to have a great voice and a terrific sense of the absurd. And, of course, Gabe's artwork has matured and grown in that time.
The incident at Foolscap is a shame because I think Gabe & Tycho are cut from the same cloth as Harlan. Their dealings with other sites and the way they've made a livelihood out of their talents is admirable. And they've never shied away from saying that they think.
So, in a perfect world, I think Harlan would be quite a fan of their strips -- they're smart, funny and subversive. And I can't imagine that Gabe and Tycho wouldn't find some amazing stuff to admire in Harlan's writing.
As a fan of both entitities, I think the incident and its aftermath is a little silly; on the page (Web or paper), all three gentlemen are brilliant in their own way and have largely spent their career pleasing a good chunk of the same community saying a good deal of the same things.
So cheers to all the fans. If nothing else, maybe this whole thing will cause a little cross pollinization and help some of posters discover some great work on the other side.
(short post on the matter: http://www.terribly-happy.com/2005_09_25_oldblogger.html#112786161516867576 )
Rick Wyatt <webmaster@harlanellison.com>
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 9:5:31
I am declaring personal attacks on Gabe and Tycho, as well as their fans, as off-limits for now. I just had to send an especially ugly one back to its poster and I will continue to do so.
You are welcome to continue to make your thoughts about Harlan Ellison and his fans, or Penny Arcade and their fans, known, and those do not have to be nice thoughts. No one is asking you to bite your tongue if you have something to say. HOWEVER, first off please bear in mind that any nastiness you direct at Gabe, Tycho, or their fans is likely to translate into more trouble for me, more work for me, and in general more pain-in-the-ass crap for me. So if you give a shit about that (it's become obvious many of you do not), bear it in mind. Also, straight up flaming and posts whose only purpose is to be nasty to Penny Arcade or its creators will be terminated with extreme prejudice.
I am making this rule because I do not have 24 hours a day to monitor this site as I had to yesterday. I am not making a similar rule for attacking Harlan or his fans because so far Harlan's fans have not made a habit of spamming thousands of messages onto Penny Arcade's boards or trying to knock the Penny Arcade site offline. In the event Gabe or Tycho let me know something like that is happening, I will take this board and the forums down for what I consider to be an appropriate amount of time.
Adam-Troy Castro <adam-troy@sff.net>
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 8:32:24
I'm not really interested in debating what happened, at all -- as stated before, I wasn't there -- but before the issue disappears into the aether, I will comment on one sentiment our visitors here have repeated several times.
To wit: "I have never heard of Harlan Ellison before, but would never read him, now that I know he's an asshole."
No comment on the asshole charge. Everybody has one, and everybody's been one. I've seen Harlan being one. I've been one in his presence. I've seen him be much more. I hope he'd say the same of me.
And again, I honestly don't know how to interpret the events of Foolscap.
But --
-- even assuming that he was an asshole 24/7 --
-- what the living bejesus does that have to say about the quality of what he writes?
I mean, if you read books at all, then 99.99999% of the time, they will be books written by folks you've never met and probably won't ever meet. You don't know whether they were written by a bunch of halo-brandishing Gandhis, or by a secret tribe of cat-milking perves. All that matters to you, the reader, is the quality of the work on the written page.
Folks who meet their favorite author, find the experience wanting, and stomp away saying that they'll never read him again, are just being silly.
Folks: one writer I venerate, Barry Malzberg, was breathtakingly rude to me on one of our first meetings. It didn't turn me off his fiction. I still admired it. Nor was I more kindly disposed to his stuff when I met him again and again, to more pleasant effect. Nor did I suddenly love his stuff beyond all reason when he did me a great kindness. I may have liked him more as a man, by that time, but the words on the page were the same they'd always been.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, there are writers who have never been anything but sweet to me, who when encountered as people bring a little glow into my life -- whose work, I'm sorry to say, resonates about as compellingly as day-old oatmeal. I don't go out of my way to read every book they ever wrote, just because I like them as people. Why would I? I don't even have enough time to keep up with the writers I *want* to follow.
And yet folks persist in linking the quality of the personality to the quality of the work. They say, "I won't read a damn thing that guy writes, because I saw him drunk at a convention."
And we don't just do this to writers. We do it to everybody in the arts. Actors, Musicians, Painters. The most common topic of conversation, vis-a-vis Tom Cruise, is just how big a jerk he is. People say they won't see any of his movies, anymore, because he acts like an asshole when squirted with water. Or because he acts like an idiot around his girlfriend of the month. Does any of that behavior, embarrassing or otherwise, affect the quality of his films, in EITHER direction? (I think he's made a few good ones, a lot of mediocre ones, and some appalling ones, like anyone else in his business. Your mileage may vary.) Why should it matter to ME that Actor X throws phones at bellboys? Or, alternatively, that Actress Y adopts Ethiopian orphans? Bully for them. Mildly Interesting, but Largely Irrelevant, for me. Does it make any of their work one bit better or worse?
None of these people are the characters they play. That's their whole freaking job description.
Or to put it another way, I think it's Really Interesting that Steve McQueen once saved Harlan's life. But I judge him as an actor, by PAPILLON.
Against that, think about the logic of this. "Now that I know he's an asshole, I wouldn't even think of reading one of his books."
Lunacy.
And irrelevant for yet another reason. Is Harlan supposed to be devastated by the loss of a reader he didn't have before, who he wouldn't have had in any event, because that person is capable of writing off somebody's entire life work because of a few seconds of public rudeness?
"Dostoevsky was a bastard. I would never read any of his books."
The only answer for that is, you wouldn't have anyway.
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 8:25:8
Thank you for the tenor of your remarks. Understand that much of the angst on this board came as a result of a flood of attacks -- no other word for them -- from complete strangers to this board. The vast majority admitted, as you do, not knowing Ellison or his works, and therefore being completely unaware of who we (his admirers) are or what we stand for.
In the same way that PA readers would have eviscerated any attempt by Ellison readers to flood the PA boards with attacks on Tycho and Gabe, we rushed to Ellison's defense. (Not that he needs it in any way shape or form.)
Not knowing who Ellison is was never the question, but as Gabe so rightly pointed out, the knowledge on both sides would have prevented some severe misunderstandings.
Sadly, the wave of attacks hit not Harlan Ellison but the other writers on this board. WE were the victims, not Ellison.
Several -- though not all -- of the attackers were childish, arrogant and worst of all anonymous. They assaulted our words and thoughts, hiding behind an internet wall lobbing insults at random. No educated or thoughtful debate, no attempt to explain and rationalize the situation (as you have done), and generally behaving in precisely the way they denigrated Ellison for (reportedly) acting in Seattle. One even dragged Ellison's beautiful and unassailable wife into the fray with an off-handed and quite cruel broadside meant simply to hurt feelings.
The disagreement was between three talented people, Ellison, Gabe and Tycho.
The rest of us -- the regulars on this board and one very weary webmaster -- were the victims of the abuse.
And that, I'm afraid, has dimmed my views of PA board users. Not Gabe and Tycho, but those people who are their fans.
And that's a shame.
Steve B
Chris <chrisjks@gmail.com>
Sacramento, California - Wednesday, September 28 2005 7:26:33
I have to say that i'm a fan of Penny Arcade (along with Ctrl-Alt-Del and DoomToons), and i've never heard of Mr. Ellison before reading about this on the Penny Arcade front page. From reading Gabe's account, and the account of two other foolscap-attendees, it sound like Mr. Ellison was being a bit rude. Making a remark like "Don't you want your hat?" should not, in any way, illicit a response such as "Fuck off." If Gabe had made the Star Wars crack first, without any reason, then I can see a reason to respond to him the way Mr. Ellison did. But that isn't what happened. What did happen was this - Gabe made a remark (possibly to make a lighthearted joke or connect with his next guest of honor), and Mr. Ellison misread the remark and lashed out, leaving Gabe the feeling of defending himself. Which he did, and had the right to do so in this context.
In response to the fans of either side, grow up. I applaud those of you that articulated your thoughts without a curse, and I destest the ones that couldn't resist throwing a few low-brow insults behind PA's back. I detest fanboys of any kind.
For clarification of the fanboys out there, I'm not saying that he is an asshole, or a jerk, or an old codger. I'm saying that his actions at the time were disrespectful and dishonorable. Here's hoping that both sides let the incident go and move on.
Erika
- Wednesday, September 28 2005 7:20:7
The best insult to someone that is seeking attention is complete indifference and ignorance.
Mark Goldberg <markabaddon@aol.com>
Minneapolis, - Wednesday, September 28 2005 7:12:24
Is it safe to come out now?
Finished Anansi Boys this morning and I was very impressed. Original story, compelling characters (something that was slightly lacking in his first novel American Gods because of the main character, although that was deliberate) and just an all around funny and creepy read. Definitely highly recommended.
Alex, I read Octavia Butler's Xenogenesis trilogy and it left me a little cold. While I thought it was a brilliant concept, and was extremely well written, for some reason her style did not speak to me. Not that I thought her work was not well done, as it certainly was, but for some reason I was unable to connect with her as a writer.
Alan Coil <lcoil@peoplepc.com>
Southeast Michigan - Tuesday, September 27 2005 16:14:12
If there is any more proof that the internet is a waste of time and human energy, I don't know where you would find it.
Lee
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 16:12:22
I think I hear Moe Howard yawning from the grave.
Chuck Messer <chuck_messer@hotmail.com>
Lakewood, Colorado - Tuesday, September 27 2005 15:34:51
I'm posting a bit early today, but I think it's time now to for all Webderlanders to turn their backs on the most recent influx of trolls and greet them with icy silence.
Do not respond to them, scroll past their posts. They no longer exist.
From now on, each is a non-person.
Just go on about your daily postings and filter out the bullshit. All it takes is a little willpower.
Chuck
Tom Galloway <tyg@panix.com>
Silicon Valley, - Tuesday, September 27 2005 15:27:55
Rick <webmaster@harlanellison.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 15:19:48
Gabe and Tycho are welcome to post here as often as needed to respond to anything as they see fit - same dispensation as is given Harlan.
As for the rest, Harlan and PA fans and non-fans alike, welcome and feel free to voice your opinions as long as you follow the clearly posted rules at the top - the most important of which is one post every 24 hours.
Cheerio!
Robert Morales
New York City, - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:57:59
Let's Be Clear, Here
Mon, September 26 2005 - 2:27 PM
by: Tycho
We're talking about a person that a couple TOTAL ASSHOLES find rude.
* * *
So...anything else happen today?
Steven Utley <impatientape@yahoo.com>
Smyrna, Tennessee - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:55:45
SP33doh <SP33doh@yahoo.com>
Bothell, Washington - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:53:17
so now we're "A bunch of folks who go ballistic over an insult to the writers of a videogame website"
now, since we all love metaphores.
say that you're Christian, if someone told jesus to "fuck off", would you go "ballistic"?
Andy
Seattle, WA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:47:15
What I can say is this:
I was impressed with Harlan's accessibility (and endurance)throughout the con - panel after panel. And after a full day of panels, the one and a half hour benefit speech ran over two hours; it was both entertaining and insightful. Several days later there is still much to ponder.
One thing that I found rather curious was the number of people that seemed to want interrupt him in order to bait or argue with him, as though he was the old gunslinger that the young bucks wanted to see if they could outdraw.
Is this a common occurrence? From where I sat, it often looked pointless, rude, and disrespectful.
Gabe <gabriel@penny-arcade.com>
Seattle, wa - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:41:10
I was not aware of Harlan’s history of being a jerk so I didn’t know what to expect. I didn’t know anything about the guy really. On the flip side he has no idea that PA is read by 3.5 million people, that we have our own convention or that we have a charity that has given more than half a million dollars to children’s hospitals all over the country. Had we been properly introduced maybe we could have talked about the internet and the sorts of opportunities it’s given artists to succeed outside the world of huge publishers. I realize there just wasn’t time to sit us all down and go over everyone’s history and that’s unfortunate.
Oh well, I feel like in the end he did what he’s famous for and we did what we’re famous for. I honestly think we butted heads because we are very similar. When I first saw Harlan speaking at the con I thought to myself, “I bet that’s what I’ll be like in another 150 years.”
Hank Graham <foolscap@comcast.net>
Seattle, WA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:18:9
*sigh*
Harlan didn't put on a hat because Harlan wasn't provided with a hat. It was A JOKE. We had cheap, silly-looking jester's caps for Gabe & Tycho, and a legal pad (another type of "foolscap," for those of you who didn't know) for Harlan.
I think Harlan was mildly amused by this nonsense, as he was meant to be. (And if he wasn't, I expect he'll let me know.) The look on his face while I was handing out the hats was the setup that made the payoff worthwhile. In any event, he gave a mild smile when he saw the paper, and realized that no, I was not going to try to get him to wear a silly hat.
Gabe wasn't trying to needle Harlan when he asked if Harlan would like to wear one, I think, although it may have been perceived that way.
Due to some scheduling problems, we were not able to have Gabe & Tycho around the convention as we'd have liked. That's actually part of the reason we ended up overworking Harlan.
Among the missed opportunities there, I had hoped to have panels where all of our GOH's could meet. Gabe and Harlan are a lot more similar than they are different, and they share a lightning-fast wit I don't have, and have always envied.
They also share a basic quality of being genuinely nice guys who try to do the right thing. You can see that with Harlan's insistence to keep working the programming schedule he'd been presented, because he's a professional and he didn't want to disappoint anyone. You can also see it with Gabe & Tycho, who couldn't participate fully due to scheduling problems, and so turned down all payment for their appearance at Foolscap this weekend.
To the many partisans dismissing the works of either Harlan or Gabe and Tycho, my answer is that you should go look at what you're missing.
James P. Levy <susjpl@hofstra.edu>
Levittown, NY - Tuesday, September 27 2005 14:8:33
Dr. Darque'Angel <thebeastthatscreamsfanboiattheheartoftheworld@xxx.com>
Kayro, OH - Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:53:9
"otherwise these HAVE to be the most hypersensitive fanboys ever"
HOW many 'cons have you been to? Intarweb fanbois had to learn their chops SOMEWHERE.
Ellison acted like a total cock, a rude curmudgeon at the con. To his fans, this is lovable, endearing behavior. To others, it's the mark of an abusive asshole. Deal with it.
Richard Sterling <joemcfunky@yahoo.com>
Austin, TX - Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:50:40
Sad to say this Harlan Ellison person came to my attention via Penny Arcade as well. Really, I would've prefered not knowing he existed, because upon reading the account of his childish behavior at the foolscap convention, I read a little more about him. Wow, what a jackass. How can you people be fans of his work knowing he thinks he is better than all of you and he looks down on every one of you. I mean:
"Had they the opportunity to hear him speak for as long as I did, I believe they would have realized that being told to "fuck off" by Harlan is no reason to react at all. It's simply under the threshold of standard-HE-behavior; it wouldn't even show up on an abuse-radar scan."
If this egomaniac has convinced his fans that being told to "fuck off" by him is not the demeaning belittlement he actually intends it to be, well that's just sad. He might be the greatest author in the world, but I'm not about to read any of his garbage when he clearly has no respect for me, or pretty much anyone else alive. What a small, sad man he must be.
Jay Smith
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:33:29
What's that? He was RUDE? That's it? He didn't even try to SPANK one of them? There was no pantsing involved? Good lord. But these guys are important, right? They run a revolutionary computer company that provides software to hospitals, right? Banking? Pay-per-view porn? No?
They're internet cartoonists? COOL! Are they the Homestar Runner guys? Cuz I loves me the Homestar...and Bub and Coach Z..."Good jorb!" Oh they crack me up. No? Then... oh THAT one? That's a pretty cool one, too. It reminds me of Dork Tower and Sinfest and a couple others, but it's still cool.
So, a bunch of fans of an are coming here being rude and disrespectful to prove that they're better than someone who is...um...rude and disrespectful? Is that INTENTIONAL irony? No? But at least Harlan stood on stage and used his real name. Come to think of it, so did the other two guys.
Oh well. It's the Internet. And like the man says: "Debate on the Internet is like running for President. Even if you win, you're still an idiot."
Steve Evil <evening_tsar@hotmail.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:32:48
Get back to your Lara Croft e-group. This place is for readers.
(And that goes doubly for the spineless twerp who can't handle horror stories. You sound like the girl from my high school who wouldn't read "Animal Farm" because she was "too old for a story about pigs." You're probably think Zamyatkin wrote space opera.)
-Steve E.
CH
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:30:43
Sounds to me like your boy came up lame when the target shot back. What happened there?
"From the way some people are acting, you'd think Harlan screamed, "You expect me to wear this hat?! Fools and jerks, the lot of you!", ripped it to shreds, and then jumped onto the nearest fan and tore his throat out with his teeth."
He could have politely declined. Decorum, I know, but still.
"No. Instead Harlan quietly didn't put on the hat and probably hoped no one would draw attention to it. So what happens? The lamebrain next to him draws attention to it. Harlan responds curtly..."
That's one way of putting it. Another would be to say he told him to fuck off.
"...and then, perhaps thinking better of it, tries to show up he's in the spirit of it by discussing another meaning of foolscap. Does that work? No, because the lamebrain--presumably a writer--doesn't know this common writing term."
Come on. "Foolscap" is a common term for paper? Common to who, exactly? Elizabethan courtiers five hundred years ago? And anyone who doesn't know that is ignorant? You're shitting me, right?
"So Harlan's frustrated some more, and now the lamebrain makes it even worse by showing his pounding ignorance of one of the most influential authors in the field by complimenting him on "Star Wars," of all things."
That was pretty funny. Spontaneous comebacks usually are, even if they're not. And who said he didn't do any research?
"The fact that Harlan didn't spend twenty minutes slicing and dicing this guy, by me, indicates that (a) the guy was luckier than he deserved and (b) Harlan's mellowing."
Yessir, perfect portrait of restraint and tact, that one. Rule of thumb: when you pick a fight and then tuck tail, the logical expectation is that you didn't expect to prevail.
Glimmering or fading illumati, young punk or crotchety crank, if someone tells folks in certain circles to fuck off and insults their intelligence based on their education without provocation on first meeting, they're not going to be cool enough to make a sarcastic crack, nor will they try to respond like some sort of pseudo academe and trot out similarly arcane trivia: some hikers will eventually find the offender with his foolscap rolled up into a tight little tube and shoved up his arrogant ass.
That "Well, that's just Harlan" shit isn't going to fly, and excusing him because he's in the Pantheon (cough) won't either. Notoriety for being an abrasive prick isn't justification for said behaviour, and there's nothing in being a man of letters of some renown that says that a simple "No, thank you" won't serve as well "Fuck off."
Peter David <padguy@aol.com>
Long Island, NY - Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:28:46
It doesn't change my opinion of the Gabe at the convention in terms of his self-professed behavior, but at least he wasn't schmuck enough to write to me about his own actions.
PAD
Paindog <xxx@xxx.com>
Medea, I just told you - Tuesday, September 27 2005 13:5:19
"The fact that Harlan didn't spend twenty minutes slicing and dicing this guy, by me, indicates that (a) the guy was luckier than he deserved and (b) Harlan's mellowing."
Gosh. A vicious tongue-lashing. Oooh. That just gives me shivers. Well, maybe it would give me shivers if I was a synchophantic HARLAN SI THE BEST WRITER EVAR!! fanboi who routinely got his fat, sci-fi character wanna-be ass routinely kicked in high school.
Then again, Harlan might just sucker punch you, like he did that in that one con. Sucker punches from an old man or a tongue lashing .... evil
BTW HE loved you in that Babylon 5 episode.
Peter David <padguy@aol.com>
Long Island, NY - Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:59:0
Take it from someone who was directly contacted by the person who was at the convention that Harlan slapped around: He got off easy. The fact that Ellison left the stage shows HUGE restraint on Harlan's part.
From the way some people are acting, you'd think Harlan screamed, "You expect me to wear this hat?! Fools and jerks, the lot of you!", ripped it to shreds, and then jumped onto the nearest fan and tore his throat out with his teeth. No. Instead Harlan quietly didn't put on the hat and probably hoped no one would draw attention to it. So what happens? The lamebrain next to him draws attention to it. Harlan responds curtly and then, perhaps thinking better of it, tries to show up he's in the spirit of it by discussing another meaning of foolscap. Does that work? No, because the lamebrain--presumably a writer--doesn't know this common writing term. So Harlan's frustrated some more, and now the lamebrain makes it even worse by showing his pounding ignorance of one of the most influential authors in the field by complimenting him on "Star Wars," of all things.
The fact that Harlan didn't spend twenty minutes slicing and dicing this guy, by me, indicates that (a) the guy was luckier than he deserved and (b) Harlan's mellowing.
PAD
C.A. Dahl <scharmers@hotmail.com>
Mill Creek, WA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:49:57
Harlan's earlier works blew my mind when I was kid. Hell, even his endlessly rehashed and re-anthologized works still blow my mind from time to time.
But lord do Jesus, is the guy an asshole. A pendatic egoist of the highest order outside of his work. If I was the Penny Arcade guy, I would have asked, "Hey, you're the guy doing Last Dangerous Visions, aren't you? Well...where is it?"
--scharmers
Peter David <padguy@aol.com>
Long Island, NY - Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:44:44
Sorry, but if you're the Gabe in question, then it sounds like you were the asshole. Comes across to me, even by your own telling of it, that you were needlessly baiting him and got deservedly slapped around for it.
First of all, you can put on a stupid hat and no one will care. Ellison puts a stupid hat on and there's a couple hundred photographs taken and posted on the internet inside of two hours with captions of "Harlan Ellison makes a fool of himself."
Second, if he wasn't putting the hat on, OBVIOUSLY he didn't want it. So you asked him a completely pointless question that was seen by him--correctly, near as I can tell--as you needling him.
Third, Harlan than attempted to defuse the situation by pointing out that since had a notepad that he was scribbling on, he already had a foolscap. The fact that you don't know what foolscap is indicates ignorance on your part, because it's a pretty common term. So now you've presented yourself to Ellison as someone trying to goad him and is ignorant besides.
Fourth, the fact that you think of him as an "old coot" speaks volumes of the tone and attitude that you likely projected.
Fifth, there's an old saying that it is better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you a fool than to speak and, in so doing, confirm it. When you congratulated Ellison on his "Star Wars" work--a series of films with which he not only hasn't had a thing to do, but has openly reviled as crap--you sealed your fate by confirming for everyone within hearing distance that either (a) you knew Ellison hated those films and were baiting him yet again or (b) you're truly that ignorant and people wondered what the hell you were doing there in the first place.
Your behavior was pathetic, and now you're perpetuating it by sending someone whom you KNOW is Ellison's friend a recounting of your lunkheaded behavior as if you done good and thought I'd appreciate it.
This is your cue to write back and say I'm being mean, by the way.
PAD
Steve Dooner <sdooner@earthlink.net>
South Weymouth, MA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:41:55
Who are these people?
Steve Dooner
Ian
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:34:26
Also, several people have pointed out that with two such guests – both known for their sharp wit but each having very different views of the world – such a confrontation was perhaps inevitable. I can kind of see where people are going by that. However, I would expect them to get into an argument over the utility of the internet, or the relative merits of different artistic mediums. Harlan telling someone to fuck off over being offered a hat, then proceeding to ridicule someone for being unfamiliar with a piece of obscure literary jargon isn’t really how I would envision such a confrontation happening.
Aaron <post@puckish.org>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:14:16
Mike Toole <chiefdork@animejump.com>
Cambridge, MA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 12:13:22
Guy P. Srinivasan <srinivgp@gmail.com>
Redmond, Washington - Tuesday, September 27 2005 11:38:36
I was at Foolscap (in case you're wondering, I usually sat near 'nutcase' and 'giggle-boy'). The basic problem is that Gabe and Tycho were guests of honor: they kept sitting on panels instead of listening to Harlan talk. Had they the opportunity to hear him speak for as long as I did, I believe they would have realized that being told to "fuck off" by Harlan is no reason to react at all. It's simply under the threshold of standard-HE-behavior; it wouldn't even show up on an abuse-radar scan. On the other hand, if we omit 'by Harlan' in the above, their reactions are perfectly understandable. I don't think an apology is needed by either party. They both acted as expected. And as for the PA folks yelling in this forum, well, let's put it this way: if you meet a HE fan on the street, say "Hi!". If you meet a PA fan on the street, say "Hi!". If you meet a PA fan who trolls message boards, you can stay away. Somehow I don't believe the subset of PA fans you see in these message boards are representative.
Brian <brian@bshort.org>
NYC, NY - Tuesday, September 27 2005 11:24:16
You did an excellent job embarrassing yourself at Foolscap, Harlan. You seem to fancy yourself an Important Writer, but the only thing you'll be remembered for is your poor behavior.
Civility never goes out of style.
Bob Cram
Brunswick, Maine! - Tuesday, September 27 2005 11:11:16
1. I will still read Harlan.
2. I will still read Penny Arcade.
3. When I meet one of Harlan's fans I'll say hi and engage them in discussion if they're interested.
4. If I meet one of PA's fans I'll probably cross the street or leave the room - whatever it takes to avoid speaking with them.
Regardless of what happened at Foolscap (wasn't there and can't speak to it) the vitriol spilled here by the people on behalf of PA is out of all proportion to any civilized response.
Harlan, just want to say thanks for all the enjoyment reading your work has given me - especially the stories in Angry Candy, as they helped me through a particularly dark time.
-bob
Doug R.
CA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 11:5:30
I notice that a lot of the Harlan fans posting here are dismissive of gamers and videogames as "techno geeks" with "short attention spans" and even mourn the culture of games as a "sad fact" of our society. These posters are showing every bit as much ignorance as those who post on the other side, ignorant of HE's works and much of literature in general.
Modern videogames have evolved since Pong. Don't get me wrong, Pong was a great game, but there are now entire genres of games, many with highly imaginative interactive stories involving dozens of characters, an actual plot beyond just shooting stuff til it dies, and each game represents the collective effort not only of "tech geeks", but also talented (and as in the literary world, not-so-talented) artists, writers, composers, and producers. Many modern games take hundreds of hours to play through the entire story line, and some have open-ended stories that are continually being crafted by the development teams and occasionally by the players themselves. Short attention spans and inattentiveness are traits that most games punish, rather than reward.
Video games are now where much of the innovation in science fiction and fantasy are now taking place. Yes, I said "innovation" even knowing full well that many games are derivative sequels based on prior successful hits. The same is true of the literary world as well, as Gabe was no doubt aware when he made his "Star Wars" reference. The best games of today can stand up against the best science fiction novels and movies of any decade as genuine works of creativity.
Dismissing a generation or a culture that you know nothing about is categorically wrong, whether you identify with the crotchety geezers or the sore-thumbed video gamers. If you want to ignore videogame culture and hope that it just "goes away," you will miss the best modern storytelling that is being produced right now.
Sean Brown <thegreatmoof_546@yahoo.com>
Midvale, Utah - Tuesday, September 27 2005 11:0:26
I'm probably the least-qualified person to comment on Harlan Ellison. I'm only 19 and after reading the man's biography, I can say the only works of his I am familiar with are the movies he's helped write for. Of those movies, my favorite was Pitch Black. Not for the writing, though. That part was pretty awful, all things considered. Vin Diesel is simply well-cast and breathes cool.
At any rate, this Ellison fellow reminds me an awful lot of some people I was going to high school a few years ago. Y'know, that one annoying kid who'd always turn in gothic poetry for English assignments and had this raging inferiority complex? Yeah. I was taking creative writing classes with those kinds of people. They wrote nothing but horror and macabre (similar to Ellison) and they were the one person you prayed to GOD that you wouldn't have to deal with.
My point is, no matter how many of his little horror stories Mr. Ellison has written that other little horror junkies seem to enjoy, this man is basically an angry teenager who hates anyone who doesn't just bow down to him. Thing is, he's famous, so he probably feels justified in his anger even moreso.
If you don't quite understand what the hell I'm talking about when I talk about how fame's probably gone to his head, there's some lyrics you should check out if you don't know it. The band is Good Charlotte, and the song is Lifestyles of the Rich and the Famous.
Amy Kostyn-Jenkins <akojenkins@aol.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 10:57:55
I'm still exhausted. Any trip that requires a time change of more than an hour fucks up my sleep patterns.
I'll turn this over to my husband, Ben, first:
Since I was actually THERE, and didn't just hear about this second or third-hand, this is my take on the Gabe & Tycho mess. Harlan did refuse the hat. Harlan was also in a HURRY. He'd just finished his GOH speech and was anxious to leave the "stage" because it was already time for the writing workshop to begin. You can't be "chased from the stage" when you're late for your favorite portion of the convention.
Amy again: I was in the writer's workshop. Harlan was indeed slightly late, and the convention staff didn't have a typewriter ready for him--that was the only mild annoyance I saw. The Harlan *I* saw all weekend was in a reasonably good mood and oodles of fun. In other words, Harlan. He could've done without that parrot bite, though. I do wonder if he ever got that tetanus shot.
This was a small, friendly convention. I genuinely enjoy Harlan and Susan's company, and I loved having the opportunity to spend so much time with them. I met several board denizens (and a lovely man named Scott who is NOT online), heard a few anecdotes that were new to me, and got to watch myself choke under pressure. Okay, that last thing wasn't so great. Harlan, I hope you do one of those writer's workshops again sometime, so I can demonstrate that I actually CAN tell a goddamned story. Grr.
Finished it all up with some good steak and mediocre cake (told ya so) in fantastic company. While we were on our way out of the restaurant, a young man at another table stopped us. In an awestruck and slightly nervous voice, he asked, "Are you Harlan Ellison?" It was the perfect ending to a wonderful meal. I cannot wait to do it all again. Minicon in April, anyone?
Amy (and Ben)
Anomalous Anonymous
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 10:40:16
Credentials: I am a reader of classic speculative fiction, including Mr. Ellison's work. I also read PennyArcade Monday through Friday. I have no beef with either.*
I want to point to the unintentional hiarity of the situation:
Two different sets of guests, both known for their savage wit, were brought together. One, a critic of the old school, not enamoured of technolgy; the other, a pair of clever young bucks, seething with techno-lust. Could the result have differed much?
In an ideal world, perhaps, they could have joined forces against the forces of ignorance and stupidity, unleashing such a torrent of sarcasm, profanity, and insight as to transform our worlds, both literary and nettish.
In an even more ironic twist of fate, the netstorm caused by this collision of personalities is, in itself, entertaining. I take no sides in this one, but I do regret a lost opportunity.
To the customary posters on this board, I wish you luck in dealing with the onslaught.
Pax.
*Though I can't say I liked everything either have written. Some works from both give me nightmares.
Eddie
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 10:21:32
It's funny to me how the only defense that can be put up by HE's rabid fanbois (yes, I'm going to use the same term some have been using to denigrate PA readers) is his supposed literary genius, which by the way in the realm of literature is a HIGHLY subjective label.
I've read some of Mr. Harlan's works, and I also read PA. The man's genius, while debatable, DOES NOT excuse him from poor social grace. It is said that the use of cursing is the last resort of a slow mind. Please don't try to pretend that somehow Mr. Harlan "kept back" some remarkably cutting comment, and for God's sake quit trying to excuse the man's deplorable behaviour. Oh, and before I forget, get off your high horses too. You might break your neck.
Killian Gray
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 10:5:52
Harlan seems like the dorky kid in high school who was always super resentful of everyone with even a modicum of social grace. Fascinating that someone who is clearly so well-read never took the time to learn to act civil.
Steeltemplar
Virginia - Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:44:2
I would say that the issue of Harlan Ellison's or Penny Arcade's repective contributions to society is irrelevant. Or it is to me at any rate.
The main issue, as I see it, is that Ellison's behavior was unacceptable in polite circles. Especially when it is considered that the man he insulted was not being in the least bit hostile towards him. I understand that Ellison is a great author and also getting on in years. Neither of these things make it right for him to treat Gabe like that. It would be wrong if I did it and it's wrong for him to do it.
Brian Karasek <bkarasek@gmail.com>
Chapel Hill, NC - Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:40:3
I was just disappointed that two people who obviously share a great love of their craft hit it off so spectacularly badly. I can appreciate a man who does not suffer fools. I can appreciate a man who has earned his place as the "literary illuminati." I just wonder what it was about the sentence "Don't you want your hat?" led Mister Ellison to invite the fellow from Penny Arcade to "fuck off."
In the defense of PA, they received unwarranted profanity and responded with perfectly warranted sarcasm. That's a more mature response than any internet shithead I know.
Lynn
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:22:2
A friend just sent me a link to the Penny Arcade "explanation" of recent events. Hmm.
Harlan Ellison is to literature as Albert Einstein is to theoretical physics. First and foremost, know your enemy: http://harlanellison.com/bioreal.htm. And yes, if you don't know who he is, who just self-categorized with the thousands of high school students who don't know who Albert Einstein is.
Dude, Harlan told you to fuck off. This *actually* offended you?
And let me get this straight? You actually think he just walked away from your pathetic attempt at a witty remark because he couldn't think of anything to say?!
My advice to you: Go home, hug your pets, kiss your mother, and count your internal organs. What Harlan did for you was a supreme kindness. He didn't eviscerate you in front of a crowd. He didn't reveal you for the idiot child you obviously are in front of your fans. (Well, most likely he restrained himself because you weren't worth wasting his breath on, but you're still damned lucky. )
I'd give a quarter -- okay a nickel -- to be there in twenty years when you wake up and grok the difference between pop culture and literature, and realize exactly which category your little web comic falls into.
::sigh:: Tempest? Teapot. Teapot? Tempest.
Jack Smith <one_eyed_jack1@hotmail.com>
Toronto, Ontario - Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:18:44
To all HE fans...you do realize that, while many of you declaim "internet trolling" (an admittedly primitive and juvenile activity), your only recourse is to defend someone who you openly admit is an "asshole". An "asshole" who many of you claim to emulate.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but is being a professional asshole -- someone who has, of all things, actually *studied* at the hands of a *master* asshole -- somehow morally superior to juvenile post-bombing? The latter may lack judgment, but the former is behaviorally untenable because it is -- ostensibly, according to the posts here -- studied.
I think HE would do well to post an apology for his behavior at the conference, which was nothing short of an embarassment to himself and his trade. Insulting Mike Krahulik's intelligence because of his non-attendance of college is nothing but base sneering, and is hardly worthy of someone who purports to be one of America's literary illuminati. I don't think we need to cite all the fantastic American authors (or others of other nations) who did not attend college, people who I'm sure HE would never have the guts to compare himself to.
If this is what he has come to, then he has truly shown his obsolesence.
Jack
David Loftus <dloft59@earthlink.net>
Portland, OR - Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:15:45
> If you can't be civil to another human being, won't you please at least entertain us?
This is the difference between the video game generation and those of us who read books: They think creators owe them something.
I found the un-ironic reference to Cobain here especially amusing.
We'll just wait for you chillun of the wounded amour-propre to wander off again -- your short attention span is the one gift you bring to the table.
Convention attendee
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:11:23
Take is from someone who was actually at the convention: Mr. Ellison made a complete ass of himself. Mr. Ellison was offered a jester cap (appropriate, since the convention was called “foolscape”). He refused to take it. One of the other panelists asked him “You don’t want your hat?” Mr. Ellison told the other panelist to “fuck off”. Mr. Ellison than tapped his pad of paper and said something like “You know that I have a foolscape right here?” When the other panelist shook his head no, clearly not being familiar with the term, Mr. Ellison proceeded to mock him by asking if he had ever gone to college or even finished highschool. The other panelist retorted by saying something about enjoying Mr. Ellison’s Star Wars books. Mr. Ellison just sat for a moment, visibly seething with rage, and said something like “So that’s how it is” and stormed off the stage.
Mr. Ellison ended up coming off really badly – in addition to telling someone to fuck off for offering him a hat, he went on to ridicule them in a very nasty manner for being unfamiliar with the term “foolscape”. When the other panelist retorted by implying that he wrote low-brow literature, he got so angry that he stormed off the stage. I’m amazed that people are trying to make excuses for him by saying that he “had his reasons” or “has a right to be crotchety”. This sort of behavior has no place in civilized gatherings - and would be likely to get you beaten up in uncivilized gatherings.
I find it hilariously ironic that Mr. Ellison’s fans are decrying the rude behavior of Penny Arcade fans on this internet board when Mr. Ellison’s *real life* behavior was so inexcusably rude and childish.
ReverendTed <reverendted@satx.rr.com>
San Antonio, TX - Tuesday, September 27 2005 9:4:1
You're absolutely right about the effect Internet anonymity has on the demeanor of the average individual. Admittedly, "average" may be too kind an assessment in many trolling cases.
Interestingly enough, "Gabe" himself described the very same phenomenon in March of last year:
http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php?date=2004-03-19
Steve Barber <barbergallery@verizon.net>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 8:36:8
You leave this board for eighteen hours and all fuck breaks loose.
"This is the very essence of the worst aspects of the internet. We have trolls invading the board, behaving badly, and why?"
Alex, I hate to say it but this is precisely what Harlan's quote regarding "internet shitheads" means.
As were many who have been the unfortunate victims of having to read all of the apoplectic diatribes below I can only observe that somehow our icon of literature has somehow sullied their icons of videogamery. (No insult intended by this label. I have worked extensively with the videogaming industry -- Havas when it was there, VUGames' Sierra and Blizzard to name a few.)
Offensive to me is that the tone of the attacks is being coordinated somehow (Star Wars? A little originality, please!). More offensive is that the attackers hide behind the anonymity of the net. I have always posted my email, always been willing to stick my personal rep on what I say.
Allowing the trolls to hide behind cutesy little monickers, while refusing to take personal responsibility for the insults they fling, has long been a major failure of the net. It brings out the worst in people, especially those who elect to simply lob an insult and cackle gleefully at the fact they assume they cannot be found. Cowardly acts at best, and amateurish at the very least.
Those who frequent this board exempted from the above, of course. We know who you are.
Harlan does not suffer fools, a knowledge that is common. If, for whatever reason, he rightly or wrongly assessed one of the other panelists as a fool, he had his reasons. But the people who are righteously offended at his insults to their icons had better take a long hard look at the anonymous drivel below -- at least Harlan doesn't hide behind a false name and has the integrity to say what he thinks publicly and honestly.
I may not agree with what he says (though usually I do), but I deeply respect his right to go on record with his thoughts. This is why I reward him with my dollars every time I buy a book he wrote or a magazine he's written for.
I know of but am not terribly familiar with Penny Arcade. I respect the artists and their integrity simply as a professional courtesy. I would love to hear their thoughts in perusing the below hit and run attacks.
Yours very un-anonymously,
Steven Barber
www.barbergallery.net
(And before some arrogant little shithead thinks to use the info negatively, I'll make mention of the fact I am -- in my "day job -- an internet specialist for a very, very large telecommunications company and I can easily find who and where things originated. Companies like mine take a very dim view of internet abuse...)
Frank Church
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 8:1:7
We should just be bored by them and move on.
But I do adore pong.
----------
Wyatt, I think Harlan likes being an asshole. I learned how to be one from him. Sniffle.
Doug Farrell <fearghaill@gmail.com>
Halifax, Canada - Tuesday, September 27 2005 7:50:14
There's plenty of room to argue the "value", however you choose to define it, of each artists contributions, although I don't see the point. Yes, Mr. Ellison's work is more literary, and he's been at it a lot longer, but Gabe and Tycho's contributions to society go well beyond a three-times-a-week comic strip. I point to www.childsplaycharity.org, for example.
But this isn't about who they are. It's about manners. You can defend it as the right of an old man to be cranky if you want, but civility is neither difficult nor painful. If it was such a blow to Mr. Ellison's ego to have to share "guest of honor" status, he should have said so in advance and in private. Waiting to attack a fellow guest in a public forum was cheap and childish, and completely unwarranted.
Chris <galewind@gmail.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 7:30:29
I love how HE fans are simply dismissing PA commenters as unintelligible louts, but are coming up with nothing better than fanboy drivel themselves.
I appreciate HE's work, but I've also been a more avid reader of PA for at least five years now.
What I personally believe that HE fans need to realize is that PA is fairly well-established, ESPECIALLY online (though I also have one of their books in print). Their medium and topics of discussion typically attract a wider (read: younger) audience, but not everyone commenting here is oozing praise of either "side".
My personal opinion is this -- when you're on a panel with others, ESPECIALLY those that you don't know, it is not prudent to openly insult another panelist when you don't know who they are -- and then take it a step further to insult their intelligence. Starting a "my penis is bigger than yours" argument because you feel that your co-guests contributions are worthless, without ever viewing their work, is a poorly-judged move.
Alex Krislov <Alexkrislov@cs.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 7:4:51
....as General Halftrack used to say, or perhaps still does.
This is the very essence of the worst aspects of the internet. We have trolls invading the board, behaving badly, and why? To protest what they percieve as bad manners. And their insults are so dim, so poorly constructed, that they seem to justify Harlan's comments. Children, it works like this: if you're going to be rude, at least be clever about it. Yes, Harlan can be an asshole--but he's _good_ at it. I'd rather be insulted by Harlan than complimented by any number of lesser lights.
MARK, yep, ANANSI BOYS is great fun. I'm reading it simultaneously with Octavia Butler's forthcoming FLEDGLING, preparatory to interviewing her. Two friends of Harlan's, two great writers, both of whom, I know, speak of his talents with glowing praise. But poor Harlan will have to get along without the praise of Penny Arcade fans. I do hope he can muster the strength to carry on.
Mark Goldberg <markabaddon@aol.com>
Minneapolis, - Tuesday, September 27 2005 6:27:8
Gentlemen and Ladies,
I would kindly remind everyone that this is Harlan's breakfast nook and we should act like guests at his home. Let me be clear, he does not owe an explanation of his actions to you or to anyone. I was not at Foolscap and have no idea what was said or how he acted. Any disagreement should be handled between Harlan and the Penny Arcade people, everyone else should just butt out.
If you don't like Harlan or respect his works, that is fine, you are entitled to your opinion. However, there is absolutely no call to invade someone else's board and insult both him and his wife.
Don't you trolls have anything better to do with your time?
I am currently reading Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman, who is a friend of Harlan's. About halfway through right now and the book is absolutely brilliant. Definitely check it out if you get a chance
rich
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 6:23:45
Suffice to say, it's over (whatever IT is) so save it for next year, or, better yet, do something of your own, become a Guest of Honor with Harlan Ellison at some convention, and let fly with the vitriol in person.
In the meantime, does anyone have a blowtorch with which to cauterize a...ummm, I just need a blowtorch.
Adam-Troy Castro <adamcastro999@yahoo.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 6:8:37
...the legion of dumb folks concluding, from the ten-to-one plurality of penny arcade partisans, posting here, that Penny Arcade has a much bigger audience, and is therefore "right," need to take the following into account.
Penny Arcade's audience learns what happened on the internet and can come here, to post snark on the site of a man they haven't read and don't care about, at the spur of a moment.
MOST of Harlan's audience has never been anywhere near this website, and even if here have better things to do.
It's no surprise, therefore, that Penny Arcade can attack this house with a larger army of marauding zombies.
The bigger question, then, is just who Harlan can claim among his own partisans, in any war of words. So let's see. Without naming names. A bunch of folks who go ballistic over an insult to the writers of a videogame website...vs any six of Harlan's friends, chosen at random.
Whoa.
Doesn't look all that overwhelming any more, does it?
Redspook <redspook@puppetfood.com>
Colchester, Vermont - Tuesday, September 27 2005 5:46:32
While I am a fan of Penny Arcade I fear I am not rabid enough to fall under the title of fanboy. I know Harlan Ellison only through a strange string of creation....played I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream years ago on the PC and then got an anthology because the story was excellent. From my vantage point, it would be hard for any of us who weren't at Foolscap to actually speak to what happened so I won't bother to fire away at the particulars. I merely wanted to say that, with so many fans of both sets of people obviously interested in the events, I would think Mr. Ellison would at least take a moment to explain his supposed actions at the convention. If he feels justified in them, then just taking the time back them up for the shared fans would probably be much more efficient, and display a lot more sophistication, then responding with yet another insult. Knowing Penny Arcade as well as I do, I expected the responses they gave and they way they communicated the event on their site. It's who they are. They make their money by being, for lack of a better term, mischeivious, opinionate imps and I, as well as a healthy portion of the population, love them for it. I guess I imagined that a well known scholar and toted literary genius would carry himself differently.
Eric Martin
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 4:57:56
Yeah, but if you read the posts, the few Harlan Ellison people who have posted on this matter are coming off as measured and intelligent, while the rook of Penny-Arcade fanboys are looking like gawping pinheads.
So if mobbing with morons is your buzz, by all means, follow the numbers.
Rick Wyatt <harlanellison.com>
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 4:28:14
What a surprise and shock for me to receive, via several posts and inumerable insouciant e-mails. What a revelation, after over 2 decades of reading the man's work and a decade of knowing him personally.
What an amazing lesson....to learn, after all these years...
that Harlan Ellison...
can be an asshole.
Elijah Newton
Ypsilanti, MI - Tuesday, September 27 2005 4:26:13
oh.
Penelope
Ashiya, Japan - Tuesday, September 27 2005 4:16:14
I'd just like to point out that for every 1 person Harlan has on his side in this issue, 10 side with the Penny-Arcade guys. I think it's ironic that all of those awards haven't earned him enough loyal fans to stand up and defend him.
Oh, and seeing how his one comment on the issue seems to solely be a crack at Gabes physical appearence, I can only come to the conclusion that this man (asside from being a cock-wad) relies soley on insulting others to keep his shallow ego boat afloat.
Yay! I can play that game too.
Is that your wife on the front page Harlan, or did you marry your dog?
Stu <Stu@mosquitobay.com>
Seattle, WA - Tuesday, September 27 2005 3:13:48
Come on, Harlan is obviously at a loss in trying to interact with a generation that he doesn't understand. If the only way that he can cope is by being rude, then that is his problem. There is no need to be rude in return.
Besides, being grumpy is the right of every old man! I plan on being very grumpy when I am over 70, too ;)
SP33doh <SP33doh@yahoo.com>
Bothell, Washington - Tuesday, September 27 2005 2:59:30
Kayin
- Tuesday, September 27 2005 2:33:18
You at least have "respect" Gabe for driving you off stage with a simple "zing". It was clever and unexpected. So either admit your loss or get some clever revenge. Sitting on your hands just makes it look like more of a beating.
jack skillingstead <jskillingstead@yahoo.com>
seattle , washington - Tuesday, September 27 2005 2:28:57
Who the hell is Penny Arcade? 'nuff said.
Jason Hart <omisty@getnet.net>
Phoenix, AZ - Tuesday, September 27 2005 2:20:29
I have been a fan of Mr. Ellison's work for about 25 years.
I am also a fan of Penny Arcade (albeit, for a much shorter time). I don't play video games and have very limited experience with the medium. Quite a number of the PA strips lose me. Once in while they strike me as very clever and I will chuckle out loud.
I wasn't at the convention so I don't know exactly what happened but the amount of disrespect between the "guests of honor" sickens me.
I don't understand why Mr. Ellison or Gabe&Tycho (oneword) didn't do some amount of research when they found they would be sharing this honor. I think Mr. Ellison might appreciate some of the less game-centric comics. I also think that the PA folks would certainly appreciate some of Mr. Ellison's stories.
I hope this can be resolved without some stupid flame war.
Rabid Dog
Memphis, TN - Tuesday, September 27 2005 1:14:11
I held Ellison in high regard for the only aspect of the man that I knew, that of his written word. Now, however, I have been been exposed to multiple aspects of the man, and I must say, sir, you may rot with the rest of the human filth that don't bother to put their personal talents toward the betterment of mankind, but seek only the praise of others and the gluttony that such hubris as yours carries with it.
In short, you are a worthless piece of shit. Learn to respect your fellow artists and truly serve your species, or fade into oblivion like the millions of "intellectuals" who have expounded on paper before you.
Para <si_t@hotmail.com>
N, A - Tuesday, September 27 2005 0:47:34
Is that it?
I expected a higher quality level of vitriol or at the very least, more convincing dismissive sneering.
Sir, I have read your stories. Some of them were good, some of them were merely OK*, but I know you can do better than that. Gabe and Tycho are raking you over the coals over at Penny Arcade, they're making you out to be an unplesant caricature of a man, they're probably very correct in their assesment, but you could at least fire back with more than a snit.
C'mon, defend your actions! Make up a long fantasy rivalry between you and Penny Arcade! Claim that Gabe is the reincarnation of a life-long enemy you knew the 5th century! You're a sci-fi** nerd legend renowned for his crankiness.
If you can't be civil to another human being, won't you please at least entertain us?
*Not your Star Wars stuff though. Top notch, all the way through!
**I know, I know. "Speculative fiction." Like that's ever really going to catch on.